Top Qs
Timeline
Chat
Perspective

2009 Shopian rape and murder hoax

Rape and murder case in the Indian-administered territory of Jammu and Kashmir From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Remove ads

In 2009, allegations began circulating of the purported abduction, rape and murder of two young women  Asiya Jan and Neelofar Jan  allegedly by the Central Reserve Police Force of India.[1][2][3] Between 29 and 30 May 2009, at Bongam, Shopian district, Jammu and Kashmir, the two women (sisters-in-law) had gone missing from their orchard on the way home on 29 May 2009. The next morning, their bodies were found both one kilometer apart. Local police concluded the women appeared to have drowned in a stream, rejecting allegations that their deaths were homicides.[3]

Quick Facts Location, Date ...

On 22 June 2023, the Jammu and Kashmir administration, invoking Article 311(2)(c) of the Constitution of India, terminated two doctors, Dr. Bilal Ahmad Dalal and Dr. Nighat Shaheen Chilloo, claiming the two were "actively working" with Pakistan-based groups and falsifying evidence in the case. According to officials, the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) found that the deaths of Asiya Jan and Neelofar Jan on 29 May 2009, were due to accidental drowning, not rape or murder. The doctors allegedly manipulated the post-mortem report to frame security forces, aiming to incite disaffection against the Indian state. The CBI charge-sheeted them and 11 other people in December 2009 for "misleading the investigations and fabricating evidence about rape and murder".[4][5]

Remove ads

Victims

Neelofar Jan, aged 22 and Asiya Jan, aged 17, were sisters-in-law and resided in Bongam, Shopian. Neelofar Jan was married to Shakeel Ahmed Ahangar and the couple had a two-year-old son. Asiya Jan was the daughter of Abdul Gani Ahangar.

Initial stages of investigations

Local villagers stated that the two women were raped and the murdered by members of security forces. A protest called by Syed Ali Shah Geelani of the Hurriyat called for a shutdown of business, but later turned violent, as a consequence of which the administration declared a curfew.[6]

A press release by the police on 30 May stated that "Post-mortem conducted revealed no marks on the dead bodies including private parts." No FIR was registered for either rape or murder[7] and the government of Jammu and Kashmir ordered for a judicial probe by retired Justice Muzaffar Jan into the incident because of people's lack of faith in police investigations. Concerns arose after the doctor who conducted the post-mortem admitted to the Central Bureau of Investigation that the vaginal swabs that she had submitted to them for testing were fabricated from discarded lab items, and that she had not taken any swabs from the victims.[8][9] Later, testing by the Central Forensic Laboratory proved that the samples submitted after post-mortem did not match the victims.[10]

On 7 June 2009, Jammu and Kashmir police filed FIR of rape and murder following widespread protest across the state.[11] [12]

Remove ads

Case history

Summarize
Perspective

On 31 May 2009, the Chief Minister of Jammu and Kashmir, Omar Abdullah, appointed retired Justice Muzaffar Jan to carry out the probe and complete the inquiry in one month's time. The Superintendent of Police, Dr Haseeb Mughal, and The Chief Prosecuting Officer, Abdul Majid Dar, were to assist in the probe, headed by Justice (retired) Muzaffar Jan. The report would be subsequently tabled in the state assembly to make it public.[13] The notification issued in this regard by the Home Department said that the Commission shall:

  • ascertain whether there had been any foul play in their death and, if so, identify the person/persons responsible.
  • perform all other functions necessary for holding of inquiry and submit its report within one month from the date of the notification.
  • ascertain whether there was any failure on the part of any government department in the conduct of any investigation or handling of the post-incident situation.
  • The Commission, appointed in exercise of powers conferred by Section 3 of the J&K Commission of Inquiry Act, shall recommend action as deemed necessary against the person/persons involved/responsible and suggest action as may be necessary to ensure non-repetition of such incidents.

The government has further directed that the provisions of sub-section 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 of Section 5 of Commission of Inquiry Act shall be applicable to the Commission.

Outcome of Justice Jan commission

The final report filed by Justice Jan Commission is summarised in seven parts.

Timeline of probe and police findings and fact-finding committee

More information Date, Details ...
Remove ads

Rejection of probe

The High Court Bar Association, on 1 June 2009, rejected the probe ordered by the government demanding a sitting Judge of High Court or Chief Justice to carry out the probe instead of a retired Justice, Muzaffar Jan, while separatist leader Syed Ali Shah Geelani demanded Amnesty International probe the incident and also urged the High Court Bar Association probe the matter at their own level so the people would learn the truth. However, the Advocate General of Jammu and Kashmir, Muhammad Ishaq Qadri, commented that the Commission of Inquiry headed by a sitting or a retired judge does not make any difference regarding the legality of its findings, which are recommendatory in nature in both the cases. Unionist leader of the opposition in the assembly and the PDP president, Mahbooba Mufti, also rejected the government's inquiry commission into the case, and called upon the prime minister, Dr. Manmohan Singh, to review the performance of the state's ruling coalition personally as according to her, it had failed to extent of not registering an FIR of rape and murder in the case.[28]

Remove ads

Protests, arrests and curfew

Summarize
Perspective

As soon as the news about the incident spread in the Kashmir Valley, pre-mediated protests started. These protests were followed by the strike call by the secessionist leaders. Demands for justice, self-determination and removal of the Indian forces started, as planned. As soon as the protests started, police and Indian armed forces in order to halt the protests tried to control them peacefully and fired tear gas canisters as a last resort. Many separatist leaders were put under house arrest or jailed. The CBI probe resulted in exhuming the bodies for examination and it was found that Asiya's hymen was intact, thereby ruling out rape.[citation needed]

More information Date, Details ...

Curfew

More information Date, Details ...
Remove ads

See also

References

Loading related searches...

Wikiwand - on

Seamless Wikipedia browsing. On steroids.

Remove ads