Loading AI tools
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 5 | ← | Archive 10 | Archive 11 | Archive 12 | Archive 13 | Archive 14 | Archive 15 |
Thanks for rolling back the vandalism on the Carlo Ancelotti. I don't have rollback rights and was getting ready to do manual reverts. The user noted above is on a roll. Vandalism only account. Cindamuse (talk) 13:28, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
Hi, I was placing Promise (personality development for kids) on my user page to ask for help on how to modify it. It was not my intention to promote anything. I had placed a question on the help desk saying that I was ready to make any and all changes that were needed to reinstate the article. An editor had adviced me to post the article on the user page and then encourage people to suggest modifications, by going to the Wikipedia: Requests for Feedback. I had changed the infobox from the original article, and wanted some direction in what else needed changes. I would appreciate any feedback you could give me. Looking4solutions (talk) 16:19, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
Was not span... was informative. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Haconti1 (talk • contribs) 20:38, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
Yes the website I have posted sells paint but it also offers free information to boat owners, Iam in no way associated with the website just a customer who had trouble finding relevant paints and finishes for my boats and I would appreciate it if you were to stop calling me a spammer. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Haconti1 (talk • contribs) 20:42, August 25, 2010 (UTC)
I was rather amused by the example of shooting oneself in the foot at User talk:Marklmarklmarkl. I had actually been intending to contact you to suggest that an indef block was a bit harsh for a couple of bits of fairly low-level vandalism, until the defendant's incompetent attempt at mounting a defence provided such an effective case for the prosecution. JamesBWatson (talk) 13:21, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
Thank you. Phoebus de Lusignan (talk) 16:21, 26 August 2010 (UTC) How do I or we solve this? How can I prevent some arbitrary revertion if I'm not here while the discussion takes place? Phoebus de Lusignan (talk) 16:21, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
Paul McCartney |
---|
http://www.rollingstone.com/music/lists/6027/32782/32884 it;s copyright free and more beautiful one —Preceding unsigned comment added by Taro-Gabunia (talk • contribs) 16:09, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
can understand me what's happening? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Taro-Gabunia (talk • contribs) 22:27, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
it's only text copyrighted http://www.rollingstone.com/music/lists/5945/32609/32664 this photo is copyrighted and paul's one not —Preceding unsigned comment added by Taro-Gabunia (talk • contribs) 22:31, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
see this link: http://www.rollingstone.com/music/lists/5945/32609/32664 beneath the picture: Putland/Retna see this link: http://www.rollingstone.com/music/lists/6027/32782/32884 beneath the picture: nothing it makes me think that that image is copyright free and i have question paul mccartney's page is not protected and favourited and lennon's on eis. why? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Taro-Gabunia (talk • contribs) 22:39, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
and flickr photos??? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Taro-Gabunia (talk • contribs) 22:42, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
and what if i add to the photo: "copyright Rolling Stone magazine"? and what about featured article? John Lennon's article is protected and featured and McCartney's one - not ←[edit conflicts] :Taro-Gabunia, you are misunderstanding. In the absence of a clear statement that the photo is not copyright protected, or that the copyright is held by someone other than Rolling Stone/Jann Wenner (the case with the Jimmy Page photo), we have to assume that it is covered by the overall copyright on the bottom of the page. If you were to find such a clear statement of the photo being free - which I highly doubt you will - then we might be able to use it, but of course then we'd have to see if the consensus of the page's editors is to change the photo from the one currently in use. You can assume that something is copyright protected - you can't assume it is not. Hope this helps - you seem to be trying to improve the article, but this is not the way to do it. Cheers. Tvoz/talk 22:47, 27 August 2010 (UTC) And, you can't just add a copyright notice, you need permission from the copyright holder to reprint it. Tvoz/talk 22:49, 27 August 2010 (UTC) http://img265.imageshack.us/img265/4774/11paulmccartney.jpg and what about LENNON page? