Top Qs
Timeline
Chat
Perspective
Matthieu Cottière
French Reformed pastor and theological writer From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Remove ads
Matthieu Cottière (Cotterius) (1581–1656)[1][2] was a French Reformed pastor at Tours and theological writer.[3]
Life
His parents were Simon Cottière or Couttière and Françoise Ribbe. He studied theology at Geneva to 1604, presenting a dissertation on justification. He then moved on to the University of Leiden, and took part in the series of debates on predestination and justification between Arminius and Gomarus.[1][2][4]
Cottière became a pastor at Pringé in 1607. He was minister at Tours from 1617 to 1656.[1] He was a Huguenot deputy at the national synod of Alais in 1620, where he defended the orthodoxy of the Albigensians,[5] and at Charenton in 1631.[6] He married Marguerite (or Marie) Amirault in 1624.[7] They had eight children.[2] A son Isaac also went into the church.[6]
Remove ads
Works
Summarize
Perspective
Cottière was a millennialist,[8] who believed that the millennium had begun in the year 1517.[9] He was a follower of John Napier,[10] and an influence on Johann Heinrich Alsted.[3] The Synopsis criticorum of Matthew Poole called him "vir doctus et acutus".[11]
- Apocalypseos Domini Nostri Jesu Christi (1615).[12] There was a letter of dedication to James I of England.[13]
- Traittez des originales et versions (1619), against the Bible translation of Pierre Coton.[14]
- Paradoxe, que l'Église romaine, en ce qu'elle a de différent des Églises dites réformées, n'est ancienne que de quatre cents ans environ (1636)[15]
- Les propheties, touchant l'estat de la religion et de l'eglise des derniers temps (1637)[16]
- L'Apocalypse, de nostre seigneur Jesus Christ (1642)[17] This is a French translation of the 1615 Latin work.[1] Included (subtitle) was a commentary on a 1641 work on the Apocalypse by the Jesuit Bernardin de Montreuil.
- Esclaircissement sur une principale controverse (1642)[18]
- Les degrez de consanguinité et d'affinité (1644)[19]
- De Hellenistis et lingua Hellenistica (1646).[20] Opposed Daniel Heinsius, in the controversy he had with Salmasius over the nature of New Testament Greek.[21]
A 1648 work Epistola ad Spanheimum, in the controversy over universal grace and Amyraldism,[22] was answered by Friedrich Spanheim in Epistola ad Cottierum (1648).[6][23]
Remove ads
References
External links
Wikiwand - on
Seamless Wikipedia browsing. On steroids.
Remove ads