Loading AI tools
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
I noticed that you added the talk page for this article and that you did some clean up work on this article. I wrote this version of the article and I left a note on the article's talk page stating that someone deleted a significant amount of information in the article. I realize I wrote the deleted info, so I may not be the best judge of what has been done. However, would you look into this? Thanks.Bill Pollard (talk) 14:34, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
Hello, There is no further disambiguition required for this film, the Hindi film's title is Ladies and Gentemen whereas the Malayalam film's title is Ladies & Gentleman.
Anish Viswa 05:14, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
The Writer's Barnstar | |
For all of your very hard work to Wikipedia! ;) CURTAINTOAD! TALK! 10:10, 11 January 2013 (UTC) |
In your recent edit summaries (as here) [[Project:AWB|AWB]] is now working! --Tito Dutta (talk) 01:46, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
The allrovi replacement failed on Kuch Kuch Hota Hai, and possibly all other articles. And why did you remove directorial debuts template? BollyJeff | talk 14:01, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
Would you mind if I moved it back? I had given it the name with the dab term because there's also two other potential articles that use the name: the pilot episode of the Planet of the Apes TV series, and (I think) a short story by a notable sci-fi author. Even though those articles don't exist yet, I'd rather take care of the disambiguation possibilities in advance ... in fact WP:DISAMBIG says: "Disambiguation is required whenever, for a given word or phrase on which a reader might search, there is more than one existing Wikipedia article to which that word or phrase might be expected to lead." (emphasis mine). Daniel Case (talk) 05:47, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
Hello Bovineboy2008. Please see my response here. Wikipedia seems to have two different articles about the same upcoming Ram Leela film. One of the articles is now buried in the edit history under a redirect. In my response I suggested some options. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 04:38, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
Since we had an issue with someone making changes to this article, someone else has made drastic changes. He claims his changes make the article completely objective. I strongly beg to differ. Could you have the WikiProject Film coordinators look at this issue? I know once in a while there are cases where Wikipedians have strong disagreements that they themselves cannot resolve. I will not become involved in an edit war, as that is unproductive. Please see my comments on the article talk page. Bill Pollard (talk) 14:11, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
Hello! This is a note to let the main editors of the article List of highest-grossing films know that it will be appearing asthe main page featured list on February 25, 2013. You can view the TFL blurb at Wikipedia:Today's featured list/February 25, 2013. If you think it is necessary to change the main date, you can request it with the featured list directors The Rambling Man (talk · contribs), Dabomb87 (talk · contribs) or Giants2008 (talk · contribs), or at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured list. If the previous blurb needs tweaking, you might change it—following the instructions of the suggested formatting. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page so Wikipedia doesn't look bad. Thanks! Tbhotch.™Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 04:50, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
Traditionally, the highest-grossing films have been war films, musicals andhistorical dramas, but franchise films have been the best performers in the 21st century, especially the Harry Potter, Lord of the Rings andPirates of the Caribbean series. The only films in the top ten that do not form a franchise are the top two, Avatar and Titanic, both directed by James Cameron.Disney has enjoyed success with its Pixar brand, of which the Toy Story films have been the best performers. James Bond, Star Wars, and Indiana Jones are still among the highest-grossing franchises, despite starting over thirty years ago. Gone with the Wind (poster pictured) was the highest-grossing film for 25 years and, adjusting for inflation, would remain so.
You may have an opinion on this: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of VeggieTales characters
Hi... I came across this page Kaalja Teenagers, created today by User:Sukpreet2013, but this article has no references similar to few articles previously created by this user before. Is it okay to nominate it for deletion. Can you do it, since I do not know the steps. Vigyani (talk) 14:59, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
I have removed the redirect, expanded it and nominated for DYK. You can suggest alternative hook or help to expand the lead a bit in summary style! --Tito Dutta (contact) 10:26, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
Please consider adding comment at Talk:Chhota Bheem and the Throne of Bali requested move! Your move was unclear specially when the article was at DYK. --Tito Dutta (contact) 20:56, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
Regarding your revert of a page move from RED 2 toRED 2 (film). MisterShiney (talk · contribs) sent me a "thank you" for my edit summary here. That's apparently the explanation that was missing when he moved the page.
