FIVB Senior World Rankings

The FIVB Senior World Rankings is a ranking system for men's and women's national teams in volleyball. The teams of the member nations of Fédération Internationale de Volleyball (FIVB), volleyball's world governing body, are ranked based on their game results with the most successful teams being ranked highest. A points system is used, with points being awarded based on the results of all FIVB-recognised full international matches. The rankings are used in international competitions to define the seeded teams and arrange them in pools. Specific procedures for seeding and pooling are established by the FIVB in each competition's formula, but the method usually employed is the serpentine system.

The ranking system has been revamped in 2020, responding to criticism that the preceding calculation method did not effectively reflect the relative strengths of the national teams. The old version of the ranking system was finally used on 31 January 2020.

As of 8 January 2025, the highest ranked team in the men's category is Poland, while in the women's category is Italy.

Previous calculation method

Main article: FIVB Senior World Ranking system (until 2020)

The system of point attribution for the selected FIVB World and Official Competitions below is as follows:^[1]

• Olympic Games and qualifying tournaments: included for 4 years and points are also granted for the qualification matches, to the best non-qualified teams.
• World Championship and qualifying tournaments: included for 4 years and points are also granted for the qualification matches, to the best non-qualified teams.
• World Cup: included for 4 years
• World Grand Prix: included for 1 year
• World League: included for 1 year

Current calculation method

In 2019, FIVB collaborated with Hypercube Business Innovation of the Netherlands to design a new world ranking platform. The previous calculation method had a problem of circularity in the international volleyball calendar: only countries who participated in the major volleyball events could earn ranking points, whilst the number of ranking points of countries also determined the seeding and access to major events. This unfair principle did not contribute to the sporting and commercial quality of volleyball.^[2]

On 1 February 2020, the new ranking system was implemented and took into account all results from 1 January 2019 and later.^[3] The system is consistently updated to reflect the latest results and performances. The ranking considers the match results from:

• Olympic Games and qualifying tournaments
• FIVB World Championship
• FIVB World Cup
• FIVB Nations League and Challenger Cup
• Confederations' Championship and qualifying tournaments
• Annual Official Continental Confederations' Events
• Annual Official Zonal Associations' Events

Notes:^[4][5]

• Olympic qualifying tournaments, FIVB World Cup and FIVB Challenger Cup are discontinued tournaments (as of 2025).
• Official competitions must feature a minimum of four senior national teams to be eligible for world ranking points.
• Matches played in multi-sport events, friendly matches or unofficial competitions are not eligible for world ranking points.
• From 2023: Matches from Annual Continental and Zonal Events are not considered for the world ranking if they involve teams that are also participating in the FIVB Volleyball Nations League (VNL) in the same year.
• From 2025: Each Continental Confederation may include up to two Annual Continental Events in the world ranking.
• From 2025: Each Zonal Association may include one Annual Zonal Event in the world ranking.

The rankings outcome of each match depends on two main factors:

• The playing strength of the teams competing.
• The actual match performance or final result of the match.

Ranking Procedure

It is based on the zero-sum system, like CONCACAF Ranking Index or FIFA World ranking, where, after each game, points will be added to or subtracted from a team's rating according to the formula:^[6]

${\displaystyle S_{\text{after}}=S_{\text{before}}+{K(R-E) \over 8}}$

where:

• ${\displaystyle S_{\text{after}}}$ – the team's number of World Ranking scores after the game
• ${\displaystyle S_{\text{before}}}$ – the team's number of World Ranking scores before the game
• ${\displaystyle K}$ – the match weight factor; see below
• ${\displaystyle R}$ – the result of the game depended on match and sets won (3–0, 3–1, 3–2, 2–3, 1–3 or 0–3); see below
• ${\displaystyle E}$ – the expected result of the game has the value between -2 and +2. If the match is completely balanced, the expected result is 0. The bigger the surprise, the more points are transferred; see below for calculation details.

A key principle of the world ranking is that a team winning a match cannot lose ranking points and a team losing a match cannot gain ranking points.^[7] Hence, if a team wins a match but the result is lower than expected, with ${\displaystyle R<E}$, the team will be rewarded with the minimum ranking points (0.01), i.e.

