Loading AI tools
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 |
Hello Active Banana. With all due respect, when a newly registered user suddenly blanks and redirects several related articles at once, it's usually labelled as vandalism... which I stopped short of doing myself. Those were major changes you made, and most major changes as such, are expected to be the result of discussion and consensus to move forward with a new plan. Though I agree with you that those articles are in desperate need of references, I strongly disagree with your claim that the subjects aren't notable. We are not just talking about any run-of-the-mill bar-band here, we are talking about The Tragically Hip, and I severely doubt there would be any shortage of source material available, if one would just take time to Google it up. If you disagree, and still feel that you have a better plan, I'd highly recommend that you start a discussion thread either on the talk pages of those articles, or centrally on the main Hip-article talk page. You may also wish to go a step further and take those articles to AfD, which would form a solid consensus through discussion over a seven day period. I personally would not support such an AfD, but would happily agree with its final decision, whatever that might be. Without consensus to make such drastic changes however, I can only view page blanking as abusive editing. I hope this addresses your questions. Have yourself a great day, and welcome to Wikipedia :) -- WikHead (talk) 20:07, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Landshark has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Samwb123T (R)-C-E 17:14, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
Hi, you asked about evidence of damage done by deleting unsourced BLPs. Please see the reply I posted today to Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Biographies_of_living_people. Basically
There is also a long-term ethical problem with the "notability rule" itself, namely what authority does Wikipedia have to decide who is "notable" and who is "non-notable"? (Actually this decision is being made by a very small minority of admins who have no particular authority on the matter, and who were self-selected by their irritation with what they consider "unworthy" articles.) Imagine the situation where two professors are running for tenure, or two candidates are competing for mayor in a a small town — and one of them has a Wikipedia article, while the other has been declared "non-notable" by the Wikipedia staff. See the problem there? All the best, --Jorge Stolfi (talk) 22:22, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for your note on the IP vandal's talk page just now pointing to Chrispreston20 (talk · contribs); fortunately your warnings seem to have done the trick and he has stopped, at least for now. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 17:03, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
Hi Active Banana/Archive 1'! You participated earlier in the sticky prod workshop. The sticky prods are now in use, but there are still a few points of contention.
There are now a few proposals on the table to conclude the process. I encourage your input, whatever it might be. Thanks. --Maurreen (talk) 06:52, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
Hi, I just noticed that you're a fairly new account, and are participating in some of the big policy-related issues here. I applaud your bravery, but I know it can sometimes be confusing even with small issues. Hell, I've been here for 5 years and I still get lost in the walls of text. So, I just wanted to let you know that if you need any help with anything around the wiki, please don't hesitate to drop me a note. The WordsmithCommunicate 15:16, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
no problem! cheers-- LYKANTROP ✉ 22:17, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Pinoy Big Brother: Teen Clash 2010, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. It would be appreciated if you stop your deletionist activity, especially if it's about a show you may or may not even watch.--Eaglestorm (talk) 16:45, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Active Banana and Pinoy Big Brother. Thank you.--Unionhawk Talk E-mail 17:50, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for helping clean up. Drmies (talk) 13:49, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
Been here for like three months and trying to tell me what to do? I've been here for a while and created hundreds of notable stubs and I don't need you telling me a bunch of nonsense. There are some article that are large and some are stubs, and the stub template basically says you can help expand this article. Now instead of being a dick about it, why can't you get some references instead of merging. Now you may not be the biggest fan of a particular aritst, album, film, etc, but even you help an article. Alot of the admins, which you are not, will help an article by adding sources instead of abusing the "no source" template or "merge template". I dare you to take those article to the Articles for Deletion page and if those admins can not find any notable sources, whether it be Billboard, RIAA or otherwise, then I would be fine with that because these people would rather help an article if possible then have it deleted. But you? You ain't helping a damn thing, I would rather have a proven admin overlook the situation then someone like you who has not accomplished anything on this site. Live and Die 4 Hip Hop (talk) 22:10, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
Please don't write that kind of (piss poor) language you use on my talk page. Thanks. --Mjrmtg (talk) 18:16, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
Re User talk:MatthewGoodfan101#Notability and third party coverage: When you unilaterally turn an article into a redirect, you are essentially deleting it. Per WP:Deletion policy#Redirection, if a user doesn't agree with a redirection, please discuss rather than revert. In essence, unilaterally redirecting and being reverted is no different than having a {{PROD}} removed—one user boldly thinks the article should go, and the next thinks it should stay. Take the matter to discussion, and if you wholeheartedly believe in your actions, take it to WP:AFD. Cheers, -M.Nelson (talk) 05:39, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
Stop posting to my talk page or I'll report you. Stay away. --Matt57 (talk•contribs) 21:12, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
I usually remove them simply because they look bad and/or strange (i.e. a section named "References" with nothing in it - it's usually the only section on the page with no content). One solution could be to post a {{references}} tag inside it, so at least it has some content. All Hallow's Wraith (talk) 22:47, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
Hello!!!
