Talk:TASCAM

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance Companies portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. WikiProject Companies To-do: Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes Maintain : Portal:Companies Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs Other : Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner Answer requests for comments California: Los Angeles Low‑importance California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Greater Los Angeles portal This article is supported by Los Angeles area task force (assessed as Low-importance). Professional sound production High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Professional sound production, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sound recording and reproduction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

For such a time honored mainstay in the recording industry, there is not enough mention of some of the awards and technical innovations introduced by Tascam. I inserted the award to the DR-60D unit and a little about it. More than the technical details in the article, the unit is important in that it is a DSLR solution for photographers needing better sound. I may add some of the AB and XY portable audio recorders to the page since they also represent a breakthrough in portable audio. Most units by companies offer fix mic directions whereas Tascam has moveable mics for both AB and XY positioning. Perhaps this will catch on as an industry trend. Hard to say at this time.TriumvirateProtean (talk) 05:16, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

Thankyou, this page has been woefully inadequate for a long time, and had some inaccurate info. Many TASCAM products have received industry recognition, I think the product list should be "Notable Products", which would be easily citable with these recognition links. 71.95.152.94 (talk) 16:03, 19 July 2013 (UTC)

I have spent a few days total adding a Notable products section, deleting spam and cleaning up the general dereliction of this article. That said, I have a WP:CONFLICT. Trying to be as Neutral as possible, this is the extent of my editing, but I will be back from time to time to check for graffiti/spam. Oumot (talk) 17:47, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on TASCAM. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131102141801/http://tecfoundation.com/tec/1994.html to http://tecfoundation.com/tec/1994.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110109102315/http://tecfoundation.com/tec/1998.html to http://tecfoundation.com/tec/1998.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130915034119/http://tecfoundation.com/tec/2001.html to http://tecfoundation.com/tec/2001.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130915013801/http://tecfoundation.com/tec/2002.html to http://tecfoundation.com/tec/2002.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:03, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

Create a Trivia section?

In section 'History' appears:

"TASCAM partnered with Philly punk band the Dead Milkmen and philanthropic record label The Giving Groove to sponsor a remix contest"

The above could later on be considered for deletion because of showing 'recentism' or insufficient relevance.

Suggestion (to avoid deletion): Create new 'Trivia' section in the article to hold this text. 85.48.187.139 (talk) 10:59, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

Edit/followup: Just had a thought, I think would be better to create the new section "Technical Innovations (& Awards)" instead. TASCAM has made considerable impact with the creation and development of a market of affordable yet professional quality product. I'm surprised not to see much here about it. The "TASCAM partnered with...." text I mentioned might sit better in such a section. 85.48.187.139 (talk) 11:13, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

Manufacturing location

Any sources for factory locations? Springnuts (talk) 17:40, 2 October 2022 (UTC)