${\displaystyle S_{\text{after}}=S_{\text{before}}+0.01}$

The team that lost the match will instead lose the minimum ranking points (0.01), i.e.

${\displaystyle S_{\text{after}}=S_{\text{before}}-0.01}$

Match weight factor

The match weight factor is set to reflect the prestige of the tournament. In 2025, FIVB changed the match weight factors for some events:^[8]

Event	Match weight factor ${\displaystyle (K)}$
	2019–2024[4]	2025–[5]
Annual Official Zonal Events	–	30.0
Annual Official Continental Events	10.0	30.0
Continental Championship qualifying	17.5	–
FIVB Challenger Cup	20.0	–
Olympic Games qualifying / FIVB World Cup	35.0	–
Continental Championship	35.0	40.0
FIVB Nations League	40.0	40.0
FIVB World Championship	45.0	50.0
Olympic Games	50.0	50.0

Match result

We set the result ${\displaystyle R=R_{n}}$, where ${\displaystyle n}$ is the index of the actual result (set score) ${\displaystyle n=1}$ – A win 3–0 ${\displaystyle n=2}$ – A win 3–1 ${\displaystyle n=3}$ – A win 3–2 ${\displaystyle n=4}$ – A lose 2–3 ${\displaystyle n=5}$ – A lose 1–3 ${\displaystyle n=6}$ – A lose 0–3

Match Result ${\displaystyle R_{n}}$ ${\displaystyle P_{n}}$ A win 3–0 +2 ${\displaystyle P{\text{1}}}$ A win 3–1 +1.5 ${\displaystyle P{\text{2}}}$ A win 3–2 +1 ${\displaystyle P{\text{3}}}$ A lose 2–3 -1 ${\displaystyle P{\text{4}}}$ A lose 1–3 -1.5 ${\displaystyle P{\text{5}}}$ A lose 0–3 -2 ${\displaystyle P{\text{6}}}$

Expected match result

The expected results is then calculated as ${\displaystyle E=R_{1}P_{1}+R_{2}P_{2}+R_{3}P_{3}+R_{4}P_{4}+R_{5}P_{5}+R_{6}P_{6}}$ where ${\displaystyle P_{n}}$ is the probability of the outcome ${\displaystyle R_{n}}$ obtained using the following model (known as Ordered probit):

Team A win 3–0

${\displaystyle P_{\text{1}}=\Phi (C_{\text{1}}+\Delta )}$

Team A win 3–1

${\displaystyle P_{\text{2}}=\Phi (C_{\text{2}}+\Delta )-\Phi (C_{\text{1}}+\Delta )}$

Team A win 3–2

${\displaystyle P_{\text{3}}=\Phi (C_{\text{3}}+\Delta )-\Phi (C_{\text{2}}+\Delta )}$

Team A lose 2–3

${\displaystyle P_{\text{4}}=\Phi (C_{\text{4}}+\Delta )-\Phi (C_{\text{3}}+\Delta )}$

Team A lose 1–3

${\displaystyle P_{\text{5}}=\Phi (C_{\text{5}}+\Delta )-\Phi (C_{\text{4}}+\Delta )}$

Team A lose 0–3

${\displaystyle P_{\text{6}}=1-\Phi (C_{\text{5}}+\Delta )}$

where ${\displaystyle \Phi (z)}$ is the Cumulative distribution function of the Normal distribution, and ${\displaystyle C_{1},\ldots ,C_{5}}$ are the cut-points

• ${\displaystyle C_{1}=-1.06}$
• ${\displaystyle C_{2}=-0.394}$
• ${\displaystyle C_{3}=0}$
• ${\displaystyle C_{4}=0.394}$
• ${\displaystyle C_{5}=1.06}$

set so that ${\displaystyle P_{n}}$ is the probability of the outcome ${\displaystyle n}$ between two equal strength opponents (that is when ${\displaystyle \Delta =0}$), which is derived from the actual match results of the past decade.

The cut-points in the normal distribution based on head-to-head between two equal strength teams, i.e ${\displaystyle \Delta =0}$.

The cut-points in the normal distribution based on head-to-head between two teams after considering a strength difference, i.e ${\displaystyle \Delta >0}$.

