Talk:Nutter McClennen & Fish
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Sources and notability being addressed as time allows.
This article was nominated for deletion on 11 November 2013 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Sources for Nutter's high ranking among both summer and midlevel associates -- year after year -- is now linked. "Summer associates" are the upcoming pool of law school grads; they ranked Nutter as the second most desireable firm in the country.
Sources for Nutter's "Best Lawyers" and "Massachusetts Super Lawyers" rankings now linked.
What could be the notability or "POV" issues here? This is one of the oldest and most well-known firms in the country. Brandeis/Warren history speaks for itself, reputation and ranking of attorneys well-established and referenced, ranking and desireability among summer and midlevel associates well-established and referenced, client list -- even this partial one -- pretty damn impressive. What's the problem? Someone from WilmerHale complain?
The founders do make the firm notable, but the entry does read like an advertisement. Rewriting for a neutral POV and citing sources would be useful. What is it that Wilmer Hale would say? Longobord (talk) 00:32, 24 April 2013 (UTC)