Loading AI tools
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Diminished unison redirect. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||
|
This redirect was nominated for deletion on 4 November 2014. The result of the discussion was keep. |
Is this a viable article? I can see the rationale, but I don't think any theorist uses the term except in jest! --Jubilee♫clipman 15:45, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
Even more to the point, Semitone describes the phenomenon that three distinct intervals become identical when heard in equal temperament and other some other temperament systems (augmented unison, minor second, and diminished third (eg c♯-e♭)). That article could hold all three, as long as the difference is made clear. --Jubilee♫clipman 23:12, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
Any one who has given music intervals a fair study will undoubtedly surmise that the entire necessity for the use of "diminished" is firstly considerate in the treatment of the perfect 5th, the most cohesive interval overall to harmonic motion, embellished by the 7th and higher, yet given a firm foundation by the 3rd. And so it goes for the use of "augmented". The fact remains that the perfect 5th may be altered to be diminished or augmented. It is then logical to apply that same alteration to any other perfect interval, in this particular case, the perfect prime. Not to be consistent with perfect intervals in regards to their type would be irregular, and I have found nothing irregular in God's design concerning music theory, especially given the facts of the overtone series and its direct support to further harmony. Just as the overtone series provides us with a basis, the fundamental tone, so does the diminished unison provide a basis in the next step up from monophony in this - it is the smallest interval. - Prophet of the Most High (talk) 09:44, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
This article claims that a "diminished unison" exists as an inversion of the augmented octave. However according to my reading of the article Inversion (music), this would not be the case. This latter article says that you invert an interval by raising or lowering either of the notes the necessary number of octaves, so that both retain their names (pitch class) and the one which was higher is now lower and vice versa. So if I start with an augmented octave (one octave plus a semitone), to invert it I have to shift one of the pitches by two octaves, otherwise the higher one is still higher and the lower still lower. The result is thus a diminished octave (one octave minus a semitone). Having thought this one through, I am even more convinced that a "diminished unison" is a paradoxical concept, but I still wouldn't advocate deleting the article — it should explain the paradox (and, if my reasoning above is correct, explain the fallacy of the inverted augmented octave argument). I would be intrigued to see what any of the cited references say, but none are online references. --Deskford (talk) 22:39, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
Actually the Sembos reference, used to back up the inverted augmented octave argument, can be read on Google Books. I find his explanation (page 51) a little hazy and overladen with exclamation marks. He also seems to contradict himself, having said on page 37 that intervals exceeding the interval of an octave ... are called compound intervals and on page 49 that compound intervals cannot be inverted. Surely by definition an augmented octave exceeds an octave...? --Deskford (talk) 23:39, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
(outdent) Piston's Harmony and Counterpoint are available as torrents. The others might be too, but I haven't checked yet. I suspect these are not made available freely as PDFs simply because they are such good sellers! Anyway, try harmony, theory etc plus one of the names on Google and you'll soon find some decent books... --Jubilee♫clipman 04:00, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
Regarding the inversion and compound interval issues brought up by Deskford: neither of which are relevant to this page except as they relate to Sembos's credibility as a source and both issues may complicate things more than they are worth since you don't have a clear understanding of the issues in the first place. However, like many things, inversion is fairly simple to do but fairly complicated to explain in words. Inversion_(music)#Inverted_intervals: "Traditional interval names add together to make nine: seconds become sevenths and the reverse, thirds become sixes and the reverse, and fourths become fifths and the reverse....See also complement (music)." Thus an octave inverts to a unison: 8+1=9, not to an octave or double octave. "Under inversion, perfect intervals remain perfect, major intervals become minor and the reverse, augmented intervals become diminished and the reverse." Thus an augmented octave becomes a diminished unison. Hyacinth (talk) 05:14, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
OK, sorry: you are right, we should not be belittling people here. Hyacinths logic is perfectly correct; Deskford's analysis worked through the logic of the opening statement to the letter and produced quite a different result from that produced by the rule of nine or inversion of ratios. Hyacinth is technically correct, though; however, since the article points out that some theorists disallow the diminished unison in any sense, she has to admit that there must be another interval that these do allow as the inversion of the aug 8va: viz, the aug 1st. Regarding the definition of a diminished unison, however, I have found (Googling diminished unison) several online sources that have quite a different way of looking at it; these could be used to expand the article, though we still need quotes from the top rank theorists, such as Lovelock, Prout et al:
Unisons & Octaves
If we imagine a second note sounding at the same time as the key-note (they form a dyad), we could ask ourselves what is the interval between them?
The simplest interval we can consider is the interval between two identical notes - e.g. C and C. The interval is called the unison, the perfect unison or the perfect prime. We can also say that the notes are 'in unison'.
The interval from C to C sharp is called the augmented unison or the augmented prime - 'unison' because the note names are the same (both Cs), 'augmented' because the interval is one semitone greater than a 'perfect' unison.
The interval from C to C flat is called the diminished unison or the diminished prime
Some theorists do not allow the diminished unison because the C flat lies below the C natural and this breaks the rule that all dyadic intervals are named from the lower note.
