Loading AI tools
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Hi there! Quick question from someone who is not into trees, plants, shrubs and everything that has to do with it: the article acacia states there are 163 species in the genus acacia, but there are 613 articles in the Category:Acacia right now. How? Kind regards, Coldbolt (talk) 22:06, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
great start! had a very luxurious lunch out the back when were down. Added the qulifier as on commons there are more london hotels than there are.... many... so figured best to do so. cheers and keep up the good work! JarrahTree 07:50, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
The Board of Trustees of the Wikimedia Foundation has appointed a committee to lead the search for the foundation’s next Executive Director. One of our first tasks is to write the job description of the executive director position, and we are asking for input from the Wikimedia community. Please take a few minutes and complete this survey to help us better understand community and staff expectations for the Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director.
Thank you, The Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Steering Committee via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:48, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pyrmont,_Albany - needed, as it stands it could be anywhere :) - hope you can help on that one - cheers JarrahTree 05:56, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Allocasuarina helmsii, and it appears to be a substantial copy of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allocasuarina_corniculata.
It is possible that the bot was mistaken and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.
If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 23:09, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Gsg headmasters.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.
If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly hi! 09:29, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:21, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
I have paraphrased some of the content you added to the above article, as it appears to have been copied from http://edit.epa.wa.gov.au/Policies_guidelines/envprotectbulltn/Documents/Albany%20Regional%20Vegetation%20Survey/arvs_report_aug_2010.pdf (page 89), a copyright web page. All content you add to Wikipedia must be written in your own words. Please let me know if you have any questions or if you think I made a mistake. — Diannaa (talk) 02:56, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
{{citation}}
: |edition=
has extra text (help)there might be more where that came from JarrahTree 09:44, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
Hi, I'm LatymerKing. Hughesdarren, thanks for creating Grevillea tenuiloba!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. it just needs a few more references, and a little bit more detail, and then you're set!
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. LatymerKing (talk) 10:53, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
Hi, Your edits of Napier include continually removing a reference, if you have updated information you can add it with an accompanying appropriate reference, see the section of verifibility above. Regards. Hughesdarren (talk) 09:07, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
Hi, Firstly let me apologise for my newness and inexperience on editing an article. But, as it was clearly wrong, I thought, for the sake of accuracy, I should fix it. Thank you for now agreeing to some of my updates, which I know to be correct as I am the previous owner of Napier Downs and am referred to in the article. I still have a few issues. One the location as 130km from Derby is correct, but it is NOT also 130km North of Fitzroy Crossing. If you look at a map, you will see this is impossible. There is no reference verifying this, so I assume that someone has just had a guess. It is actually approx. 150km North West of Fitzroy Crossing, which is what I tried to amend. The area of the lease is approx. 380,000 ha. I am not sure where you got the area that you have stated. The article that you refer to says it is It covers more than 400,000ha and carries about 20,000 head of red brahman cattle. That, in fact is not accurate, but it will do. The sale price was not disclosed and merely speculated by the article in Beef Central that you refer to. I wonder if anyone verifies the articles that are used as a ref. I know in the case of Beef Central it was not verified and they simply wrote the article with speculative information. The sale was actually completed in September 2015. The line... In 1910 Napier Downs occupied an area of 90,000 acres (364 km2) and was still owned by M. C. Davies... is also incorrect. I attempted to amend this but you have not allowed this. If you read the article that is referred to in the reference, it clearly says 900,000 acres and not 90,000. According to the pastoral lease, a copy of which I hold, it states that on 30th June 1969 the area of Napier Downs was 1,000,000 acres. I am happy to provide any further information and assist in the accuracy of this article. Leut1 (talk) 03:17, 4 September 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Leut1 (talk • contribs)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Eucalyptus ceratocorys requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. 2602:306:3357:BA0:91A7:F0E4:FFD3:D75F (talk) 21:13, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
Hi, I'm Ivi104. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Eucalyptus ceratocorys, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. Ivi104 (talk) 21:39, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bevan Lawrence is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bevan Lawrence (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 16:34, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Hughesdarren. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Your addition to Eucalyptus occidentalis has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 20:43, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
Hello Hughesdarren,
Thanks for your great work adding Noongar names to plants (especially Melaleuca species). I think the names should be lower case as per Manual of style. Your opinion? Keep up the great work. Gderrin (talk) 09:11, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
Hello again, I've stumbled on this book ("Aboriginal People and their plants") doing a Google search . Thought you might be interested if you hadn't seen it already. Gderrin (talk) 20:03, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
From the icy Canajian north; to you and yours! FWiW Bzuk (talk) 20:46, 25 December 2016 (UTC)
Fremantle_Woolstores is meant to be an overview article only - and there is hopefully opportunity to create sub articles of each structure of the structure, when and how is up to the enthusiasm - thanks JarrahTree 13:01, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
Alluring Albany - could you please look at this jumble of joy
has about 5 - 8 potential derivative offshoot articles
are the first obvious items, there are more...
any thoughts feedback on or off wiki much appreciated JarrahTree 13:48, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Hello Darren,
I noticed you've started some Darwinia articles - thanks and well done. I'm busy with other genera at the moment and thought you might like to expand Darwinia hortiorum. I can't find good resources on most of the other species but the formal description of D. hortiorum is here. All the best to you. Gderrin (talk) 11:50, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Packenham_Street,_Fremantle - JarrahTree 06:02, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
Hello! On the new articles you are creating, you should probably included stub templates (if they apply) with the correct stub category. It would also be good for you to create a talk page of the articles that you are creating and add WikiProjects to them. Nice job on the articles otherwise, though! RileyBugzYell at me | Edits 22:20, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
It's recent, has Elizabeth Quay, is well lit, shows a detailed skyline, and is a generally better picture than the one currently.