Please stop be pretending unnecessary warning about ABS-CBN articles and ABS-CBN articles shows among other Why you put warning in GMA Network instead if you that. I try to put the actual references about the ABS-CBN and ABS-CBN shows both the network website itself and other showbiz website like PEP for the truth. But if you are not an ABS-CBN viewers just leave them alone or I report you for what you have done. -- Puppyph (Puppyph•contribs) 11:39, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
FYI, it's OK for a user to blank messages from their own talk page as at User talk:124.106.168.43, it just confirms that the messages were actually read. It's also possible that the IP is dynamic, so they are not the one who the warnings were for. In any case, not worth the back-and-forth. If they continue to vandalize, just file the report at WP:AIV and point out that they blanked the talk page and continued to vandalize, and a block will come quickly. Happy editing! --Joshua Scott (LiberalFascist) 04:08, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
Why don't you just mind your own business and stay away from Philippine Wiki pages. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 143.166.255.62 (talk) 14:33, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
Dont pose as an admin. I'll have you reported. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 143.166.255.62 (talk) 14:37, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
Just stop editing Philippine wiki pages and just edit your own countries wiki pages. You are not Filipino so stay away.
User Active Banana is actually messing up the wiki pages of our country, deleting articles which has already been there for quite some time that even Wiki admins didn't even bother to delete. As what you said, "Wikipedia is the free encyclopedia, that anyone can edit." I believe Active Banana is the arrogant one.
You may want to look again, he/she/it singles out Philippine Pay-TV networks, anyway, while he/she/it is at it, Active Banana, maybe he can also delete some artices in other countries' Pay-TV sites, such as Starhub TV, Astro (satellite_TV), STAR TV, Indovision and Sky Digital (UK & Ireland). These wiki pages all have Directory kind of entries. These wiki pages all have Channel listings just like these one: List of channels on Virgin TV. Actually, there's more but go ahead Active Banana, delete all of them and delete it now. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 143.166.255.62 (talk) 16:01, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
You've already put tags again on the Philippine Pay-TV networks, to be just and fair, why not put tags on ALL of the Pay-TV networks in other countries. So, as of now, since you haven't done it yet, will be deleting the tags for all Philippine Pay-TV Networks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 143.166.255.62 (talk) 17:17, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
You are not being fair and you are targeting and you single out, Philippine Media wiki pages. This is an act of racism. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 143.166.255.62 (talk) 18:35, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
Please see: Wikipedia:WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers —Preceding unsigned comment added by 120.28.225.66 (talk) 16:36, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Why are you keep to remove the channel line-ups of Philippine cable providers but you are not removing those of other countries? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.1.37.145 (talk) 05:05, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
FYI, I mentioned you at , not in a negative way, but I'm just notifying you per standard practice. --Joshua Scott (LiberalFascist) 02:37, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
dude im not editing anything about joe penna, shut up —Preceding unsigned comment added by Orange Jooce (talk • contribs) 16:42, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
It seems like the additional rationale you asked for was provided which supports allowance of the photo. Your last comment was referring to NFC, to which I responded to: . It would be good if you could remove the tags placed on the image if you have no other issues. Thanks. --Wikiwatcher1 (talk) 19:46, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
Glad to, I'll take a look. Wildhartlivie (talk) 01:00, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
OK. -Peducte (talk) 12:35, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
I like how you try to promote wikilove. However, there is a difference between assuming good faith and promoting trolling. Cookies aren't for users who have a strong history of vandalism-only edits..—Tommy2010 22:06, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
Yeah! Don't feed the trolls! And definitely not with cookies! ×××BrightBlackHeaven(talk)××× 08:52, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
Please do not delete information in pages en masse as you did in Momay. Yes, you might be right about informations being unsourced, but removing them en masse will not help either, especially if the edits were clearly a good faith edit, instead insert a tag which requests references for the given information such as citation needed would be helpful.
