Loading AI tools
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 15 | ← | Archive 18 | Archive 19 | Archive 20 | Archive 21 | Archive 22 | → | Archive 25 |
I'm getting the stranger and stranger notion that Nicosia is infected by socks. wtf?. Created today. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 11:14, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
Yet another new account and 2 IPs descending on the article right after protection expired. Might need another round of protection (at your discretion, of course) Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 11:54, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
nailed'em Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 06:47, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
Do you remember this user? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:79.5.238.156 http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Robert_G._Edwards&diff=prev&oldid=447689299-- he did it again...Tyrannobdella rex (talk) 19:16, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
I know who makes this changes because he did it in the italian wikipedia, but he was blocked for ever... see here http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speciale:Contributi/79.5.238.156 and here http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discussioni_utente:79.5.238.156 you can see what he did for 3 years on italian wikipedia... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tyrannobdella rex (talk • contribs) 19:31, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
Maybe he is not the same man ( i don't believe it because he is an italian IP), but he says, like the other, that Robert G. Edwards had a degree in biology and not in agricolture, and he makes again a change. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Robert_G._Edwards&diff=next&oldid=448007670 I'm sorry for this man, but, Robert G. Edward had a degree in agricolture, it is sure: http://sla-divisions.typepad.com/dbio/2010/10/robert-g-edwards-2010-nobel-prize-winner-in-physiology-or-medicine.html http://healthzone24x7.blogspot.com/2011/05/robert-g-edwards-great-physiologist-to.html I don't know why he makes this changes... Sorry for the noise--Tyrannobdella rex (talk) 07:33, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
did it^^--95.245.8.234 (talk) 15:05, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
Yes, I saw, he started again on italian wikipedia too, as you can see here http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speciale:Contributi/87.30.187.203 I know who he is, because i did a lot of researches about his identity, and i spoke with him on some sites, it was easy found him. I don't have his ip, but is too easy, for some recurrent "phrases" and writing ways, and because he gave me a lot of confirmation during the discussions. I wonder if there is a way for shutting him down maybe with legal ways. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tyrannobdella rex (talk • contribs) 14:43, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
Sorry, I thought it had been a work of a vandal. I didn't mean to precipitate myself. Regards, --Lecen (talk) 19:03, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
Any idea why this isn't showing up at SPI? Does the bot take a while? This guys a pain. Thanks. Dougweller (talk) 20:50, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
Buster Seven Talk 12:39, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
The IP vandal who insists on removing "Roman" from "Roman Catholic" is back, using 76.4.176.205. I've left a warning. Beyond My Ken (talk) 04:20, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
Just a small thank you for being so on top of admin tasks (especially the RM of The Short-Tempered Clavier and other dysfunctional works for keyboard oknazevad (talk) 11:48, 7 September 2011 (UTC) |
I don't know the backstory, but I came across User:Abraham.divine on a weird post at RFPP. You blocked the original account, so alerting you. Seems ducky to me. —SpacemanSpiff 14:06, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
You might want to check out the contributions of Robertistheman (talk · contribs). I suspect somebody has a beef with you. --Biker Biker (talk) 12:53, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
I added some socks of his that I stumbled onto after you blocked a couple, which you may not yet have noticed. FactStraight (talk) 00:53, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
I noticed that you have been editing this file several times today. Unfortunately, it's kind of futile because the file is regenerated from scratch every 15 minutes by an automatic script, which extracts entries from the relevant article talk pages. Favonian (talk) 13:29, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
Please explain not accepting my addition to genocides in history. It is hardly "original research" or not adequately sourced. Here it is:
According to Hebrew Scriptures, during the conquest of Canaan by the Israelites, Moses and Joshua ordered several genocides. "And they warred against the Midianites, as the LORD commanded Moses; and they slew all the males... And the children of Israel took all the women of Midian captives, and their little ones, and took the spoil of all their cattle, and all their flocks, and all their goods... And Moses was wroth with the officers of the host...Have ye saved all the women alive?...Now therefore kill every male among the little ones, and kill every woman that hath known man by lying with him...But all the women children, that have not known a man by lying with him, keep alive for yourselves"(Numbers 31:7-18). At the conquest of the City of Jericho,they utterly destroyed all that was in the city, both man and woman, young and old, and ox, and sheep, and ass, with the edge of the sword" (Joshua 6:21).
These actions, on their face, meet the definition of genocide. Why is another source required who called them genocide??