As an admin I won't undo your revert, but I leave it for you to reconsider. The rationale for the move is that the name of an un-released film shouldn't be the primary topic for a title like "Red 2", which is most commonly used to refer to a food dye; therefore the film title should have a disambiguator in it to identify it as a film. ~Amatulić (talk) 01:58, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Raghusri. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to 1 (2013 film) because it did not appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Raghusri 12:56, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to 1 (2013 film). Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of thesandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Raghusri 12:07, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Baahubali. It is consideredvandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to a loss of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Because, who said you that the film will release in 2015. Is there any source? If so please provide a source in the edit summary. Adding a category like that is not good! Raghusri 12:17, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Can you please provide me the link of the page where the Consensus reached regarding Cat addition in articles, because i don't want to engage in edit war. Regards, Raghusri (talk) 11:20, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
Slogging through translations of Arabic is a real pain, but as I have done some work on the article, I invite you to revisit the AFd for The Camp (film). Thanks,Schmidt, MICHAEL Q.08:35, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
At Wolf Totem (film), why remove the release year? It is referenced in the article. It helps to inform readers that it won't come out this year. Erik (talk | contribs) 00:33, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
I saw a little thanks for an edit in my personal notifications (and when did that start btw) and cracked up when I saw what edit you thanked. I don't know why that "agonist" stuff chaps my hide so much but I'm glad others share the distaste. I'm thinking of trying to convince the tv project to adopt a similar take as the film project to the idea. It makes me want to headdesk myself to death. It's almost as bad as "irregardless". Millahnna (talk) 07:46, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
I invite you back to the discussion and request you reconsider. Thank you, Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 19:38, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
Please revisit THIS discussion. Thanks. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 21:22, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
This paragraph has to be removed:
"Reckless desire wreaks havoc over Memorial Day weekend as a family confronts the volatile and fragile nature of love. A modern retelling of Anton Chekhov's "The Seagull", set in rural New England."
It's identical to the imdb page. The information about other details like producer, release date, can also be obtained from imdb web-page, but they are a minor issue. Including these wouldn't violate copyright, contrary to including a complete paragraph.Noholist (talk) 21:50, 3 August 2013 (UTC)
I accidently reverted that edit!
Sorry!
-- L o g X 18:43, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
You did a good thing in moving thisarticle to its proper title under WP:NCF. But we had a few issues arise from the fact that the thing was (and now still is) at AFD at the time. Turns out it was non-admin closed prematurely (which had to be undone). Undoing the close was a bit odd because of the move. (ie: Old AFD title, new article title, resetting delsorts, etc.) I think the issues have all been resolved, but will have to recheck my work/fixes if/when the thing closes properly in a few more days. Cheers. and have a good holiday. Schmidt, Michael Q. 16:12, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
You have redirected the original page of The Mortal Instruments:City of Ashes, please do not delete a page again, or you're reported. Editor86 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Editor 86(talk • contribs) 12:17, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
dab was needed per L'arbitro (1974 film).Cavarrone 18:09, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
could you fix this infobox in this article? seems to be using something very odd. thank you. Frietjes (talk) 23:15, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Hi, I see that you have removed the secondary info. That's okay, but what about the DVD cover from deluxe edition? Is that relevant? The reason I replaced the initial image is because the deluxe edition is the two part film combined. I feel that the new cover would better reflect the article.--NeoBatfreak (talk) 20:30, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
Dear Sir Good Morning!
My Name Is User:Suganya Abishek Please Semi-Protect This Article Muni 3: Ganga
Thankyou Sir have a Nice Day — Preceding unsigned comment added by Suganya Abishek (talk • contribs) 01:44, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
Sorry I saw your TechMove request on Mulan congjun 1939 film and had to contest it. There are so many films with that title that it isn't helpful to remove the thing identifying it. Sorry In ictu oculi (talk)
Hi Bovineboy!
