Top Qs
Timeline
Chat
Perspective
Monarchism
Advocacy of a monarch or monarchical rule From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Remove ads
Monarchism is the advocacy of the system of monarchy or monarchical rule.[1] A monarchist is an individual who supports this form of government independently of any specific monarch, whereas one who supports a particular monarch is a royalist. Conversely, the opposition to monarchical rule is referred to as republicanism.[2][3][4]
Remove ads
History
Summarize
Perspective
Monarchical rule is among the oldest political institutions.[5] The similar form of societal hierarchy known as chiefdom or tribal kingship is prehistoric. Chiefdoms provided the concept of state formation, which started with civilizations such as Mesopotamia, Ancient Egypt and the Indus Valley civilization.[6] In some parts of the world, chiefdoms became monarchies.[7]
In the 17th and 18th centuries, the Enlightenment began.[8] This resulted in new anti-monarchist ideas[9] which resulted in several revolutions such as the 18th century American Revolution and the French Revolution which were both additional steps in the weakening of power of European monarchies.
Africa
Central Africa
Ethiopia
In 1974, one of the world's oldest monarchies was abolished in Ethiopia with the fall of Emperor Haile Selassie.[10]
Asia
China
For most of its history, China was organized into various dynastic states under the rule of hereditary monarchs. Beginning with the establishment of dynastic rule by Yu the Great c. 2070 BC, and ending with the abdication of the Xuantong Emperor in AD 1912, Chinese historiography came to organize itself around the succession of monarchical dynasties.[a][b] Besides those established by the dominant Han ethnic group or its spiritual Huaxia predecessors, dynasties throughout Chinese history were also founded by non-Han peoples.[16]
Japan
The emperor of Japan or Tennō (天皇; pronounced [tennoꜜː]), literally "ruler from heaven" or "heavenly sovereign",[17][c] is the hereditary monarch and head of state of Japan. The Imperial Household Law governs the line of imperial succession. The emperor is personally immune from prosecution[19] and is also recognized as the head of the Shinto religion, which holds the emperor to be the direct descendant of the sun goddess Amaterasu. According to tradition, the office of emperor was created in the 7th century BC, but modern scholars believe that the first emperors did not appear until the 5th or 6th centuries AD.[20][21] During the Kamakura period from 1185 to 1333, the shōguns were the de facto rulers of Japan, with the emperor and the imperial court acting as figureheads.[22] In 1867, shogun Tokugawa Yoshinobu stepped down, restoring Emperor Meiji to power.[23] The Meiji Constitution was adopted In 1889, after which the emperor became an active ruler with considerable political power that was shared with the Imperial Diet.[24] After World War II, the 1947 Constitution of Japan was enacted, defining the emperor as the symbol of the Japanese state and the unity of the Japanese people.[25] The emperor has exercised a purely ceremonial role ever since.[26]
Europe
Austria-Hungary
Following the collapse of Austria-Hungary, the Republic of German-Austria was proclaimed. The Constitutional Assembly of German Austria passed the Habsburg Law, which permanently exiled the Habsburg family from Austria. Despite this, significant support for the Habsburg family persisted in Austria. Following the Anschluss of 1938, the Nazi government suppressed monarchist activities. By the time Nazi rule ended in Austria, support for monarchism had largely evaporated.[27]
France
France was ruled by monarchs from the establishment of the Kingdom of West Francia in 843 until the end of the Second French Empire in 1870, with several interruptions.
Classical French historiography usually regards Clovis I, King of the Franks (r. 507–511), as the first king of France. However, historians today consider that such a kingdom did not begin until the establishment of West Francia, during the dissolution of the Carolingian Empire in the 800s.[28][29]
Germany
In 1920s Germany, a number of monarchists gathered around the German National People's Party (founded in 1918), which demanded the return of the Hohenzollern monarchy and an end to the Weimar Republic; the party retained a large base of support until the rise of Nazism in the 1930s, as Adolf Hitler staunchly opposed monarchism.[30]
Italy
The aftermath of World War II saw the return of monarchist and republican rivalry in Italy, where a referendum was held on whether the state should remain a monarchy or become a republic. The republican side won the vote by a narrow margin, and the modern Republic of Italy was created.[31]
Spain
After the 1931 Spanish local elections, King Alfonso XIII voluntarily left Spain and republicans proclaimed a Second Spanish Republic.[32] After the assassination of opposition leader José Calvo Sotelo in 1936, right-wing forces banded together to overthrow the Republic. During the Spanish Civil War of 1936 to 1939, General Francisco Franco established the basis for the Spanish State (1939–1975). In 1938, the autocratic government of Franco claimed to have reconstituted the Spanish monarchy in absentia (and in this case ultimately yielded to a restoration, in the person of King Juan Carlos).