And also, please stay civil when editing pages, comments with sarcasms such as these are not very nice. If your aim is actually to help improve Wikipedia, then you will try and improve the pages by finding sources yourself, instead of deleting the information. And if you have no idea about the page, then leave tags to inform other editors to improve the page. Thank you.--TwelveOz (talk) 10:43, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
I have gotten interested in creating templates for wikilove items. Before I do however I would like to ask a few questions.
Is the blank wikilove template only for administator usage?
Do we edit the blankwikilove or copy and make a new article? Gromoror (talk) 21:56, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
Hello - I haven't edited for a while - can you please remove the note you left on the bottom of my page?
Thanks! Uncle uncle uncle 19:52, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
{{helpme}} File:GumapangLusak.JPG This copyright image does not appear to be "low res" as required of copyright images under WP:FAIR, but I am not at all an image expert. How do I flag it for someone to check and verify, and if it is too hi res, replace it with a lower res version? Active Banana (talk) 04:00, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
Done
P.S. For swift help with this or anything else, do talk to us live, with this or this. Pop in and say hi :-) Chzz ► 04:18, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
I don't know how to request for page protection, i see already the page & its to complicated to see the steps on how would i request for protection, kindly show me how? simple steps of requesting for page protection... thanks... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Knight Crawler X (talk • contribs) 05:07, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
PS. can you also remove some speculative character/actors like captain barbell as piolo pascual, darna as angel locsin, & dyesebel as anne curtis, they are license to the other station particularly the rival station of ABS-CBN 2 which is GMA 7 thanks. by the way GMA 7 will again remake Captain barbell as a teleserye to be showed on GMA 7 as for their 60th aniversary this year... thanks (im just asking, i don't wanna wish that you will grant this immediately but you can see the list of shows of GMA 7 here in wikipedia if you want a proof) thanks... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Knight Crawler X (talk • contribs) 05:21, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
I've done a few, good work. Led me to an article by a sock that was 99% copyvio, which I deleted (the copyvio, that is), so that's serendipity. Dougweller (talk) 10:14, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
A very messy situation which appears to been initiated due to my misinterpretation of an edit summary spiraled out of control. But the matter appears to be closed.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Although I'm loath to wade into a battle that has nothing to do with me regarding an article I do not edit, I do feel the need to point out, since you seem to like Wikirules and guidelines, that one very important bit of Wiki etiquette is WP:DTTR. You will find that personal (and civil messages go a long way. freshacconci talktalk 15:41, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
Can you add references to the Jordan Crawford article and can you update the Jordan Crawford article? WayneOlajuwon (talk) 00:44, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
TwelveOz has eaten your {{cookie}}! The cookie made them happy and they'd like to give you a great big hug for donating it. Spread the WikiLove by giving out more {{cookie}}s, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Thanks again!
Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat a cookie with {{subst:munch}}!
Now I have to eat a real one.--TwelveOz (talk) 20:25, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for the catch. I caught it myself, after noting my search had been for Fulvio Wtzl, it became clear I wasn't getting all of the results I'd thought I should have. NativeForeigner Talk/Contribs 01:45, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
Good to see someone being proactive regarding the article. I would have made that change myself, but I don't think there's any way my changes would have been considered objective. Doniago (talk) 18:04, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
Can you fix the copyright status of File:Jordan Crawford.jpg? Wayne Olajuwon (talk) 00:52, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
See what the IPs Done on the "Isang Lakas Page", we have to do something before the page is being super vandalize & the information will not be appropriate to the page, some of the information they intend to add are those character that are broadcasted to their rival station/channel particularly GMA 7, some of the characters mentioned are Captain Barbell(to be showed this year as part of the 60th anniversary of GMA 7), Darna (has 2 versions, 2 actresses are (1st)Angel Locsin, & (2nd) Marian Rivera), Dyesebel (Reprised Also by Marian Rivera), these character/actors/actresses Mentioned are from GMA 7, the IPs always including the Characters of Captain Barbell, Darna, & Dyesebel so that their shows/programs gain high ratings and to sabotage the rival station/channel particularly GMA 7, and also the IPs themselves are "Loyal Fans" of The Rival Station of GMA 7 which is ABS-CBN,
PS. Because GMA 7 are celebrating their 6oth Anniversary this year, Those IPs and others who like to Sabotage them are "Loyal Fans" of ABS-CBN the rival Station/Channel of GMA 7. so that they gain High Ratings & Dislodge GMA 7 from Contention... Thanks... --Knight Crawler X (talk) 04:39, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
Regarding one of the sources you questioned: for what it's worth, The Stage is rather widely cited on Wikipedia, which suggests there is some community acceptance of its reliability. However, if you're not convinced, WP:RSN might be a good place to seek more immediate input.