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Taro-Gabunia (talk • contribs) 22:50, 27 August 2010 (UTC) http://www.flickr.com/photos/kubacheck/3782013509/ i this photo copyrighted? i mean if i sign up on filckr, ulpoad mentioned image will i be able to use that cute image on wikipedia? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Taro-Gabunia (talk • contribs) 22:57, 27 August 2010 (UTC) [another edit conflict] Finally (sorry Favonian for hijacking your talk) - decisions about protecting pages are based on the level of vandalism that takes place there - and an article being "featured" is based on the quality of the article. One article has nothing to do with the other, nor is it a commentary on the relative merits of Lennon and McCartney as musicians, writers, or human beings. Tvoz/talk 23:00, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
does anyonehave flickr account to upload that photo? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Taro-Gabunia (talk • contribs) 23:04, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
ok than can you remove that photo of paul raising two thumbs up?????????????????????????????????????????? and i have question in georgian version of paul's page, it's პოლ მაკ-კარტნი and should be პოლ მაკარტნი can i rename it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Taro-Gabunia (talk • contribs) 23:10, 27 August 2010 (UTC) |
As I stated, there is no consensus reached for the current wording, feel free to find, there is not. If the current wording has not been established through consensus and merely words of an Armenian, it can't be expected others should reach a consensus to change it. That wording is going to change.
About 1RR rule, I have not violated the rule, I have made a change and other people attacked my edit with reverts I merely corrected their revert, not the other way around. So the blocking from edit is invalid and aganist WP rules. Please lift it. Tmhm --95.211.88.136 (talk) 08:08, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
I did consider that. But searching online and on the news, the aways is better known as the "European Footballer of the Year" in English. MaxO1897 (talk) 12:13, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
Please don't edit war (Racism and ethnic discrimination in Israel), I have explained why it doesn't belong, on that talk page.Stud1989 (talk) 10:48, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
Please explain yourself, Favonian, in response to this edit. Good luck! Drmies (talk) 19:25, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
<--"Snaps" as in schnapps, I would imagine...and yes, I'll have one, since I'm not done for the night. As for admin abuse, I probably have more overlap with User:ChildofMidnight than most around here, and so if anyone has to take over his role, it ought to be me. I'll see you at ANI, if you dare defend your reckless and unilateral actions against good-faith contributors. Drmies (talk) 01:24, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
Your suggestions sound good. I'm off Wiki for the next few hours, if you feel like taking the lead, but I can do it later today if not. I was looking into prod'ing the Martyrs Shrine page; it seems to have some notability issues. If you have any thoughts or feel like checking it out, I had not done any real research yet. Thanks for the work! --TeaDrinker (talk) 20:09, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
You've deleted "Carl Daniel Taylor" sadly people were defacing it with statements about homosexuality.. could you please reinstate the page and disallow those people from adding such remarks.. we miss Carl's page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jimjamtaphead (talk • contribs) 10:57, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
Each detail of his life has had it's truth expanded, I'll admit that, but the background stories and information from the original version are completely true.. I hope you can bring it back.. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jimjamtaphead (talk • contribs) 11:04, 1 September 2010 (UTC) I take it you're not going to put the page back up because you have nothing better to do that remove people's wiki pages... So, assumption made, criticism not required.