I'm new to editing Wikipedia - I'm a film buff and edited a page on the film Hollow, which an editor (I think you) rolled back, can you give me some guidance as to why, and what I need to do to have the changes accepted?
Many thanks in anticipation.
James
Jamesmayor2002 (talk) 12:21, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Hi, hope you're doing well. :) Regarding Wolf Totem (film) and your category removal here, I'm not understanding your reason. We can verify the release year, and we can apply the year-based category accordingly. Do you think that just the year is too vague for categorization? I don't think it is useful to deprive this article of that listing on that basis. If a film had a specific release date (and was categorized for the given year) was postponed to another specific release date in the following year, we would update that year-based category accordingly. Why couldn't we do that here? 2014 is what we can verify, and barring verification of a postponement to 2015, we should categorize it as a 2014 film. Erik (talk | contribs) 15:33, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
Hi there. I'm not sure if you will disagree with my creation of My Prairie Home (film) with disambiguation, based on the album of the same name by Rae, as an aid to navigation. There is no Wikipedia article for the album. I know you'll move the page if you disagree. Thanks, Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:42, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
I understand that the article Searching for David's Heart is primarily about the novel, with only a small section about the film adaptation. But how does that exclude it from being part of {{WikiProject Film}}? The article contains both a film stub template and film categories, and as far as I can tell, the film information is not covered anywhere else on Wikipedia. Please restore the film project banner, so that the information about the film has a chance to be expanded. Thanks! Fortdj33 (talk) 14:59, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
One of the golden rules of PROD is if it is removed, you can not PROD an article again. I've removed the PROD from Stay Moore: The World of Donald Harrington. Please take it to AFD. Funnyfarmofdoom (talk to me) 19:30, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
I received your comments that there is already a movie titled "The Song" and that page doesn't have the (film) designation like a lot of movies. It's also an obscure film more than 50 years old. Our movie "The Song" will be released across the country next September most likely, We can't guarantee our film will release in 2014. Generally, the protocols are "Movie Title". If there is already a page by that name it's "Movie Title (film)", if that page title is already taken, then there are descriptors like The Song (2014 Film). The Song (film) makes it the most modern and widespread use of a movie title called "The Song" which will receive wide exposure in the coming year. Please do not redirect anymore. — Preceding unsigned comment added by CityOnAHill (talk • contribs) 13:35, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
On my article True Love (Once Removed) -- you removed the production and filming sections, recently. I did not understand the explanation for that removal; the other changes I do understand.
The film itself does not explicitly state a location or setting, but the film was primarily filmed in Iceland, and some inside work in the UK in the credits for the film and Palm Springs Short Fest. Also, it was produced by Thomas Thomas Films, a production company started in 2000 by Kevin Thomas and Philippa Thomas (his wife was producer), and their first short.Kevin Thomas and Thomas Thomas Films, but that section got removed. If due to external links, please explain. Also, and I know you did not mark the page, but it's marked as an Orphan -- the page links back to the main actor's wiki page. Can I remove the Orphan reference? Respectfully and thank you,
Stop to make the changes in Winx Club 3D A Magical Advenutre undo! They're right how it is! If you do it again, I'm going to ask for an edit block for you 217.251.95.139 (talk) 14:45, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
No it dshouldn't! I asked another user and he said it's allowed to stay there! So please stop it now!87.161.197.80 (talk) 11:23, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
The Barnstar of Diligence | ||
For all of the work you do Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 05:54, 23 December 2013 (UTC) |
Hello, how are the holidays going? Will you please take a look at User:Captain Assassin!/sandbox5 and move it to The Interview (2014 film) -? Happy Christmas and holidays :). -- Captain Assassin! ( T -C - G) 05:17, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
Seamless Wikipedia browsing. On steroids.
Every time you click a link to Wikipedia, Wiktionary or Wikiquote in your browser's search results, it will show the modern Wikiwand interface.
Wikiwand extension is a five stars, simple, with minimum permission required to keep your browsing private, safe and transparent.