Loading AI tools
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 |
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 13 external links on 2011 Norway attacks. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 09:28, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 5 external links on 2011 Norway attacks. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 14:34, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the |checked=
to true
Attacks "against the government, the civilian population, and a Workers' Youth League (AUF)-run summer camp"?
The van bomb was parked less than two yards from a wall of The Cabinet Building (Regjeringsbygget). The location is around fifteen metres from the closest sidewalk. The target there was the government, and passerbys were victims of collateral damage.
The summer camp of the Workers' Youth League was the other target. The vast majority of these victims were members of that politcal organisation and they were civilians. One victim was an off-duty police officer, that had an extra job, taking care of security at the summer camp on the small island.
In neither location, the civilian population of itself was the target. Why does the article say that the civilian population was attacked? 89.8.199.128 (talk) 09:45, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on 2011 Norway attacks. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit User:Cyberpower678/FaQs#InternetArchiveBot*this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 06:47, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
"a total of 53[citation needed] identical sculpture memorials erected for the deceased victims". 89.8.3.161 (talk) 22:27, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 10 external links on 2011 Norway attacks. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:17, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on 2011 Norway attacks. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{dead link}}
tag to http://www.senterpartiet.no/meny-forside/ein-trist-dag-for-noreg-article71618-12919.html{{dead link}}
tag to http://22juli.info/default.aspxWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:44, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on 2011 Norway attacks. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:17, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
Another issue that is coming to light is that apparently significant sections of Breivik's manifesto are copied and pasted from Theodore Kaczynski's manifesto, with just the odd word changed to alter the institutions the rant is directing against.
http://nymag.com/daily/intel/2011/07/anders_breivik_unabomber.html http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/2011/07/24/oslo-utoya-norway-attacks-anders-breivik-manifesto-unibomber_n_908143.html
I can't find anywhere in the articles, where it says why he attacked the targets he did. Is it missing? If not, then where is this clarified?Jimhoward72 (talk) 19:19, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
Well, it was not mentioned directly, but if you connect the dots, you'll see that he's nothing else than a stupid socially isolated and mentally sick guy who had perhaps severe problems in his past which had affected his ability to build up a proper ideology clear of hatred and phobias. That having been said, he just hated anybody else than those of his own ideology¹ and since he was stupid and could not distinguish the real world from world of fiction and game², he planed and organized this brutal attack over years in his sick imagination as well in the reality. And sadly he didn't keep the plan in his head.
1. Muslims and Lefties have nothing in common but he hated 'em both. 2. he considered himself as a knight to rescue Europe, which is very fictional in 21st century... Roshak08 (talk) 20:21, 12 August 2019 (UTC)
This section is said to be excessively detailed: lots of quotes from news articles and people that might not be encyclopedically relevant. I'd like to take a stab at trimming it down an making it less detailed, so I'd like toreceive some input from others on what kids of things I should remove or keep. Thanks! QueensanditsCrazy (talk) 22:28, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Cultural Marxism conspiracy theory has an RFC for possible consensus. A discussion is taking place. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments on the discussion page.--Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 20:12, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
"Dutch symphonic metal band Epica released a song entitled "Internal Warfare", on their 2012 album Requiem for the Indifferent. "
Also, there is no need for vanity mention of any band members (of any band). 89.8.95.220 (talk) 07:16, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Should this article mention everytime Breivik's name has been sprayed on (or "graffitied") on a monument?
Please someone, consider to remove stuff like that from the article!
Please also give justification in the edit remark. Possible remarks that might justify removing text from article: "The graffiti had no international impact", or
"The graffiti had no significant national consequence (apart from having photograph of graffiti in national newspapers)".
I expect to remove the mention, one time today (and one time only).
For the record: Spraying Breivik's name on the monument for the victim of a racial killing; that is insensitive, and it is low. However, Wikipedia does not write about everything that is insensitive or low. Somewhere we will have to draw the line, for the time being. 89.8.95.44 (talk) 16:15, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
When did the study end? (Perhaps @DIACHRONY: has an idea about locating an applicable reference.) 89.8.108.103 (talk) 03:51, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
Hi @El C:! It seems that you have "partially locked" the article, for the next 31 days.
Please be so kind, to list here the 3 most problematic diffs, in regard to what you have labeled "disruptive editing".
The discussion page has not indicated that there has been a problem, one might say. 89.8.108.103 (talk) 18:26, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
The wiki-article is currently making some odd claim, and trying to call some organisation, for Breivik's organistation. It seems to me, that one entity - or "gratis-registration company" - is still registered to Breivik; that company/organisation is the only one that is Breivik's organisation. (I am talking about the so-called farming-company that Breivik also had back in 2011.) About Breivik possibly being a leader of a political party: there have not been any media reports about former members of such an organisation. There is no independent information about such an organisation, and no verifiable information. 89.8.100.51 (talk) 13:06, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
Seamless Wikipedia browsing. On steroids.
Every time you click a link to Wikipedia, Wiktionary or Wikiquote in your browser's search results, it will show the modern Wikiwand interface.
Wikiwand extension is a five stars, simple, with minimum permission required to keep your browsing private, safe and transparent.