As for the other source, I'm not married to it. --Ibn (talk) 18:59, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. Active Banana (talk) 00:49, 5 June 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.72.128.246 (talk)
Hello. Fyi, I removed your speedy deletion tag from this one because you had tagged as a recreated article. Surely the page had been deleted before but a speedy deletion of "recreation" is only valid for pages that were discussed on AfD. Pages that were speedily deleted before and are then recreated can only be tagged under the same CSD criterion again - which in this case was an author blanking.
Anyway, let the original creator of the article has meanwhile blanked and thus asked for deletion himself. De728631 (talk) 18:51, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
- I did a quick search, but I was unable to find any freely licensed photos of Mark Rothko. Since Mark Rothko committed suicide more than 40 years ago, I don't expect any newly free licensed images to turn up and, naturally, one can't be created. However, to use a non-free photo you have to correctly source it, including relevent details such as the photographer or copyright holder. A much better, uncropped, verson of that photo is available at rothko_portrait.jpg (2100 × 2401) from Stampfli & Turci art dealers. The page that hosts that image "Mark Rothko. The Retrospective – Kunsthalle Hamburgturn" describes the photo as:
- Mark Rothko. Retrospektive – Kunsthalle Hamburg
- Mark Rothko, um 1961
- © 1998 Kate Rothko Prizel & Christopher Rothko / VG Bild Kunst, Bonn 2008
- If you upload the image, make sure you include that information in the image description. Please don't upload the full image (or if you do, edit the image description page with {{non-free reduce}} to ask someone else to reduce the size for you.) —RP88 (talk) 11:04, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
—Preceding unsigned comment added by Active Banana (talk • contribs) 11:15, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
I took your advice and I am writing in IAR Talk page, but it seems the page is visited very infrequently. Please if you want to make a comment right now use my talk page, so you won't disrupt what I am writing. Deep Atlantic Blue (talk) 12:33, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
for me the "short version" is the true and only verified characters, in the "long version" characters like captain barbell, darna, & dyesebel are not verified characters that will be shown in the telefantasy show, they are license/link/related to or to be shown on GMA 7 like captain barbell for their 60th Anniversary this year.. as for the others like lastikman, varga, kapitan boom, tiny tony, dragonna, flash bomba, & maruja all are license/link/related to and to be shown as "Isang Lakas" on ABS-CBN. All my information are verified, and if the following characters that i mentioned for GMA 7 are to be shown on ABS-CBN 2, i swear i will not edit this "Isang Lakas Page" anymore. I will assure you that my information is true and verified... thanks. --122.53.125.234 (talk) 00:59, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
Hi, Active Banana! Thank you for your contributions in the Eliseo Soriano article. Reading the history of the said article, it seems that most of the persons and users involved in trying to remove the BLP violations (i.e removing poorly-sourced claims at the lead) were blocked since their edits were accused of being vandalism by an editor (who is currently not around). The pro-violation editor has, surprisingly, violated the 3RR rule by reverting the anon's edit three times (within 24 hrs).
Aside from numerous "personal attacks" against pro-Soriano editors (I'm neither pro-S nor anti-S) and BLP violations in talk pages, the editor seems to be Canvassing other users with the same opinon as what she believes (here). Should the user be reported and blocked due to his "borderline incivility"? IronBreww (chat) 02:54, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
Hi there BANANA (no offense meant!), VASCO here,
I am well aware of the site policy on civility and akin, but i have ZERO respect for vandals and will fight them with my soul. Incredibly, one entire chunk of storyline in which i "worked my tail off" was removed, no words added - now comes the incredible part - and no one noticed, i bet the perpetrator did not even get a notice. Ah, and i would reinstate it also if it was another editor's work.
Yes, i am also aware this is not a fansite, i have been here at the site, and have NEVER added: falsehoods, POV or weasel (ok maybe the latter a little, when i was a rookie). Unref'd info which is true is less true? But don't worry, i will find a ref this week or so.
