Loading AI tools
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hi, thank you for all the good work you do here at Wikipedia. Could you take a look at the article about Sanna Nielsen to see if there are any bugs in the formatting that needs fixing. Appreciate it. Take care.--BabbaQ (talk) 01:17, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
Here's a search. I've been changing to inline version rather than removing the bullet when there's only one or two items (and switching to the right kind of list item). --Izno (talk) 00:06, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
{{commonscat-inline}}
should be used in the body of the article and {{commonscat}}
should be used at the end of the article. —Anomalocaris (talk) 00:09, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Hi Anomalocaris, Hope all is well :),
When you have a spare 5 minutes could you check my archive box and see if all's okay please?,
I've updated the coding and removed the <big>
and <center
coding so just wanted to make sure there's not any errors,
Also on my box the 2015 and 2016 lines aren't centered correctly like the lines above and below it - Is there anyway to fix this ?,
Many thanks, –Davey2010Talk 15:15, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
'''<span>...</span>'''
. I edited {{Digital clock and date}}
to remove some lint there. Your page calls {{User:TParis/RfX Report}}
, which redirects to {{Cyberpower678/RfX Report}}
, which is missing a closing italics (''
), but there's no point in my fixing it since the "page is maintained by a bot". I have asked the owner to fix it. The call to {{User:TParis/RfX Report}}
is in a table, but lacked the pipe character (|
) to indicate a table row. I inserted the pipe character, fixing a lint error, but this changed the alignment of the table. The page is now lint-free except for the missing end tag in {{User:TParis/RfX Report}}
. —Anomalocaris (talk) 03:46, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
7&6=thirteen (☎) has given you a Dobos torte to enjoy! Seven layers of fun because you deserve it.
To give a Dobos torte and spread the WikiLove, just place {{subst:Dobos Torte}} on someone else's talkpage, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. |
7&6=thirteen (☎) 16:51, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for prodding me to finally use modern-ish HTML markup in my signature! --bdesham ★ 23:02, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
Hello, I made the change to my signature markup using one of the formats you had recommended. I wasn't aware that there were any problems as I normally use Firefox and the old one didn't appear to have any rendering problems. Should be fine for the next five years! Blue Riband► 13:44, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for the note about my signature font tags. I've been away from active editing for quite some time so hadn't left signed messages in ages until a couple of days ago. I've updated it and it should be all good now. AUTiger » talk 06:02, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
Thanks, fixed my signature :)
MossBoss254 Talk 01:12, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for the heads-up on my signature! Without the notice, I probably wouldn't have ever noticed it was still using obsolete tags. My signature should now be up to current HTML standards. --Aamsse talk to me 03:35, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
— Mahalo for the corrected syntax! – Altman📞– 01:57, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
You pinged me: is my sig a problem? If so please explain what I need to do to fix it. PamD 10:47, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
Changed as requested. Thanks for letting me know. Regards, MidnightBlue (Talk) 16:39, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
Hello Anomalocaris,
You seem to have misunderstood the purpose of the {{edit protected}} templates. Per the instructions at Wikipedia:Edit requests, the request needs to be specific. The people patrolling these requests are not necessarily those who are familiar with the various templates and modules, so all we can do is gauge consensus and do some basic checks.
If you need help fixing a particular error, you could try asking at WP:VPT. But generally it might be best to leave these errors to people who know how to fix them.
Regards — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 08:21, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
{{Self}}
, I was unable to generate the exact code change. However, I was able to state the exact problem. I disagree with you and with xaosflux. There is no urgency in responding to the edit request; it could just sit there as a discussion topic until someone capable of fixing the bug does so. You and xaoxflux seem to think the main thing is to make the request be resolved quickly. I believe that the main thing is to have a valid (even if not as precise as is desired) error report be resolved correctly, however long it takes. That's my view, and I realize you and xaoxflux don't share it. In fact, I might be the only one who sees it my way. Anyway, I won't persist on this. —Anomalocaris (talk) 08:47, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
MSGJ, xaosflux: I don't want to get into a debate here, because, as I said, I won't persist. But I do want to explain why I hold my view. Protected pages replace the "edit this page" tab with "view source". On the view source page, such as View source for Template:Self, it says:
- What can I do?
- ...
- If you have noticed an error or have a suggestion for a simple change, you can submit an edit request, by clicking the button below and following instructions. An administrator or template editor may then make the change on your behalf. Please check the talk page first in case the issue is already being discussed.