In 1975, Juan Carlos I became King of Spain and began the Spanish transition to democracy. He abdicated in 2014, and was succeeded by his son Felipe VI.
United Kingdom
In England, royalty ceded power to other groups in a gradual process. In 1215, a group of nobles forced King John to sign Magna Carta, which guaranteed the English barons certain liberties and established that the king's powers were not absolute. King Charles I was executed in 1649, and the Commonwealth of England was established as a republic. Highly unpopular, the republic was ended in 1660, and the monarchy was restored under King Charles II. In 1687–88, the Glorious Revolution and the overthrow of King James II established the principles of constitutional monarchy, which would later be worked out by Locke and other thinkers. However, absolute monarchy, justified by Hobbes in Leviathan (1651), remained a prominent principle elsewhere.
Following the Glorious Revolution, William III and Mary II were established as constitutional monarchs, with less power than their predecessor James II. Since then, royal power has become more ceremonial, with powers such as refusal to assent last exercised in 1708 by Queen Anne. Once part of the United Kingdom (1801–1922), southern Ireland rejected monarchy and became the Republic of Ireland in 1949. Support for a ceremonial monarchy remains high in Britain: Queen Elizabeth II (r. 1952–2022), possessed wide support from the U.K.'s population.
North America
Costa Rica
The struggle between monarchists and republicans led to the Costa Rican civil war of 1823. Costa Rican monarchists include Joaquín de Oreamuno y Muñoz de la Trinidad, José Santos Lombardo y Alvarado, and José Rafael Gallegos Alvarado. in 1822, Costa Rican monarchists were loyal to Emperor Agustín de Iturbide of the First Mexican Empire.[33]
Honduras
.svg)
After the independence of the general captaincy of Guatemala from the Spanish empire, Honduras joined the First Mexican Empire for a brief period. These were divided between the annexationists, made up mostly of illustrious Spanish-descendant families and members of the conservative party who supported the idea of being part of an empire, and the liberals who wanted Central America to be a separate nation under a republican system.
Mexico
After obtaining independence from Spain, the First Mexican Empire was established under Emperor Agustín I. His reign lasted less than one year, and he was forcefully deposed. In 1864, the Second Mexican Empire was formed under Emperor Maximilian I. Maximilian's government enjoyed French aid, but opposition from America, and collapsed after three years. Much like Agustín I, Maximilian I was deposed and later executed by his republican enemies. Since 1867, Mexico has not possessed a monarchy.
Today, some Mexican monarchist organizations advocate for Maximilian von Götzen-Iturbide or Carlos Felipe de Habsburgo to be instated as the Emperor of Mexico.
Nicaragua
The miskito ethnic group inhabits part of the Atlantic coast of Honduras and Nicaragua, by the beginning of the 17th century the said ethnic group was reorganized under a single chief known as Ta Uplika, for the reign of his grandson King Oldman I this group had a very close relationship With the English, they managed to turn the Mosquitia coast into an English protectorate that would decline in the 19th century until it completely disappeared in 1894 with the abdication of Robert II.[34]
Currently, the Miskitos who are shot between the two countries have denounced the neglect of their communities and abuses committed by the authorities. As a result of this, in Nicaragua several Miskito people began a movement of separatism from present-day Nicaragua and a re-institution of the monarchy.
