Loading AI tools
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
I saw that you draftified a list I started, by moving it to Draft:List of NIH Distinguished Scholars. I don't think it's fair to say there's "no evidence of active improvement" as required in WP:DRAFTIFY, since you moved it within a day of me starting on it. I would have worked on it more sooner if it hadn't been moved, and I just went today and improved the sourcing with proper ref tags and some additional sources not hosted by the agency conferring the award. If this list turns out not to be notable after all, I'd appreciate determining that through the full AFD process, because I'm having trouble working out how the notability criteria are meant to apply to things like lists and categories. So I hereby WP:DRAFTOBJECT, which I think means you're supposed to move it back? GenomeFan92 (talk) 01:36, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello, Hughesdarren. Thank you for your work on List of NIH Distinguished Scholars. User:DoubleGrazing, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
I'm unreviewing this, purely to reflect the article's provenance, and in no way intended to cast doubt on the reviewer's autopatrol or other credentials.
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with <nowiki>{{Re|</nowiki>DoubleGrazing<nowiki>}}</nowiki>
. Please remember to sign your reply with <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>
. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:18, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
I appreciate your recent review of my article White and Black River Valley Railway. I have an unrelated question. I have a reviewer who is point-blank refusing to allow a page on a technical college in Oklahoma that has 22,000 students per year, on the basis of “zero notability”. I have asked if his objection is to technical colleges generally or anything in the State of Oklahoma, but personally I think any state-operated school with 22,000 students is per se notable. He has also not replied as the what the appeal process might be. Surely, one guy doesn’t have the unilateral right to refuse a page of any kind on a particular topic. So what IS the appeal process, or who do I need to contact? Thanks. TulGuy (talk) 18:55, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
The specific article was on the Autry Technology Center, which as stated is a technical college run by the State of Oklahoma and having about 22,000 current students (and presumably hundreds of thousands of alumni, since it has been around since 1967). After I posted the article, I got no message except the standard one that the article had been reviewed by Onel5969 . However, when I checked the page, it had been replaced in its entirety by a redirect page going to the List of CareerTech centers in Oklahoma. Since that wasn’t what I posted and I was unclear as to what Onel5969 reviewed, I posted an inquiry on his talk page. That message and his reply were:
You were apparently the reviewer on the page Autry Technology Center, but I'm not sure what you reviewed. The page that currently appears is just a redirect to "List of CareerTech centers in Oklahoma". This is not the page I wrote; I can repost if you need it. If there's a problem with the page I wrote, please let me know what it is. Thanks. TulGuy (talk) 17:20, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
No, I reviewed your page, which had zero notability, and redirected it to the list article, which is what I said in the edit summary. Onel5969 TT me 10:51, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I believe a state-sponsored technical school with 22,000 yearly students is per se notable. What does he want—Nobel laureate graduates? It’s a technical school. I doubt he objects when a tech-trained service person shows up to fix his plumbing, electricity, air conditioning, car, or whatever. Whether his objection is to technical schools generally or anything from Oklahoma, I find his position of “zero notability” elitist, outrageous, and way out of step with the standards of other reviewers on Wikipedia.
I’m sure if he’s “called” on it, Onel5969 will simply come up with other excuses for not allowing the page in its current form, but he’s made it pretty clear that he’s not allowing it under any circumstances. I will be happy to work with another reviewer, or simply see a changed version of the page posted, but I’ve gone as far as I can go with Onel5969.
Here is the page, in its entirety. <removed>
Hi, thanks for your work, but please remember not to link common terms and chronological items (United States, 2006, etc). Tony (talk) 02:15, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
Holy shit that was quick! Thanks! X750. Spin a yarn? Articles I've screwed over? 09:04, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've Talk:Eucalyptus rhodantha/GA1begun reviewing the article Eucalyptus rhodantha you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Eewilson -- Eewilson (talk) 09:23, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
Great! I am. I’ll get started! I can tag Gderrin if you plan to be involved, too, or just follow along on the review page. I’ll start on this today. – Elizabeth (Eewilson) (tag or ping me) (talk) 15:04, 2 December 2022 (UTC)
Hi Hughesdarren. The page in question is the stub of a translation of the equivalent page in French Wikipedia. I realize now that I should have started the migration from the interlanguage links there. What would be the best way to get back there? Should I just start over? Mark J (talk) 12:10, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
Hey Hughesdarren,
Thanks for all your fantistic work in 2002, (here and in the other place) and all the best to you and yours for 2023. Gderrin (talk) 00:04, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
Hughesdarren,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
– Elizabeth (Eewilson) (tag or ping me) (talk) 20:59, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
– Elizabeth (Eewilson) (tag or ping me) (talk) 20:59, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
The New Page Reviewer's Silver Award | ||
For over 2,000 article reviews during 2022. Well done! Keep up the good work! -MPGuy2824 (talk) 03:03, 2 January 2023 (UTC) |
Hughesdarren,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
— Moops ⋠T⋡ 17:17, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
— Moops ⋠T⋡ 17:17, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
The article Eucalyptus rhodantha you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Eucalyptus rhodantha for comments about the article, and Talk:Eucalyptus rhodantha/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Eewilson -- Eewilson (talk) 18:02, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
