Carr v. Saul, 593 U.S. ___ (2021), was a decision of the United States Supreme Court concerning the Appointments Clause.
Quick Facts Argued March 3, 2021 Decided April 22, 2021, Full case name ...
| Carr v. Saul |
|---|
 |
|
| Full case name | Willie Earl Carr, et al. v. Andrew M. Saul, Commissioner of Social Security
John J. Davis, et al. v. Andrew M. Saul, Commissioner of Social Security |
|---|
| Docket nos. | 19-1442
20-105 |
|---|
| Citations | 593 U.S. ___ (more) |
|---|
| Argument | Oral argument |
|---|
|
| A petitioner need not challenge the constitutionality of an agency's structure under the Appointments Clause in an internal agency administrative proceeding in order to present that challenge in court on appeal. |
|
- Chief Justice
- John Roberts
- Associate Justices
- Clarence Thomas · Stephen Breyer
Samuel Alito · Sonia Sotomayor
Elena Kagan · Neil Gorsuch
Brett Kavanaugh · Amy Coney Barrett
|
|
| Majority | Sotomayor, joined by Roberts, Alito, Kagan, Kavanaugh; Thomas, Gorsuch, Barrett (Parts I, II–A, and II–B–2); Breyer (Parts I, II–B–1, and II–B–2) |
|---|
| Concurrence | Thomas (in part and in the judgment), joined by Gorsuch, Barrett |
|---|
| Concurrence | Breyer (in part and in the judgment) |
|---|
|
| U.S. Const. art. II, § 2, cl. 2 |
Close
