Loading AI tools
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 5 | ← | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 | Archive 11 |
I can use a simpler English if you are unable to understand why the article was at AFD. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 04:20, 29 April 2015 (UTC) This may be far too advanced but I'll try and show you a little history here. Lazada Philippines and Lazada Malaysia and yet another Lazada Vietnam which are all suprisingly or not so surprisingly owned by Tada Rocket Internet which for the most part have been written by one editor User:Thesentenceformulator. Maybe know a little history or have the decency to do something useful before you prat on about coherence. It's amazing what a person can understand if they act or research and say ask about why they did something. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 04:30, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
If I thought it needed cleanup I'd tag it for cleanup we have a reason to delete as it would taken a rewrite to become encyclopedic its a CSD and when this was contested afd was the next step. If you don't like that rationale feel free to change community consensus but it is an recognized community reason for deletion. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 20:38, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
I have no intention of leaving promotional pages uncontested when they need a rewrite.—Excellent! Thanks for your hard work on these, ErikHaugen (talk | contribs) 21:44, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
By motion, the Arbitration Committee authorises the following injunction effective immediately:
You are receiving this message because you have commented about this matter on the AN page, the AE page or the Case Requests page
and are therefore restricted as specified in (2). For the Arbitration Committee, L235 (t / c / ping in reply) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:30, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
You are receiving this message either because you are a party to the Arbitration enforcement arbitration case, because you have commented in the case request, or the AN or AE discussions leading to this arbitration case, or because you have specifically opted in to receiving these messages. Unless you are a party to this arbitration case, you may opt out of receiving further messages at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Arbitration enforcement/Notification list. The drafters of the Arbitration enforcement arbitration case have published a revised timetable for the case, which changes what you may have been told when the case was opened. The dates have been revised as follows: the Evidence phase will close 5 July 2015, one week earlier than originally scheduled; the Workshop phase will close 26 July 2015, one week later than originally scheduled; the Proposed decision is scheduled to be posted 9 August 2015, two weeks later than originally scheduled. Thank you. On behalf of the arbitration clerks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:58, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
This message is sent at 12:53, 5 July 2015 (UTC) by Arbitration Clerk User:Penwhale via MassMessage on behalf of the Arbitration Committee. You are receiving this message because your name appears on this list and have not elected to opt-out of being notified of development in the arbitration case.
On 5 July, 2015, the following motion was passed and enacted:
Pavlov's RfA reward Thank for !voting at my recent RfA. You voted Support so you get a whopping three cookies, fresh from the oven! |
You participated in a Burma RM in the past so I'm informing you of another RM. I hope I didn't miss anyone. New move attempt of Burma>Myanmar Fyunck(click) (talk) 09:49, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
Hi there. I saw you removed my speedy tag on this page. I'm just wondering if you can explain why you did. I'm not doubting you that I shouldn't have placed the tag. But I'd like to learn why I was wrong so that I can better understand the speedy deletion criteria in question. Cheers! Mww113 (talk) 21:12, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi there,
I am reviving the July 2011 proposal to move this article on grounds of both usage and grammatical logic. For more details please see my talk page post.
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:57, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:54, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
Hei, Du slettet mitt første forsøk på å lage en engelsk side på dirigenten Terje Mikkelsen. Jeg vil nå gjøre et nytt forsøk, etter å har vært på skriveverksted for Wikimedia og har fått større kjennskap til Wikipedias behov for lenker og referanser. Det er et problem at så mye av hans virksomhet har vært i russisktalende land og Kina, men jeg tror jeg nå har skaffet nok engelsk dokumentsajon til at en artikkel skal bli holdbar. OK? Hilde Holbæk-Hanssen (talk) 19:24, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
Thank you. Sorry, you have a very Norwegian name. Hilde Holbæk-Hanssen (talk) 07:52, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Since you participated in a recently closed (no consensus) move discussion for Real Robot, I’m just notifying you of an RFC on that title. —67.14.236.50 (talk) 21:41, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Hello, ErikHaugen. This message is intended to notify administrators of important changes to the protection policy.
Extended confirmed protection (also known as "30/500 protection") is a new level of page protection that only allows edits from accounts at least 30 days old and with 500 edits. The automatically assigned "extended confirmed" user right was created for this purpose. The protection level was created following this community discussion with the primary intention of enforcing various arbitration remedies that prohibited editors under the "30 days/500 edits" threshold to edit certain topic areas.
In July and August 2016, a request for comment established consensus for community use of the new protection level. Administrators are authorized to apply extended confirmed protection to combat any form of disruption (e.g. vandalism, sock puppetry, edit warring, etc.) on any topic, subject to the following conditions:
Please review the protection policy carefully before using this new level of protection on pages. Thank you.
This message was sent to the administrators' mass message list. To opt-out of future messages, please remove yourself from the list. 17:47, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Hello,
Please note that TOTP based two-factor authentication is now available for all administrators. In light of the recent compromised accounts, you are encouraged to add this additional layer of security to your account. It may be enabled on your preferences page in the "User profile" tab under the "Basic information" section. For basic instructions on how to enable two-factor authentication, please see the developing help page for additional information. Important: Be sure to record the two-factor authentication key and the single use keys. If you lose your two factor authentication and do not have the keys, it's possible that your account will not be recoverable. Furthermore, you are encouraged to utilize a unique password and two-factor authentication for the email account associated with your Wikimedia account. This measure will assist in safeguarding your account from malicious password resets. Comments, questions, and concerns may be directed to the thread on the administrators' noticeboard. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:32, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
I might have taken it even vaguely seriously, if it hadn't been an IP, who was referring to WP:ZEN. Not exactly a high credibility source. Thanks, Luc "Somethingorother" French 02:57, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
Hi ErikHaugen.