You noted in your revert that there was a discussion about the image on its talk page? I don't see that anywhere... WikiWizz123123 (talk) 10:27, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
A discussion is in progress on the Perth article talk page about which is the best image to use. You could add your image there and other editors could make their preferred choice. Hughesdarren (talk) 10:24, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
Hughesdarren/Archive 6 | |
---|---|
Scientific classification | |
Kingdom: | Plantae |
Clade: | Tracheophytes |
Clade: | Angiosperms |
Clade: | Eudicots |
Order: | Proteales |
Family: | Proteaceae |
Genus: | Conospermum |
Species: | C. brownii |
Binomial name | |
Conospermum brownii | |
I was wondering whether you'd ever considered using automatic taxoboxes instead of manual taxoboxes when creating new articles? I think your approach to article creation (working methodically through a genus to create articles for all Western Australian species) is very well suited to using automatic taxoboxes. It's a little bit more work to prepare a genus to use automatic taxoboxes, but once the genus is ready to go, it's very easy to create taxoboxes for new species. I took the liberty of setting up the back end templates for Conospermum. The code below is all that is needed to produce the taxobox at right (in edit view, the actual code is what appears above this paragraph).
{{speciesbox
|genus = Conospermum
|species = brownii
|authority = [[Meisn.]]
}}
If you're not interested in automatic taxoboxes, that's fine. If you are interested I'd be happy to explain them further or help getting templates set up. I'm mainly interested in them for their potential in keeping taxonomy up to date. There are about 60,000 articles on plant taxa, and at most a few dozen editors actively working on them. Moving a genus to a different family might require edits to 100 articles. Taxonomic changes at higher ranks might effect thousands of articles. With manual taxoboxes, each taxobox must be edited individually. With automatic taxoboxes, a single edit to a template changes all the subordinate taxa. Plantdrew (talk) 02:19, 30 April 2017 (UTC)
The Special Barnstar | |
Thanks for setting a new record in reverting my perfectly good edits. I hope you feel satisfied in erasing my years of hard work and research. Good f**king day. Celebi12 (talk) 09:50, 1 May 2017 (UTC) |
Thanks for uploading File:GSG CREST Small.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Majora (talk) 04:17, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
Your addition to Enekbatus has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. This is your final warning. Further copyright violations will result in you being blocked from editing. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 15:33, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
As the strategy discussion draws to an end - any thoughts or feedback? please feel free to email me or message on talk page if - whichever you wish - as to how you feel about the 5 themes and the general ambience of the strategy programme JarrahTree 11:10, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
I appreciate all the hard work you do in creating important articles. Bfpage (talk) 11:28, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
Hi, just a note to say that ranks in taxonomy templates must be the Latin version; it may appear to work if you use the English word, but some features don't. If you look at this version of the template you created, you'll see that the word "Tribe" is on a red background: this is meant to be a hint that something might be wrong! There's a list of Latin ranks and English equivalents at Wikipedia:Automated taxobox system/taxonomy templates#rank which you might want to bookmark if you plan to create many taxonomy templates. Peter coxhead (talk) 18:02, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
Hello: thanks for all the pages you are creating in the genus Eleocharis. However, remember that only the genus and species (and subspecies) go in italics. The family and all other taxons do not. I fixed a couple but there may be others that need to be take care of. Thanks. --Polinizador (talk) 23:26, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Hughesdarren. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
...to you and yours, from the Great White North! FWiW Bzuk (talk) 16:14, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
Hi Hughesdarren,
Just a quick "thanks" for your encouragement over the past cpl of weeks as I've been working towards getting a features image-gallery onto every known species of Eucalypt. Well that's the aim, but of course there's no chance I'll ever get there haha! I am on a mission however to at least try to do every species I can come across from now on :)
I see you've been swapping-in the speciesbox template everywhere I look - that's a neat little feature that looks great for consistency & time-saving (Thumbs-up). Cheers ❮❮ GEEKSTREET Talk Lane ❯❯ 03:14, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
are you up to a 2018 flood article? suprised we havent hadone yet JarrahTree 01:51, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
dont go to too many dangerous places !! JarrahTree 00:38, 14 April 2018 (UTC)
The Original Barnstar | |
Thank you for your contribution to wikipedia, more specifically on Leptospermum laevigatum. Ben Stone (talk) 05:35, 17 June 2018 (UTC) |
trust a holiday is as good as a break from wikipedia :) - enjoy, it hasnt changed that much in your time off... JarrahTree 06:52, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
viz:
so any help is always appreciated - boring I know... but JarrahTree 00:54, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
I cannot believe how much you and geoff have done for biota project - both of your contributions are amazing!
