Loading AI tools
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
I invite you to vote here for whether or not Ralph Nader should be included in the info-box, @Prcc27:. Yuri Alexeyevich Gagarin (talk) 22:59, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
I saw your edit question on Eureka, California. I did not revert the edit, but it looks like to me that since the earlier mention of snow is in a record-breaking year, that it would be notable whereas a light dusting in an otherwise ordinary year is not notable. Hope this helps ! Ellin Beltz (talk) 09:05, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
You are editing against what a reliable source states. You need a much better reason than "I don't believe it". Both the Futon Critic and TV Guide are very trusted reliable sources of broadcast information. Nick's promos conflict with what really is happening. Nick is promoting the normal weekday schedule but they ARE airing the first eps on the 7th. Until 8:30 comes and goes we won't have better information than what is the latest schedules. Geraldo Perez (talk) 21:42, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
Hi. When you recently edited List of House of Anubis characters, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Philip Wright (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:56, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to House of Anubis, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Geraldo Perez (talk) 23:27, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
Hello, user. What pictures do you prefer?
--Belibaste (talk) 22:43, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
option c/e please!!!--Prcc27 (talk) 06:55, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
You started a discussion on the talk page. Don't edit war this issue. Work to get concensus on the talk page. You have made 3 reverts so far and could get blocked for breaking the WP:3RR rule. Geraldo Perez (talk) 00:56, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to List of Victorious episodes. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Geraldo Perez (talk) 21:28, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Sam & Cat. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Please heed the note that advises contributors "Don't add Cameron Ocasio unless and until there is reliably sourced official announcement." Orlady (talk) 04:34, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
There was a source thank you very much! --Prcc27 (talk) 07:07, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
Please use high quality references per WP:MEDRS such as review articles or major textbooks. Note that review articles are NOT the same as peer reviewed articles. A good place to find medical sources is TRIP database Thanks.
Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 12:29, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
Understand the term main character. Justice just appeared and was credited in a crossover of both TV series, in that sense iCarly cast must be added to Victorious just because of this. Consider that I've seen your editing in the past, reverting me is not WP:CONSENSUS and if it is needed you and me can be blocked or the page protected. For good of the three better discuss rather than start an WP:EW. Tbhotch.™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 21:07, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on ICarly. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Tbhotch.™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 21:15, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at iCarly. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Understand the concept of main character. It was a special opening for that episode only. talk about it on the talk page before adding it. WP Editor 2012 (talk) 20:54, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at iCarly shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. 155blue (talk) 00:46, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. Your edits have been reverted or removed.
Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. IMBD is not a WP:RS Please read that page. Also she is not a cast member WP Editor 2012 (talk) 17:21, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
Please do not delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at Talk:List of House of Anubis episodes. Such edits are disruptive and appear to be vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. If you are really that IP, log out and make the changes as that editor. The dates of the original comments are important. Otherwise leave old comments in a talk page alone. Geraldo Perez (talk) 05:25, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
Your edit has been rejected. Please take it to discussion. If you continue edit warring, I will ask to have you blocked. — kwami (talk) 07:39, 17 November 2013 (UTC)
I did take it to the discussion. You started the edit war. --Prcc27 (talk) 07:45, 17 November 2013 (UTC)
Geraldo Perez (talk) 15:08, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
Please use high quality references per WP:MEDRS such as review articles or major textbooks. Note that review articles are NOT the same as peer reviewed articles. A good place to find medical sources is TRIP database Thanks.
Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 01:45, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
Does the claim "Circumcision does not appear to have a negative impact on sexual function." use a secondary source? --Prcc27 (talk) 02:17, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
Next time you add content without consensus you may be blocked. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 02:39, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
Would you check out the percentages and colors they match up to at Public opinion of same-sex marriage in the United States#By state? Right now Missouri which has a support rating of 38% is labeled as pink while Kansas at 39% is in red. I also want to know where you consider the "majority" point to be? Is 51% support stretching it a bit? - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 00:14, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
See Wikipedia:Reviewing. Regards. Ron 1987 (talk) 03:28, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
Gov. Pat Quinn has instructed county clerks to issue marriage licenses to all who apply. It's not just in Cook County - it's throughout the state. This supercedes the legislation. - ILBobby (talk) 00:01, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
Those colors where on there for a reason. I can't see the colors made in the edit by Bigdaddybrabantio. I'm getting sick of this. The colors where good for a reason, but you keep editing it. Please keep it the way it was.GayTenn (talk) 19:56, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Could you reply to my comment at Talk:Same-sex marriage in Kentucky ? I think the entry for Same-sex marriage in Kentucky could be made much better very easily in the way I suggest, but since you started the entry I'd like to hear from you. Thanks. Bmclaughlin9 (talk) 20:44, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2014 Eureka Earthquake is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2014 Eureka Earthquake until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Gaijin42 (talk) 16:35, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
Hi, I'm Dreambeaver. Prcc27, thanks for creating 2005 Eureka Earthquake!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. It seems you have made a mistake with the date of the earthquake, which you have stated in the article as 14 June 2014. Wanted to bring that to your notice. Happy writing!
