Loading AI tools
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 |
Is there a general guideline for notability for coaches? The playing career was added on for biographical purposes, but the main notability comes from the coaching career. Would it be helpful to remove the playing career section from the article to shine the focus back on the coaching notability?
Litlmess15 (talk) 18:03, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Apple Maggot Quarantine Area you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jo-Jo Eumerus -- Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 14:21, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PostmarketOS. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 23:44, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
On 31 January 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Oneco, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Oneco referred to the gift of a ceremonial sword from Charles II of England as proof of the legal equality of the Mohegan sachemate with the English monarchy? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Oneco. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Oneco), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Thank You | ||
Thank you for reviewing articles during the 2018 NPP New Year Backlog Drive. Always more to do, but thanks for participating. — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 05:15, 31 January 2018 (UTC) |
You recently reverted some edits I made, stating 'Needs an RS'. Can you clarify as I am a new user? Thanks. --Fidolex (talk) 03:18, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
Hi Chetsford, our last exchange ended thus:
I think that's about it. If you can update these I think it would be in good shape, however, if you don't mind I'll ask a different person to review it. Chetsford (talk) 00:20, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Chetsford - I have revised both. Thank you for the guidance. Before handing over, could you see it to confirm I have understood you correctly though? Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Snathcb (talk • contribs) 00:37, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
By when can I expect the article to be published or the next set of comments, if any?
Snathcb (talk) 04:09, 2 February 2018 (UTC)Sandeep
Thanks Chetsford... will it be reviewed in the regular queue or on priority? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Snathcb (talk • contribs) 04:06, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
Dear Chetsford, thanks for being so approachable, kind and clear. My article has been "Speedily Deleted" by some Indian reviewer. I am in shock as it seems irretrievable and I do not even have a backup of it. Is there a way of at least getting the content, which was valuable time spent on research? I will contest the reviewer but without content what can I do? Snathcb (talk) 10:24, 8 February 2018 (UTC)Sandeep
Help, I have no idea how to add a category as you suggest and have searched for help on Wikipedia, but don't understand it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Whatkatydid (talk • contribs) 10:45, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Helicopter 66 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ed! -- Ed! (talk) 00:21, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
The article Helicopter 66 you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Helicopter 66 for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ed! -- Ed! (talk) 00:42, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:The Harvard Crimson. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for your diligence. LadyofShalott 02:30, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
What do you mean "biography of a living person"??? GentleDjinn (talk) 08:43, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
The article Apple Maggot Quarantine Area you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Apple Maggot Quarantine Area for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jo-Jo Eumerus -- Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:41, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
Backlog update:
New Year Backlog Drive results:
General project update:
If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. 20:32, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
The article Helicopter 66 you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Helicopter 66 for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ed! -- Ed! (talk) 00:41, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Dear community,
Dear Chetsford,
I am again very confused to why my article was declined - again, the same reason was given by you, Dear Chetsford, Mr. Bielicky beeing not notable enough to be included in an Encyclopedia. Since Mr. Bielicky is an European artist, I completely agree, that the referenced bibliography may not be known to every world citizen. But since Mr. Bielicky studied under Nam June-Paik and had exhibitions starting only one year after the beginning of his study in New York, Canada, Japan, China and Europe and has his first major retrospective at the first media museum in history - the ZKM Karlsruhe - this year, I would really love to know, why he could be considered not notable enough. On the topic of the cited bibliography being not independent enough: I count 23 authors and editors from 5 different countries (USA, Germany, Canada, Czech Republic and Greece) in my references that wrote about him and his work.
I dare to add my conversation with Kung as well, who declined my article for very good reasons, that I have done away with, but who as well "thought the references where not independent," which they really are not.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft_talk:Bielicky_Michael Kung: "There is generally no problem with including additional references to help WP:VERIFY content, at least not until you get to the point of Wikipedia:Citation overkill. But all you need to demonstrate WP:NOTABILITY is WP:SIGCOV in multiple (i.e. at least two) WP:RELIABLE sources WP:INDEPENDENT from the subject. One other wrinkle is that comprehensive catalog sites, IMDB for example, are not considered sources for good evidence of notability as there is no editorial control as to what's included; the goal is to include everything. I assumed that ZKM was in that category. Your welcome to resubmit your draft for another look by another reviewer. ~Kvng (talk) 14:49, 2 October 2017 (UTC)"
Thank You in advance for any help you can send me.
Best regards, Paul
MPhilMediaArt (talk) 14:12, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Dear Chetsford,
thank You for Your lightning fast and kind response.
Regarding the point:
- Mr. Bielicky's Menorah/Inventur is a "videosculpture" which - as an art term - was not established in Germany when he created it - only by the end of the year he created it, in December 1989, Wulf Herzogenrath and Edith Decker published the seminal catalogue "Video - Skulptur retrospektiv und aktuell: 1963 - 1989."
