Top Qs
Timeline
Chat
Perspective
Multinational Force–Ukraine
Proposed and planned potential multinational force for Ukraine, 2025 From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Remove ads
The Multinational Force–Ukraine (abbr. MNF–U,[a] French: Force multinationale en Ukraine, Ukrainian: Багатонаціональні сили–Україна, romanized: Bahatonatsionalni syly–Ukraina, lit. 'poly- (many-) national forces (troops)–Ukraine') is a proposed and planned potential multinational non-standing armed force for peace enforcement to be led by France and the United Kingdom in the aftermath of the Russo-Ukrainian war. Subject to a ceasefire, MNF–U would be established in Ukraine with continental Europe's and overseas military contingent as a deterrent against renewed Russian aggression in one of the largest multinational deployments in Europe since the 1990s.[5]
As Multinational Force Ukraine is not a treaty-based entity, pre-deployment membership status is conferred by representation at coalition meetings. As of December 2025[update], Japan was the latest of 33 countries that joined MNF-U.[b] Operationally inactive and open for contributors to join while remaining in planning phase, the force is yet to determine its size and operational areas of responsibility. October 2025 UK parliamentary statements from Defense Secretary Luke Pollard, and written answers in the UK Defence Journal, confirmed that UK was first to publicly acknowledge designation of its military contingent and units for MNF-U duty, though operational details remain confidential for security reasons.[37]
MNF-U’s status – though in planning phase with deployment pending ceasefire – has become subject of legal and political debates.
Remove ads
International law and peace enforcement for Ukraine
Summarize
Perspective
Historical context of multinational engagements in Ukraine
The structure and scale of multinational peace operations in Ukraine must be understood against a backdrop of historical peacekeeping and Ukraine's evolving national defense doctrine. Since 1992, Ukraine has dispatched military contingents to over twenty UN, NATO, and OSCE missions, deploying more than 45,000 personnel abroad and suffering casualties. Notably, Ukraine's peacekeeping contributions persisted into Russia's 2014-2022 aggression, reflecting both a domestic commitment to multilateralism and the external recognition of Ukraine's capability and reliability as a contributor.[38][39]
With the 2022 full-scale invasion,[40] Ukraine withdrew most peacekeepers for home defense, but the tradition underpins receptivity to a future international stabilization mission under multilateral auspices. The concept of a Multinational Force-Ukraine echoes earlier multinational stabilization efforts, including the NATO Implementation Force (IFOR) and Stabilisation Force (SFOR) in Bosnia, the Kosovo Force (KFOR), the Multinational Force and Observers (MFO) in Sinai Peninsula, and the current one in planning – International Stabilization Force in Gaza Strip. The MNF-U proposal adapts these experiences as well as Ukraine–NATO relationship, which deepened rapidly after Russia's invasion in 2022.[25]
Legal basis of the mission
The legal architecture for the MNF–U's peacekeeping mission is evolving amid UN precedent and international law.[41][42] Deployment is to occur only with a comprehensive, signed ceasefire or peace deal, respecting Ukraine's sovereignty and the norms prohibiting intervention in active conflicts without host-country consent. Rules of engagement, status of forces, and chain of command are being negotiated in detail, taking lessons from previous 'coalition of the willing'.[c][46] [22]
As of October 2025[update], lack of specific 'reassurance force in Ukraine' legal analysis highlights the risks of ambiguity in force mandate, especially in the context of 'robust peace enforcement' (as opposed to traditional peacekeeping).[47][48][49]
Remove ads
MNF–U design overview
Summarize
Perspective
The Multinational Force–Ukraine (MNF–U), also referred to as the deterrence and reassurance force, is an international political coalition – and a planned military contingent – formed in response to the Russo-Ukrainian war. Its primary objective is to support Ukraine's sovereignty and security through deterrence, reassurance, and post-war stabilization efforts. The design of the MNF-U parallels and is informed by NATO’s Combined Joint Task Force (CJTF) concept, which was launched in 1993 to provide flexible, rapidly deployable multinational and multiservice task forces for missions such as humanitarian relief and peacekeeping.[d]
Like the CJTF model, MNF-U features a modular command structure built around a headquarters nucleus, augmented by national contingents specific to mission requirements, thereby ensuring interoperability and readiness for rapid deployment.[51]
Origin and creation
As of December 2025[update], the MNF–U, though not formally inaugurated, is a non-deployed security-oriented mission within the informal Coalition of the Willing, which was featured, in particular, at an event in Kyiv on 10 May 2025, hosted by Volodymyr Zelensky, president of Ukraine, and attended by European political leaders, including Emmanuel Macron, French president; Friedrich Merz, German chancellor; Keir Starmer, UK prime minister; and Donald Tusk, Polish prime minister.[52] The coalition expanded from sixteen founding nations and two organizations in March to a 33-member-state entity by August 2025. Founding participants included:
- 2 Commonwealth realms – Canada and the UK,
- 12 European Union member states,
- Turkey, and Ukraine; as well as:
- European Union (represented by the European Commission and the European Council), and
- North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO).
