Loading AI tools
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hello. I see that IP changed your comment and then reverted it again. Well I reverted it also and the IP did it again. I left a warning to the IP and it seems the IP does not get it.
I am not going to act further as my involvement in this content dispute does not allow me to act as an administrator. I will say you are welcome to restore you comments again and if the IP insists yet again I would recommend a report at WP:EWN. If you do make a 3RR report I suggest you include these links to recent edit warring notices that the IP has removed from their page: . He removes them from the talk page so they may not be evident. Chillum 19:19, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ebenezer R. Hoar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Department of Justice. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Hi Anomalocaris, I'm looking for help with some updates to the Rep. Tom Graves article and I wonder if you might be willing to help. Looking around at the articles for a few other Republican politicians from Georgia, I saw you'd been active in this topic area recently recently, so this article might be of interest to you.
At present, some of the article sections are lacking in detail or WP:RS citations, or both. I also see a few areas where the wording does not conform to the cited source and / or is not encyclopedic. I'm seeking to address these issues.
Worth noting, I am working as a consultant on behalf of Rep. Graves and, considering my financial COI, I won't make any direct edits to the article. What I have done instead is to propose suggested updates on the Talk page here. If you are able to review and make the changes as you feel are appropriate, I'd be very grateful. Cheers, WWB Too (Talk · COI) 22:15, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Primefac (talk) 23:22, 20 February 2015 (UTC)Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of UNICEF Goodwill Ambassadors, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jean Van de Velde. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:24, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for quickly spotting the error - I was meant to have reverted the vandal not the bot , Not sure how I came to revert it but anyway thanks for quickly coming to the rescue :), Cheers, –Davey2010Talk 17:48, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Caesar salad may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 06:28, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I do not agree that "Type species must display the named genus", as you stated in your recent changes to Platymantis and Ptychadena (and which would require putting the authority in parenthesis, which is not the case at the moment). The Amphibian Species of the World, the source of this information for amphibians, lists type species using their original names, which may or may not coincide with the names of the genera they typify. So do the Mammal Species of the World. I am not sure whether this is a convention rather than a rule, but I see no reason to depart from it. Type species are usually wikilinked to their current name, so there should be no risk of confusion. Micromesistius (talk) 14:05, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
Could you not change "they" to "it". It's perfectly acceptable in British English to refer to organisations in the plural and use "they". See, for example, Conservative Party (UK). Cheers, Number 57 08:59, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Please stop edit warring over this. The outcome of the discussion at Cooperation and Brotherhood does not apply in this case as it is a different case; Rothorpe's comment that "the 'was' and 'were' are too close together", this time they are at different ends of a long sentence. The comment from Sminthopsis84 was that the sentence was apparently confusing; this is an entirely different sentence, so that comment does not apply here either. Number 57 16:04, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Yisrael Beiteinu, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Gaza and The Telegraph. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
Hello, Anomalocaris. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "U.S. political divisions economy".
The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply {{db-afc}}
or {{db-g13}}
code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13. An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 23:58, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Theda Bara may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 10:03, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Conjugation may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 05:59, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Since there are only two entries on GS-5 and GS5 each, do you think it could be just merged together? hbdragon88 (talk) 04:26, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
Please see the categorization principles listed at Category:Uncategorized pages. A stub template is an internal project category that groups articles by a maintenance condition of the article, not an end-user content category grouping articles by a defining characteristic of the topic — so a stub template does not count toward considering an article to be properly categorized. All articles in mainspace still have to have at least one real content category declared directly on the page in the Category:Blah blah format — if no such category declaration is present, then the page is still uncategorized even if it has 100 stub templates on it. Bearcat (talk) 15:44, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of the first LGBT holders of political offices in the United States, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Washington. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
An article that you have been involved in editing—Fresno pepper —has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Falconjh (talk) 13:07, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mike Huckabee, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Hill. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:29, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
Please take care when adding punctuation to template parameters. In this edit, your addition of commas to the populations in {{India census population}} caused it to break. Jackmcbarn (talk) 01:50, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Helen Suzman may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:35, 16 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:05, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Deaths in December 2011, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Daily News and Proceso. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:24, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:15, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
please remove this line from khowar language which is incorrect; Khowar is the predominant language of Chitral, and one of the 14 designated regional languages there.[citation needed] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.160.66.131 (talk) 15:50, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
The MOS text now seems to suggest that we prefer to spell this out as a fifty-to-fifty joint venture. I'm pretty sure that wasn't your intention. Pburka (talk) 22:40, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
I noticed this edit to the page Shahada; did it use a semi-automatic page searcher and editor? Thanks. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 10:32, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Please see the talk page. The section was removed because it encourages spam. There are MANY clones and remakes of this game, and I don't see why Megaplex deserves special treatment. I think it should stay gone, and the disambiguation page link removed as well. --Vladimir (talk) 00:54, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
Hi. I replied to Dweller's question a while back on his user page.
The intention behind labeling is to separate pages that meet a minimum level of quality from the content of the short pages report. This may enable us to use Special:ShortPages to easily find new or unnoticed short articles that may need to be formatted or deleted. I was not aware that Special:ShortPages with additional arguments could list any segment of page sizes. Thank you pointing that out. I am not sure, if without additional arguments the Special:ShortPages report would always fill up. Even if that was the case, the cleaned up list could be useful, for as long as we are paying attention to the pages up to some size-threashold.
In any case, I do not have strong opinion about this. --Dcirovic (talk) 07:02, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
{{lowercase}}
, like eBay)This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Seamless Wikipedia browsing. On steroids.
Every time you click a link to Wikipedia, Wiktionary or Wikiquote in your browser's search results, it will show the modern Wikiwand interface.
Wikiwand extension is a five stars, simple, with minimum permission required to keep your browsing private, safe and transparent.