So if I can come up with an "authoritative source" who labels these Old Testament actions as genocide, you will accept the edit, right? — Preceding unsigned comment added by SamGrady (talk • contribs) 13:55, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
I've noticed you've handled quite a few of my requests. Thanks so much for doing this; sorry there are so many; but some areas of WP really need a lot of cleaning up. If it's too much, tell me and I'll stop or slow down. Tony (talk) 08:30, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
Truth is, in long category lists I've encountered more than a few article titles I took to be concepts or processes, and found they were actually book titles when I clicked. Business, accounting, management—there seem to be a lot of articles on single books; I know this is allowed, but it's not the most satisfactory when it becomes a habit in a field (one big danger is cut-and-paste plagiarism, which is so hard to detect when it's a hard-copy book at issue).
Yes, I must explore the italicisation thing—thanks for the template—since that would be a solution for the book-titles-as-article-titles issue, at least some of the time. But I'm starting to see article titles italicised in category lists apparently because they're piped to a section: this is something I hadn't ever noticed, and perhaps it's a recent developer innovation. Kind of interferes with the italics as a signal that an article title = book title, and I'm not sure the message behind this formatting, as it were, gets through to ordinary editors like me, let alone readers.
One more thing, if you can bear with me: a title such as "X Y Agency" that turns out to concern, solely, the federal US agency by that not very distinctive name—should I add "(US)" if the plain title seems to claim generic status? WP:TITLE doesn't seem to be helpful on how specific article titles should be, although it prefers them to be short, naturally.
Non-controversial list ... yeah, I think I'd rather not assume that, even though I try to avoid anything that might be controversial or that I'm unsure of; for example, an uppercased title ending in "Model", "Framework", "Theory", or "Protocol" I steer clear of for the moment. Tony (talk) 11:27, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
okay — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lollage:D (talk • contribs) 09:37, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
That'll end one drama for now but I'm seriously just wanna stay off here is there anyway to get my account blocked by request? I don't want anything more to do with Wikipedia for at least a month just to get away from the drama. Please if there's anything you can do please do it. I gotta get away from here for awhile or at least till I get things in my life under control. JamesAlan1986 *talk 12:24, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
Okay thanks. JamesAlan1986 *talk 12:37, 11 September 2011 (UTC) I don't know if I'm doing it right it's at User:JamesAlan1986/vector.js can you fix it? JamesAlan1986 *talk 12:41, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
Oh my bad sorry I didn't know. Thank you. JamesAlan1986 *talk 12:46, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
Please protect this page again - the 93.94.xxx.xxx vandal is back and active. Thanks, Pdfpdf (talk) 17:04, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
Please protect this page again, again - the 93.94.xxx.xxx vandal is back and active, again. Thanks, Pdfpdf (talk) 02:15, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
I need some help sorting out this mess. On August 31, Mnealon moved Cocaine Blues (western swing song), splitting it from Cocaine Blues, saying "Multiple songs share this title, and the current article conflates them." He made this move without discussion or consensus. The fact is, all of the songs sharing this title are related, and cannot be easily distinguished from one another, as is often the case with folk songs of uncertain origin. The "Red" Arnall song, as the article says, is "a reworking of the traditional song "Little Sadie," a ballad with multiple alternate titles. As all of these songs share a similar origin, it is best that they all be discussed in one place. I want to revert Mnealon's edits, but I am not sure exactly how to go about it. Your thoughts? ---RepublicanJacobiteTheFortyFive 16:37, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
Favonian. I notice that recently there have been a plethora of disruptive edits from our IP address under the name Dust429. I will do my best to look into this and see what can be done. It's a real shame because our College is a real oasis of academia, and I believe it would have much to offer in the way of content and contributions. It seems that the perpetrator is vandalising other wikis as well: is there anyway of blocking him from all wikiprojects? Once again I apologise on the school's behalf. Sincerely. Jay Σεβαστόςdiscuss 18:30, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
Dear sir / madam,
Since August 2011 I have attempted to add text to the biography of the above.
I referenced several articles to prove my points. I admit that the text entered reflected negatively upon Adriana Ferreyr, however it was corroborated. ie truthful.
People have constantly reverted the article to its original text. One of these HAP791 has previously been warned about their posting. This user has also misrepresented an image, which has only been corrected once I informed the real rights holder today. They also misuse the image as representing 2009 when the picture was not taken until the next year.
None of the text in the article is verifiable. It is all taken from either IMDB or Linkedin. IMDB and Linkedin are non-verifiable sources of information.
The complete article is nothing more than an advertisement. Hence, one presumes, its being flagged for speedy deletion. Something I can only support.
I ask that you re-open the article and then lock it to allow a full representation of Adriana Ferreyr.