A new user group, New Page Reviewer, has been created in a move to greatly improve the standard of new page patrolling. The user right can be granted by any admin at PERM. It is highly recommended that admins look beyond the simple numerical threshold and satisfy themselves that the candidates have the required skills of communication and an advanced knowledge of notability and deletion. Admins are automatically included in this user right.
It is anticipated that this user right will significantly reduce the work load of admins who patrol the performance of the patrollers. However,due to the complexity of the rollout, some rights may have been accorded that may later need to be withdrawn, so some help will still be needed to some extent when discovering wrongly applied deletion tags or inappropriate pages that escape the attention of less experienced reviewers, and above all, hasty and bitey tagging for maintenance. User warnings are available here but very often a friendly custom message works best.
If you have any questions about this user right, don't hesitate to join us at WT:NPR. (Sent to all admins).MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:46, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello, ErikHaugen. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
This band is a proper noun and they spell their name as I've changed it, hence why I'm making sure it is fully capitalized based on reputable sources - here, here, here, here, here, and here - just to name a few, all found after spending 10 seconds doing a simple Google search. Just wanted you to know, I'm going to revert your edits given the misunderstanding. Thanks, Garchy (talk) 18:42, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
Three years! |
---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:59, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2017). This first issue is being sent out to all administrators, if you wish to keep receiving it please subscribe. Your feedback is welcomed.
13:36, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
Hi Erik, When looking for the "In Therapy" page this evening, I saw that it had been deleted by you on 24 January 2017. I see that it was something to do with copyright. I was just wondering what it was that breached copyright, as the format of the page looked like a lot of other similar pages regarding television programmes. - Scaz (talk) 23:00, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
Pages for many other TV programmes have been created with a short description of the programme that has not been deemed as infringing copyright– hopefully because they don't infringe copyright law... ErikHaugen (talk | contribs) 23:54, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
I believe it was you that was responsible for deleting the 4 Holi Wikis on AVL. Why did you delete these pages? I believe they are worth billions in educating humanity. If you cannot supply an adequate explanation I will take the matter further.
Since they have been deleted I have gone on to develop Calculus. Effectively you deleted the foundations of Calculus of Computers.NNcNannara (talk) 13:18, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Erik, I appreciate that there's a lot of text there, but as you alerted me to the issue, I'd be grateful if you could find time to comment at Template talk:Speciesbox#Default number of parent taxa displayed. Peter coxhead (talk) 22:39, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Cheers for the close at Ender's Game. Nice to see your username pop up at RM again. Jenks24 (talk) 09:23, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello, ErikHaugen. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Four years! |
---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:44, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
I was asking for the version I uploaded to be deleted. After I uploaded it I could see that it blurry and inferior. Can you please delete my upload of that file. Thanx, - FlightTime (open channel) 19:34, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
Hello, ErikHaugen. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello ErikHaugen,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Spheniscus urbinai for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. Take a look at our suggestions for essential content in short articles to learn what should be included.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.
I just did a whole reading of the page move request again and would like to know what had convinced you to believe that "Sadhguru" is a popular honorific. If so, then you must have discovered multiple people using the title "Sadhguru", except this individual and if not, then you must have bought a rather deceptive argument made by a very small bunch of editors who did nothing but badgered entire RM by engaging in petty POV pushing. Who else, other than Jaggi Vasudev, is known as Sadhguru? And you have totally overlooked that majority of reliable sources "typically write out the subject's name" as Sadhguru, not "Jaggi Vasudev", because from this month alone, we see find reliable news media referring him as Sadhguru, though I can't discover any sources written in English, that referred him as "Jaggi Vasudev" in the story's title. Qualitist (talk) 23:59, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
you please abstain from any further commenting over the MRV? That's one heck of a discussion and you are making the closer's job incredibly tedious by replying to every point made by every user. Any argument from the other-side that has been already (seemingly) voided by you need not be re-rebutted anywhere in the discussion. Thanks,∯WBGconverse 12:42, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
Hi, sorry if my messy request wasn't to clear! But I requested that this article to be renamed into Burma Independence Army, not Burmese, since Burma Independence Army is the common name for them rather than Burmese.
--Havsjö (talk) 00:50, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
Erik,
I just wanted to apologize to you for some of the things I said to and about you in the wreck of a discussion at Wikipedia:Move_review/Log/2018_November#Jaggi_Vasudev. In my head I was just ribbing you in a friendly debate, but I must say when I look back at my words weeks later, I wince. Our fundamental disagreement about that close stands, but you did not deserve to be talked to the way I did. If you ever see me interacting with you or anyone else in such an inappropriate matter, please do not hesitate to bring my attention to it, though I do believe it's highly unlikely to occur again. Please remember I do respect you as an editor and closer, and have no reason to not respect you as a person, no matter how harsh my words may have sounded. I'm sincerely sorry about that.
--В²C ☎ 01:31, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
Seamless Wikipedia browsing. On steroids.
Every time you click a link to Wikipedia, Wiktionary or Wikiquote in your browser's search results, it will show the modern Wikiwand interface.
Wikiwand extension is a five stars, simple, with minimum permission required to keep your browsing private, safe and transparent.