Top Qs
Timeline
Chat
Perspective
Fatou–Bieberbach domain
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Remove ads
In mathematics, a Fatou–Bieberbach domain is a proper subdomain of , biholomorphically equivalent to . That is, an open set is called a Fatou–Bieberbach domain if there exists a biholomorphic function whose inverse function is holomorphic.
Remove ads
History
As a consequence of the Riemann mapping theorem, there are no Fatou–Bieberbach domains in the case n = 1. Pierre Fatou and Ludwig Bieberbach first explored such domains in higher dimensions in the 1920s, hence the name given to them later. Since the 1980s, Fatou–Bieberbach domains have again become the subject of mathematical research.
Examples
Fatou–Bieberbach domains occur in great numbers for .
Let denote the group of biholomorphisms of type . Basins of attractions produce many FB domains, according to the following theorem.
Theorem ((Rosay & Rudin 1988))—Suppose that fixes a point and that all eigenvalues of satisfy . Let be the set of all for which where . Then there exists a biholomorphic map from onto .
- Let with spectral radius . Set . This is a contraction map with basin .
- In , let with . Then . It has two fixed points: . The point is fixed and has eigenvalues . The basin is a proper open subset of and thus a Fatou–Bieberbach domain.
- More generally, for , where , and a polynomial with all monomials having degree at least 2. The basin of attraction of is a Fatou–Bieberbach domain in . These maps are called complex Hénon maps.[1]
More generally, for any and any atttractive fixed point , let be its basin of attraction. If is not all of , then it is a Fatou–Bieberbach domain. It is also a Runge subset.[2] It was an open problem for a long time whether there exists Fatou–Bieberbach domains that are not Runge. This was answered in the affirmative in 2008.[3]
Let be countably many complex-affine subspaces of . There exists a Fatou–Bieberbach domain such that is a connected proper subset of for all .[4]
Given countably many closed subvarieties of . There exists a Fatou–Bieberbach domain that contains all of them.[4]
The boundary of a Fatou–Bieberbach can be very wild. For any there exists disjoint Fatou–Bieberbach domains , such that , is on the boundary of all . Similar to lakes of Wada.[4]
The Andersén–Lempert theorem states that the group generated by shearing maps is dense in . This allows construction of many Fatou–Bieberbach domains.[2]
Remove ads
Properties
Summarize
Perspective
No Fatou–Bieberbach domain is bounded, since a bounded image of an entire map would violate Liouville's theorem componentwise.
By the Ax–Grothendieck theorem, if is Fatou–Bieberbach, then for any biholomorphism , is not a polynomial.
Biholomorphism preserves Fatou–Bieberbach domains. That is, if and is Fatou–Bieberbach, then is Fatou–Bieberbach.
In one dimension, there are no Fatou–Bieberbach domains, due to Picard's great theorem.
Proof
Let be open, and be biholomorphic. Then is entire and injective. If were an essential singularity of , Picard implies is dense near every value with at most one exception, contradicting injectivity. Hence is a pole or removable, so is polynomial. Since it is injective, it must be affine with , so .
Being biholomorphic to , every Fatou–Bieberbach domain is a Stein manifold and a domain of holomorphy.
For any that is both Runge and Fatou–Bieberbach, for any , there exists a sequence of biholomorphisms such that they all fix , and [4]
Remove ads
See also
- Stein manifold
- Andersén–Lempert theory
References
Wikiwand - on
Seamless Wikipedia browsing. On steroids.
Remove ads