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Dreambeaver(talk) 07:47, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2005 Eureka Earthquake is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2005 Eureka Earthquake until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dawnseeker2000 00:40, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Hello, please do not create any more of these types of "articles". There is usually nothing to say about these types of low impact earthquakes because no one was affected, and all they'll ever achieve is stub class here. WP does not need stubs; it needs comprehensive articles where people can actually read and learn something. We have a solution for these types of events: the list articles. Thanks, Dawnseeker2000 00:44, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Please Stop removing my most recent addition to this section. The two polls that were added (NJ and NY) were from March of 2014. You can not just edit the section without reading the sources. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.230.71.243 (talk) 04:25, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
Yeah, but you added an older poll from California as well. If you don't want me to revert you, don't put older polls. Simple as that. --Prcc27 (talk) 04:32, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
Hi, I reverted your edit to Same-sex marriage in the United States and changed it back to the plural. More than one marriage was performed that morning, so the plural is more accurate. — Bill W. (Talk) (Contrib) — 04:08, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
Been travelling this last week and have only been able to edit via a smart phone. Editing that way can be a little tricky (its happened to me before) and I inadvertently touched rollback while checking my watchlist. Apologies, and have a great rest of the weekend. Dawnseeker2000 03:10, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
Please don't edit war. Unreferenced material can be removed at any time. Use the talk page. — kwami (talk) 22:23, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
Also, I noticed the thing that said colors in the table match the map. Prcc27 (talk) 23:00, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
@Kwamikagami:Could you please fix Connecticut; it doen't match the table..!? --Prcc27 (talk) 03:25, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
@Kwamikagami: Here's the link, it's already on the table... --Prcc27 (talk) 03:37, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
@Kwamikagami: How is it dead...? On my computer it works..! :o What do you mean by "dead"..? --Prcc27 (talk) 03:45, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
What about Illinois? In the state article there's another poll from a few months earlier, but I can't access that either. I'm hoping it has better than a 9% sampling error; we can probably change the state from pea-soup to azure if you can access it. — kwami (talk) 04:58, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
@Kwamikagami: Okay. I think it's good that we got rid of dark gray. But umm.. How come some of the states with polls that aren't two years or older have question marks; specifically Oregon and Nevada..? Prcc27 (talk) 19:52, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
ounded off to 4%, like it is for DE, then we wouldn't worry about it, though it matters if the value is rounded off from closer to 54.5% or closer to 53.5%; that potentially changes Oregon as well.)
@Kwamikagami: Pretty sure the Utah one is actually an old one; you might wanna check the other ones too. Prcc27 (talk) 04:10, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
@Kwamikagami: Another Louisiana poll Prcc27 (talk) 04:23, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
Added map to Same-sex_marriage_in_the_United_States#Presently_in_litigation. You might want to check for accuracy & completeness.
I thought most states had cases pending. Maybe we just don't cover many of them? — kwami (talk) 04:25, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
@Kwamikagami: Yeah, but the colors on Utah need to be flipped since the most recent poll shows opposition rather than a tie. Prcc27 (talk) 06:39, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
@Kwamikagami: But shouldn't Georgia be beige..? It seems like it's within the margin of error. Prcc27 (talk) 10:21, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
@Kwamikagami: I think the other California poll was actually more recent.. Prcc27 (talk) 19:49, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
Hey, found another Texas poll. It's older, but also surveyed a larger base, and AFAICT was not about recognizing marriages performed in another state, and still it came back with the same results, a statistical tie. So I feel better about having Texas gold. — kwami (talk) 05:54, 27 April 2014 (UTC)
Hi @Kwamikagami:, sorry to bother you; I was just wondering if both polls for North Carolina should be pink. (Sorry, I don't fully understand how this works). --Prcc27 (talk) 04:39, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
@Kwamikagami: Why does Alabama have a red question mark..? --Prcc27 (talk) 05:23, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
@Kwamikagami: Should we add this misleading poll? Also, D.C. needs to be gray with a blue question mark (I don't know how that can be pulled off) and I'm leaning towards opposing having Alabama be a red question mark. --Prcc27 (talk) 01:36, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
@Kwamikagami: Okay. Also, the most recent poll suggests that a majority of Americans are against same-sex marriage, but the polling sample seems to discredit it. Should it still be added to the by state chart to show how there were two (or three) different polls with different results. We could note how the most recent poll isn't that accurate in the sample size section. I should probably take this to the talk though... --Prcc27 (talk) 03:32, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
@Kwamikagami: I put the poll on the talk. --Prcc27 (talk) 05:04, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
The LGBT Barnstar | ||
I also award you a barnstar for working to make Public opinion of same-sex marriage in the United States a better article through discussion and edits. Great work! =) - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 00:50, 25 April 2014 (UTC) |
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gay sexual practices, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Frottage (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
So the gov who vows to appeal is named Butch Otter. I had to laugh. Do you think he's taking it personally? — kwami (talk) 04:39, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
Done! File:CousinMarriageWorld.svg You may need to clear you cache (usually hitting ctrl-F5 while viewing the page) to see the change. Pardon us using your talk page Darlwik. EvergreenFir (talk) 07:03, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
Hello, please don't modify other peoples messages as you did here and here . Thanks! Thegreyanomaly (talk) 19:56, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
Can you explain your reasoning for the recent changes you have made to this page? I really don't see how the new map helps the article at all. 67.215.140.115 (talk) 03:01, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at LGBT rights in the United States. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 02:00, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
I am placing this tag as you have inserted a map into the article that was not agreed upon via consensus and removed the map that was agreed upon. The agreed upon map File:Samesex marriage in USA.svg covers all the articles it is used in. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 02:00, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
Prcc27, I wrote "per 3/4 participants", not "votes". However, I can see how anyone would take that as meaning the decision was based on majority. My bad.
There was unanimity that MSM blood donor controversy was not desirable. Gay male blood donor controversy was the only alternative on offer. You've since offered Men who have sex with men blood donor controversy, which would appear to me to fit with what others would support.
Can I suggest you move it to that title and leave a note on the current talk page (not the archive)?