The edit to the Greg Rust page was valid. The announcement was done on the Channel Ten news, which featured Mark Webber, Daniel Ricciardo and the announcement that Rust would also be a part of the action. Of course i could not reference it because the "Festival of Speed" website is still in construction. The edit was valid enough not to warrant the removal of the information and certainly not the locking of the page. I find it insulting that you also did not give a reason for your reverting of my edit. If you think this is the way to create a community based on individual knowledge, you're going about it the wrong way. Very disappointing from a member who suggests that he does good. Some of the edits on this page, however, would suggest that it's a cover for an individual wanting to gain a sense of personal achievement. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.164.227.94 (talk) 13:36, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
Is it not reasonable to place down something with the expectancy of having a reference within the next 24 hours? It was hardly unconstructive. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.164.227.94 (talk) 13:42, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
All statements? Even the comment on Ernst Rohm: "By this time, Röhm and Hitler were so close that they addressed each other as du"? That's not referenced. Then it shouldn't be there. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.164.227.94 (talk) 13:47, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
Happily. When the website is completed, within a short period of time, i will provide a reference. In the meantime, you may revert the page in what we'll call a good-faith move from you. Thank you for your generosity. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.164.227.94 (talk • contribs)
Seems a bit unfair, doesn't it? Not allowing an edit that would appear to be reasonable just because the period of time to which it will take the reference to be located is a few hours? Can't help but think there's a superiority complex here. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.164.227.94 (talk) 14:05, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
it is not a hoax, this word is real. u let people edit real things and make them completly ridiculous and false but u do not allow something that is real. soarp i a climbing maneuver. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Br3n8 (talk • contribs) 18:28, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
I hope the pages I created suit the Wikipedia standards better now?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plastic_tears
--DarkPistolero (talk) 10:44, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
That was quick!
You must be bored!! ;-)
(Thanks for such a quick response!) Cheers, Pdfpdf (talk) 14:22, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
hello favonian,
my page was deleted again... the reason is: (G12: Unambiguous copyright infringement: http://www.electrogarden.com/music/egn/amGod/)
i made a copy of my article, before i posted my article. but can't find this link?!? the link was included in an older article, but after the first deletion, i erased all link, which seems not correct. i let only the bands and the labels webpage.
i'm the mastermind of this music band... so i don't understand why it's deleted again.
hope you can help me ... enclosed i sent you the script of my article...
thanks a lot all the best! dominik van reich
How can i Block Favonian ? or Attack Wikipedia ? —Preceding unsigned comment added by GaPpLr (talk • contribs) 10:37, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
castigat ridendo mores castigat ridendo mores
damnant quodnon intelligunt
parturient montes, nascetur ridiculus mus
facile est inventis addere
facile largire de alieno
facile omnes quom valemus recta consilia aegrotis damus
cacoethes carpendi
cacoethes loquendi
cacoethes scribendi cacoethes . —Preceding unsigned comment added by GaPpLr (talk • contribs) 10:54, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
Hey, what's up? I realise you've been in my face about vandalism, but seriously, my user name is MessinUup4ev, how much more obvious can it get. Anywho, that's that, have a nice day. —Preceding unsigned comment added by MessinUup4ev (talk • contribs) 19:15, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
Hi, Favonian! I heard the IP address 98.177.155.42 got block, and he's currently requesting unblock. He promises not to do damage/disruption to Wikipedia, understands the reason for the block, and will just do the useful ones. The blocking admin(istrator) was Ckatz, so can you discuss the block with him/her? Thank you!
97.65.112.182 (talk) 23:06, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
WHY WAS THIS DELETED, I LOVE THESE GUYS. BEST BAND EVER, YOU PROBABLY DELETED THIER PAGE BECAUSE YOUR HOMO-PHOBIC. PLEASE PLEASE RECONSIDER. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.122.219.242 (talk) 08:45, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
Hello, Why did you remove the Dirtyphonics page ? It was clean and welldone, respecting the rules... Why don't you help to upgrade instead of destruct ? Best regards —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.64.218.229 (talk) 09:16, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