United States
After the U.S. declared its independence, the form of government by which it would operate still remained unsettled. At least two of America's Founding Fathers, Alexander Hamilton and Nathaniel Gorham, believed that America should be an independent monarchy. Various proposals to create an American monarchy were considered, including the Prussian scheme which would have made Prince Henry of Prussia king of the United States. Hamilton proposed that the leader of America should be an elected monarch, while Gorham pushed for a hereditary monarchy.[35][36] U.S. military officer Lewis Nicola also desired for America to be a monarchy, suggesting George Washington accept the crown of America, which he declined. All attempts ultimately failed, and America was founded a Republic.
Since the ratification of the constitution, support for monarchy has possessed a generally low popularity, though it has increased slightly over time. In 1950, 3% of Americans said it would be a good idea for America to possess a royal family, while 93% thought it would be bad. This question was re-asked in 1999, where 11% of Americans answered that in favor of a royal family would be good for the United States and 87% against.[37] A 2013 CNN poll found that 13% of Americans would be open to the United States possessing a royal family again.[38] A 2018 poll asking if America would be better or worse if it possessed a constitutional monarchy had 11% of Americans answering better and 36% answering worse.[39] A 2021 poll by YouGov found that 5% of Americans would consider it a good thing for the United States to have a monarchy (7% support among men and 4% support among women), with 69% answering that it would be a bad thing. In the YouGov poll, African Americans were most likely to answer positively in favor of a monarchy at 10% support.[40] In 2023 another poll was conducted which found 12% of Americans favored monarchy in the United States while 63% remained opposed.[41]
South America
Brazil
From gaining its independence in 1822 until 1889, Brazil was governed as a constitutional monarchy with a branch of the Portuguese Royal Family serving as monarchs. Prior to this period, Brazil had been a royal colony which had also served briefly as the seat of government for the Portuguese Empire following the occupation of that country by Napoleon Bonaparte in 1808. The history of the Empire of Brazil was marked by brief periods of political instability, several wars that Brazil won, and a marked increase in immigration which saw the arrival of both Jews and Protestants who were attracted by Brazil's reputation for religious tolerance. The final decades of the Empire under the reign of Pedro II saw a remarkable period of relative peace both at home and internationally, coupled with dramatic economic expansion, the extension of basic civil rights to most people and the gradual restriction of slavery, culminating in its final abolition in 1888. It is also remembered for its thriving culture and arts. However, Pedro II had little interest in preserving the monarchy and passively accepted its overthrow by a military coup d'état in 1889 resulting in the establishment of a dictatorship known as the First Brazilian Republic.[42]
Remove ads
Current monarchies
Summarize
Perspective
The majority of current monarchies are constitutional monarchies. In a constitutional monarchy the power of the monarch is restricted by either a written or unwritten constitution, this should not be confused with a ceremonial monarchy, in which the monarch holds only symbolic power and plays very little to no part in government or politics. In some constitutional monarchies the monarch does play a more active role in political affairs than in others. In Thailand, for instance, King Bhumibol Adulyadej, who reigned from 1946 to 2016, played a critical role in the nation's political agenda and in various military coups. Similarly, in Morocco, King Mohammed VI wields significant, but not absolute power.
Liechtenstein is a democratic principality whose citizens have voluntarily given more power to their monarch in recent years.
There remain a handful of countries in which the monarchy is an absolute monarchy. The majority of these countries are oil-producing Arab Islamic monarchies like Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Qatar, Oman, and the United Arab Emirates. Other strong monarchies include Brunei and Eswatini.