Not much gets by without someone noticing... If I may, let me offer some unsolicited advice: Not now. I haven't seen a candidate even get close with less than 5000 contribs, they almost always end within an hour or two via WP:NOTNOW. Wikipedia:Guide to requests for adminship is worth a read. It looks like you might be on the right path, but it is just too soon for most of the community to trust you yet. Age and experience work against you, but fortunately, both of those are easily solved with time and by doing things. Dennis Brown | 2¢ | WER 20:44, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Gay blood donation. Since you had some involvement with the Gay blood donation redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - MrX 21:56, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
I was tired of seeing the CU/DP map as a PNG all over the place. I map an SVG map and uploaded it at File:Same-sex unions in the United States.svg. I have a lot of work to do, so I'll let you replace the PNG map. Thegreyanomaly (talk) 19:01, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
Thank you for your contributions to the encyclopedia! In case you are not already aware, an article to which you have recently contributed, Men's rights movement, is on article probation. A detailed description of the terms of article probation may be found at Talk:Men's rights movement/Article probation. Also note that the terms of some article probations extend to related articles and their associated talk pages.
The above is a templated message. Please accept it as a routine friendly notice, not as a claim that there is necessarily any problem with your edits. Thank you. -- Bbb23 (talk) 00:39, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
The Editor's Barnstar | |
For a good job in the articles about LGBT topics. Миша Карелин (talk) 20:21, 27 June 2014 (UTC) |
Dear user, I dont know you like European footbal or no, but there is a question about famous footbaler Pele's article. About his confesion to had a gay sex. The discussing is here . Please take part if you can. M.Karelin (talk) 13:28, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Same-sex marriage in Texas, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Orlando Garcia. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Same-sex marriage in the Fourth Circuit may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:53, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Template:Samesex marriage in USA map shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. You're well over the limit here. Please stop edit warring and take your concerns to the talk page. Artichoker[talk] 06:19, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
I know you would like to keep thinking "A [temporarily] stayed ruling doesn't legalize same-sex marriage," when it actually does, but please don't disruptively edit articles to make your point as you did here . The column edited refers specifically to when a bill was signed or a judicial order was filed. Every other state that received SSM by judicial ruling with a temporary stay uses the date of judicial ruling for that column (Massachusetts, California (In Re Marriage cases), Connecticut, Iowa, New Jersey). Admittedly, the Prop 8 case is slightly convoluted, but Walker's ruling was the only legal ruling that discussed the legal merits of Prop 8 (the vacated ruling doesn't count, and the 5-4 SCOTUS ruling didn't deal with the merits), and thus his order was the one that "re"-legalized SSM and it is his date that is relevant to the table. Please do not repeat this edit. (Also, if you are to respond, please direct all responses to the article's talk page where everyone will see it) Thegreyanomaly (talk) 15:00, 25 August 2014 (UTC)
@prcc27 I'm going to be incommunicado for three weeks. Could you take care of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_U.S._state_laws_on_same-sex_unions if any rulings drop? Thanks. Mw843 (talk) 21:38, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for creating Same-sex marriage in the Seventh Circuit, Prcc27!
Wikipedia editor SantiLak just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Well written article. Don't forget to expand as events develop.
To reply, leave a comment on SantiLak's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Hi, would you clarify the information regarding same sex marriages in Mexican state of Coahuila. Is that only recognition, or full marriage (they say it is in force since 17th of Senptember, see here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Same-sex_marriage#Timeline). M.Karelin (talk) 12:33, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
I have been waiting for multiple days, and you have not responded. Dustin (talk) 03:41, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
Hello dear user. I started a new section in Talk page in the Barack Obama page - (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Barack_Obama#The_Best_Economic_President_In_Modern_Times.3F.3F). As far as only one person replied, it would be nice if you also say your opinion there in talk page, what you think about it? Thansk in advance. M.Karelin (talk) 19:37, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
I wish you wouldn't ask for pages/maps to be protected just because there is lack of consensus on what an edit should be. Protection is overkill because it prevents *anyone* from making any changes. Just let us sort it out on our own. (No need to respond on my talk page, I can check your talk page if you have a response.) Tinmanic (talk) 14:49, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
The article Same-sex marriage by Circuit Court has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —Largo Plazo (talk) 09:53, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Same-sex marriage by Circuit Court. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Same-sex marriage in the United States#July–present. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Same-sex marriage in the United States#July–present – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.
If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. —Largo Plazo (talk) 12:45, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
If you're dead-set on de jure over de facto, we should have a third color for the rogue counties, like a medium blue with the stayed ban counties not issuing in gray. That way the maps are not just legally accurate, but also reflect the real world. Also, your original Missouri map fails the Commons standards since it is not sizeable (you cannot zoom in and keep resolution). I am fixing that. Dralwik|Have a Chat 23:42, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
Hello dear friend. I think the map in the mentioned article is very outdated. SSM is legal in Utah and Oklahoma, but the colores are NOT blue for those states. M.Karelin (talk) 05:15, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
I'm sorry I said that. I can be a hothead when it comes to such issues and I feel like I'm being called out unfairly, and I tend to say the first thing that comes into my mind. I'll strike the sentence on the talk page and add public apologies there as well, it's only fair I do that. Kumorifox (talk) 14:32, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
Reverted your edits to the SSM timeline. You provided no refs, and are contradicted by our articles. 108.171.132.164 ([[User talk:108.171.132.1 64|talk]]) 22:51, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
the divorce you count as Florida's third recognition of SSM is already counted as the second (Brassner). The news is just the divorce made final. Bmclaughlin9 (talk) 16:59, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
How about making the Florida county map show only the local cases? That way, we can show the Miami-Dade development and avoid deciding the scope of the stayed federal decision? Dralwik|Have a Chat 09:04, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
Why did you deleted my change on Chile's civil union?Kallme (talk) 02:10, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
We say they were performed and are still valid in MI and AR, and also that they're recognized in MI if performed in MI. That means the same thing. Unless, as you say, they're not still valid in AR, in which case the entire 'still valid' section should be deleted. It makes no sense to have both. — kwami (talk) 21:14, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
Sorry, don't mean to nit-pick, but the grammar was good as it was. — kwami (talk) 23:54, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
Consensus is currently against you on the talk page. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 02:44, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
Purposefully introducing errors is vandalism. Please stop. — kwami (talk) 03:34, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
Please explain how SSM is illegal in Kansas City. What is the penalty? A fine, or jail time? — kwami (talk) 03:42, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
http://www.justiceservices.gov.mt/DownloadDocument.aspx?app=lom&itemid=8749&l=1
Chase1493 (talk) 22:46, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
If SSM is recognized in AL, shouldn't it be blue-green on the map? — kwami (talk) 18:30, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
You are invited to participate in Wiki Loves Pride!