Submit an edit request
That "Submit an edit request" is the only thing most users will see. It's a beacon that practically begs the user to click. So the user clicks, and sees an editing window with an HTML comment, "State UNAMBIGUOUSLY your suggested changes below this line, preferably [emphasis mine] in a 'change X to Y' format." I know, people who respond to these requests want a request in the form of "change X to Y". But it is also unambiguous to simply report that a template generates a Multiline table in list lint error and it needs to be fixed. Ambiguous means "Open to multiple interpretations" or "Vague and unclear". There is only one possible interpretation of my request: the template creates a specific type of lint error. It is unambiguous.
Everything is set up leading the user down a primrose path, "Oh, please, click this button and submit your request" and then "state your request clearly in a way that can't be misinterpreted" and then editors come back, "You have to submit your request in the form of change X to Y." This is bait-and-switch, and it's not nice, especially to new editors (which I am not).
It doesn't have to be this way. Unambiguous requests, even if not in the form of "change X to Y", can remain open until someone fixes them. But, as I said, I don't want to get into a debate, and I won't persist. I just wish that this primrose path led to the garden of satisfaction. —Anomalocaris (talk) 21:09, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Please provide a specific description of the edit request, that is, specific text that should be removed and a verbatim copy of the text that should replace it. "Please change X" is not helpful and will often be rejected; the request should be of the form "please change X to Y because...type directions. — xaosflux Talk 22:04, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Copied from User talk:The Transhumanist#Your recent edits of many outline articles, where this conversation started, and the user responded here.
In your recent edits of many outline articles, you removed navigation templates and categories, examples below.
Examples:
[[:Category:Harvard University]]
and others{{James Bond}}
and others{{Catholicism}}
and others{{United Kingdom topics}}
{{Wisconsin}}
As it happens, I came to explore your edits after I went to Outline of Mexico and saw that you had removed {{Mexico topics}}
. So, what's going on? —Anomalocaris (talk) 07:01, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
Dear Anomalocaris,
Thank you for your interest. The outlines are usually a desert, where I'm contacted by other editors about my edits on them once in a blue moon. So, your communication is a breath of fresh air. I will be happy to explain the rationale for my edits, and look forward to your further feedback.
I'm in the middle of long overdue cleanup/maintenance of the outlines. This included inserting missing lead sentences, missing outline notice at the top of those outlines for which that was missing, missing sister links template, removal of the wikimindmap dead link, insertion of the {{Outline footer}} where missing, fixing category tags (mostly their sort order), adding missing "Wikipedia outline" category tag, and so on.
First, concerning the category links removed from Outline of Harvard University: note that the Harvard University category was retained. It was included at the bottom of the page as a category tag. The category links that were removed were hard links to categories. "Category" sections, and hard category links, are generally not included in outlines because they are redundant structural elements, and part of a separate navigation system (the category system). Recreating the category system (that is, the category links themselves, rather than tags) and its structure within the outlines is not a purpose of outlines -- those links are already in place on the category pages themselves, and can be accessed there and with the CatTree tool. Outlines are topical tree structures, and so each subject has one branch in the tree, with the branches populated by links to articles (including prose and list articles). Categories are not articles, and therefore don't belong in outlines as hard links (check other outlines, and you will see that is not generally practiced). In addition, note that categories are external to the encyclopedia itself, and have their own reserved location on articles (the bottom of the page, as category tags). I hope that explains the hard category link removal to your satisfaction.
Another way to approach the above issue, is by scope. The scope of outlines is to map out knowledge, and the contents of the encyclopedia. It is not to map out the other navigation systems, which would explode the size of outlines, and especially the amount of work needed to build and maintain them -- which is a very limited resource already. Note that Portals do include hard category links.
Navigation footers on the other hand pose different problems than hard category links. Outlines are a separate navigation system from navigation footers. Having the two systems overlap by having navigation footers on outline pages interferes with the development of outlines. For example, to determine what topics are missing from an outline, one would use the compare list feature of WP:AWB, to compare the links on the outline to the links on other navigation systems, such as the corresponding navigation footer. But that is rendered useless if the nav footer is present on the outline. What links belong to the outline and what links belong to the navigation footer becomes blurred. Determining which links on the Mexico template are not yet included in the Outline of Mexico, manually, would be extremely tedious.
Another use of outlines is as a source of links for its root topic. But navigation footers tend to accumulate on outlines, including those that do not match the scope of the outline, such as navigation footers for the parent topic, etc. This renders making lists of the outline's subjects (such as with WP:AWB's make list feature, infeasible. Those are used for many tasks, such as in the construction of indices and glossaries, lists for tagging articles within the scope of a WikiProject, focused recent changes efforts, etc. But those are thwarted if non-relevant or off-scope navigation templates are present.