Yours faithfully William de Berg (talk) 18:50, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
WikiMedal for Janitorial Services | ||
For the prompt removal of crates of detergent VanIsaacWS 09:39, 13 September 2011 (UTC) |
I don't know if you've seen the latest on this case. I don't think I have anything to offer regarding the latest suspected socks that Hersfold found, but perhaps you do. Cheers —DoRD (talk) 11:47, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
Hello - the move wars at Bensalem Township, Pennsylvania and Horton Township, Pennsylvania have resumed. Would you mind re-protecting them? Thanks. Dohn joe (talk) 00:19, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
In the latest revision, I referenced several documentaries based on the latest research and findings by notable historians and scholars – and endorsed by government and notable institutions. Wikipedia is not about holding some religious belief – it’s all about scientific and historical facts and findings, and presenting the truth in front of the world community – which it is created for. For disputed facts you can present the arguments of the both sides, but you CANNOT forcibly suppress the other point of view and delete data. But this is exactly what this user User:History2007 is doing. Even he does NOT have the courage to keep my logical and explaining posts in his talk page. Whenever I am posting something in his talk page - he is hastily deleting this. This person has clearly some ill intention and is ill spirited. He needs a immediate BLOCK. - Wikiglobaleditor (talk) 09:42, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
Hi there Favonian, hope you're doing well. I thought I might ask for your help on something, if that's OK. Is there a guideline that you know of that restricts trivial information within articles? Consider something like "He bought his first phone at the age of 15" in an article about a footballer which is sufficiently verified. To me this seems utterly out of the scope of an encyclopaedia. WP:INDISCRIMINATE states something merely being true, or even verifiable, does not automatically make something suitable for inclusion in the encyclopaedia, but then is very narrow in referring only to fiction, lyrics databases and statistics. There is WP:WHATISTOBEDONE, but it's rather vague. Thanks for your advice and help in advance. Jay Σεβαστόςdiscuss 10:13, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
Hello! I'm a new Wikipedian, as I can see you are also interested in history perhaps you could explain me how to upload pictures on to Wikipedia . thanks again! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Highlandjacobite (talk • contribs) 15:16, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
This pesron user William de Berg continues to commit vandalism on wickepedia and it is compromising its integrity to true factual unbiased information. He is citing references that do not prove the accuracy of his stamentes-- they are misleading and not factual. He is trying to gain an ufair advantage for George Soros by portrying Ms. Mr. Ferreyr in a bad light. Please read the refences to see that they do not prove his claims. This is a person working for Mr. Soros that is trying to misrepresent Ms. Ferryer in order to gain an advantage for him. Is there any way to prevent his behaviour which falls under the category of slander and defamation. This in in regards to the page Adriana Ferreyr Regards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hap791 (talk • contribs) 15:55, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
Favonian, This user Bbb23 is vandalizing the wickipidia page of Adriana Ferreyr. He has taken off numerables references one by one and then put the page up for deletion for a lack of referenceces. He has also deleted the talk page that you have created for discussion of the page. Best, Jane. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jane77765 (talk • contribs) 22:53, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
Thank you for reviewing the new article written by me, user:mattkillion (the "Article").
First, I am sorry for the repeated removal of the csd template. I thought a bug was causing it to appear over and over. Everytime it appeared, I deleted it. Now that I understand what the code is for, I apologize for repeatedly deleting it. This will not happen again.
Separately, I would like to request undeletion of the Article because the organization that is the subject of the article is notable for the following reasons:
1. Largest provider of outdoor ads in 300 cities in 50 states to nonprofit and govt agencies.
2. Organization mentioned in several articles, including ones by military agencies (such as the Dept of Veterans Affairs), about the organization's work in outdoor ads for suicide prevention.
3. Organization has such an extensive federal govt representation that it has a GSA contract which provides for streamlined federal govt acquisitions. 4. Organization has millions of dollars in revenue.
Let me know if other topics should be covered.
At the least, is it possible to undelete the article and include the csd template so that users can review?
Thank you for the reconsideration.
-user: mattkillion — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.82.68.35 (talk) 03:29, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
Thanks a lot for your help and time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Highlandjacobite (talk • contribs) 12:40, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for sorting out that mess. Nadiatalent (talk) 12:59, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
The falling temperatures (at least in the northern hemisphere) and the removal of the greek lettersNaraht (talk) 15:27, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
If Wikipedia's rules state that, when edit warring occurs, the disputed content shall be removed while the case is being discussed, I wish that you as an administrator revert Kagg's edit of today, containing the content, so that the article returns to its status before the edit warring began. At least this is the rule on the Norwegian Wikipedia.