thanks for your super quick review and edits !!!..I have now enabled hotcat...which I whish I knew about earlier...cheersEdisstrange (talk) 04:50, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Eucalyptus salmonophloia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Isotype.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
The Citation Barnstar | ||
Making the effort from half the world away to find a valid reference for the Titicus Reservoir page and begin the process of properly citing an article that theretofore had none. |
Which is simply an amazing thing - in terms of technology, what the encyclopedia is all about, and ultimately what you are all about as an editor and contributor here. 2601:196:180:8D80:9445:F485:733B:85ED (talk) 18:22, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
Four years! |
---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:51, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Hi, as an active New Page Patroller, I wanted to make sure you were aware of an upcoming Wikimedia Foundation project to improve the PageTriage extension. We recently published results of user interviews, and have some findings that we would value patrollers' opinions on. If you haven't yet, please consider adding the project page to your watchlist to stay up to date with our progress! Samwalton9 (WMF) (talk) 13:17, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
The redirect Lady apple has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 March 12 § Lady apple until a consensus is reached. * Pppery * it has begun... 15:49, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've Talk:Eucalyptus wandoo/GA1begun reviewing the article Eucalyptus wandoo you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 09:43, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
The article Eucalyptus wandoo you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Eucalyptus wandoo and Talk:Eucalyptus wandoo/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 11:01, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
The article Eucalyptus wandoo you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Eucalyptus wandoo for comments about the article, and Talk:Eucalyptus wandoo/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 07:42, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:09, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
On 20 June 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Eucalyptus wandoo, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Noongar used the Eucalyptus wandoo tree (woods pictured) as a medicine and ointment? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Eucalyptus wandoo. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Eucalyptus wandoo), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Aoidh (talk) 00:02, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
Good to see that today, pictured! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:14, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
please review again Theresunset (talk) 09:00, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
Wow, thanks for the speedy review! =) BoomboxTestarossa (talk) 23:25, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
Sorry, i published the page without finishing working on it. I have done that now. Thank you for taking off the (speedy deletion) tag. Thank you :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by William kohler (talk • contribs) 09:48, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
New Page Patrol | October 2023 Backlog Drive | |
| |
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. |
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:13, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
Social Moth (talk) 12:51, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
Hi. About your request for deletion of the page Mesen (Emulator), you said the reason is promotion. I don't understand what am I promoting, the Emulator is inactive no longer in development because they moved to Mesen 2, Mesen 1 is an essential emulator in the emulation history. it does have libretro core for the RetroArch. I was really in a deep stat of writing about it, then the notification came. and to be honest I kinda got sad about if I should continue writing it or not because I am afraid I will write then everything gets deleted. Open source on github. KaderRocket (talk) 23:38, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
I do not see why you think Peter Gill should not have an article. He is, for example, a recipient of the Schrödinger Medal of the World Association of Theoretical and Computational Chemists and most of the other recipients have articles. The few that do not probably deserve an article. I have been an editor for a long time and administrator for many years until I thought I was too old to it. By creating it, I thought others might add to it but you quickly deleted it. I could probably add more myself, but I have other things to do for the rest of today. Can you not leave it for a few days? Bduke (talk) 03:46, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
Hello Hughesdarren:
WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive!
The goal of this drive is to reduce the backlog of unreviewed drafts to less than 2 months outstanding reviews from the current 4+ months. Bonus points will be given for reviewing drafts that have been waiting more than 30 days. The drive is running from 1 November 2023 through 30 November 2023.
You may find Category:AfC pending submissions by age or other categories and sorting helpful.
Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.
Special Edition New Page Patroller's Barnstar | ||
This award is given to Hughesdarren for collecting more than 200 points during the October 2023 NPP backlog drive. Thank you so much for taking part and contributing to the drive! Hey man im josh (talk) 01:44, 1 November 2023 (UTC) |
Thank you for the quick review of NGC 871's article. I wrote it because it's a requested page on the Astronomy WikiProject but to my surprise the amount of research directly related to it is rather limited. Most papers are about the galaxy group the object is in. Unless more research comes along for this guy specifically (possible, I'll keep an eye for it), I don't think it will leave the Start-class soon. Anyway, thanks again! DGSATI (talk) 00:07, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar | |
Thank you for your tireless contributions to the New page patrol. Your efforts are immensely valued. Thilsebatti (talk) 08:49, 16 November 2023 (UTC) |
Your comments are invited at Talk:Crown (botany) § Does the crown include the trunk?, because of . Mitch Ames (talk) 07:33, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Seamless Wikipedia browsing. On steroids.
Every time you click a link to Wikipedia, Wiktionary or Wikiquote in your browser's search results, it will show the modern Wikiwand interface.
Wikiwand extension is a five stars, simple, with minimum permission required to keep your browsing private, safe and transparent.