I hope the above makes sense. Please feel free to share your thoughts, and I will be happy to discuss the matter with you further until we reach a synthesis of purpose. I'm certain you wish what's best for the reader, as do I. Discussing the various options and ramifications should result in the best path to that objective, whatever that path happens to be. I'm not married to any particular course of action, and look forward to your further observations, questions, comments, and concerns.
And of course, I will refrain from removing navigation footers from the bottom of outline pages until a solution is worked out to your satisfaction, whether that be reinsertion of the footers, adding the links from the on-topic footers into the bodies of the outlines, or some other solution.
Sincerely, The Transhumanist 08:18, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
P.S.: please {{ping}} me when you reply. Thank you. -TT
I can't figure out what you mean by the edit you apparently made on my Talk page, or even where that match of text is. Please clarify; if here, {{ping}}; otherwise on my Talk page, Thank you. --Thnidu (talk) 05:43, 27 March 2018 (UTC) Thnidu (talk) 05:43, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
Hey there! Is it possible that you could explain this edit to one of my userspace pages? I honestly have no idea what you’re saying in the edit summary, and I wouldn’t mind something perhaps more clear and concise for an average, non-technical user such as myself. – PhilipTerryGraham (talk · articles · reviews) 21:08, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
{{Diff}}
template this way:
{{Diff|User:PhilipTerryGraham/Reviews|prev|834162842|this edit to one of my userspace pages}}
: this edit to one of my userspace pages:{| role="presentation" class="wikitable mw-collapsible mw-collapsed"
:
character and causing an error of sorts on a list page? – PhilipTerryGraham (talk · articles · reviews) 02:23, 5 April 2018 (UTC)
:{| role="presentation" class="wikitable mw-collapsible mw-collapsed"
{{Talk}}
inside it. However, even without indenting, using {{Talk}}
inside the table causes problems although not lint errors. Under the heading "Good article reviews", click on either "show" link, and it's messed up. "==GA Review==" displays just like that, while the equals signs are supposed to be wiki markup for headings. It seems you shouldn't use {{Talk}}
in this way. —Anomalocaris (talk) 06:03, 5 April 2018 (UTC)
{{Talk:Rocket League/GA2}}
and causing these aforementioned errors? – PhilipTerryGraham (talk · articles · reviews) 07:19, 5 April 2018 (UTC)
{{Talk...}}
and thought it was the Talk template; I didn't recognize it as transclusion. So, the real issue is that you are trying to transclude into a table something that does not belong in a table. I do not know if there is a way of doing what you are trying to do. Try the Village Pump. If you get an answer, leave me a message here. Good luck! —Anomalocaris (talk) 08:01, 5 April 2018 (UTC)
Hi there, in patrolling for reference errors I came across one at Uber, and found that in your recent edit there, you made a number of odd changes. I only mention this in case you were using an automated tool that caused these errors (your punctuation/spacing changes made me think this was the case) - if they were genuine typos/human error, please feel free to ignore me! A ref tag was broken, quote marks were put in where they weren't needed, and what I found most odd was that a few characters were removed from a url in a citation, breaking it. Anyway, no big deal, I've fixed these, just wanted to let you know. Cheers, Jessicapierce (talk) 19:47, 5 April 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Anomalocaris!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! MatthewVanitas (talk) 03:24, 9 April 2018 (UTC) |
Is it better now? ~EDDY (talk/contribs)~ 21:55, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading File:Hiral Tipirneni Twitter image.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.
If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Mélencron (talk) 17:31, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Hiral Tipirneni Twitter image.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:
{{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}}
below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason>
with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Mélencron (talk) 20:06, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Hiral Tipirneni Twitter image.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:05, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
The Barnstar of Diligence | |
Your longstanding efforts encouraging signature compliance with Tidy and your other work cleaning up problems in that area are greatly appreciated. Thank you so very much. Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 02:03, 2 May 2018 (UTC) |
With our newfangled extended-length edit summaries, it might be helpful when fixing lint errors to maybe link to LINT so that people have some vague idea of what you're doing. As I'm sure you've received a ping about, this wasn't too well-received. I've explained it (see two diffs later) but I thought I'd mention it to you here. I know you're doing good work, though, so keep it up! Primefac (talk) 16:50, 2 May 2018 (UTC) (please ping on reply)
RedSoxFan274 (talk~contribs) 20:55, 3 May 2018 (UTC)
Thank you for informing me with the issues with my signature, I have corrected it with the fixes you had suggested. — Iunetalk 14:21, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
I feel obliged to say thanks too. My signature is corrected now. --Pajo Pajimir 19:49, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
The Technical Barnstar | |
Thanks for all the syntax fixes ;) -- Ϫ 08:24, 18 May 2018 (UTC) |
I have found no news about it being unreleased or not. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TolkienLover1 (talk • contribs) 07:35, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
I think it should be removed because it didn't receive much coverage anyway. Can you remove it? TolkienLover1 (talk) 07:39, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
TolkienLover1: Feel free to edit Tolkien family#Royd Tolkien yourself! (I took liberty of adjusting the capitalization of this section's title.) —Anomalocaris (talk) 07:46, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
I have. TolkienLover1 (talk) 07:48, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
Hello, I did one of your edit requests here, but could not tell how my change was fixing any misnesting of HTML tags. Could you look at the result and see if it's OK? Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 21:55, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
load.php
they result from MediaWiki or jquery library itself, while my code resides on index.php
and tries to avoid such messages.@Anomalocaris: Thanks for hospitality and advertising.