Cheers, keep up the good work, from Portugal - --Vasco Amaral (talk) 21:51, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
Was really taken aback with your reactions but, as the WP "good book" says, i assume good faith (hope you do the same with me, only trying to help) and hope we can cooperate well in the future. Yes, i know, no personal attacks, but my tolerance with vandals will remain the same (ZERO!). Attentively - --Vasco Amaral (talk) 23:21, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
I don't think it is appropriate to be making substantive removals of a material in the midst of an AfD, especially when the specific plans for removal are not proposed and discussed on the talk page first. I did a brief search to see if there is a policy, guideline or essay on point, and didn't find much of anything. If you are aware of such items, please let me know. If we don't have such guidance, I plan to propose that we discuss some guidance, as it is unfair to participants in the AfD. (I am aware that editing during an AfD is not prohibited. I thought the unwritten rule was that improving the article with the addition of sources, or doing uncontroversial cleanup is not just allowed, but encouraged.) However, I think removal of sources, especially ones that have been discussed, without even attempting consensus, is not something that should be encouraged.--SPhilbrickT 14:59, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
Baby, baby, baby ohhh
Like baby, baby, baby noo
Like baby, baby, baby ohh
I thought youd always be mine mine
--PrimeViper (talk) 22:12, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
Hi! When you have a minute, would you mind responding to my reply to your remark of 17:54, 11 June 2010 (UTC)? I'd like to clean up my mess. Thanks!--Yopienso (talk) 23:28, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
Hi Active Banana. There have been some allegations made against you at my talk at User talk:Fastily#Philippine Cable Channels Remove Again. Comment from you would be appreciated. Thanks, FASTILY (TALK) 07:13, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. -143.166.255.64 (talk) 23:08, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
Hi. I disagree with your re-stubbing of this article during AfD, but I don't want to edit-war about it, so I have raised the question at AN/I here. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 10:10, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
Hello Active Banana. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of India Ennenga, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Appearing in a national TV show is an assertion of notability - use PROD if it doesn't meet WP:N. Thank you. Ale_Jrbtalk 12:00, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
Personal and group blogs which allow anyone to post anything without oversight are not appropriate sources. Professional blogs can be.
"Some newspapers host interactive columns that they call blogs, and these may be acceptable as sources so long as the writers are professional journalists or are professionals in the field on which they write and the blog is subject to the newspaper's full editorial control" —Preceding unsigned comment added by Psdealer (talk • contribs) 15:54, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Rain (entertainer). Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. 99.243.117.17 (talk) 02:02, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
Hi - I just dismissed an AIV claim against you from an SPA, but in reviewing the rain article I can't seem to find anything contentious in the awards section. The 2010 Badass award matches what the MTV award page states. Can you please let me know what parts were contentious. Thanks. 7 02:22, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
Inre your recent undiscussed edit of the article introductory, as you are aware, a discussion is currently in progress within the article talk attempting to reach some consensus regarding the introductory text. While you are certainly free to continue editing in a manner of your choosing, perhaps it would be advisable to consider that, should consensus be reached within article talk as to that same introductory text, subsequent unilateral edits will most probably be difficult to defend.
