Talk:Fire escape
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
I was surprised this article wasn't written yet, so I just wrote what I knew off the top of my head. If anyone wants to find specific incidences of fire escape collapses, I think it would be a good addition to the history section. I know there was some kind of collapse here in Chicago a few years ago, but I'm not sure if it was a fire escape or just a porch. Also, some historical examples of building codes requiring fire escapes would be nice. CyborgTosser (Only half the battle) 09:24, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Fire escape article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | A fact from Fire escape appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 25 March 2005. The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
From the article: "In addition,l fire escapes proved ill suited to modern construction techniques for high-rises." It would be nice if someone could explain why fire escapes are ill suited to modern construction techniques for high-rises. I don't have the answer... Andrew Bond 13:40, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
I'm not sure of the reasons (I just know that it is not done), but I can take a guess. I think one of the big reasons is wind speeds at that height. Having an irregular object jutting off the side of the building and catching the wind would subject the exterior of the building to an irregularly distributed strain. As I understand it, the glass on the outside of skyscrapers is load bearing, and distributing that load evenly is an important concern. I didn't want to speculate in the main article though. I'll let someone with more knowledge in this area fill that in, but I agree that a short explanation is needed. CyborgTosser (Only half the battle) 23:12, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Mention should be made of the first registered patent for a fire escape: Anna Connelly, 1887. She is most often credited as the inventor of the fire escape, but perhaps her patent only applies to the invention of the well known exterior steel staircases that became know by that name. Information about her is sparse through Google. Jaypeg 14:24, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
Often tall buildings' glass is just a curtain wall. Sometimes the outer frame is load bearing though (like the World Trade Center). Another reason: Fire escapes would obstruct building occupants' views.
I am curious where people got this information about Anna Connelly having the first registered patent for a fire escape in 1887. New York City building codes required exterior balconies and stairs (referred to as fire escapes in the code) already in 1860. And numerous patents for such exist prior to 1887, the earliest in 1860. The article needs reliable references. --Metro2008 (talk) 05:53, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
Well, after searching on the internet for about 5 minutes, I was able to obtain the patent number for Anna Connelly's fire escape. I then when to the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office online archive of full text patents and searched the number. As I suspected, she did not actually invent the fire escape, she invented a type of fire escape that is actually nothing like the exterior stairs and balconies that this wikipedia entry discusses. Her patent is for a bridge that connects the roofs of buildings. I am disturbed to find that she is noted all over the internet as the inventor of the fire escape. I am a woman and am all for promoting inventions by women, but we can't give her more credit than is due. Clearly people need to check their facts, because once something ends up on the internet, it ends up being taken as truth. --Metro2008 (talk) 05:53, 19 January 2008 (UTC)