Or, view or update the current list of Tasks. This campaign is supported by the Wikimedia LGBT+ User Group, an officially recognized affiliate of the Wikimedia Foundation. Visit the group's page at Meta-Wiki for more information, or follow Wikimedia LGBT+ on Facebook. Remember, Wiki Loves Pride is about creating and improving LGBT-related content at Wikimedia projects, and content should have a neutral point of view. One does not need to identify as LGBT or any other gender or sexual minority to participate. This campaign is about adding accurate, reliable information to Wikipedia, plain and simple, and all are welcome!
If you have any questions, please leave a message on the campaign's main talk page.
Thanks, and happy editing!
An RfC has been started on Same-sex marriage in the Pitcairn Islands (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). FYI. Me-123567-Me (talk) 20:53, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
Regarding your map showing Florida counties and their stance regarding SSM...now that it has been legalized across the country, and Florida AG Bondi has of course dropped her case, I was wondering if the map could be made to reflect those counties that have legalization unhindered, and then those where clerks have stopped performing ceremonies (dark blue for the former, maybe purple for the latter (14 counties) like the US SSM map since it is technically legal, just more complicated to get the license validated as opposed to most other counties in the state). Would that be alright?
By the way, links showing these counties. Admittedly, it's been difficult to find full updates on where all of them stand post-Obergefell: Ghal416 (talk) 19:17, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Either you are deleting section links from your edit summaries (they should appear as /* Section */) or you just aren't using section-only editing at all, but it is helpful for you to link the section you have edited in a talk page in your edit summary. If you use the section-only edit, it should automatically add text to your edit summary linking the section you have edited, but you are either always editing the page as a whole or deleting the section-link from your edit summary if you are not. On the File talk:Same-sex marriage in the United States.svg page, it is more difficult for me to track your comments than just about anyone else, so I thought I should point this out to you. Dustin (talk) 19:48, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
Dear Sir: Would you kindly review this proposal/compromise: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Njsustain/sandbox Could this be all things to all people and hopefully avoid any future edit wars? Njsustain (talk) 15:15, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
Statistical ties occur when two or more candidates report numbers that are within the margin of error. Nitroxium (talk) 14:28, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
There is a request for comment on the 2016 article, and your involvement has been noted. You may wish to vote. Spartan7W § 00:22, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar | |
I've been watching your edits on same-sex marriage since U.S. v. Windsor. You've always been on your game there. Love it. Thanks for all your contributions. Semperferox (talk) 05:41, 15 August 2015 (UTC) |
I downloaded your file and added Georgia. But before I uploaded it, I faced 2 challenges. First, do I have the authority to modify the map? Two, if I do, how do I update the map so that the history of map changes are maintained? Thanks All4peace (talk) 18:28, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
Hello, Prcc27
Is there a place where I can speak with you privately? This would be very appreciated. 107.188.135.107 (talk) 06:41, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
Well? 107.188.135.107 (talk) 06:47, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Circumcision. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Alexbrn (talk) 19:44, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
Prcc27, don't worry- You didn't break any wikipedia policies. I've been blocked for things like this yk. What's your email? I want to talk to you in further detail about this. Cirflow (talk) 08:36, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
Hmm, now I'm feeling bad for sticking that on the 2016 article (stuck it there since it was just using text to say the same thing). Anyway... while it's cool you took an interest in this, I reverted your changes. There's quite a number of sources that make it clear that distance from the -nationwide- vote is what matters, with landslide elections being the classic case where this is obvious - Massachusetts was not a swing state in 1984, it was super-Democratic. If you look at the sources in the "potential battleground states" section (e.g. http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2015/05/2016-predictions-117554 , http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/the-gops-uphill-path-to-270-in-2016/2014/01/18/9404eb06-7fcf-11e3-93c1-0e888170b723_story.html ), you'll see that states like Nevada & Iowa (won convincingly by Obama by more than 5%) are marked as "toss-up", while Georgia (won by Romney by 7.5% or so) is marked "Likely R". Georgia is not really a battleground state; if the Democrats are contesting it in 2016, then they've likely already won anyway. Sources seem clear enough on this. SnowFire (talk) 14:06, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:48, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
User All4peace (talk) has initiated a discussion, on the article talk page on English Wikipedia about how we present MOE.
