Top Qs
Timeline
Chat
Perspective

Matthieu Cottière

French Reformed pastor and theological writer From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Remove ads

Matthieu Cottière (Cotterius) (1581–1656)[1][2] was a French Reformed pastor at Tours and theological writer.[3]

Life

His parents were Simon Cottière or Couttière and Françoise Ribbe. He studied theology at Geneva to 1604, presenting a dissertation on justification. He then moved on to the University of Leiden, and took part in the series of debates on predestination and justification between Arminius and Gomarus.[1][2][4]

Cottière became a pastor at Pringé in 1607. He was minister at Tours from 1617 to 1656.[1] He was a Huguenot deputy at the national synod of Alais in 1620, where he defended the orthodoxy of the Albigensians,[5] and at Charenton in 1631.[6] He married Marguerite (or Marie) Amirault in 1624.[7] They had eight children.[2] A son Isaac also went into the church.[6]

Remove ads

Works

Summarize
Perspective

Cottière was a millennialist,[8] who believed that the millennium had begun in the year 1517.[9] He was a follower of John Napier,[10] and an influence on Johann Heinrich Alsted.[3] The Synopsis criticorum of Matthew Poole called him "vir doctus et acutus".[11]

  • Apocalypseos Domini Nostri Jesu Christi (1615).[12] There was a letter of dedication to James I of England.[13]
  • Traittez des originales et versions (1619), against the Bible translation of Pierre Coton.[14]
  • Paradoxe, que l'Église romaine, en ce qu'elle a de différent des Églises dites réformées, n'est ancienne que de quatre cents ans environ (1636)[15]
  • Les propheties, touchant l'estat de la religion et de l'eglise des derniers temps (1637)[16]
  • L'Apocalypse, de nostre seigneur Jesus Christ (1642)[17] This is a French translation of the 1615 Latin work.[1] Included (subtitle) was a commentary on a 1641 work on the Apocalypse by the Jesuit Bernardin de Montreuil.
  • Esclaircissement sur une principale controverse (1642)[18]
  • Les degrez de consanguinité et d'affinité (1644)[19]
  • De Hellenistis et lingua Hellenistica (1646).[20] Opposed Daniel Heinsius, in the controversy he had with Salmasius over the nature of New Testament Greek.[21]

A 1648 work Epistola ad Spanheimum, in the controversy over universal grace and Amyraldism,[22] was answered by Friedrich Spanheim in Epistola ad Cottierum (1648).[6][23]

Remove ads

References

Loading related searches...

Wikiwand - on

Seamless Wikipedia browsing. On steroids.

Remove ads