Please consider refraining from further edits to the article introductory (perhaps even self-reverting) and, instead, re-consider presenting your suggested edits within talk as a more effective method for influencing the article development. Rgds JakeInJoisey (talk) 15:25, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
Just as a note, but you have made three reverts in a 24-hour period and any other revert could result in being blocked from editing. Aspects (talk) 20:13, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
Hello, I am a Reviewer (verify) here, and I am responding to the request on Wikipedia:Editor assistance/Requests#User: Active Banana. Please go to Talk:Rain (entertainer)#Sourced content. Thank you.Taric25 (talk) 21:14, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Rain (entertainer). Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. I have reported you, and Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Active Banana reported by User:Taric25 (Result: ) is where you may see my report. Thank you. Taric25 (talk) 06:51, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
I always read Philippine cable wiki pages. Do not remove those listings. I always refer to the listings so I can know their lineups. I strongly oppose your move of removing channel listings. 17:18(+8) 18 June 2010Vgyu 09:18, 18 June 2010 (UTC)VgyuVgyu 09:18, 18 June 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vgyu (talk • contribs)
I strongly oppose to what you are suggesting. Check Discussion pages for WP:NOTDIR. -G8crash3r | Talk 18:33, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
Some of the cable sites are inaccurate. Wikipedia is more accurate so STOP REMOVING THEM! Vgyu 08:59, 19 June 2010 (UTC)VgyuVgyu 08:59, 19 June 2010 (UTC) 16:59 Saturday, June 19, 2010 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vgyu (talk • contribs)
Thank you for checking Nina Girado's article. I'm really learning alot in terms of finding sources. I swear the statements are all fact and confirmed, I just have a hard time trying to find reliable references, but I'm still searching for each sentence that needs one. Kristelzorina (talk) 13:19, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
Well my view is that words or phrases like "400 year old", "prominent" and "famous" are probably true in the case of Krupp (like the family or not) and not necessarily peacock words in this case. So I don't think we should just delete them unless we can reasonably demonstrate them to be false or 'over the top'. But feel free to start a discussion on the talk page. Also your edit contained a typo that broke one of the links. --Bermicourt (talk) 19:51, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
Per your request, I have informed all of the users involved in the previous discussion prior to the policy I proposed. I apologize for the misunderstanding, as I was not attempting to votestack, simply to avoid concern with me leaving messages on talk pages. Please accept my apology. Thank you. Taric25 (talk) 00:07, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
Hello, can this link be a reliable source to - "Make You Mine", topping radio and video charts. - http://www.philmusic.com/main/content/view/4/7/
I'd thought asking you would be helpful. Kristelzorina (talk) 11:49, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
Hello, could you please read WP:AGF before accusing people of conflicts of interest. FYI if you look at my edits, I just removed some "notsability issues" that were not justified, Google or specialized publication can bring a lot of sources. On the rest I agree that those articles (and others in the same field) are blatant marketing material. Canonebeseriouz (talk) 17:18, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
Hi, I wasn't the one who deleted the image. Your diff showed an edit to the upload page which is something different. According to this it was Black Kite who deleted the image so you'd better ask him. On a first glance I don't the image will pass wp:nfcc though. Garion96 (talk) 23:03, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
Active Banana, I cannot express how sorry I am an how much I feel like a fool. I recall putting the talk page of User:200.63.165.19 on my watch list, and I saw User:Amalthea blocked the IP, because it was an open proxy being used to evade a block. I was totally shocked, and I feel like such dick for suspecting you were using making sockpuppet allegations when in fact it was the user who reported you at Wikipedia:Editor assistance/Requests who was actually using a sockpuppet. I really don’t know what to say other than sorry. Please forgive me. Taric25 (talk) 02:21, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
Hello Mr Banana,
I'm not entirely familiar with wikipedia rules and regulations but I was surprised to see that you have labelled the article on the 5th Viscount Younger of Leckie as possibly not meeting notability requirements.
Peers of the Realm are notable, and members of the House of Lords (who are peers of the realm as well as legislators) are certainly notable. The article may be a work in progress - I don't know much about the chap - but it includes a reference to the Offical Parliamentary Report (Hansard) which proves that he will shortly become a legislator. Can legislators fail the notability test?
Thanks.
Intermess (talk) 14:18, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
Hello,
I am sorry, if it may look i am vandalizing wiki but i am trying to correct the things that were messed up during the day. I am using the official website, i took out parts that may have sounded not neutral. I am not familiar with wiki and the rules. But i tried and read it. A lot of the part are originally from way before. The only things i added are from the Official page of MBLAQ www.m-blaq.com
So sorry, i am not going to do it anymore, i only tried it cus people said really bad things, in their editing. Like one active member would be dead and such.
Anyway i am sorry,
Bye —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.147.198.48 (talk) 19:48, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
Hi Active Banana. Thanks for helping me answer my talk page posts - I really appreciate it. Not that I have any complaints about your current method of answering queries, but I just want you to know that you are free to respond to queries directly on my talk page too. At any rate, have a cookie.
Fastily has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!
Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!