- Mr. Bielicky was the first media artist, who used a - to that time - military grade GPS-system to track the Biblical Exodus in the Negev desert and documented this data in an early netscape website (documented in reference 18. Karl Gerbel, Peter Weibel. (Ed.): Exhibition Catalogue: Ars Electronica 95: Mythos Information. Welcome to the Wired World. Springer, Vienna. 1995. pp. 214 ff. ISBN 9783791318691), he is today known for installations of pictogram projections, that are generated by real-time Twitter- and YahooFinance-data, a concept that he started in 2009 with the "Garden"-series.
Please let me know if this information is of any value to You. Best regards, Paul — Preceding unsigned comment added by MPhilMediaArt (talk • contribs) 12:14, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
Hello:
The copy edit that you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Helicopter 66 has been completed.
There were only a few minor changes made.
Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.
Regards,
Twofingered Typist (talk) 22:14, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Jonreillythr (talk) 02:56, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
I am asking what are you looking for because the reason for denial were generic. Is it the sourcing which are good sourcing or another reason you are not advising. As a Op Ed for WSJ and repporter for LA Times Entertainment Section this is a figure that meets similar subjects on Wilkipedia. In fact some Wilkipedia subject matter strains credulity as to its' importance. I would request additional guidance or feedback as to your denial. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jonreillythr (talk • contribs)
Now ypu are questioning my credentials as a Op Ed Writer for the Wall Street Journal and writer for Los Angeles Times Entertainment Section along with various pieces in The Hollywood Reporter and Variety? I find your tone to be very demeaning and quite frankly sexist. You put reality show stars in your pages but not a executive that was not Mr. Spacey's "dogwalker" but Agent along with Dr. Dre and Guy Ritchie. What meets your standards of noteworthy? I am not going to fein myself as a Publicist I am a Journalist that covers the Entertainment Industry. So rather than barrage me with your demaning comments how about providing some insight of what fits your idea of a reputable figure? Also ten emmy nominations with 4 wins. I ask that another party review my submission. I find your comments to me as stated before demaning, sexist and unprofessional. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jonreillythr (talk • contribs)
I do what are your credentials? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jonreillythr (talk • contribs)
I read your unsubstainated claim that I was Mr. Walterschied, where did that come from? Fein means pretend and my statement was I am not his publicist. I am a Journalist. Again you have a very demaning mannerism and I ask for someone to review your comments to me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jonreillythr (talk • contribs) 00:47, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
Your credentials are having a drivers license again showing your demaning and bullying tactics. I would like you to explain to the Wilkipedia community your credentials as a editor. Are you a Journalist or a internet bully. Seems that you are sexist and a bully. I will speak to my editors at WSJ on how to file a formal complaint against your bullying sexist behavior and see where that goes. This is your platform for showing you have some power you probably never attained in life. It is sad when people like you arethe ones reviewing articles and making decisions. Why cant you tell us your work experience. I have given mine with the WSJ, LA Times, Variety and Daily Beast. What are yours? What qualifies you to make decisions from a piece on Donald Trump to as you referenced Jacck the Ripper?04:51, 13 February 2018 (UTC)04:51, 13 February 2018 (UTC)~~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jonreillythr (talk • contribs)
On 11 February 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Tripwire force, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a tripwire can be used to prevent salami attacks? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Tripwire force. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Tripwire force), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Government Army (Bohemia and Moravia) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Zawed -- Zawed (talk) 02:02, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ames family, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Amyas (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:43, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
Hi Chetsford. Just a courtesy note to advise you that I've closed an RFC you initiated, at Talk:Apple_Maggot_Quarantine_Area#Request_for_Comment:_Description_of_the_Quarantine_Area_in_the_Lede. Apologies for the delay in closing this RFC, there is a backlog of RFC closures which is being worked through. All the best, Fish+Karate 14:50, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
On 13 February 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Disability History Month, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that while five of the states of the US observe a variation of Disability History Month in October, it is unofficially observed in the United Kingdom from November to December? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Disability History Month. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Disability History Month), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Hey There, sorry for the delayed response. I am trying to understand the issues as to why the page for RuListing is not being accepted. RuListing is a company I work for and we want to get a basic wiki page in place. We figured the information was following the general standards for wikipedia so not sure what we would have to change to get it to post?
thanks -Dan Dankitchen (talk) 17:21, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of J.E. Rhoads & Sons at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 00:44, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:""Helicopter U.S. Navy 66".ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:43, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of Jaroslav Eminger at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Argento Surfer (talk) 15:22, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
On 17 February 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Pacific Architects and Engineers, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that during the Vietnam War, Pacific Architects and Engineers provided cover for the CIA's Phoenix Program? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Pacific Architects and Engineers. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Pacific Architects and Engineers), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Alex Shih (talk) 00:01, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 |
Seamless Wikipedia browsing. On steroids.
Every time you click a link to Wikipedia, Wiktionary or Wikiquote in your browser's search results, it will show the modern Wikiwand interface.
Wikiwand extension is a five stars, simple, with minimum permission required to keep your browsing private, safe and transparent.