I would very‐much appreciate your participation ! Info por favor (talk) 22:31, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
The 78.26 RFA Appreciation award | |
Thank you for the participation and support at my RFA. It is truly appreciated. I hope to be of further help around here, and if you see me doing something dumb, you know where to find me. Again, I thank you. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 02:16, 24 December 2015 (UTC) |
Hello, I would like for you to go to my user talk:Cirflow page. Me and another editor are engaged in a discussion- It is the newest topic open. User:Cirflow
Please read policy before reverting. It says "with the exception that some lists restrict inclusion to notable items or people". You should revert your edit. Prcc27💋 (talk) 00:47, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
I've created a discussion at Template talk:Democratic Party presidential primaries, 2016#Image. Please don't change the image until a consensus is reached. MB298 (talk) 01:47, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Your preferable photo had been disputed by a number of editors, including most recently myself and another editor – so as to avoid edit warring by trying to achieve WP:EDITCONSENSUS, it would have been better to go through the channel of achieving discussion based consensus. Might I add, WP:EDITCONSENSUS should have stopped following the initial editor's reversal of your edit, per WP:BRD. It's good we're finally at the discussion based consensus step, though. Best, —MelbourneStar☆talk 01:57, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
I think there's been a little hiccup in our updates of the map. My upload did not change the color used for Clinton. All it does is make it easier to edit the map with a text editor. Abjiklɐm (tɐlk) 08:58, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
It is very easy to pull a pattern out of your editing of POV pushing on circumcision related issues. This is behavior that can lead to a topic-ban. This is Wkipedia not Wikipenispolitics. So please knock it off and confine discussion of that "controversy" to articles that actually deal with that the subject. Thanks. Jytdog (talk) 16:39, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
Hi! I've taken to updating this page (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Popular_Vote_Interstate_Compact#Currently_active_bills) every few weeks. You recently updated the Arizona Upper House bill status, and to save myself some work, I'd like to know whether you checked the others through this (https://legiscan.com/gaits/search) or another reliable source. I'm not really sure how you should respond, since I'm relatively inexperienced with Wikipedia. Do you post on my talk page? Should I watch this page? Is it automatically sent to me via notifications?
I suppose at this point, it's already been more work to post here, but it'd be useful to learn a bit about Wikipedia anyway.
Blippy1998 (talk) 13:38, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
As a participant of WikiProject LGBT studies, you are invited to participate in the third annual Wiki Loves Pride campaign, which runs through the month of June. The purpose of the campaign is to create and improve content related to LGBT culture and history. How can you help?
Looking for topics? The Tasks page, which you are welcome to update, offers some ideas and wanted articles.
This campaign is supported by the Wikimedia LGBT+ User Group, an officially recognized affiliate of the Wikimedia Foundation. The group's mission is to develop LGBT-related content across all Wikimedia projects, in all languages. Visit the affiliate's page at Meta-Wiki for more information, or follow Wikimedia LGBT+ on Facebook. Remember, Wiki Loves Pride is about creating and improving LGBT-related content at Wikimedia projects, and content should have a neutral point of view. One does not need to identify as LGBT or any other gender or sexual minority to participate. This campaign is about adding accurate, reliable information to Wikipedia, plain and simple, and all are welcome! If you have any questions, please leave a message on the campaign's talk page.
Thanks, and happy editing! ---Another Believer (Talk) 20:39, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 2005 Eureka Earthquake. Since you had some involvement with the 2005 Eureka Earthquake redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Dawnseeker2000 02:55, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 2014 Eureka Earthquake. Since you had some involvement with the 2014 Eureka Earthquake redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Dawnseeker2000 03:46, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
I'm inviting you back to participate in the runoff election between C and E.
If you don't want to support either one, you could oppose one or both by voting "C -6 (6 against)", "E -6 (6 against)", "C -5 E -1", "C -1 E -5", ... --Dervorguilla (talk) 00:33, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
As written, your vote will necessarily result in the following comment in the tally results, for clarity:
A2.6 and B1.8 - discarded as out of accepted process, see WP:POINT.
Those two votes will not affect the percentages. I would prefer to avoid that bit of unpleasantness. ―Mandruss ☎ 16:43, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Also my plan is to respect the tenths portions of your C1.3 and E0.3 votes, resulting in two tallies ending in .3. People may wonder WTF, investigate or ask about it, and they will learn that it's because of Prcc27's POINTy vote. More disruption, more unpleasantness. ―Mandruss ☎ 17:02, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Sparkie82 (t•c) 12:06, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
I assume you are aware of the 1RR in place, a lot of reverting has been going on lately is all. This is just a heads up message. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 16:26, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
Hey man, so why did you remove the new picture of Donald Trump? Everyone seems to agree in Talk. You're talking about some kind of RfC, but it's been archived and the picture hadn't been taken back then. What's the problem with the picture? It's recent and it looks good. So what's the problem, why would you remove it? People agree. User1937 (talk) 13:35, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
Please stop removing content from the talk page at Talk:United States presidential election, 2016. Your removal a consensus notice (which has been on the page for months now) appears to be intended to obscure of effect the RfC that is currently going on, or is intended to harrass me directly. Stop it now. Sparkie82 (t•c) 17:54, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
I do not believe that your close was an accurate understanding of WP:UNDUE, WP:SYNC, and WP:NPOV. Nor do I believe that WP:Consensus was against the inclusion. I will be challenging the close. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 01:49, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
But before I ask for a close review, explain why you think your close was correct? After all, protocol suggests that I discuss the matter with you before taking it to WP:AN for review. Isaidnoway, who understands the WP:NPOV policy quite well, might also be interested in commenting here. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 02:01, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
I just saw your reply at the article's talk page. While I obviously don't agree with your issue with "national debate," we are both in agreement with using "widespread debate." I noted in the RfC that I would be fine with using that wording as an alternative. So does this mean you are willing to alter your closing statement? If so, is it in support of the proposed sentence, but without use of "national," "icon" or "iconic"? Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 03:39, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
Okay, I just saw you revise the close. I don't fully agree with it, sure, but I can work with it. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 04:08, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
Just to be clear, I didn't see that the notion that Lexa's death fulfilled the trope was challenged; even the creator agreed that it unintentionally fulfilled the trope. I did see disagreement about the creator's/other writers' intentions and whether Lexa should have been killed off in a different way, though. But all of this is made clear in the character's article. Adding "contentious debate" would be redundant. A debate is, by definition, contentious. Usually. Anyway, thanks. I appreciate the compromise and that we worked this out without taking it to a drama board. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 04:17, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
Hi, your closure of this this RFC seems a little astonishing. The overwhelming opinion was to disambiguate (and indeed the subsequent requested move (which for unknown reasons was completed before this RFC was closed) very recently moved Kaine (disambiguation) to Kaine. Your closure seems to unnecessarily complicate matters. older ≠ wiser 03:43, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
I concur with Bkonrad. The closure seems more of a supervote than an assessment of consensus as contained in the !votes. I also note that the logic in the close is faulty; even if Tim Kaine is viewed more than the other pages, it does not mean that readers accessing Kaine are searching for that page; additionally, the usage referred to is usage in the wider world, not Wikipedia page views, nor GHITS. I formally request that you self-revert the close, per Wikipedia:Closing discussions#Challenging other closures. - Ryk72 'c.s.n.s.' 10:40, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