Cheers, FASTILY (TALK) 20:33, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
You had tagged {expert} for the above article. Good move, however, the tag is being removed by another user. A debate is required on the article. Can you take up the resposibility and be a fair judge. Your help is required.Teutonick (talk) 04:52, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
In regards to the source, I have found one which can be seen here:
I got these from a page I got off eBay. Unfortunately, no bibliographical info was given and I am trying to chase it up. If I can't get the info, how should I proceed with this in terms of citation? --Charlie Huang 【遯卋山人】 09:18, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
You may be interested to know that I have brought this user to WP:ANI here. Pfainuk talk 18:17, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
Thank you for all the work on the article I recently started on Angela Tilby - this certainly taught me new information! I am grateful for you for doing this - it could well help the article to be saved from deletion now. It is always good when people collaborate with others on Wikipedia in this collaborative way - so a big round of thanks to your there. ACEOREVIVED (talk) 18:50, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
See WP:AN3#User:Warrenpd reported by Nomoskedasticity (talk) (Result: ). At first glance it looks like the other guy made seven reverts and you made five. Both of these exceed WP:3RR. To avoid sanctions, you should comment in the thread at AN3 and promise to stop warring on this article. EdJohnston (talk) 21:52, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
here . It involved me alleging you committed some misconduct, but I said I didn't see enough of it to make your behavior worth an ArbCom sanction. Others (including ArbCom) may disagree, and you should know it's there in any event. -- JohnWBarber (talk) 01:06, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
I just started using wikipedia yesterday. I am an intern for Rasmussen College and they wanted me to update their wiki page. I guess I didnt really know what I was doing because the page is locked now. I read all of my messages and I have all of the sources for my edits. I really need to get this done before the end of the day. Is there any way I can get it unlocked. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Warrenpd (talk • contribs) 14:25, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
for pitching in at Russ Savakus. Luck you, here is your prize. Einar aka Carptrash (talk) 04:53, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
I changed Cast members of As the World Turns to July because today is the last day of June and they haven't come on the show. So leave them alone. They appear in July. THANKS!!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.110.139.100 (talk) 05:02, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
Can this link be a good source for Nina Girado#Voice??? - http://www.casttv.com/video/rxgk561/how-other-artists-describe-the-asia-s-soul-siren-nina-asap-sessionistas-at-the-araneta-video Kristelzorina (talk) 12:41, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
Re your message: No problem. =) I'm going to file a quick CU request about the accounts in a moment. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 22:38, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
Can you please tell me what's so bad about the edit I made to Kal Ho Naa Ho that it needed to be reverted (three times so far)? I am only here to help. BollyJeff || talk 01:36, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
Thank you very much for improving the article Nanjing University. And if any content described in a way like ads, also please help to revise. Thanks! Furthermore, I think query, debating and communication will help to ensure validity and proper way of description of contents. Peducte (talk) 18:07, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
Hello! I see that User:Gun Powder Ma said you added advert template to the article Nanjing University. I also read Wikipedia:NOT#SOAPBOX, and the explanation about advertising. I don’t agree on the tag. The contents of article Nanjing University are serious, although there may be problems in translation. If you do think some contents are ads, please clearly point out the specific contents and let's have discussions one by one. If not, then I'll delete the tag. Again thank you for improving the grammar of article. - Peducte (talk) 14:32, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
Welcome to my talk page. Please see my words and give your opinions. - Peducte (talk) 15:06, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for your precious opinions. In some degree I agree with you. Since You added the Advert tag, would you please help to revise those words of overabundance? And those you think lack sources please add sign of citation request, and I'll see whether I can help to provide sources or not. (from my talk page) - Peducte (talk) 15:18, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
According to what said, the problems can be divided into two parts. So, the tag Advert is not proper. It should be replaced by requests of citation and the issue on problems of Peacock. - Peducte (talk) 16:05, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for your advising. - Peducte (talk) 16:05, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
Please see Talk:Nanjing University. (more reply) - Peducte (talk) 16:34, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
Please see Talk:Nanjing University. - Peducte (talk) 16:00, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
Bana shsh kibhenko (talk · contribs) is there too... Shahid • Talk2me 13:37, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
I think ive written about most of the important things about this artist. what do you think I could do to make the article better, so it could be featured or something ? thanks. Nefesf9 (talk) 10:56, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
I am interested in posting a request for comment on the issue of channel listings. Is it okay if I start that in a new section at WT:NOT? Thanks. -- Wikipedical (talk) 22:56, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
Seamless Wikipedia browsing. On steroids.
Every time you click a link to Wikipedia, Wiktionary or Wikiquote in your browser's search results, it will show the modern Wikiwand interface.
Wikiwand extension is a five stars, simple, with minimum permission required to keep your browsing private, safe and transparent.