If we now consider the interval between our key-note C and any other C, we would say that the interval is one, two, three or more octaves depending on which C is the upper note; for example, the eighth degree of the scale is one octave above the key-note.
Unisons
A "perfect" unison is exactly 0 half steps.
C -> C is a perfect unison. It is the exact same note.
Our next modifier is "diminished". When you diminish an interval, you make it smaller by one half step. So 0 - 1 = -1.
A -> Ab is a diminished unison.
"Augmented" is the opposite. When you augment an interval, you make it bigger by one half step.
D -> D# is an augmented unison.
So perfect, diminished, and augmented are the only modifiers for the first group. Again, they can be applied to unisons, 4ths, 5ths, and octaves.
- music-theory-for-musicians.com
Anytime you lower the last note of a perfect interval it becomes a diminished unison, 4th, or 5th:
C-Cb = diminished unison
C-Fb = diminished 4th
C-Gb = diminished 5th (tritone)
A diminished unison = MINUS one semi tone i.e. the top note is BELOW the bottom note
Perfect intervals flatted ONCE:
Diminished Unison Diminished Fourth Diminished Fifth Diminished Octave
Unison, fourth, fifth, octave. These intervals may be perfect, augmented, or diminished. A perfect fourth is five semitones, a perfect fifth is seven semitones, a perfect octave is twelve semitones. A perfect unison occurs between notes of the same pitch, so it is zero semitones. In each case, an augmented interval contains one more semitone, a diminished interval one fewer.
Thus, while Sembos considers the aug to be flat and the dim to be sharp (at least in the case of certain inversions), almost all the others I have found so far have it the other way around, while Allexperts (sensibly) avoids talking about flats or flatting to illustrate their point. Dolmesch also point out the fact that some theorist disallow the interval. Where inversion is discussed, they all give the correct interpretation. Allexperts is typical:
An interval may be inverted, by raising the lower pitch an octave, or lowering the upper pitch an octave (though it is less usual to speak of inverting unisons or octaves). For example, the fourth between a lower C and a higher F may be inverted to make a fifth, with a lower F and a higher C. Here are the ways to identify interval inversions:
* For diatonically-named intervals, here are two rules, applying to all simple (i.e., non-compound) intervals:
* #The number of any interval and the number of its inversion always add up to nine (four + five = nine, in the example just given).
* #The inversion of a major interval is a minor interval (and vice versa); the inversion of a perfect interval is also perfect; the inversion of an augmented interval is a diminished interval (and vice versa); and the inversion of a double augmented interval is a double diminished interval (and vice versa).
:A full example: E flat below and C natural above make a major sixth. By the two rules just given, C natural below and E flat above must make a minor third.
* For intervals identified by ratio, the inversion is determined by reversing the ratio and multiplying by 2. For example, the inversion of a 5:4 ratio is an 8:5 ratio.
* Intervals identified by integer can be simply subtracted from 12. However, since an interval class is the lower of the interval integer or its inversion, interval classes cannot be inverted.
(On a totally different track, one foreign website I found seems to like me: zeakryat.com!)
BTW, Hyacinth, I think we do understand the basic principles of interval and inversion: we are simply trying to make sense of the facts before us on Wikipedia. The inversion article is apparently contradictory to a lay person as Deskford points out. However, that issue needs to be raised on that article's page, not here. --Jubilee♫clipman 00:12, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
I've added Dolmetsch and tried to explain the weird Sembos statement. This article is actually better cited than the vast majority of the other interval articles now! Perhaps even further improvement is possible? --Jubilee♫clipman 22:06, 25 December 2009 (UTC)
How, why, and where does this article need additional citations? Hyacinth (talk) 00:06, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
I doubt perfect unisons are diminished unisons. 121.7.199.205 (talk) 11:11, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
"Diminished unison" is simply an erroneous name for "augmented unison." There is already a page, semitone, which covers the interval "augmented unison." Just because one self-published author, and one webpage, use a neologism, doesn't mean there should be an entire article about it. Furthermore, the only difference is in semantics. There is no practical difference between an augmented unison and a diminished unison (that is, if one even believes that the later exists).BassHistory (talk) 12:47, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
I stated that this article needs to be deleted (see section above) for obvious reasons. No one uses this term, other than to say it doesn't exist - see the references in this page. If someone wants to clarify their statements that a "diminished unison while appearing like an augmented unison is treated differently" - I'd love to hear it. The problem with this page is that it's an article that is describing something that doesn't exist and can't exist. Unlike mathematics, music notation is pretty finite at it's current state.
On the other hand, there needs to be an augmented unison article written. It's current redirect to semitone is not the answer. While they are similar things (yes, they occupy the same space intervallically), there needs to be discussion on why augmented unison terminology is used and the resolutions of an augmented unison (usually to a third). --Devin.chaloux (talk) 12:56, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
Seamless Wikipedia browsing. On steroids.
Every time you click a link to Wikipedia, Wiktionary or Wikiquote in your browser's search results, it will show the modern Wikiwand interface.
Wikiwand extension is a five stars, simple, with minimum permission required to keep your browsing private, safe and transparent.