Economic Freedom Fighters v Speaker of the National Assembly
2016 South African legal case / From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Dear Wikiwand AI, let's keep it short by simply answering these key questions:
Can you list the top facts and stats about Economic Freedom Fighters v Speaker of the National Assembly?
Summarize this article for a 10 year old
SHOW ALL QUESTIONS
This article is about the decision known as EFF I. For EFF II, see Economic Freedom Fighters v Speaker of the National Assembly (2017).
Economic Freedom Fighters v Speaker of the National Assembly and Others; Democratic Alliance v Speaker of the National Assembly and Others [2016] ZACC 11 is an important judgment of the Constitutional Court of South Africa which finds that President Jacob Zuma breached the South African Constitution by failing to implement the recommendations in the Public Protector's Nkandla report.
Quick Facts EFF v Speaker; DA v Speaker, Court ...
EFF v Speaker; DA v Speaker | |
---|---|
Court | Constitutional Court of South Africa |
Full case name | Economic Freedom Fighters v Speaker of the National Assembly and Others; Democratic Alliance v Speaker of the National Assembly and Others |
Decided | 31 March 2016 |
Docket nos. | CCT 143/15; CCT 171/15 |
Citation(s) | [2016] ZACC 11; 2016 (5) BCLR 618 (CC); 2016 (3) SA 580 (CC) |
Case history | |
Related action(s) | Economic Freedom Fighters and Others v Speaker of the National Assembly and Another [2017] ZACC 47 |
Court membership | |
Judges sitting | Mogoeng CJ, Moseneke DCJ, Bosielo AJ, Cameron J, Froneman J, Jafta J, Khampepe J, Madlanga J, Mhlantla J, Nkabinde J, Zondo J |
Case opinions | |
Recommendations of the Public Protector are binding unless set aside by a court. President Jacob Zuma and the National Assembly breached the Constitution by failing to implement the Nkandla report. | |
Decision by | Mogoeng CJ (unanimous) |
Keywords | |
|
Close