Remove ads
Political philosophy
Summarize
Perspective
Otto von Habsburg advocated a form of constitutional monarchy based on the primacy of the supreme judicial function, with hereditary succession, mediation by a tribunal is warranted if suitability is problematic.[43][44]
Non-partisanship
British political scientist Vernon Bogdanor justifies monarchy on the grounds that it provides for a nonpartisan head of state, separate from the head of government, and thus ensures that the highest representative of the country, at home and internationally, does not represent a particular political party, but all people.[45] Bogdanor also notes that monarchies can play a helpful unifying role in a multinational state, noting that "In Belgium, it is sometimes said that the king is the only Belgian, everyone else being either Fleming or Walloon" and that the British sovereign can belong to all of the United Kingdom's constituent countries (England, Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland), without belonging to any particular one of them.[45]
Private interest
Thomas Hobbes wrote that the private interest of the monarchy is the same with the public. The riches, power, and humour of a monarch arise only from the riches, strength, and reputation of his subjects. An elected Head of State is incentivised to increase his own wealth for leaving office after a few years whereas a monarch has no reason to corrupt because he would be cheating himself.[d]
Wise counsel
Thomas Hobbes wrote that a monarch can receive wise counsel with secrecy while an assembly cannot. Advisors to the assembly tend to be well-versed more in the acquisition of their own wealth than of knowledge; are likely to give their advices in long discourses which often excite men into action but do not govern them in it, moved by the flame of passion instead of enlightenment. Their multitude is a weakness.[e]
Long termism
Thomas Hobbes wrote that the resolutions of a monarch are subject to no inconsistency save for human nature; in assemblies, inconsistencies arise from the number. For in an assembly, as little as the absence of a few or the diligent appearance of a few of the contrary opinion, "undoes today all that was done yesterday".[f]
Civil war reduction
Thomas Hobbes wrote that a monarch cannot disagree with himself, out of envy or interest, but an assembly may and to such a height that may produce a civil war.[g]
Liberty
The International Monarchist League, founded in 1943, has always sought to promote monarchy on the grounds that it strengthens popular liberty, both in a democracy and in a dictatorship, because by definition the monarch is not beholden to politicians.
British-American libertarian writer Matthew Feeney argues that European constitutional monarchies "have managed for the most part to avoid extreme politics"—specifically fascism, communism, and military dictatorship—"in part because monarchies provide a check on the wills of populist politicians" by representing entrenched customs and traditions.[46] Feeny notes that
European monarchies—such as the Danish, Belgian, Swedish, Dutch, Norwegian, and British—have ruled over countries that are among the most stable, prosperous, and free in the world.[46]
Socialist writer George Orwell argued a similar point, that constitutional monarchy is effective at preventing the development of fascism.
"The function of the King in promoting stability and acting as a sort of keystone in a non-democratic society is, of course, obvious. But he also has, or can have, the function of acting as an escape-valve for dangerous emotions. A French journalist said to me once that the monarchy was one of the things that have saved Britain from Fascism...It is at any rate possible that while this division of function exists a Hitler or a Stalin cannot come to power. On the whole the European countries which have most successfully avoided Fascism have been constitutional monarchies... I have often advocated that a Labour government, i.e. one that meant business, would abolish titles while retaining the Royal Family.’[47]
Erik von Kuehnelt-Leddihn took a different approach, arguing that liberty and equality are contradictions. As such, he argued that attempts to establish greater social equality through the abolishment of monarchy, ultimately results in a greater loss of liberty for citizens. He believed that equality can only be accomplished through the suppression of liberty, as humans are naturally unequal and hierarchical. Kuehnelt-Leddihn also believed that people are on average freer under monarchies than they are under democratic republics, as the latter tends to more easily become tyrannical through ochlocracy. In Liberty or Equality, he writes:
There is little doubt that the American Congress or the French Chambers have a power over their nations which would rouse the envy of a Louis XIV or a George III, were they alive today. Not only prohibition, but also the income tax declaration, selective service, obligatory schooling, the fingerprinting of blameless citizens, premarital blood tests—none of these totalitarian measures would even the royal absolutism of the seventeenth century have dared to introduce.[48]
Hans-Hermann Hoppe also argues that monarchy helps to preserve individual liberty more effectively than democracy.[49]
Natural desire for hierarchy
In a 1943 essay in The Spectator, "Equality", British author C.S. Lewis criticized egalitarianism, and its corresponding call for the abolition of monarchy, as contrary to human nature, writing,
A man's reaction to Monarchy is a kind of test. Monarchy can easily be 'debunked'; but watch the faces, mark well the accents, of the debunkers. These are the men whose tap-root in Eden has been cut: whom no rumour of the polyphony, the dance, can reach—men to whom pebbles laid in a row are more beautiful than an arch...Where men are forbidden to honour a king they honour millionaires, athletes, or film-stars instead: even famous prostitutes or gangsters. For spiritual nature, like bodily nature, will be served; deny it food and it will gobble poison.[50]
Political accountability
Oxford political scientists Petra Schleiter and Edward Morgan-Jones wrote that in monarchies, it is more common to hold elections than non-electoral replacements.[51]
Notable works
Notable works arguing in favor of monarchy include
|
|
Remove ads
Support for monarchy
Summarize
Perspective
Current monarchies
Former monarchies
 | This section's factual accuracy may be compromised due to out-of-date information. The reason given is: Some information in this section is more than 10 years old. (November 2022) |
The following is a list of former monarchies and their percentage of public support for monarchism.