Hi, I saw you closed this discussion without implementing the outcome. The intention is that you do not only assess consensus, but also implement consensus. If you don't know how, then please don't close the discussion because this is very confusing. Marcocapelle (talk) 21:36, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Donald Trump. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
Hello. Do you see the consensus in that discussion? Three users said, it was the inaugural tournament, only two users for merging. OVERLAP rule doesn't apply here, because the tournaments are not the same. Interwiki conflict will be in case of merging, see for old European Open and for new European Masters. It's a different tournaments in all wikipedias. Do you have the source which says it's a same tournament? (it was not shown in the discussion) Where is the analyze of arguments shown in the discussion? 95.133.148.13 (talk) 15:45, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of Hillary Clinton presidential campaign endorsements, 2016. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
I wanted to say thanks for the close at Talk:Shooting_of_Keith_Lamont_Scott#RfC:_Scott_history_of_carrying_a_gun, and not just because you closed in my favor. That's a tough and generally thankless job, and essential to Wikipedia's functioning. ―Mandruss ☎ 18:17, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
Judging by your bio, it seems that we have some life similarities. :-D Anyway, here's the spiel I came here to post:
I see that you're a Bernie and Jill supporter, which indicates to me that you would support fair voting reform. The Wikipage: Instant-runoff voting.
For the group fighting for it, check out: http://www.FairVote.org.
To see why it's necessary, check out: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wqblOq8BmgM.
It's supported by the Green Party: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eb7MQ7da6sg.
Suggestions:
KnowledgeBattle (Talk) | GodlessInfidel ︻╦╤── 20:05, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Donald Trump sexual misconduct allegations. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
Well-reasoned and policy-cited close at Talk:Slut-shaming (better than I expected anyone to produced from that discussion). However, it actually is best to include a non-admin closure notice. What you're looking for is {{nac}}, which links to the general guideline on that, rather than the WP:RM-specific link you added then removed as non-pertinent. — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼ 09:46, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Clinton Foundation. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Singapore. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Dreams from My Real Father. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Popular election. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
You are invited to participate in the 50,000 Challenge, aiming for 50,000 article improvements and creations for articles relating to the United States. This effort began on November 1, 2016 and to reach our goal, we will need editors like you to participate, expand, and create. See more here! |
--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:40, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Conservative Party of Canada leadership election, 2017. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:United States involvement in regime change. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Ronald Reagan. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Female genital mutilation. Legobot (talk) 04:38, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Samantha Bee. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Moazzam Begg. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Prcc27. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Rodrigo Duterte. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Michael Portillo. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Volunteer (Ireland). Legobot (talk) 04:26, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Steve Bannon. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Cold war (general term). Legobot (talk) 04:27, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Fidel Castro. Legobot (talk) 04:30, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Donald Trump. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Indian 500 and 1000 rupee note demonetisation. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:2016 South Korean protests. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank International. Legobot (talk) 04:30, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Abortion-rights movements. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Donald Trump. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Beheading in Islam. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 16 December 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Murder of Maria Ladenburger. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:United States presidential elections in which the winner lost the popular vote. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Bernie or Bust. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:United States presidential election, 2016. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Betsy DeVos. Legobot (talk) 04:32, 26 December 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 28 December 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of fake news websites. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Syrian Observatory for Human Rights. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Pizzagate (conspiracy theory). Legobot (talk) 04:31, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Southern Poverty Law Center. Legobot (talk) 04:32, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:United States presidential election in the District of Columbia, 2016. Legobot (talk) 04:30, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:2016 United States election interference by Russia. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of American police officers killed in the line of duty. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Thomas Mair (murderer). Legobot (talk) 04:28, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
Hi Prcc27, please allow me to get in touch because you have stated sympathy with environmental causes on your user page. I would like to invite you to check out the Environmental impact project page on Meta, where I am trying to create some momentum to reduce the environmental impact of the Wikimedia movement. My first goal is to have all the Wikimedia servers run on renewable energy. Maybe you could show your support for this project as well by adding your signature here? Thank you, --Gnom (talk) 22:04, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Raymond Chan Chi-chuen. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Betsy DeVos. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Sarah Jane Brown. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Tony Blair. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Donald Trump. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:William McKinley. Legobot (talk) 04:33, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Donald Trump. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:James O'Keefe. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Breitbart News. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
You may want to participate in this RfC regarding the inclusion of candidates in election infoboxes. MB298 (talk) 01:52, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:United States presidential election, 2016. Legobot (talk) 04:31, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Political appointments of Donald Trump. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Emmett Till. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Elections and Referendums. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Reza Aslan. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Melania Trump. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Charles Murray (political scientist). Legobot (talk) 04:26, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Disputed status of Gibraltar. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Armenia. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Ben Swann. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Melania Trump. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template:Did you know nominations/Executive Order 13767. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Hey, I noticed you were the last user to edit the worldwide MSM blood donor map. I already made a request at the talk page, but if that hasn't gone anywhere by the time you read this, could you please change Northern Ireland to be the same colour as the rest of the UK? They repealed the lifetime ban in September last year. HelgaStick (talk) 14:37, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Sean Hannity. Legobot (talk) 04:32, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Donald Trump–Russia dossier. Legobot (talk) 04:31, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Sebastian Gorka. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Maryam Rajavi. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Immigration and crime. Legobot (talk) 04:30, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Protests against Donald Trump. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Demagogue. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Categorization. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Cold War II. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:United States presidential election, 2020. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:2017 Olathe, Kansas shooting. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Hi, Prcc27! Thank you again for supporting the Sustainability Initiative, which aims at reducing the environmental impact of the Wikimedia movement. Over the past two years, more than 200 Wikipedians from all over the world have come together to push the Wikimedia movement towards greater sustainability.
