Loading AI tools
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The official Motown title for this song is "Someday We'll Be Together" with no commas. --b. Touch 01:36, 18 Mar 2005 (UTC)
I believe I hear male backing vocals at points throughout this song. Is there any info on this male vocalist? I've provided some lyrics as an example:
DR: Diana Ross
S: Maxine and Julia Waters
MV: Unidentified male vocals
S: Someday we'll be together.
DR: Ahhh, Say, say, say it, say it again. (MV: Do tell)
S: Someday we'll be together.
DR: Oh, yeah, oh yeah.
DR:
You're far away,
From me my love. (MV: Baby)
And just as sure my, my baby,
As there are stars above,
I wanna say, I wanna say, I wanna say, (MV: Yeah)
— Preceding unsigned comment added by GRZinnj (talk • contribs) 10:57, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
--User: GRZinnj 06:59, 26 Aug 2019
Just a question.... as the main article is "The Supremes", shouldn't this article be titled "The Supremes discography"? - eo 13:19, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
I couldn't agree more. Also, is there a reason why the link to "This Is The Story...Vol.1" redirects to the full discography? Is it a mistake or hasn't anyone uploaded the information yet? I have it...Dollvalley 17:55, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
Someone please change where did our love go album back to 1964 since most the songs weren't record in 1964.Saimaroimaru 2008 (talk) 00:37, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
The album, "Where Did Our Love Go?" was released on the 30th/31st of August, 1964. Hence, by definition and default, all the songs herein had to have been recorded prior to August of 1964. Some of the songs date back to 1962 and 1963 and finally, 1964. In reality, "Where Did Our Love Go?" was actually The Supremes Greatest Hits from 1962 - 1964 since "Come See About Me" was released in October of 1964. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Spenser - The Unknown (talk • contribs) 18:51, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
I changed back the chart to its orginal form, alot of info such as disco chartings and ac chartings were left out. While its not diana singing its apart of the supremes history i appreciate it if you putting back to your version you include all info not just some.74.178.200.105 (talk) 04:07, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
Lol, the unregistered user won. XD Oh wait thats me.Umishiru (talk) 10:36, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
False chart positions have appeared here more than once; I don't know where they are coming from — at least it is not specified in this article. Per Joel Whitburn's Hot Dance Disco 1974-2003 (ISBN 0-89820-156-X), based on Billboard magazine's dance/club chart, the Supremes only have four chart entries:
Errors on this page are in turn prompting people to incorrectly add the Supremes to the List of artists who reached number one on the U.S. dance chart article. - eo (talk) 18:01, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
The link provided in the singles table for the Cash Box is not very useful anymore, many of the links on that website return "404 Object Not Found" errors. Specifically I'm questioning the peak positions of "When the Lovelight..." (#2) and "Run Run Run" (#22). There are huge differences in the positions here between Billboard and Cash Box. Seriously, #2 for "Lovelight"? That doesn't seem correct to me. Is there an alternate place for the Cash Box positions to be verified? - eo (talk) 18:07, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on The Supremes discography. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 02:23, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
I have done a major re-format of all the tables, added mising references for the US charts and also expanded the tables with Belgium, Netherlands and Norway chart history for the group. Article still needs a reference for the group's Australian chart history as well as the Shelved albums section. Additionally, the article could do with a Box Sets section as per The Beatles discography as so many of the 1960s albums have been re-released in expanded form. JonathanLGardner (talk) 22:02, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
The reference for the entire US Record World chart history is not specific to The Supremes, linking to a landing page of the entire archives. It isn't easy to verify any chart positions without spending hours searching through scans of each issue. Should these be removed? As for Cashbox singles charts, the individual single pages have citations linking to the week-specific chart verifying the song's peak position. Thus, I am adding these to the citation so these can be easily verified by browsers without searching through the archives. JonathanLGardner (talk) 12:17, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
Unless there is a good reason not to, discographies are usually submitted as Featured list candidates, rather than Good article nominees (see WP:DISCOGS and WP:Good article criteria#What cannot be a good article?). —Ojorojo (talk) 15:32, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
Seamless Wikipedia browsing. On steroids.
Every time you click a link to Wikipedia, Wiktionary or Wikiquote in your browser's search results, it will show the modern Wikiwand interface.
Wikiwand extension is a five stars, simple, with minimum permission required to keep your browsing private, safe and transparent.