FCC v. Pacifica Foundation
1978 landmark US Supreme Court case / From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Dear Wikiwand AI, let's keep it short, summarize this topic like I'm... Ten years old or a College student
Federal Communications Commission v. Pacifica Foundation, 438 U.S. 726 (1978), was a landmark decision of the US Supreme Court that defined the power of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) over indecent material as applied to broadcasting.[1]
FCC v. Pacifica Foundation | |
---|---|
![]() | |
Argued April 18–19, 1978 Decided July 3, 1978 | |
Full case name | Federal Communications Commission v. Pacifica Foundation, et al. |
Citations | 438 U.S. 726 (more) 98 S. Ct. 3026; 57 L. Ed. 2d 1073; 1978 U.S. LEXIS 135; 43 Rad. Reg. 2d (P & F) 493; 3 Media L. Rep. 2553 |
Case history | |
Prior | Complaint granted, 56 F.C.C.2d 94 (1975); reversed, 556 F.2d 9 (D.C. Cir. 1977); cert. granted, 434 U.S. 1008 (1978). |
Holding | |
Because of the pervasive nature of broadcasting, it has less First Amendment protection than other forms of communication. The F.C.C. was justified in concluding that Carlin's "Filthy Words" broadcast, though not obscene, was indecent, and subject to restriction. | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinions | |
Majority | Stevens (Parts I, II, III, and IV-C), joined by Burger, Blackmun, Rehnquist, Powell |
Concurrence | Stevens (Parts IV-A and IV-B), joined by Burger, Rehnquist |
Concurrence | Powell, joined by Blackmun |
Dissent | Brennan, joined by Marshall |
Dissent | Stewart, joined by Brennan, White, Marshall |
Laws applied | |
U.S. Const. amend. I; 18 U.S.C. § 1464 |