Loading AI tools
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
It's five minutes to 2008 here in BC so I guess I have a few minutes to spare. I have just nominated list of Pacific hurricanes for peer review.
Your contest mentions that articles to be nominated must either be on a candidates page or on PR by 2008. It also says they must be articles. I'll let you decide if a list is eligible. If its is, I am entering this into the contest/competition. If it isn't, that's fine with me and nothing bad will happen.
Thanks, Miss Madeline | Talk to Madeline 07:56, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
Are you really going to create an article on Hurricane Charley (1986), as you indicate? There used to be one, but it was merged. If you're willing to make it your (to call it something) "highest priority future article" I can get it started by reversing the redirection and merger, and then you can work from that. Miss Madeline | Talk to Madeline 03:01, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Now all done at Sid Barnes. Thanks for teaching me something new! --Dweller (talk) 11:09, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Hurricane Daniel (2006) passed as a GA. Well done! See the talk page for subsequent comments. Best regards, Rt. 18:24, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Um, could you possibly tell me why all the pressures for the 1934 Atlantic hurricane season are showing up as unknown even though I typed pressures in for almost all of them? -- §HurricaneERICarchive 01:52, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
Thank you very much for the barnstar. Miss Madeline | Talk to Madeline 00:41, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
Hey, what was the name of that list of articles that link to List of retired Atlantic hurricane names? I wanted to finish fixing those links, but I can't find that list. Juliancolton (talk) 16:21, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
How urgent is that future creation going to happen? I just noticed on your page that you were intending to make one. I have a mostly-complete plaintext on my computer I can Copy and Paste into a sandbox if you don't mind. Miss Madeline | Talk to Madeline 04:00, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
Hi there. This article is at the Featured article review, here. I was wondering if you might comment on whether it should keep or lose FA status. Cheers, Marskell (talk) 06:47, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
Nah, I don't mind. It looks good. Juliancolton (talk) 13:23, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
Would you mind taking a look at Hurricane Daisy (1962), my newly publisher article? It has been assessed, but only as Start. :( Juliancolton (talk) 01:42, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
Here is my newest article. It took me a few hours to put together, and was wondering if it could be assessed. If you're wondering why I'm not on IRC at all today, its because I'm having IRC trouble.Mitch32contribs 00:38, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
It looks good. What I wanted to ask is where can I help out making the next issues? Juliancolton (talk) 02:51, 11 January 2008 (UTC) Oh, BTW, I worked on Darby the best I could, but I don't think it is large enough to publish. Thoughts? Juliancolton (talk) 21:04, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
In the last month, you have created a new WP:FL. From what I can tell, you are a veteran and have produced others in the past. Congratulations! I also see you have nominated an LOTDC this month. This is your official reminder that your votes are needed. Please participate in the voting.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTD) 22:20, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
The 1928 Okeechobee Hurricane article states that the hurricane moved ashore "between Jupiter and Boca Raton" with estimated winds of 150 mph (130 kts). Additionally, the hurricane's minimum central pressure of 929 mbar (27.43 inHg) was measured over land at West Palm Beach, according to the MWR. The best track indicates a pressure of 929 mbar in accordance with 150 mph winds shortly prior to landfall, so I think it is correct to utilize that fix as the landfall estimate. It would be consistent with the article, too. I must conclude that the best track's time frame is incorrect, thus bringing the hurricane over Florida later than reality. CVW (Talk) 17:45, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
--Elkman (Elkspeak) 20:25, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks! I appreciate it! Good to be back on activity. Sadly, my Alma article is getting shafted because the Hurricane Archives are down on my end. To make up for it, I ended up doing a last-minute hurricane article (Elida of 02) simply because there were no entries for it on that site. Like Nina, it's a single-edit job with no sandbox phase. Consider it an apology for the downtime on Hurricane Archives. Jake52 My island 06:36, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
Please look at this diff. It never hurts to have a fatter awards section :) Miss Madeline | Talk to Madeline 00:18, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
...are really beginning to bother me. Carol, Hazel, Gracie, Beulah, Betsy in Louisiana, Frederic, a storm in 1940, Hilda (1964), a 1918 storm, Louisiana 1926, Connie (1955), 1899 storm in Puerto Rico, Indianola 1886 storm (it says it was a 2!), and this is all just on one table! But these errors are repeated on other NHC charts. Iniki is wrong on one table but on another it's listed correctly, 1944 Great Atlantic is also conflicting...the list goes on and on, it's nuts. What is the deal here? They made HURDAT, why should the tables say anything different? If there was something they noticed in any kind of reanalysis and it affected the storm's peak intensity, HURDAT would reflect that. Perhaps not so much at landfall (Erin, 1995) but there would have to be a documentation of reanalysis data that affects landfall intensity. All I'm seeing is a bunch of charts with vastly different info and only categories listed. It's friggin' confusing and it's starting to affect our articles. Should we fire a WTF their direction and let them know the severity of the discrepancy? I think this is something that should be brought to their attention. It's all on this report -- §HurricaneERICarchive 01:33, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
You can. I've had my say, I probably won't take part. I may not like what they have to say. -- §HurricaneERICarchive 21:00, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
Sorry to bother you again, but I want to start on that WPAC typhoon, or a NIO storm, but I don't know where the official archives are in those places. Thanks. Juliancolton (talk) 19:06, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks, I think I will do the pacifc typhoon article first. Yes, I am finished with Putnam, now I am just waiting for the GAN to pass. Juliancolton (talk) 00:50, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
Ok, do south west Indian Ocean cyclones have TCRs? Juliancolton (talk) 01:56, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
On second thought, there is not alot of damage info for storms outside of the NHC, so is there a pacific storm that was notable, or is there an article that I should try to improve? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Juliancolton (talk • contribs) 14:52, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
Is there an article for me to work on that I can't mess up too bad? ;) Juliancolton (talk) 18:57, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
I know I am flooding your talk page with questions, but at the WP:METEO, we are going to do as the WPTC did, and see how many members are still active. I was wondering if I could use your message {{User:Hurricanehink/Active}}, adjusted, of course, to apply to the WP:METEO. Juliancolton (talk) 19:32, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
This isn't really on subject with the sub-header title, but I didn't want to clutter your talk page. Anyway, my craving for trying to get a season articles is growing; do you mind if I try to do something with the messy 2000 Atlantic hurricane season? If so, I will probobly do a format similar to 2005 and 2003. Juliancolton (talk) 23:22, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
--Archtransit (talk) 19:15, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
User:Juliancolton/Active
Its not ready yet. ---CWY2190TC 03:17, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
You're invited to the
Sixth Philadelphia-area Wikipedia Meetup
January 2008
Time: January 26th, 5:00 PM
Location: The Marathon Grill, 10th and Walnut
You have received this message because you are on the invite list, you may change your invite options via that link. BrownBot (talk) 21:06, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
I accidentally forgot to log in prior to editing. Can you revert my anonymous IP edits to the 1917 article and remove them from the page's history? I don't want my IP address to be viewable for the public in the history section. Thank you. CVW (Talk) 23:13, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
Seamless Wikipedia browsing. On steroids.
Every time you click a link to Wikipedia, Wiktionary or Wikiquote in your browser's search results, it will show the modern Wikiwand interface.
Wikiwand extension is a five stars, simple, with minimum permission required to keep your browsing private, safe and transparent.