Portola, California
City in California, United States From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Portola (/pɔːrˈtoʊlə/ por-TOH-lə) is the only incorporated city in Plumas County, California, United States. The population was 2,104 at the 2010 census, down from 2,227 at the 2000 census. Portola is located on the Middle Fork of the Feather River and was named after Spanish explorer Gaspar de Portolá,[5] although he did not explore this area.
City of Portola | |
|---|---|
.jpg) Union Pacific trains in Portola | |
 Location in Plumas County and the state of California | |
  City of Portola Location in the United States | |
| Coordinates: 39°48′37″N 120°28′11″W | |
| Country |  United States |
| State |  California |
| County | Plumas |
| Incorporated | May 16, 1946[1] |
| Area | |
| • Total | 5.41 sq mi (14.00 km2) |
| • Land | 5.41 sq mi (14.00 km2) |
| • Water | 0.00 sq mi (0.00 km2) 0% |
| Elevation | 4,856 ft (1,480 m) |
| Population | |
| • Total | 2,100 |
| • Density | 390/sq mi (150/km2) |
| Time zone | UTC-8 (Pacific (PST)) |
| • Summer (DST) | UTC-7 (PDT) |
| ZIP codes | 96122, 96129 |
| Area code | 530 |
| FIPS code | 06-58352 |
| GNIS feature IDs | 1659425, 2411473 |
| Website | www |
Portola is a crew change site on the Western Pacific Railroad (now Union Pacific Railroad) Feather River Route over the Sierra Nevada. The city is also home to the Western Pacific Railroad Museum (formerly Portola Railroad Museum), one of the largest railroad museums in the Western United States. The museum is famous for its Run A Locomotive program, where the public can participate in a "fantasy experience" program allowing them to run a railroad locomotive on the museum grounds. The railroad tradition also extends to a yearly local event called “Railroad Days”.
Portola was in the national media spotlight in 1996–1997 when a conflict occurred between the local community and the Department of Fish and Game over how to deal with an invasive species of northern pike in Lake Davis. The lake was chemically treated in 1997 to eradicate the fish, but they reappeared in 1999. In early September 2007, the California Department of Fish and Game eradicated the pike[6] using CFT Legumine, a new liquid formulation of rotenone.[7]
The town of Portola, California, sits along both sides of the middle fork of the Feather River, in Plumas County, on the upper eastern part of northern California. Portola lies off the eastern slopes of the Sierra Nevada. The local landscape is best described as being part of the Feather River drainage, which flows westward down the Feather River Canyon.
.jpg)
Portola is located at 39°48′37″N 120°28′11″W.[8]
According to the United States Census Bureau, the city has a total area of 5.4 square miles (14 km2), all of it land.
Portola lies on the Middle Fork of the Feather River in the Sierra Nevada mountain range. The headwaters of the Middle Fork of the Feather River originate just east of Portola in Sierra Valley, near Beckwourth.[9]
Lake Davis is located approximately 6 miles (9.7 km) north of Portola, and is a popular fishing and camping location. About 15 miles (24 km) to the west and southwest of Portola, Plumas-Eureka State Park and Lakes Basin Recreation Area feature granite peaks, glacial lakes, streams, and temperate coniferous forests, which make them popular destinations for outdoor enthusiasts.[10][11]
Being on the eastern slopes of the Sierra Nevada, Portola has a continental Mediterranean climate (Köppen: Dsb) with dry summers characterized by extreme diurnal temperature swings, and cold (though not severe) and snowy winters. Frosts occur on 218 mornings per year. Extreme cold is rare and temperatures below 0 °F (−17.8 °C) are observed on only 2.6 mornings per winter in an average year.[12] During the summer, daytime temperatures of 100 °F (37.8 °C) are reached on average only once every two years.[12]
| Climate data for Portola, California (1991–2020 normals, extremes 1915–present) | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Month | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | Year |
| Record high °F (°C) | 68 (20) |
72 (22) |
80 (27) |
86 (30) |
94 (34) |
110 (43) |
110 (43) |
107 (42) |
100 (38) |
92 (33) |
82 (28) |
72 (22) |
110 (43) |
| Mean daily maximum °F (°C) | 43.0 (6.1) |
46.0 (7.8) |
51.6 (10.9) |
57.7 (14.3) |
67.0 (19.4) |
77.2 (25.1) |
86.4 (30.2) |
85.2 (29.6) |
78.8 (26.0) |
66.4 (19.1) |
52.5 (11.4) |
42.1 (5.6) |
62.8 (17.1) |
| Daily mean °F (°C) | 31.1 (−0.5) |
33.7 (0.9) |
38.4 (3.6) |
43.4 (6.3) |
51.0 (10.6) |
58.4 (14.7) |
65.5 (18.6) |
63.9 (17.7) |
58.0 (14.4) |
48.1 (8.9) |
38.3 (3.5) |
30.7 (−0.7) |
46.7 (8.2) |
| Mean daily minimum °F (°C) | 19.3 (−7.1) |
21.4 (−5.9) |
25.3 (−3.7) |
29.1 (−1.6) |
35.1 (1.7) |
39.5 (4.2) |
44.6 (7.0) |
42.6 (5.9) |
37.1 (2.8) |
29.7 (−1.3) |
24.1 (−4.4) |
19.4 (−7.0) |
30.7 (−0.7) |
| Record low °F (°C) | −24 (−31) |
−21 (−29) |
−12 (−24) |
3 (−16) |
13 (−11) |
20 (−7) |
22 (−6) |
19 (−7) |
12 (−11) |
3 (−16) |
−6 (−21) |
−28 (−33) |
−28 (−33) |
| Average precipitation inches (mm) | 4.16 (106) |
