Top Qs
Timeline
Chat
Perspective

Bargmann's limit

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Remove ads

In quantum mechanics, Bargmann's limit, named for Valentine Bargmann, provides an upper bound on the number of bound states with azimuthal quantum number in a system with central potential . It takes the form

This limit is the best possible upper bound in such a way that for a given , one can always construct a potential for which is arbitrarily close to this upper bound. Note that the Dirac delta function potential attains this limit. After the first proof of this inequality by Valentine Bargmann in 1953,[1] Julian Schwinger presented an alternative way of deriving it in 1961.[2]

Remove ads

Rigorous formulation and proof

Summarize
Perspective

Stated in a formal mathematical way, Bargmann's limit goes as follows. Let be a spherically symmetric potential, such that it is piecewise continuous in , for and for , where and . If

then the number of bound states with azimuthal quantum number for a particle of mass obeying the corresponding Schrödinger equation, is bounded from above by

Although the original proof by Valentine Bargmann is quite technical, the main idea follows from two general theorems on ordinary differential equations, the Sturm Oscillation Theorem and the Sturm-Picone Comparison Theorem. If we denote by the wave function subject to the given potential with total energy and azimuthal quantum number , the Sturm Oscillation Theorem implies that equals the number of nodes of . From the Sturm-Picone Comparison Theorem, it follows that when subject to a stronger potential (i.e. for all ), the number of nodes either grows or remains the same. Thus, more specifically, we can replace the potential by . For the corresponding wave function with total energy and azimuthal quantum number , denoted by , the radial Schrödinger equation becomes

with . By applying variation of parameters, one can obtain the following implicit solution

where is given by

If we now denote all successive nodes of by , one can show from the implicit solution above that for consecutive nodes and

From this, we can conclude that

proving Bargmann's limit. Note that as the integral on the right is assumed to be finite, so must be and . Furthermore, for a given value of , one can always construct a potential for which is arbitrarily close to Bargmann's limit. The idea to obtain such a potential, is to approximate Dirac delta function potentials, as these attain the limit exactly. An example of such a construction can be found in Bargmann's original paper.[1]

Remove ads

References

Loading related searches...

Wikiwand - on

Seamless Wikipedia browsing. On steroids.

Remove ads