Top Qs
Timeline
Chat
Perspective

Lucía, Lucía

2003 film From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Lucía, Lucía
Remove ads

Lucía, Lucía (Spanish: La hija del caníbal) is a 2003 film directed by Antonio Serrano based on the 1997 novel La hija del caníbal by Rosa Montero.[3] The film stars Cecilia Roth, Carlos Álvarez-Nóvoa, and Kuno Becker.

Quick facts Spanish, Directed by ...
Remove ads

Plot

Lucía, a children's book writer, is travelling to Brazil with her husband on vacation, when her husband disappears after going to the airport bathroom. She later learns that he was kidnapped by a group called the People Workers Party that wants 20 million pesos from her. Her husband frantically tells her to find the money in his aunt's safe deposit box. With the help of her neighbours, a Spanish Civil War veteran, and a young musician, Lucía sets out to find his kidnappers. She eventually discovers the truth about his disappearance after learning from the police that her husband is accused of being part of an elaborate embezzlement scam from within the Treasury Department of the government and may have possibly faked his kidnapping.

Remove ads

Cast

Production

Thumb
The novel

The film was shot over a period of eight weeks in and around Mexico City, as well as at the Puebla airport and the Sierra Gorda of Querétaro. In the United States the film was released under the name Lucía, Lucía, since the producers thought the name La hija del caníbal (literally, "The cannibal's daughter") would lead audiences to believe the story was about a cannibal.

Reception

Lucía, Lucía was not as successful as Serrano's first film Sexo, Pudor y Lágrimas. Its box-office output in Mexico was MNX$10 million (under a million dollars). In Spain it was released on November 21, 2003 in 100 theaters.[4] In the United States it had a box-office output of $269,586 in just 50 theatres. The film is the 204th highest grossing foreign film in the United States.[2]

On the review aggregator website Rotten Tomatoes, 45% of 49 critics' reviews are positive, with an average rating of 5.5/10. The website's consensus reads: "A relatively simple mid-life crisis story is burdened by overly cumbersome plot devices."[5] Metacritic, which uses a weighted average, assigned the film a score of 51 out of 100, based on 22 critics, indicating "mixed or average" reviews.[6]

Remove ads

Accolades

The film was nominated for the following awards:

See also

References

Loading related searches...

Wikiwand - on

Seamless Wikipedia browsing. On steroids.

Remove ads