3.93 (100) |
3.57 (91) |
1.55 (39) |
1.15 (29) |
0.52 (13) |
0.34 (8.6) |
0.30 (7.6) |
0.44 (11) |
1.07 (27) |
2.33 (59) |
4.00 (102) |
23.36 (593.2) |
| Average snowfall inches (cm) | 11.7 (30) |
12.6 (32) |
9.0 (23) |
2.8 (7.1) |
0.6 (1.5) |
0.0 (0.0) |
0.0 (0.0) |
0.0 (0.0) |
0.1 (0.25) |
0.4 (1.0) |
3.6 (9.1) |
10.3 (26) |
51.1 (129.95) |
| Average precipitation days (≥ 0.01 in) | 8.7 | 8.5 | 8.1 | 6.0 | 5.7 | 2.6 | 1.0 | 1.2 | 1.8 | 3.5 | 6.2 | 8.4 | 61.7 |
| Average snowy days (≥ 0.1 in) | 3.1 | 2.8 | 2.3 | 0.7 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 1.6 | 3.4 | 14.4 |
| Source: NOAA[13][14] | |||||||||||||
2010
The 2010 United States Census[17] reported that Portola had a population of 2,104. The population density was 389.1 inhabitants per square mile (150.2/km2). The racial makeup of Portola was 1,762 (83.7%) White, 13 (0.6%) African American, 54 (2.6%) Native American, 12 (0.6%) Asian, 1 (0.0%) Pacific Islander, 198 (9.4%) from other races, and 64 (3.0%) from two or more races. Hispanic or Latino of any race were 342 persons (16.3%).
The Census reported that 2,080 people (98.9% of the population) lived in households, 0 (0%) lived in non-institutionalized group quarters, and 24 (1.1%) were institutionalized.
There were 887 households, out of which 278 (31.3%) had children under the age of 18 living in them, 378 (42.6%) were opposite-sex married couples living together, 114 (12.9%) had a female householder with no husband present, 53 (6.0%) had a male householder with no wife present. There were 68 (7.7%) unmarried opposite-sex partnerships, and 4 (0.5%) same-sex married couples or partnerships. 286 households (32.2%) were made up of individuals, and 113 (12.7%) had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 2.34. There were 545 families (61.4% of all households); the average family size was 2.92.
The population was spread out, with 502 people (23.9%) under the age of 18, 198 people (9.4%) aged 18 to 24, 462 people (22.0%) aged 25 to 44, 638 people (30.3%) aged 45 to 64, and 304 people (14.4%) who were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 39.8 years. For every 100 females, there were 93.4 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 89.8 males.
There were 1,134 housing units at an average density of 209.7 per square mile (81.0/km2), of which 482 (54.3%) were owner-occupied, and 405 (45.7%) were occupied by renters. The homeowner vacancy rate was 6.8%; the rental vacancy rate was 21.0%. 1,156 people (54.9% of the population) lived in owner-occupied housing units and 924 people (43.9%) lived in rental housing units.
2000
As of the census[18] of 2000, there were 2,227 people, 899 households, and 595 families residing in the city. The population density was 994.6 inhabitants per square mile (384.0/km2). There were 1,008 housing units at an average density of 450.2 per square mile (173.8/km2). The racial makeup of the city was 86.21% White, 0.45% African American, 2.65% Native American, 1.08% Asian, 0.09% Pacific Islander, 5.84% from other races, and 3.68% from two or more races. Hispanic or Latino of any race were 11.81% of the population.
There were 899 households, out of which 36.7% had children under the age of 18 living with them, 48.2% were married couples living together, 11.7% had a female householder with no husband present, and 33.8% were non-families. 29.0% of all households were made up of individuals, and 12.6% had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 2.45 and the average family size was 3.02.
In the city, the age distribution of the population shows 29.5% under the age of 18, 7.3% from 18 to 24, 26.0% from 25 to 44, 23.8% from 45 to 64, and 13.5% who were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 37 years. For every 100 females, there were 97.1 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 92.1 males.
The median income for a household in the city was $28,103, and the median income for a family was $35,156. Males had a median income of $32,159 versus $21,157 for females. The per capita income for the city was $14,734. About 14.5% of families and 20.3% of the population were below the poverty line, including 28.7% of those under age 18 and 5.4% of those age 65 or over.
The city is governed by a five-member council. Council members serve staggered four-year terms. The council chooses the mayor and mayor pro tem.[19]
In the California State Legislature, Portola is in the 1st Senate District, represented by Republican Brian Dahle,[20] and the 1st Assembly District, represented by Republican Megan Dahle.[21]
In the United States House of Representatives, Portola is in California's 1st congressional district, represented by Republican Doug LaMalfa.[22]
Wikiwand in your browser!
Seamless Wikipedia browsing. On steroids.
Every time you click a link to Wikipedia, Wiktionary or Wikiquote in your browser's search results, it will show the modern Wikiwand interface.
Wikiwand extension is a five stars, simple, with minimum permission required to keep your browsing private, safe and transparent.
