Loading AI tools
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 5 | ← | Archive 9 | Archive 10 | Archive 11 | Archive 12 | Archive 13 | → | Archive 15 |
Hey you did you saw the evidence as the reason I need unprotection of Tony Penikett yesterday right?
So this means I have been respectful editor so you unprotect Tony Penikett and 5th Queens for good?
Tony Penikett — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.69.12.88 (talk) 05:01, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Reason: add some missing details — Preceding unsigned comment added by 196.221.16.73 (talk) 14:31, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
So you unprotect the article at once for trustworthy editor like me please? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 196.221.16.73 (talk) 19:02, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Please see the wnyc talk page Formulairis990 (talk) 02:12, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Hi Bearcat. I don't profess to know my way around this site as you do so, perhaps you can help me out. I am trying to regain as much of my life after serving as an elected official-as you may know or can imagine, that is challenging. christine cusanelli Nonetheless, I still would like to update this page with accurate information. I attempted to add information today, and understand now a bit better how to appropriately cite sources, what constitutes as appropriate info etc. I can see you are trying to be as equitable as possible while still trying to convey information you believe ought to be public. I respect that and would like to move a little closer to what I know to be factual and accurate about the work I did as a public servant. Is there a better way to share proposed edits that I have without overhauling what you've written and still be accurate and fair to me as the living individual? I can see I overlooked the culture piece on this site by going ahead and editing.
Wikioncc (talk) 04:31, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
Wikioncc (talk) 05:06, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
OK fine the real reason I want to unprotect Tony Penikett because I want to improve the article more full source detail an no matter what I do If I was polite editor in Wiki so as 5th Queens as well so that's all I can do. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 197.132.255.210 (talk) 12:55, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Unprotection: Add some missing details. Mo
Hi there. Did you notice that this draft was moved from userspace to mainspace a few days ago. Rather than speedy deletion, did you consider moving it back to userspace or perhaps draft space? — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 18:15, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:03, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Since you were the admin who protected CUDA about a year ago, figured I'd let you know that editing has subsided signficantly on this page, and "pending revision" protection can be removed. Thank you. --GoneIn60 (talk) 19:36, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Thank you for your note regarding Abhishek Verma (arms dealer/businessman). Please note that I did not hijack any page, infact, the Abhishek Verma profile I had uploaded yesterday was actually the profile which was created originally by my associates in 2012 on Wikipedia which you can easily refer to by going into the history of that article or delve deep into Wiki user pages.
In 2013 or 2014, the other Abhishek Verma (archer) hijacked Abhishek Verma (arms dealer's page) and put up his own content while deleting Abhishek Verma arms dealer's content.
Kindly note, as per the dates of birth of the two gentlemen, Abhishek Verma arms dealer is 48.5 years old whereas Abhishek Verma archer is just 26, thus 4 years back he would have been 22 years and not achieved success in life as much as the other Abhishek Verma arms dealer. Therefore, in my opinion the pages should be named as below:
Abhishek Verma (arms dealer) page to be searched and available as 'Abhishek Verma'
and
Abhishek Verma (archer) page to be searched and available as 'Abhishek Verma (archer).
We should give priority to seniority to living personalities by age, fame and their social and financial status as well as number of google hits they receive. Abhishek Verma arms dealer has in excess 1 million google hits and the web is full of his photos and thousands of newsarticles are published on him.
Moreover there are four other WIKI articles, on "Ravi Shankaran", "Scorpene Deal" and "Navy War Room Leak Case" as well as "Tihar Jail" that contain references to this Abhishek Verma Arms Dealer, whereas the other Abhishek Verma (archer) is referred to only once.
Abhishek Verma arms dealer has certainly more citations & newsarticles than the other ones.
This is my view on the matter of conflicting entries of two different persons with the same name on Wikipedia.
Thank you.
I read your comments on my page.
Certainly a billionaire businessman who has national celebrity status in India deserves to be the PRIMARY ARTICLE on wikipedia and not the archer who is rarely ever heard about.
I propose that this topic is discussed amongst the editors of Wikipedia through your medium and goodoffices and they research the net and newspapers on the net as to who is more famous/infamous in India, and the one who should be primary, whether Abhishek Verma businessman or Abhishek Verma archer.
What are your thoughts? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Authorincharge (talk • contribs) 04:28, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
Hi there. Are you creating the page for the actor? If so, I'll leave the red link so that it will become a blue link. - Kiraroshi1976 (talk) 08:01, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
Hi Bearcat. I saw that you put a catagory tag on Jozef De Vroey and, if you'd be so kind, was wondering if you'd be able to guide me as to which ones would be best and how exactly to do it as I've never done this before. Thanks. Picomtn (talk) 10:52, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Hi, there. I'm hoping to get some more info about the removal the a link to Creighton's letter? I read the referenced WP:ELNO guidelines and don't see which point the link violates. The letter contains information about her views on poetry, the status of one of her more popular books, her son - who isn't mentioned in the article - and offers an example of her signature. In different ways any and all of this could be worked into the article, which seems to be addressed as a caveat in #19. In short, I'm not clear why you removed. Thanks! Dnllnd (talk) 00:38, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Definitely Not the Opera, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Laurie Brown. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:53, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
Hi - I'm trying to understand how an edit you made to an article on Bruce Mau back on 19th February 2014 seems to have added a rather weird photo credit to the picture of this subject, which remains to this day, yet the edit differences between yours and the previous edit don't seem to show that you added the text. And neither did they.
I only stumbled on the page as I was using Lupins spellchecker and noticed a photocredit which didn't tie up with the wikimedia commons entry. Initially I suspected it was either in incorrectly uploaded image, or a prank name entered by someone. I'm probably being very naive in not understanding page history very well, but I genuinely can't see how the text 'Photo courtesy of David Gillespie' got onto infobox on that page. It appears not to have been made by the previous editor (Kevpao), nor by you, and both your edits were of just a couple of bytes. So how on earth did it get there? I'm either being incredibly dumb (quite likely), or maybe there was an intermediate edit that was completely deleted, perhaps because it was too offensive to keep in history.
I was minded to simply remove the text credit, but felt it would aid my learning curve if I tried to get to the bottom of it, and you are clearly a very experienced user who can probably set me straight. Any thoughts can offer me would be most appreciated! Parkywiki (talk) 23:36, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
My apologies, I somehow managed to remove one of your comments from the AfD. Another editor restored it. Sorry... reddogsix (talk) 04:23, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
Thank you for your contributions
| |
---|---|
Women Writers worldwide online edit-a-thon
(check out our next event Women in Photography worldwide online edit-a-thon) |
--Ipigott (talk) 13:48, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list)
Seamless Wikipedia browsing. On steroids.
Every time you click a link to Wikipedia, Wiktionary or Wikiquote in your browser's search results, it will show the modern Wikiwand interface.
Wikiwand extension is a five stars, simple, with minimum permission required to keep your browsing private, safe and transparent.