The content concerned was added on 15th September by a new IP user. By the way, the information ('criminal' and 'bigamous') is already mentioned in this BLP.
--- Aaemn784 (talk) 12:07, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
You relisted this since the RFC was open. Now we have two RFCs. If it is OK with you, I think the RM discussion should be closed as no consensus and reopened if needed based on the results there. If I do the close, I'll probably mention the option of converting to a list. Vegaswikian (talk) 23:25, 25 September 2011 (UTC)
Hello, you have closed the move request in Chembai article with decision as 'not moved'. I respect your decision, but you didn't mention the reason on why and how you arrived at that conclusion. I like to know your reasoning for the decision, since I initiated the move request.
Thanking You,
Anish Viswa 04:57, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
An actually helpful editor, instead of being rude and just shouting "no", has informed me the proper template is MFD and I am working on that now. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.33.212.171 (talk) 12:53, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
Hi, Favonian. I'm a bit puzzled by your close of the move request at Talk:MCG (disambiguation). While opinion was fairly evenly split, isn't that disagreement actually evidence that there is no primary topic, and that the page should be moved? Powers T 13:12, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
User:Iadrian yu is romani-an chauvinist Iaaasi's meta/sock -puppet. Why do you support his edits? (you always restored his bad faith edits or chauvinist provocation in Matthias Corvinus article.
Moreover, there is no other English language (real printed!) encyclopedia in the world, which use so-called bynames/nicknames in the title of the articles. "Matthias Corvinus" is not official name it's just a nick name of the Monarch. Please Modify the title of the article to Matthias I of Hungary.
Columbia Encyclopedia
Encyclopædia Britannica
Encyclopædia Universalis
Encarta Encyclopedia (2009)
Brockhaus Enzyklopädie
Encyclopaedia Larousse — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.0.114.29 (talk) 15:01, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
HAhaha:)))))) consensus of laymen? The voters were Romani-an users Serbs Slovaks? Who are not from native English speaker countries, who are not even Hungarians. It is an English (not romani serb slovak etc...)encyclopedia about a Hungarian (and not romani-an serbian slovak) king. British American Academic historians call him officially as Matthias I of Hungary, every english language encíclopedia use the Matthias I of Hungary title. Matthias Corvinus are represented as byname. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.0.114.29 (talk) 16:18, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
Just for some laughs. Wifione Message 12:32, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
I seem to have started a dangerous fad. The Foundation has been contacted! Favonian (talk) 21:42, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
Hello, is there a possibility of protecting the talk page also ? It is very tempting for User:Stubes99 considering that this move request was his idea and there are various comments from his behalf. Thank you. Adrian (talk) 06:51, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
Hello administrator. Can you delete this page Radamel Falcao García? Please read the Requested move: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Radamel_Falcao.
Thanks. --Hydao (talk) 10:20, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
Ok, thanks. :) --Hydao (talk) 10:28, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
Consensus has been found, article renamed, peace on Earth! Favonian (talk) 11:32, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
I've been tracking this guy for the past month or so, since he seems to have it out for me. Apparently he finally got hit with a rangeblock, so now he's using proxies. Here's the Whois on the one you just blocked. --Lenin and McCarthy | (Complain here) 20:00, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
I seconded your suspicions of User:Xyz or die at User talk:MuZemike/Archive 9#Wahwahpedal but it appears there is no interest in pursuing any further sockpuppets or the sockmaster. I have also noticed some curious editing patterns, particularly surrounding the article Beck and several related articles that have recently been deleted.
On July 14, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/W.I.N. Records was nominated for deletion by the sockpuppet User:Huh direction. The same day, User:Huh direction also nominated Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tom Grimley (2nd nomination). After no activity, the Grimley article was relisted and received a delete vote from User:Xyz or die. Still having no consensus, it was relisted again and received delete votes from User:duffbeerforme and the sockpuppet User:Zalinda Zenobia.
On July 31, the article Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Poop Alley Tapes was nominated by User:duffbeerforme and received a delete vote from User:Huh direction.
On August 5, the article Poop Alley Studios was proposed for deletion.
On August 8, sockpuppet User:Know Your NME unlinked Poop Alley Studios and WIN Records in the Beck article (see ). I undid one of the changes because Poop Alley Studios was not yet a red link at the time. I initially noticed this edit because I assumed User:Know Your NME was a sockpuppet of User:Kim Cardassian.
On August 12, Poop Alley Studios was deleted. It would be nice to know which user proposed the deletion. I'm not privy to that information.