Thanks Favonian, I have read this already. This band is touring all around the world, has won awards, has released records, has been first in the UK charts, was published in the press several times, was on the air on radios like BBC1... etc. Not enough? By the way, the music has evolved a lot these last years and this requirements list is a bit aged... who is responsible of it ? Some of the reguirements look very unconstructive to me. For example, what if a band is not in the charts or "golden record" because it gives his music instead of selling it ? What if a band has created a new style of music and stays a "small band" when big popstars are on Wikipedia just for doing a stupid remix ? Wikipedia can be desapointing some time ! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.64.218.229 (talk) 10:08, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
For your good work. Cheers, JNW (talk) 11:36, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
"complaints by musical wannabes", you are so cute. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.64.218.229 (talk) 12:27, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
This is not a sufficient reason to be unpolite and disrespectful. (81.64.218.229 (talk) 13:04, 6 September 2010 (UTC))
HEY ! you need to stop reverting the information on "ikechukwu ndefo" cuz its false. i have deleted it so many times. i have signed it as well. please stop reverting it as the information is false. thanks Chichi beybuh (talk) 10:35, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
hi, if possible delete the whole article on "ikechukwu ndefo" go on the maersk sealand website and you will see that he is not the CEO so why would wikipedia not remove false information on him. Please delete it because i have tried and it keeps saying insufficient explanation. I have explained enough; he is not the CEO. someone else is. Chichi beybuh (talk) 10:42, 8 September 2010 (UTC) sept 7th 2010
alright thanks. i have done so. thanks. Chichi beybuh (talk) 10:59, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
Hi Takabeg. Could I ask you to use English in talk page discussions? Comments such as User talk:Tmhm#Slm may be intended only for the user in question, but talk pages should be readable to any editor taking an interest in the discussion. Please see WP:TPG for the guidelines. Thank you. Favonian (talk) 11:07, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
Can I delete some part of a user's talk page reply if he calls me a racist there? I deleted the word racist as this word does not help improve the article discussed. See http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Daraheni&diff=prev&oldid=383372983 Kavas (talk) 13:21, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
Dear Favonian, I was wondering whether it would be all right with you if I were to borrow the perspective, temperament, and structure of the answers you gave in your RfA. I've studied quite a few RfAs - almost fifty odd of them - and somehow have found your answers to be mirroring my thoughts. As I really appreciated the straightforwardness you showed in your RfA, I wanted to model my future RfA answers on your answers. Thence, the request. Sincere regards. ♪ ♫ Wifione ♫ ♪ ―Œ ♣Łeave Ξ мessage♣ 16:07, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
Hi Favonian, FYI I've quoted some CSD tags in an RFA !vote, including one that you deleted - you might want to see Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Wifione. Regards ϢereSpielChequers 22:00, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for this. A few more weeks and they'll rediscover Space, Time and Spacetime. Hold on to your trousers... Cheers - DVdm (talk) 16:42, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
Beat me to it, removing the tags! I hadn't forgotten; just slow. Cheers! Chzz ► 13:30, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
tks • Ling.Nut 12:18, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
Hi, sorry I did not want to delete, just put to the end of that stupid discussion some sources.
The fact that in the article more than a half is on the guy's descent not his deeds, due to some Romanian users who try to capitalize Hunyadi's possible Romanian descent. But the healthy ratio would be descent 10%, deeds-works-writings-battles won 80% death 10%. Check the comments, theey are on how many Hungatrians lived inb Hungary in diffeent times, what was her mother/father, I just listed 4 contemporary or 50 years later writers and what they said in 15th-16th century.
--Vargatamas (talk) 20:27, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
The Resilient Barnstar | ||
To Favonian, for putting up with the most ridiculous personal attacks and overall unmerited bullshit. I hereby award you this barnstar for your resilience and good handling of such egregious comments. -Tommy! 23:29, 11 September 2010 (UTC) |
Can you tell me why this page is flagged? If this is flagged for deletion, then this page should be also "I Wear Your Shirt" as it is very similar. Please advise.
Kshe95 (talk) 23:55, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
Kshe95 (talk) 00:13, 12 September 2010 (UTC) So, I guess there is nothing I can do at the moment, is there?. I wish it did not have to be this way. Thanks for getting back to me.