Hello Darren,
Thought I'd be smart and add taxonomy. Great minds think alike! I can expand a bit though (if I'm quick!). Gderrin (talk) 09:52, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of Acacia ramulosa at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Zakhx150 (talk) 09:03, 5 October 2018 (UTC)
Replying on your talk page so you have the relevant links at hand. I just stumbled across the Acacia with a manual taxobox that you'd missed, but I did do a search for Eucalyptus species with manual taxoboxes you'd missed. The tool I used to find them is PetScan. Here is a link to search for the remaining Acacias with manual taxoboxes. Note that I've entered values across different tabs to construct the search ("Taxobox" under the Templates&links tab, "Acacia" under the Categories tab). PetScan does go down pretty frequently, but usually comes back up in less than a hour; if it's not working for you, just try again a little later. Plantdrew (talk) 20:14, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
so many plant items have had the absent biota-importance=low - it is such a relief to see you fixing that, thank you JarrahTree 09:34, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
Hello Hughesdarren,
Many plant pages I've edited would have red links if not for your work on places/rivers/towns/roads in W.A. Thank you.
I am curious about Muirs Highway. Google Maps, my (life saving!) Hema "Road & 4WD Track Atlas" give its name as Muir (without the "s") Highway and the road sign at the roundabout at Mount Barker give "Muir Highway". Your "Muirs Highway" article has a road sign with the "s". Is there more to this story? A recent name change perhaps? Maybe both names are correct and we need a dab? Gderrin (talk) 21:55, 14 October 2018 (UTC)
Ahh I knew the muir family will haunt me for the rest of my days... (it is a long and complex story)
"Orchids of Western Australia by Andrew Brown, Pat Dundas, Kingsley Dixon, and Steven Hopper. 2008. 421 pp. ISBN-10: 0980296455X. $80.00 (hbk). University of Western Australia Press, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia.(Book review)", Systematic Botany, 34 (3), American Society of Plant Taxonomists: 611, 2009-07-01, ISSN 0363-6445 the library description for the book has a diuris on singular muir,
then the plural at
I would never put it up at the page we would never hear the end of it... it appears to be interchangeable - the very important thing is to make sure it is not identified as muir highway without a state context there are muir highways elsewhere on this poor planet. JarrahTree 23:06, 14 October 2018 (UTC)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Byblis_gigantea is supposedly in the endangered list and is a vacuous stub - any thoughts from you or Geoff best way to go with endangered/empty stub items? JarrahTree 04:21, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
Hello Hughesdarren,
Thanks for your work on E. cernua (and everything else!). A couple of weeks ago I was searching for an orchid along the railway heritage track near Kundip and came across this small tree with a very helpful sign telling me what the tree was. (If only identifying orchids was so easy!) Otherwise, I'm leaving eucalypts alone. But I thought you might like to know Brooker and Hopper's original paper is available online here. Gderrin (talk) 11:13, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
Mate! We need to get our acts together. I've just spent about an hour making almost exactly the same edits to this page as you. Damn! You beat me to it. Hope you don't mind if I tweak it (the article I mean) a little bit.Gderrin (talk) 00:08, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
My apologies Hughesdarren if I ruined any of your work. I'm on a very slow learning curve. Allthingsnative —Preceding undated comment added 01:37, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
thank you very much for what you have done - much appreciated - enjoy!! JarrahTree 12:36, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
Lake muir event info with South_West_Seismic_Zone - what do you think? JarrahTree 23:47, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
so lake muir is in the zone from my reckoning. JarrahTree 13:43, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
On 16 November 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Acacia tenuissima, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the seeds of Acacia tenuissima (pictured) were used by Indigenous Australians to make damper? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Acacia tenuissima. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Acacia tenuissima), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Hello, Hughesdarren. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Eucalyptus cladocalyx, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Calyx (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:29, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
I gave a bunch of geographic locations as red links in an article, western rosella#Distribution and habitat, and wonder if stubs, redirects or pretend it is 'someone else's problem' provides a solution to match the otherwise blue links [targets to articles that you probably created]. And how are you? Tell me after you answer my query. cygnis insignis 13:35, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mount Saddleback, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Archaean (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
thank you - it just exhausted me to see how much had been done. Thank you JarrahTree 10:35, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
and also explained at , - I think there have been another two ips before that doing very similar edits JarrahTree 10:54, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Coyrecup Lake, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chara (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:47, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
Just wanted to say thank you for reviewing my new article Gibson Southern Jumbo. I used to own one a 1964 example of these fine guitars (pictured in the article photo), maybe will again some day! Cheers from Tony Rees in NSW, Australia. Tony 1212 (talk) 22:45, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lake Barlee, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Playa (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Seamless Wikipedia browsing. On steroids.
Every time you click a link to Wikipedia, Wiktionary or Wikiquote in your browser's search results, it will show the modern Wikiwand interface.
Wikiwand extension is a five stars, simple, with minimum permission required to keep your browsing private, safe and transparent.