Loading AI tools
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 35 | Archive 36 | Archive 37 | Archive 38 | Archive 39 |
Since I screwed up last month, I only did the FAS numbers I was sure of this month (I left FA demotions and ΔFAs blank for now). If you have a chance, could you (or a TPS) please check my numbers and fill in the last two stats? Thanks, Ruhrfisch ><>°° 03:09, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
You may want to have a chat with User:RealProffesional Yes. -- Ϫ 06:37, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
Hi DaBomb!
Thanks for closing that. Even a few minutes exposure to that article (and its sequel) gave me nightmares last night.
There are several lists that were supported by both myself and TRM, and neither of us seems to want to close them. Therefore, you are the one who logically should close these lists. FLC could use the closures, too, as the process is rather jammed at the moment. Please take a look at FLC when you get some free time. Thanks. Giants2008 (27 and counting) 18:34, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
Hello,
Inoticed you have semi-protected the Turk Telekom Arena page due to edit warring. The problem with the page is about the "owner" field about the stadium. The stadium has been built by and owned by the "Turkish General Directorate of Youth and Sports", this is publicly known and there is no discussion about this ownership, there's even a big sign on the stadium that reads "This stadium is owned by the GSGM" here's the news: [] GSGM being the Turkish initials of Youth and Sports general directorate []. Here's another resource [] Problem is this club's fans in WP keep editing the ownership as if it's owned by the club, Galatasaray SK, which is not the case - and again there's no discoussion about who owns the stadium, there's no bogus situation, it's publicly very well known. Now the page is protected, and the "Owner" field remains as the club, so when the protection is removed the edit warring will resume. With this information, could you please change this field and end this meaningless issue? Thanks very much for your help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pisarro (talk • contribs) 03:13, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
I totally screwed up the Stony Brook University Track article when I erroneously moved it, numerous times. Can you please move Stony Brook UniveristyTrack back to "Stony Brook University Track" and then deleted the crappy redirect? Thanks! Jrcla2 (talk) 15:15, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
If schools see "The Human Centipede" as a front-page "can't avoid looking at it," Featured Article they will block Wikipedia. Imagine yourself as an elementary school principal and you saw 5th graders looking at the front page of Wikipedia with "The Human Centipede," as the FA. What do you do next? Abe Froman (talk) 03:29, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
I noticed that this article has been under semi-protection since May 2011. Requesting unprotection to see if previous vandalism-level will re-occur. Shearonink (talk) 01:41, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
FYI: Per discussion at Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors, I've written a new TFA summary for the Battle of Tippecanoe here. Thanks! —Kevin Myers 10:40, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
Hi, are you able to do FC for two weeks? Please see my note at the newsroom. Tony (talk) 11:37, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
I require your urgent attention at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured list/November 2011. Nightw 12:57, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
Hi again. Could you uncontroversially please move St. Francis College Terriers men's basketball → St. Francis Terriers men's basketball? Per WP:CBBALL naming conventions, there shouldn't be a "College" or "University" in its title. Thanks! Jrcla2 (talk) 18:51, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
Hi. I just semi-protected SS Edmund Fitzgerald for two weeks, and also applied move protection for the same time period. I noticed after doing this that you had already move-protected the page, but for a shorter period of time, because it was to appear (and apparently is now appearing) as TFA. I assume there's no harm in my having extended the move protection past what you did, but if you see a problem that I'm overlooking, please feel free to revert what I did. — Richwales (talk) 04:46, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
Question: if William de St-Calais is protected (in advance of upcoming TFA), why doesn't it look protected? --Kenatipo speak! 23:50, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
I completely rewrote the lead of Blackbeard and therefore also the TFA blurb. Did I do it right? I'm ignorant of any technical restrictions. Parrot of Doom 23:57, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
Can someone add "and Bishop of Durham" to the end of the first sentence of the TFA blurb? --Kenatipo speak! 03:23, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
We have no TFA for the 26th at the moment. — Edokter (talk) — 00:13, 26 November 2011 (UTC)
New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello Dabomb87/Archive 38! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.
Please click HERE to take part. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey |
03:10, 1 December 2011 (UTC)
Hi, Dabomb87. Could you be kind and tell my why Princess Maria Amélia of Brazil won't be TFA's on next 1 December even though it had three people supporting it? You chose in its place instead School for Creative and Performing Arts. Is it really more important than the 180th anniversary of the princess' birth? Maria Amélia's article was promoted on 16 April 2011 by eight different reviewers and not it's simply not good enough? Just because Malleus Fatuorum said so? I warned on the article's nomination that Malleus Fatuorum and I share a history of enmity and that his opinion was biased and it seems no one cared. That's very unfair. I have several featured articles on my back, such as Pedro Álvares Cabral, Empire of Brazil and Pedro II of Brazil (all three TFA too) and Maria Amélia's isn't worth it? Couldn't you place School for Creative and Performing Arts's on another day? Regards, --Lecen (talk) 16:27, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
Hi,
Just a head-up. There is what seems to be a genuine request for un-semi-protecting the Zombie article here: Talk:Zombie#Can_we_unprotect_this_until_9_Dec.3F. According to the page log you applied the semiprotection over a year ago. Cheers, Squiddy | (squirt ink?) 20:14, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
Please see Wikipedia_talk:Today's_featured_article#Alert:_system_not_working.3F. Ta, Trafford09 (talk) 16:11, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
Please consider running "U.S. state reptiles" in your TFL slot.TCO (talk) 16:30, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
FYI, a complaint (and my response) at WP:ERRORS. Regards, BencherliteTalk 19:11, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
I am the person who has done the most edits to Mary Anning and I would like to be around to help patrol the article when it runs on the main page. I will not be available to do that around the 16th. Also I was really hoping to try and get this article run on the main page closer to or preferably on her birthday on May 21. Rusty Cashman (talk) 23:49, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
Hi, How do you see what articles are going to be scheduled as a Main Page Feature article?--Abebenjoe (talk) 19:04, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
see barnstar page 22:06, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 35 | Archive 36 | Archive 37 | Archive 38 | Archive 39 |
Seamless Wikipedia browsing. On steroids.
Every time you click a link to Wikipedia, Wiktionary or Wikiquote in your browser's search results, it will show the modern Wikiwand interface.
Wikiwand extension is a five stars, simple, with minimum permission required to keep your browsing private, safe and transparent.