Hi, I see you're on CSD duty right now. Could I draw your attention away for a while to help with User:Winglet13 and his articles? I don't want to get anywhere close to 3RR so haven't reverted his most recent removal of a {{db-advert}} tag on his Turkish Engine Center article. IMO, even if in the unlikely case the article doesn't qualify for speedying, the repeated removal of the db template isn't good. Thanks! Strange Passerby (talk) 11:23, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
The guy's back as User:Winglet013, and recreated it as a redirect to TEC. Could you please do the honours? Cheers, Strange Passerby 15:10, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
Favonian 1249 (Scottish time) - Would you cast your mathematical eye over my user page Ehical SMM and give me some feedback on how we constitute vandalism? Ta Ethical SMM (talk) 11:51, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
You see Favonian I was right. It is a matter of perspective. I see it as me helping you with your project. And if you're not clear, cosmicgilly is about augmented reality, which is right up your street surely? Ethical SMM (talk) 12:29, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
And a final question for you Favonian - What matrices in F1 racing do you think applicable to social media networks? cosmicgilly knows. Ethical SMM (talk) 19:36, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
Hello Favonian. I was typing you a message about the fact that this IP had returned to its single purpose of removing links to the word eggnog. Before I finished I noticed that you have already blocked the IP so all I to do now is thank you for your vigilance and for your time in taking care of this. Cheers. MarnetteD | Talk 17:36, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
Hey you, why are you deleting Oil Slick (Transformers)? And you gotta recreate this article, alright? 75.142.152.104 (talk) 04:54, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
Hi new to this so sorry if ive done somethin daft! you deleted due to G10, Attack page and unsourced BLP
G10-- I cannt see any (disparage or threaten their subject) in this page at all. Attack Page-- no "personal attacks" either Unsources-- wikipedias own page and the "london Gazette" seem like ok sources Happynose (talk) 11:15, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
Ok I understand a bit better now.
The only thing is that as a historical person Oliver North was involved in more than just the Iran-contra affair, and has and still does do things in the public eye. What do to base the premise the association had anything to do with "Iran-Contra" ? wiki's own pages have the connection in a different section . Sorry if im a bit thick :)
Happynose (talk) 11:35, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
Good point I haddnt looked at it that way. But the fact that any Ex uk member of forces that is pictured inside the NSA with an Ex National Security Council member and being asked to "help the Senate Intelligence Committee" would make him notable?
Happynose (talk) 11:52, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
Thanks. One last question . If I find out moore information re lawrence (if any) have i been on the right lines with regard refs etc so far...Be gentle this is my first time! Happynose (talk) 12:03, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
Regarding the blank stub, my bad. I shoulda/woulda/coulda edited off-line before posting the stub. I was primarily adding him because his name was used within City of Life and Death, but had a blank entry. I thought I was a faster typist, but I was incorrect. I have the bare beginnings with a couple of sources, if you'd like me to put 'em in. Otherwise, I'll return after a decent interval and with added detail. Cmholm (talk) 10:36, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
The title wasn't changed - the size of the engine was added - I think it's required - shouldn't need a discussion. maybe you can just put it through.Vegavairbob (talk) 15:28, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
I saw that you removed 'Category:Requests for unblock' from User talk:Amir.Hossein.7055. It seems that the unblock request never got formally reviewed since when the user in question posted the unblock request, he did it incorrectly. I am not sure what is supposed to be done in a situation like that. Maybe an admin still needs to act on the unblock request, even though it was malformatted? Nsk92 (talk) 15:38, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
Hello,
You blocked the IP address 71.247.247.55 earlier today for repeated vandalism. I did some digging and found that the edit and reversions (1, 2, 3) made to the page Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Climate change/Proposed decision strongly resemble edits made earlier this year by accounts permanently banned for sockpuppetry:
and possibly also this now-deleted edit:
Based on this evidence, do you think that it it would be wise to apply an indefinite block to this IP as well?