On August 16, User:Huh direction unlinked Poop Alley Studios (see diff)
Finally, on August 29 User:Xyz or die deleted the entire sentence that once had links to all of the above deleted articles (see diff).
It all seems peculiar to me. Thought it might be of interest to you. Piriczki (talk) 02:58, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
Remember 99.63.26.63 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)? They just don't stop. See 99.63.24.11 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Cheers - DVdm (talk) 18:38, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
And back they are, this time as DVdm (talk) 10:32, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
. Checked and reverted all edits. Same M.O. -You recently warned TheOrangeOne149 regarding unverified additions to Nectar. An editor at IP 68.48.116.119 made virtually identical edits to that page, as well as one edit to Orange (word). I reversed the edit to Orange (word), and now TheOrangeOne149 has re-added that information. Although the edits to Orange (word) are not vandalism (they just give undue weight to one of the dozens of things called "orange"), TheOrangeOne149 feels like a disruptive editor. Cnilep (talk) 10:53, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
Hello, thank you for the help provided. Is there a posibility of deleting the history of the youtube video 1 and 2 as you did here ? Adrian (talk) 18:24, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
Regarding this incident. Greetings. Adrian (talk) 07:02, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
The Writer's Barnstar | |
A special Writer's barnstar 4 u!! Dipankan001 (talk) 05:55, 7 October 2011 (UTC) |
Thanks for having taken care of this. See also User talk:Magog the Ogre#Mikemikev sock. I'm pretty sure we haven't seen the last of this. Cheers - DVdm (talk) 10:27, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
In the Will Smith article, the edit buttons in each sub-section are non-existent for some reason. The only place you can edit Will Smith is from the top tab. Do you know why this is? Pass a Method talk 22:20, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
I was writing a Sandbox UML Specifications for Relational Database and I Received a message. I don't understand what is been blocked-User account/ Sandbox or am I not allowed to write an article for the Sandbox. Please Reply me because I am really willing to write the article. And also give me further instructions if any.
Hussain a tamboli (talk) 16:24, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
Hey, I see that you blocked User:Fucksummer, I just want to make sure that did you block that IP also? because it belongs to the Hostel of one of the colleges which is a part of WP:IEP and students were complaining that they are unable to edit. Please get back to us as soon as possible. Thanks. Rangilo Gujarati (talk) 17:47, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
... I wonder :-| Cheers and thx. - DVdm (talk) 10:57, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
I am from College of Engg. Pune and I was writing "UML specifications for Relational database" in my sandbox. And then suddenly I got your message-"You are currently unable to edit pages on Wikipedia due to an autoblock affecting your IP address". We are writing wiki-articles as an academic course assignment under India Education Program. I don't understand this, If somebody from our subnet has created the user:Fucksummer then why should I suffer. Sir, Please help me by unblocking me. I have talked to our Course wiki-ambassador: user:Rangilo Gujrati. You can talk to him also. But please help me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hussain a tamboli (talk • contribs) 06:51, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
I just saw that You have unblocked me. Sorry for the previous message I apologize for that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hussain a tamboli (talk • contribs) 06:59, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
A websites under the using — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mdsa2011 (talk • contribs) 09:40, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
Thank you for your reverts on my userpage and usertalk, and for the temporary block. Have a good day! Shuipzv3 (talk) 12:33, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
Please could you put her in my user space. Kittybrewster ☎ 22:55, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
Please note that the reported editor in WP:AN3#User:John Torn reported by User:OneLittleMouse (Result: Page protected) has been blocked indef by AGK as a sock. See WP:Sockpuppet investigations/John Torn. This could imply that the article protection is no longer needed. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 03:56, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
Please would you change the descriptor. It is generally agreed he was never a property developer. Do we describe him according to what he is now best known as/for or what he has been known for? Kittybrewster ☎ 15:08, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
There was a bug in MediaWiki 1.18 that caused blocks made via the API to have talk page access disabled when it should have been enabled. This also affected scripts such as User:Animum/easyblock.js. Please review the following blocks to make sure that you really intended talk page access to be disabled, and reblock if necessary.
If you have any questions or concerns, feel free to post at User talk:Anomie#Allowusertalk issue. Thanks! Anomie⚔ 02:05, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
Seamless Wikipedia browsing. On steroids.
Every time you click a link to Wikipedia, Wiktionary or Wikiquote in your browser's search results, it will show the modern Wikiwand interface.
Wikiwand extension is a five stars, simple, with minimum permission required to keep your browsing private, safe and transparent.