Gretings --PerfektesChaos (talk) 11:49, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
I've been asking people I encounter with bad-markup sigs to fix them. (and giving them the code to do it, of course). — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 07:51, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for fixing the italics in the talk section for The Big Trail. I was writing it on my cell phone at the time, which never helps, and I've discovered that if you miss something in italics punctuation, which is impossible not to do when working with a cell phone, once you save it on a talk page, you can't go back and fix it unless you have a different level within wikipedia. I was appalled when I saw it and I thank you for fixing it. From now on I'll skip the italics on the talk pages when using a cell phone. Trocadero Thunder (talk) 09:42, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Hark! An unexpected guest for super! How kind of you to call. But pray tell, Mr A. Malocaris, what prompts your visit to my lowly Talk page? Martinevans123 (talk) 08:35, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
Dear Anomalocaris,
You are cordially invited to join the Portals WikiProject.
This is a very active project. We are in the process of completely revamping the entire portal system, and cleaning up the portal namespace. After these are done, we'll be greatly expanding the collections of portals. We have many design discussions going on, and many task types to choose from.
We also have a newsletter, that covers the progress of portal development, and the latest toys.
If you are interested, please feel welcome to sign-up at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Portals#Project_participants.
By the way, I'm very interested in what you think of portals. What do you like most about them? What do they lack that they should have? What can't they do, that you would like them to be able to do?
I look forward to your replies. — The Transhumanist 09:05, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
P.S.: Please {{ping}} me in your reply. Thank you. -TT
I've dropped the protection of these to extended confirmed. Please proceed to make the edits yourself, there is no valid reason I cna find for these to be sysop-only locked, and the protecting admin is long gone from Wikipedia. Courcelles (talk) 09:34, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Re - may be because the edit requests weren't for regular articles? I'll bear that in mind. Important thing is that the edits get made, thanks for letting me know. Fish+Karate 08:12, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for helping with the tables. I appreciate your input! Need anything in return just ask. Adamdaley (talk) 11:30, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
I appreciate it! Botterweg14 (talk) 17:46, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
The Minor barnstar | |
For your work on Duncan D. Hunter. Bearian (talk) 14:00, 22 August 2018 (UTC) |
The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar | ||
For your unexpected and kind help tidying my user page is very much appreciated :) ( also i never knew anyone could give banstars) ~ BOD ~ TALK 19:56, 23 August 2018 (UTC) |
[[|100px]] | Paleo scorpio award |
I'm free!! SBHarris 05:01, 30 August 2018 (UTC) |
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dana Rohrabacher, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mother Jones (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have recently shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect: any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or any page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. Galobtter (pingó mió) 18:25, 28 September 2018 (UTC)
Hey, Anomalocaris,
I am returning to Wikipedia and just saw your message to me about my signature and some problems it might be causing. I cut and pasted the code you left but it was too many characters for the signature box. Is the signature still causing problems? If so, is there a shorter code that I could use instead? Thanks for the notice. Liz Read! Talk! 23:15, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
Hi this is to inform you that West African Ebola virus epidemic which you edited will be submitted for WikiJournal of Medicine...The objective of this message is to invite the contributors to collaboratively submit the article for review through Wiki.J.Med, and if possible, to help in further betterment of the article in accordance to the suggestions of the reviewers. Wikipedia articles are collaboratively authored. So, it is very important to make the authors aware of such a process that the article is currently undergoing thanks--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 13:18, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lacey Schwartz, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Antonio Delgado (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:51, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Anomalocaris. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Anomalocaris. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Seamless Wikipedia browsing. On steroids.
Every time you click a link to Wikipedia, Wiktionary or Wikiquote in your browser's search results, it will show the modern Wikiwand interface.
Wikiwand extension is a five stars, simple, with minimum permission required to keep your browsing private, safe and transparent.