What's new?
We are writing you this message because there is great news: The Board of Trustees of the Wikimedia Foundation has finally passed a resolution stating that the Foundation is committed to seeking ways to reduce the impact of its activities on the environment. Also, we have created a cool logo and found a nice name for the project which you can see on the right :-)
What's next?
Currently, we are working with Wikimedia Foundation staff to make sustainability a key priority for the selection of a new location for Wikimedia servers in Singapore. Also, we have presented the Wikimedia Foundation with a green energy roadmap to have all Wikimedia servers run on renewable energy by 2019.
Please help!
Let's keep this project moving forward – and there are several ways in which you can help:
If you have any questions, you can contact us on on Meta. Again, thank you very much for your support! --Aubrey and Gnom (talk) 09:46, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Office of Victims of Immigration Crime Engagement. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Erik Prince. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Proposed deletion of biographies of living people. Legobot (talk) 04:30, 29 April 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Notability (organizations and companies). Legobot (talk) 04:30, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Otto Warmbier. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:White Helmets (Syrian Civil War). Legobot (talk) 04:26, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:2017 Berkeley protests. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Politics of the Republic of China. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
WikiLGBT is on Twitter! | |
---|---|
|
RachelWex 17:25, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Islamic terrorism in Europe (2014–present). Legobot (talk) 04:28, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Women's Equality Party. Legobot (talk) 04:31, 21 June 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Attack on Prekaz. Legobot (talk) 04:31, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Husan. Legobot (talk) 04:30, 8 July 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:/r/The Donald. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Blue Ribbon Online Free Speech Campaign. Legobot (talk) 04:30, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Calendar. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Cold War II. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Donald Trump. Legobot (talk) 04:32, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:British Somaliland. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Theresa May. Legobot (talk) 04:32, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Alternative for Germany. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Dismissal of James Comey. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Timeline of the Trump presidency, 2017 Q3. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Timeline of the Trump presidency, 2017 Q3. Legobot (talk) 04:32, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Timeline of the Trump presidency, 2017 Q3. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Republican Party (United States). Legobot (talk) 04:26, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Council. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Linda Sarsour. Legobot (talk) 04:30, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Presidential Advisory Commission on Election Integrity. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Racism in South Korea. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Nazism. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Islamic terrorism in Europe (2014–present). Legobot (talk) 04:25, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Prcc27. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Antisemitism in the United Kingdom. Legobot (talk) 04:30, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:National Rifle Association. Legobot (talk) 04:33, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
The Special Barnstar | |
For your work on LGBTQ pages. MitchG74 14:54, 21 December 2017 (UTC) |
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Targeted killing. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Peter Strzok. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Pink tide. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Armenian Genocide. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Federal Correctional Institution, Coleman. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Alternative for Germany. Legobot (talk) 04:30, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Christianity in Iran. Legobot (talk) 04:30, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (policy). Legobot (talk) 04:31, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Real News Update. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
About your question here, before I answer, I wanted to give you the opportunity to rephrase or change it some other way. Jytdog (talk) 17:20, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
Hey man, I'm relatively new to Wikipedia and I'm not sure what the proper etiquette would be for some sort of disciplinary action to be taken against Bunco man for his repeated editing against consensus. He's been warned several times not to remove sourced information, yet continues to revert edits and delete refs. It looks like he's done something similar (and was banned for it several times) on Austin Petersen's page, insisting that he doesn't represent the Libertarian Party (that Bunco man evidently has been a member of since its inception in 1971) because of his rejection of the NAP, saying it's some kind of right-wing conspiracy to put Petersen and people like him (Rand Paul, other "libertarian conservatives" that are otherwise members of the GOP) at the head of the party. He also asserted that the Wikipedia admins are in on it and that one of the editors is Petersen himself. But I digress; he's even reverting the edits of and comically arguing with AnomieBOT. What can be done to get him to cut it out? Sorry to bother you, you just seemed like one of the other few regulars on that article. IOnlyKnowFiveWords (talk) 07:47, 7 March 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Notability (organizations and companies). Legobot (talk) 04:30, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:National Rifle Association. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
Hey. Any opinion on those countries on the SSM talk page? I'm not clear enough on the concept to decide what should go on the map or in the infobox. — kwami (talk) 09:02, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:National Rifle Association. Legobot (talk) 04:30, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Doug Ford Jr.. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Portal talk:Current events/2018 March 6. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Peter Navarro. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Donald Trump. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Trump–Russia dossier. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Dana Loesch. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Immigration and crime in Germany. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Colt AR-15. Legobot (talk) 04:30, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:White Helmets (Syrian Civil War). Legobot (talk) 04:30, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Criteria for speedy deletion. Legobot (talk) 04:31, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Presidency of Donald Trump. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Sean Hannity. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of military occupations. