Top Qs
Timeline
Chat
Perspective
Everclear
Brand name of rectified spirit From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Remove ads
Everclear is a line of rectified spirits produced by the American company Luxco. It is made from grain[2] and bottled at up to 95% alcohol by volume (190 U.S. proof). While the brand has been iconic for decades, it holds a "notorious reputation" for its extreme potency and has been at the center of significant public safety controversies.[3] These concerns include risks of acute alcohol poisoning, its role as a facilitator in sexual assaults, and its high flammability, which has led to numerous documented incidents of catastrophic burn injuries. The manufacturer, Luxco, has faced intense criticism and legal action over allegations of deceptive marketing practices after it removed explicit fire warnings from its labels while simultaneously promoting the product for dangerous uses.[4][5]
Remove ads
History and Reputation
Everclear's notoriety was solidified in 1968 when the Guinness Book of World Records named it the "Most Potent Potable."[1] For decades, it became culturally synonymous with college binge drinking, often treated as a rite of passage or used in hazardous party punches and drinking games.[1] This reputation was built almost entirely through word-of-mouth, as Luxco did little to no formal marketing for the product until the mid-2010s.[1] The name itself has become a generic term for any high-proof grain alcohol, and it inspired the name of the American rock band Everclear.[1]
Remove ads
Safety and Health Risks
Summarize
Perspective
The extreme alcohol concentration of Everclear presents two primary dangers: rapid alcohol poisoning and extreme flammability.
Acute Alcohol Poisoning and Sexual Assault
At 95% ABV (190-proof), Everclear is more than twice as potent as standard spirits. This allows for the rapid consumption of a large quantity of alcohol, often masked in punches, leading to a dangerously high blood alcohol content and potentially fatal alcohol poisoning. University officials have singled out the product for its role in binge drinking and sexual assault. Frostburg State University President Jonathan C. Gibralter warned that "most of the time students don't even know they're consuming it," while other university leaders have called it a "date rape drug."[6] Then-University of Virginia President Teresa Sullivan specifically compared the odorless and colorless Everclear to a "date rape" drug for its ability to create conditions in which sexual assaults can occur.[3]
Extreme Flammability and Flame Jetting
With a flash point of approximately 14°C (57.2°F), Everclear is classified as a highly flammable substance. Its high ethanol content causes it to behave like a commercial fire accelerant when exposed to an open flame. This can lead to "flame jetting," where alcohol vapor escaping the bottle ignites and the flame travels back into the container, causing a violent expulsion of burning liquid. News reports and legal filings have described this effect as turning the bottle into a "makeshift flamethrower."[citation needed] The burning alcohol, often with a nearly invisible blue flame, can adhere to skin and fabric, causing deep and extensive third-degree burns.[7]
Remove ads
Labeling and Marketing Controversy
Summarize
Perspective
Removal of Explicit Warnings
For decades, Everclear bottles featured a prominent, explicit warning on the front label, often in a red box, stating:
CAUTION: DO NOT APPLY TO OPEN FLAME. KEEP AWAY FROM FIRE, HEAT AND OPEN FLAME - CONTENTS MAY IGNITE OR EXPLODE.
In 2018, as part of a major rebranding effort, Luxco removed this detailed warning. The new label relegated safety information to a small box on the back, containing only the words:
WARNING: FLAMMABLE LIQUID. HANDLE WITH CARE.
Critically, the explicit mentions of "open flame," "explode," and "ignite" were eliminated. According to a 2025 lawsuit, Luxco's other chemically identical products retained more comprehensive warnings, suggesting the removal from the flagship Everclear brand was a deliberate choice.[5]
Shift to "DIY" Marketing
Coinciding with the removal of the explicit fire warnings, Luxco launched a marketing campaign called "Make It Your Own," repositioning Everclear from a party beverage to a versatile "DIY ingredient."[3] Through a dedicated website and social media, the company began promoting the product for making infusions and tinctures, but also for uses involving ignition sources, such as for cooking, flambéing, and as fuel for fondue pots and homemade candles.[4] Plaintiffs in subsequent lawsuits argued that this marketing was reckless and "falsely [promoted] its safe use near flames," encouraging consumers to engage in the very behaviors the old warning labels had explicitly cautioned against.[4][5]
Legal Challenges and Burn Incidents
Summarize
Perspective
The Digan v. Luxco Lawsuit (2025)
In July 2025, a demand letter was sent to Luxco on behalf of Yvette Digan, a 22-year-old exchange student who suffered third-degree burns over 30% of her body at a fraternity house gathering.[citation needed] The incident occurred when Everclear was poured near a fire, causing an explosive flame jet that engulfed her. A subsequent lawsuit filed in federal court accused Luxco of negligence and deceptive practices for removing the explicit warnings while simultaneously marketing the product for dangerous uses. The suit alleged that Luxco "chose marketing aesthetics over preventing third-degree burns to unsuspecting young adults" and sought to force the company to halt sales until the original, comprehensive warnings were restored.[5]
Pattern of Documented Incidents
The Digan lawsuit cited a pattern of similar incidents across the country where Everclear was linked to severe burn injuries:
January 2016: University of Toledo runner Janelle Noe was burned over more than 50% of her body with "second, third, and 'third degree deep burns'" at a party. The incident occurred when a person poured Everclear onto a lit candle, causing it to explode. Doctors told her that if she had "burned seconds longer, I would’ve died."[8] August 2024: Two patrons at a Dallas, Texas bar, Abigael Hance-Briscoe and Dustin Johnson, suffered second and third-degree burns when a "Flaming Pineapple" cocktail made with Everclear exploded. A bartender allegedly added more Everclear to the flaming drink, causing it to ignite "in our direction." Hance-Briscoe stated, "My skin was falling off of my arms," and that her bra had "melted into my skin."[7] November 2024: In Lakeville, Massachusetts, a man and a young girl were severely burned when a flash fire occurred while cooking Chouriço à Bombeiro ("firefighters' chorizo"). The family was adding more alcohol to sustain the cooking flame when a gust of wind allegedly caused the fire to erupt across the kitchen.[9] December 2024: At a bar in Binghamton, New York, a bartender added alcohol to a flaming drink, causing an explosion that burned three people. Video showed flames shooting into a 20-year-old woman's face, who was seen running away with flames still on her head and chest.[10]
Remove ads
State Bans and Regulation
Due to its high alcohol content and associated risks, the 190-proof version of Everclear is illegal to sell in a number of U.S. states, including California, Florida, Maine, Hawaii, Iowa, Michigan, New York, Nevada, Ohio, Washington, North Carolina, New Hampshire, and Minnesota. In 2014, Maryland banned the sale of all 190-proof grain spirits, with lawmakers hoping the measure would help reduce sexual assaults and binge drinking on college campuses.[11] To circumvent these bans, Luxco created a 189-proof version as well as the lower 151- and 120-proof versions. Additionally, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) prohibits the transportation of alcoholic beverages exceeding 70% alcohol by volume (140 proof) on aircraft, classifying high-proof products like 190-proof Everclear as hazardous materials not permitted in either carry-on or checked baggage.[12][13]
Remove ads
References
External links
Wikiwand - on
Seamless Wikipedia browsing. On steroids.
Remove ads