Top Qs
Timeline
Chat
Perspective

Fermat–Catalan conjecture

Generalization of Fermat's Last Theorem and of Catalan's conjecture, From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Remove ads

In number theory, the Fermat–Catalan conjecture is a generalization of Fermat's Last Theorem and of Catalan's conjecture. The conjecture states that the equation

has only finitely many solutions (a, b, c, m, n, k) with distinct triplets of values (am, bn, ck) where a, b, c are positive coprime integers and m, n, k are positive integers satisfying

The inequality on m, n, and k is a necessary part of the conjecture. Without the inequality there would be infinitely many solutions, for instance with k = 1 (for any a, b, m, and n and with c = am + bn), with m=n=k=2 (for the infinitely many Pythagorean triples), and e.g. .

Remove ads

Known solutions

Summarize
Perspective

As of 2024 the following ten solutions to equation (1) which meet the criteria of equation (2) are known:[1][2][3]

(for to satisfy Eq. 2)

The first of these (1m + 23 = 32) is the only solution where one of a, b or c is 1, according to the Catalan conjecture, proven in 2002 by Preda Mihăilescu. While this case leads to infinitely many solutions of (1) (since one can pick any m for m > 6), these solutions only give a single triplet of values (am, bn, ck).

Remove ads

Partial results

Summarize
Perspective

It is known by the Darmon–Granville theorem, which uses Faltings's theorem, that for any fixed choice of positive integers m, n and k satisfying (2), only finitely many coprime triples (a, b, c) solving (1) exist.[4][5]:p. 64 However, the full Fermat–Catalan conjecture is stronger as it allows for the exponents m, n and k to vary.

The abc conjecture implies the Fermat–Catalan conjecture.[6]

For a list of results for impossible combinations of exponents, see Beal conjecture#Partial results. Beal's conjecture is true if and only if all Fermat–Catalan solutions have m = 2, n = 2, or k = 2.

Poonen et al.[7][8] list exponent triples where the solutions have been determined:[note 1]   {2,3,7},[8]   {2,3,8},[9][10]   {2,3,9},[11]   {2,2q,3} for prime 7<q<1000 with q≠31,[12]   {2,4,5},[10]   {2,4,6},[9]   (2,4,7),   (2,4,q) for prime q≥211,[13]   (2,n,4),[14][15]   {2,n,n},[16]   {3,3,4},[17]   {3,3,5},[17]   {3,3,q} for 17≤q≤10000,[18]   {3,n,n},[16]   {2n,2n,5},[19]   {n,n,n}.[20][21]   For each of these exponent triples, if there is some solution at all, it is listed among those in section § Known solutions.

Sikora partially used the cluster computers at the Center for Computational Research at University at Buffalo to test all tuples (a,b,c,m,n,k) such that min(m,n,k) ≤ 113 and am, bn, ck < Mmin(m,n,k), where M2 = 271, M3 = 280, M4 = 2100, and M5 = ... = M113 = 2113. He did not find any other solution than those above.[note 2][1]

Remove ads

See also

Notes

  1. The notation "{p,q,r}" means that the solutions have been determined for every permutation of (p,q,r).
  2. For example, the five known large solutions were all reproduced during the test for min(m,n,k)=2, where am, bn, and ck were considered up to 271.

References

Loading related searches...

Wikiwand - on

Seamless Wikipedia browsing. On steroids.

Remove ads