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Israel. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 5 August 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Political activity of the Knights of Columbus. Legobot (talk) 04:30, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Political activity of the Knights of Columbus. Legobot (talk) 04:32, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Malaysian general election, 2018. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of cities in Israel. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Christine Blasey Ford. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Prcc27. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect DETERMINEPRIMARY. Since you had some involvement with the DETERMINEPRIMARY redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. PorkchopGMX (talk with me - what i've done) 18:00, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Ilhan Omar. Legobot (talk) 04:43, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Templates for discussion. Legobot (talk) 04:30, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of 2017 albums. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Notability (academics). Legobot (talk) 04:30, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Mobile country code. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Voodoo Doughnut. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship. Legobot (talk) 04:30, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (policy). Legobot (talk) 04:33, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship. Legobot (talk) 04:30, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Simplified ruleset. Legobot (talk) 04:30, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (policy). Legobot (talk) 04:32, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of law clerks of the Supreme Court of the United States. Legobot (talk) 04:30, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Disambiguation. Legobot (talk) 04:33, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Jimi Hendrix posthumous discography. Legobot (talk) 04:34, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Criticism of Huawei. Legobot (talk) 04:30, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Office actions. Legobot (talk) 04:31, 29 June 2019 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:No climbing the Reichstag dressed as Spider-Man. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Community response to the Wikimedia Foundation's ban of Fram. Legobot (talk) 04:31, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Community response to the Wikimedia Foundation's ban of Fram. Legobot (talk) 04:34, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (policy). Legobot (talk) 04:30, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard. Legobot (talk) 04:30, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Visual arts. Legobot (talk) 04:31, 6 August 2019 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Administrators. Legobot (talk) 04:33, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Disambiguation dos and don'ts. Legobot (talk) 04:34, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Infobox film. Legobot (talk) 04:32, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Music. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of accidents and incidents involving commercial aircraft. Legobot (talk) 04:35, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
Hungary has lifteme deferral for MSM. See this official deferral table: https://kimittud.atlatszo.hu/request/11200/response/16628/attach/5/V%2520rad%2520sra%2520val%2520alkalmass%2520g%2520felt%2520telei%2520DON%252001%252013.kiad%2520s%25202018.06.01.pe.pdf
The table is clearly indicates that the reason for the permanent deferral is this hungarian law: 3/2005 (3/2005. (II. 10.) EüM rendelet az emberi vér és vérkomponensek gyűjtésére, vizsgálatára, feldolgozására, tárolására és elosztására vonatkozó minőségi és biztonsági előírásokról, valamint ezek egyes technikai követelményeiről): https://net.jogtar.hu/jogszabaly?docid=A0500003.EUM
The cited source for the article https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blood_donation_restrictions_on_men_who_have_sex_with_men is also incorrect for Hungary (and I suspect for other countries too :( ).
The map should be corrected accordingly.
84.225.193.91 (talk) 11:28, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Portal/Guidelines. Legobot (talk) 04:31, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Idles (band). Legobot (talk) 04:31, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Redirect. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 10 October 2019 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Criteria for speedy deletion. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
US Banknote Contest | ||
---|---|---|
November-December 2019 | ||
There are an estimated 30,000 different varieties of United States banknotes, yet only a fraction of these are represented on Wikimedia Commons in the form of 2D scans. Additionally, Colonial America, the Confederate States, the Republic of Texas, multiple states and territories, communities, and private companies have issued banknotes that are in the public domain today but are absent from Commons. In the months of November and December, WikiProject Numismatics will be running a cross-wiki upload-a-thon, the 2019 US Banknote Contest. The goal of the contest is to increase the number of US banknote images available to content creators on all Wikimedia projects. Participants will claim points for uploading and importing 2D scans of US banknotes, and at the end of the contest all will receive awards. Whether you want to claim the Gold Wiki or you just want to have fun, all are invited to participate. If you do not want to receive invitations to future US Banknote Contests, follow the instructions here |
Sent by ZLEA at 23:30, 19 October 2019 (UTC) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Requests for comment/2019 Resysop Criteria (2). Legobot (talk) 04:29, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Help talk:Citation Style 1. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Requests for comment/2019 community sentiment on binding desysop procedure. Legobot (talk) 04:32, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Username policy. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Rojava. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (policy). Legobot (talk) 04:30, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Textus Receptus. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:Did you know on a request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. |
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. Sent at 08:06, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:Unblock Ticket Request System on a request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. |
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. Sent at 08:29, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Daily Mail on a "Wikipedia policies and guidelines" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 19:31, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Sergei Millian on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 01:30, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:Reference desk/Guidelines/Medical advice on a "Wikipedia policies and guidelines" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 06:31, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
Seamless Wikipedia browsing. On steroids.
Every time you click a link to Wikipedia, Wiktionary or Wikiquote in your browser's search results, it will show the modern Wikiwand interface.
Wikiwand extension is a five stars, simple, with minimum permission required to keep your browsing private, safe and transparent.