The parameter ${\displaystyle \Delta }$ represents the scaled difference of the teams rankings

${\displaystyle \Delta ={8(S_{\text{teamA}}-S_{\text{teamB}}) \over 1000}}$

where:

• ${\displaystyle S_{\text{teamA}}}$ – the team A's number of World Ranking scores before the game
• ${\displaystyle S_{\text{teamB}}}$ – the team B's number of World Ranking scores before the game

Examples

Before the match at the FIVB Volleyball World Championship (K = 50), Brazil (Team A) is ranked number 1 with a 415 WR score and Japan (Team B) is ranked number 11 with a 192 WR score.^[7]

Strength difference between Brazil and Japan

${\displaystyle \Delta ={8(415-192) \over 1000}=1.784}$

Expected match result

• ${\displaystyle P_{1}=\Phi (-1.060+1.784)}$
• ${\displaystyle P_{2}=\Phi (-0.364+1.784)-\Phi (-1.060+1.784)}$
• ${\displaystyle P_{3}=\Phi (0.000+1.784)-\Phi (-0.364+1.784)}$
• ${\displaystyle P_{4}=\Phi (0.364+1.784)-\Phi (0.000+1.784)}$
• ${\displaystyle P_{5}=\Phi (1.060+1.784)-\Phi (0.364+1.784)}$
• ${\displaystyle P_{6}=1-\Phi (1.060+1.784)}$

Expected match result for Brazil:

${\displaystyle E=76.5\%(+2)+15.2\%(+1.5)+4.5\%(+1)+2.2\%(-1)+1.2\%(-1.5)+0.2\%(-2)=+1.76}$

Expected match result for Japan:

${\displaystyle E=0.2\%(+2)+1.2\%(+1.5)+2.2\%(+1)+4.5\%(-1)+15.2\%(-1.5)+76.5\%(-2)=-1.76}$

World Ranking scores after Brazil win 3–0 World Ranking scores for Brazil: ${\displaystyle S_{\text{after}}={\text{415}}+{50(2-1.76) \over 8}=416.5}$ World Ranking scores for Japan: ${\displaystyle S_{\text{after}}={\text{192}}+{50(-2+1.76) \over 8}=190.5}$ World Ranking scores after Brazil win 3–1 World Ranking scores for Brazil: ${\displaystyle R=1.5}$ and ${\displaystyle E=1.76}$, thus ${\displaystyle R<E}$ so ${\displaystyle S_{\text{after}}={\text{415}}+0.01=415.01}$ World Ranking scores for Japan: ${\displaystyle R=-1.5}$ and ${\displaystyle E=-1.76}$, thus ${\displaystyle R>E}$ so ${\displaystyle S_{\text{after}}={\text{192}}-0.01=191.99}$ World Ranking scores after Brazil win 3–2 World Ranking scores for Brazil: ${\displaystyle R=1}$ and ${\displaystyle E=1.76}$, thus ${\displaystyle R<E}$ so ${\displaystyle S_{\text{after}}={\text{415}}+0.01=415.01}$ World Ranking scores for Japan: ${\displaystyle R=-1}$ and ${\displaystyle E=-1.76}$, thus ${\displaystyle R>E}$ so ${\displaystyle S_{\text{after}}={\text{192}}-0.01=191.99}$

World Ranking scores after Brazil lose 0–3 World Ranking scores for Brazil: ${\displaystyle S_{\text{after}}={\text{415}}+{50(-2-1.76) \over 8}=391.5}$ World Ranking scores for Japan: ${\displaystyle S_{\text{after}}={\text{192}}+{50(2+1.76) \over 8}=215.5}$ World Ranking scores after Brazil lose 1–3 World Ranking scores for Brazil: ${\displaystyle S_{\text{after}}={\text{415}}+{50(-1.5-1.76) \over 8}=394.63}$ World Ranking scores for Japan: ${\displaystyle S_{\text{after}}={\text{192}}+{50(1.5+1.76) \over 8}=212.38}$ World Ranking scores after Brazil lose 2–3 World Ranking scores for Brazil: ${\displaystyle S_{\text{after}}={\text{415}}+{50(-1-1.76) \over 8}=397.75}$ World Ranking scores for Japan: ${\displaystyle S_{\text{after}}={\text{192}}+{50(1+1.76) \over 8}=209.25}$

Inactive teams

Every year on 1 January, the teams that have not played any matches that counts towards the world ranking in the previous two years lose 50 ranking points. The inactive teams with less than 20 ranking points are removed from the official ranking list.^[5]

Previously, teams were considered inactive after one year without participating in competitions eligible for ranking points. This was extended to two years in 2025.^[8]

World and Continental Rankings

Further information: FIVB Senior Continental Rankings

The five Continental Rankings filter the World Ranking points won and lost in matches played between teams from the same Continental Confederation.