Notable monarchists
Several notable public figures who advocated for monarchy or are monarchists include:
Arts and entertainment
- Honoré de Balzac, French novelist & playwright[90]
- Fyodor Dostoevsky, Russian novelist & essayist
- Pedro Muñoz Seca, Spanish playwright
- George MacDonald, British theologian and writer
- C.S. Lewis, British theologian and writer
- J.R.R. Tolkien, British writer
- T.S. Eliot, American-British poet & writer
- Salvador Dalí, Spanish artist
- Hergé, Belgian cartoonist
- Éric Rohmer, French filmmaker[91]
- Yukio Mishima, Japanese author
- Joan Collins, English actress & author[92]
- Stephen Fry, English actor & author[93]
Clergy
- Thomas Aquinas, Italian Catholic priest & theologian[94]
- Robert Bellarmine, Italian Cardinal & theologian[95]
- Jacques-Bénigne Bossuet, French Bishop & theologian[96]
- Jules Mazarin, Italian Cardinal & minister
- André-Hercule de Fleury, French Cardinal & minister
- Pius VI, Italian Pope & ruler of the Papal States[97][98]
- Fabrizio Ruffo, Italian Cardinal & treasurer
- Ercole Consalvi, Italian Cardinal Secretary of State
- Pelagio Antonio de Labastida y Dávalos, Mexican Archbishop & Regent of the Second Mexican Empire
- Louis Gaston Adrien de Ségur, French Bishop & writer
- Louis Billot, French priest & theologian
- Pius XII, Italian Pope & sovereign of Vatican City[99][100]
- József Mindszenty, Hungarian Cardinal & Prince-primate
Philosophy
- Dante Alighieri, Italian poet & philosopher[101]
- Jean Bodin, French political philosopher
- Robert Filmer, English political theorist[102]
- Thomas Hobbes, English philosopher[103]
- Joseph de Maistre, Savoyard philosopher & writer[104]
- Juan Donoso Cortés, Spanish politician & political theologian
- Søren Kierkegaard, Danish philosopher & theologian[105]
- Charles Maurras, French author & philosopher[106]
- Kang Youwei, Chinese political thinker & reformer
- Ralph Adams Cram, American architect & writer[107]
- Erik von Kuehnelt-Leddihn, Austrian political scientist & philosopher
- Vernon Bogdanor, British political scientist & historian[108]
- Roger Scruton, English philosopher & writer[109]
- Hans Hermann-Hoppe, German-American political theorist[110]
- Charles A. Coulombe, American historian & author
- Plinio Corrêa de Oliveira, Brazilian philosopher and writter
Politics
- François-René de Chateaubriand, French historian & Ambassador[111]
- Manuel Belgrano, Argentinian politician
- Klemens von Metternich, Austrian Chancellor
- Miguel Miramón, Mexican President & military general
- Otto von Bismarck, German Chancellor
- Juan Vázquez de Mella, Spanish politician & political theorist
- Panagis Tsaldaris, Greek Prime Minister
- Winston Churchill, British Prime Minister of the U.K.