Regards,
Lothar von Richthofen (talk) 23:36, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
hy there, you seem to have reverted a change of User:12.189.87.254 in the article Roman Polansky. He began to change the articles German war crimes and German Holocaust crimes against Soviet Jews. Please check his edits for yourself: . He changes figures but doesn't provide any sources whatsoever and adds these strange sentences. IMHO he just another pitiful little vandal and should be blocked asap. I'm not going to concern myself with this guy any further. I already did my duty and reported him to a cop. Thanks Flamarande (talk) 12:40, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
Favonian, hur mar du? What fun! I'm working on a paper involving Nikolaj Frederik Severin Grundtvig! You all are interesting people, but now I need to learn Danish history as well. Can I trust our own article or can you turn it into an FA by next week? Man, Napoleon messed things up all over Western Europe... Drmies (talk) 04:47, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
I'm working on a presentation on the history of Beowulf, and Grundtvig has a part to play there, if only as a critic of Thorkelin. But I'm mostly interested in what he did with that poem, and if it helped him make some sort of nationalist case. Without wanting to raise your blood pressure any more, do you have any insights there? Tack så mycket! ;) Drmies (talk) 19:00, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
Hello, "Favonian",
I see that you were very quick to undo my edits of the "Vlaams Belang" Article. Maybe the edits were not NOPV (and yes, I had to look it up!), but you so quickly returning the original state of the article is not exactly neutral, either. Apparently, you are alerted every time someone edits this article. What are you and your people afraid of? The truth? Who gives you the authority to decide the content of an article, anyway? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.246.22.250 (talk) 10:50, September 15, 2010 (UTC)
Ok, since you seem to be taking this seriously, so will I. I just registered on wiki, and will from now on identify myself as rudimer. No longer just a string of digits! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rudimer (talk • contribs) 19:47, September 15, 2010 (UTC)
Hello Favonian. Winglet013 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), whom you have blocked, is requesting to be unblocked. The request for unblock is on hold while waiting for a comment from you. Regards, Sandstein 09:51, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
For allowing me to use the structure of your RfA Q&A. Apparently, it works well :) Wifione ....... Leave a message 14:47, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
For your welcome. :D --VandTrack (talk) 07:04, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
Please would you copy this deleted page to my user pages. I don't remember it. Kittybrewster ☎ 08:54, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
Hi Favonian - thanks for reviewing User:Stevencurtis. Just a quick note - I had disabled talk page access due to their attempt to grant their own unblock request, but if you feel that is not appropriate feel free to revert without any need for discussing with me. 7 08:58, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
re your message about Spod.
There is no 'proof' regarding the reference changes I made to Spod. They happened as I was there along with all the other staff and delegates of the companies mentioned.
This restriction and the constant undo'ing by Chaos5023 is not in the spirit of Wikipedia! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Spencertaylor (talk • contribs) 12:06, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
I am going to be posting this on multiple editor talk pages to get some discussion going. We have yet another section on the talk page requesting Ray William Johnson be added to the List of YouTube personalities. Something has to be done because people request he be added and don't give any references for the most part but someone tried to give references, but I checked them and they were not good ones. We don't need a new section everytime someone wants him added. We have umpteen sections requesting him be added. Again, something has to be done! Mr. C.C.Hey yo!I didn't do it! 15:02, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
Just because it's a comedic reference to Noah, doesn't make it invalid. Have you ever heard the pieces referenced? They're classic. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.164.149.207 (talk) 18:07, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
So in retrospect I suppose this would be considered trivia and not vandalism as you implied. Please refrain from ostracizing new users by misidentifying their contributions.
"Any good-faith effort to improve the encyclopedia, even if misguided or ill-considered, is not vandalism. Even harmful edits that are not explicitly made in bad faith are not vandalism."
Can you have a look at this editor please. Codf1977 (talk) 19:55, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
hi, I am trying to create a page for the web series that I am involved with, and keep being deleted. I am going to re-submit the page with the press references and links, but can you tell me if there is something I am missing? because this series ahs been covered by international press and has over 4million views. please let me know if I need to add anything specific. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lukevknight (talk • contribs) 15:50, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
Hi, Our article is entirely bereft of any unsupported praise or hyperbole, is neutral and factual in tone and information, and claims of its relevancy are supported by expansive media coverage from major international media - which automatically puts it in a tiny percentage of online productions. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lukevknight (talk • contribs) 11:29, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
Seamless Wikipedia browsing. On steroids.
Every time you click a link to Wikipedia, Wiktionary or Wikiquote in your browser's search results, it will show the modern Wikiwand interface.
Wikiwand extension is a five stars, simple, with minimum permission required to keep your browsing private, safe and transparent.