• Intercontinental Tournaments – calculated in World Rankings, but some matches can be calculated in Continental Rankings
  • Olympic Games final and intercontinental qualification tournaments
  • FIVB World Championship final and intercontinental qualification tournaments
  • FIVB World Cup
  • FIVB Volleyball Nations League and Challenger Cup
  • some Continental Cups: Pan-America
  • some FIVB recognised international events, e.g. Pan American Games, Montreux Volley Masters

• Continental Tournaments – calculated in World and Continental Rankings
  • Olympic Games continental qualification tournaments
  • FIVB World Championship continental qualification tournaments
  • FIVB Challenger Cup qualification tournaments
  • Continental Championships: Asia (AVC), Africa (CAVB), Europe (CEV), North America (NORCECA), and South America (CSV)
  • some Continental Cups: Asia (both AVC Cup and Challenge Cup)
  • Zonal Championships, e.g. Eastern Asia, ASEAN, Central America
  • some FIVB recognised international events, e.g. African Games, Asian Games, European Games

Examples

Japan (Asian Volleyball Confederation) vs Italy (Confédération Européenne de Volleyball)
The points calculated in FIVB World Rankings.

Japan (Asian Volleyball Confederation) vs South Korea (Asian Volleyball Confederation)
The points calculated in FIVB World Rankings, and AVC Continental Rankings.

FIVB World Rankings

Current men's top teams

Top 30 rankings as of 8 January 2025[9]
Rank	Change	Team	Points
1		Poland	401.31
2		France	378.07
3		United States	365.87
4		Slovenia	352.5
5		Italy	346.23
6		Japan	338.12
7		Brazil	305.87
8		Germany	274.38
9		Argentina	266.94
10		Serbia	259.28
11		Canada	254.46
12		Cuba	249.34
13		Netherlands	204.81
14		Ukraine	196
15		Iran	185.07
16		Belgium	183.24
17		Turkey	175.28
18		Czech Republic	168.95
19		Bulgaria	161.06
20		Egypt	156.94
21		Qatar	151.46
22		Portugal	147.16
23		Finland	146.72
24	1	China	144.02
25	1	Romania	143.07
26	1	Chile	139.14
27	1	South Korea	138.48
28	1	Croatia	136.4
29	1	Puerto Rico	135.23
30	2	Dominican Republic	125.41
*Change from 30 August 2024
Complete rankings at volleyballworld.com

Current women's top teams

Top 30 rankings as of 29 June 2025[10]
Rank	Change	Team	Points
1		Italy	456.91
2		Brazil	417.92
3		Poland	369.04
4		Turkey	368.54
5		Japan	347.08
6		China	346.75
7		United States	338.1
8		Netherlands	262.59
9		Dominican Republic	254.02
10		Canada	245.38
11		Serbia	234.19
12		Germany	234.08
13		Czech Republic	208.84
14		Belgium	190.98
15		Ukraine	189.05
16		France	182.65
17		Puerto Rico	182.58
18		Argentina	180.96
19		Thailand	173.1
20		Bulgaria	169.78
21		Sweden	153.59
22		Colombia	152.37
23		Kenya	152.15
24		Cuba	145.17
25		Slovenia	142.69
26	6	Vietnam	141.21
27	1	Mexico	138.42
28	1	Romania	136.33
29	1	Slovakia	128.54
30	1	Hungary	127.51
*Change from 8 January 2025
Complete rankings at volleyballworld.com

Historic men's leaders

For historical men's FIVB rankings from October 2005 to present.^[11]

Historic women's leaders

For historical women's FIVB rankings from September 2005 to present.^[12]

See also

• Volleyball portal

• FIVB Senior Continental Rankings
• FIVB Youth and Junior World Rankings