- Călin Popescu-Tăriceanu, Romanian Prime Minister[112]
- Salome Zourabichvili, Georgian President[113]
- Tony Abbott, Australian Prime Minister[114][115]
- Antônio Henrique Cunha Bueno, Brazilian politician
Monarchist movements and parties
- Action Française
- Alfonsism
- Alliance Royale
- Australian Monarchist League
- Australians for Constitutional Monarchy
- Bonapartism
- Black-Yellow Alliance
- Carlism
- Cavalier
- Chouannerie
- Conservative-Monarchist Club
- Constantian Society
- Constitutionalist Party of Iran
- Druk Phuensum Tshogpa
- Hawaiian sovereignty movement[note 4]
- Hovpartiet
- International Monarchist League
- Jacobitism
- Koruna Česká (party)
- Legality Movement
- Legitimism
- Liberal Democratic Party of Russia
- Loyalism
- Loyalist (American Revolution)
- Miguelist
- Monarchist League of Canada
- Monarchist Party of Russia
- Monarchy New Zealand
- Movement for the Restoration of the Kingdom of Serbia
- Nouvelle Action Royaliste
- Orléanism
- People's Alliance for Democracy
- Rastriya Prajatantra Party
- Royal Stuart Society
- Royalist Party
- Sanfedismo
- Serbian Renewal Movement
- Sonnō jōi
- Tradition und Leben
- Traditionalist Communion
- Ultra-royalist
Remove ads
Criticism
Criticism of monarchy can be targeted against the general form of government—monarchy—or more specifically, to particular monarchical governments as controlled by hereditary royal families. For example, Montesquieu often criticized the French monarchy and its institutions, with the belief that they were forms of despotism.[116] Monarchies in Europe and their underlying concepts, such as the Divine Right of Kings, were often criticized during the Age of Enlightenment, which notably paved the way to the French Revolution and the proclamation of the abolition of the monarchy in France.[117] Earlier, the American Revolution had seen the Patriots suppress the Loyalists and expel all royal officials.
The twentieth century, beginning with the 1917 February Revolution in Russia and accelerated by two world wars, saw many European countries replace their monarchies with republics, while others replaced their absolute monarchies with constitutional monarchies.[118]
Remove ads
See also
Notes
- Chapters LVIII-LXIV
- Among respondents, 22 per cent answered that they were not opposed to a monarchy in principle, but could not think of a person "worthy of the Russian throne", whereas 6 per cent believed there was.
- Some activists within the sovereignty movement advocate for a restoration of the Hawaiian monarchy, while others push for an independent Hawaiian Republic.
- While the Xia dynasty is typically considered to be the first orthodox Chinese dynasty, numerous sources including the Book of Documents mention two other dynasties that preceded the Xia: the "Tang" (唐) and the "Yu" (虞) dynasties.[11][12][13][14] The former is sometimes called the "Ancient Tang" (古唐) to distinguish it from other dynasties named "Tang".[15] Should the historicity of these earlier dynasties be attested, Yu the Great would not have been the initiator of dynastic rule in China.
- All attempts at restoring monarchical and dynastic rule in China following the Xinhai Revolution ended in failure. Hence, the abdication of the Xuantong Emperor in AD 1912 is typically regarded as the formal end of the Chinese monarchy.
- Leviathan, 19.4, pp.124-5
- Leviathan, 19.5, p.125
- Leviathan, 19.6, p.125
- Leviathan, 19.7, p.125
- as part of Austria-Hungary
- The Figaro poll showed that 38% of French respondents said monarchy makes them dream. In addition, 55% believe that monarchy is not adapted to today’s society, while on the contrary 44% judge it to be timeless and still adapted to today’s society.
- Whilst the percentage of people who supported the return of the Prussian monarchy was 8%. However, 14 percent were in favour, and among “right-wing voters”, 15 percent supported the idea of a royal family in general.
- According to the survey, 14% supported the Monarchy and 57% were against it. 29% were unsure on the matter.
- 37% of people who responded to the survey claimed Portugal would be worse as a Monarchy, 19.7% thought it would be better than the Republic and 43.3% were indifferent to it.
- 54.7% of Romanians say they would vote against the monarchy and for maintaining the republic (compared to 41% in July 2013). 35.4% say they would vote in favor of the monarchy (compared to 27.2% in July 2013), and 9.9% do not know or do not answer (compared to 31.8% in July 2013).
- in their capacity as monarchs of Great Britain
Remove ads
References
Wikiwand - on
Seamless Wikipedia browsing. On steroids.
Remove ads