While mission statement is pending, the MNF–U is described as a non-CSDP flexible armed force, designed to operate outside the EU's Common Security and Defence Policy framework.[53]
Expected mission and objectives
As of December 2025[update], MNF–U's stated mission objective includes:[31]
- strengthening Ukraine's defense capabilities across land, sea, and air;
- designing post-war security guarantees for Ukraine;
- supporting peace negotiations in the Russo-Ukrainian war.
As designed, the force organization is an ad hoc non-standing army, with its planning — including financial burden-sharing — at an advanced stage as of 2026. The MNF–U as a non-standing force is not planned to be permanently headquartered: only rotational operational HQ with Kyiv 'coordination cell' is designated for command and control.[24]
- Contributors and Partners
In addition to 33 contributing nations from Europe, the Commonwealth, and the Asia-Pacific,[e] the coalition's partners include:
- the United States,
- European Union Military Assistance Mission in support of Ukraine (EUMAM UA),
- NATO Security Assistance and Training for Ukraine (NSATU),
- US Security Assistance Group–Ukraine (SAG-U), Joint Multinational Training Group–Ukraine (JMTG–U).
- Opposing entities
Perceived by policymakers opponents are:[20]
- Belarus, Iran, North Korea, and
- Russia with its armed forces.[54]
Doctrinal constraints and potential dynamics
As a coalition, MNF-U remains politically active but militarily nascent.
As of 2026[update], planned as rapidly deployable, multi-national, multi-service force, this is consistent with established protocols for international military collaboration and previous operational planning disclosures. MNF-U was inactive as of November 2025, despite the political coalition (CoW) being active. Kyiv HQ physical location is yet to be determined.
The funding mechanism involves the European Peace Facility (EPF), indicating a complex, hybrid financial arrangement leveraging existing EU mechanisms. In contrast, the legal basis is defined as being outside EU's Common Security and Defence Policy, underscoring mission's ad hoc, non-treaty nature.
Doctrinal and structural alignment (pre-November 2025)
MNF-U is an analog of the CJTF model, designed for stabilization operations outside formal alliance defense mandates:
- Combined - involves the forces of up to 33 countries as contributors;
- Joint - objective as a coalition rapid deployment force necessitates Army, Navy, and Air Force contributions for a mission;
- Task - to be organized for a specific purpose – deployment upon agreed ceasefire.
The force command and control (C2) procedural and human interoperability across the 33 contributing nations is planned in consistency with usual protocols for international collaboration. Operational tempo of the mission demands the ability to be generated rapidly and at short notice.
MNF–U potential dynamics and end state
On November 5, 2025 in Bodø, Norway, the Joint Expeditionary Force (JEF) — a UK-led multinational force of 10 Northern and Eastern European nations — formally launched an Enhanced Partnership with Ukraine.
This decision, made by JEF defence ministers, was approved to grant Ukraine the status of "Advanced Partner" in the JEF. European observers characterized the JEF's actions as a "bypass of NATO's sluggishness and bureaucracy". This confirms a strategic trend in European defense planning toward flexible, rapid-response coalitions. The JEF’s decision was explicitly described as a "strong message to Russian President Vladimir Putin" regarding the collective strength and operational responsiveness of the UK-led military alliances.
- Timelines and phasing
Timelines for deployment, initial operational capability, or transition to full operational capability are expected to be in phases.
- Exit strategy and end state
As of 2026[update], there were no mention of criteria for mission success assessment, conditions for withdrawal, or the envisioned end state for the MNF-U's presence in Ukraine.
Remove ads
Background
Summarize
Perspective
As a coalition stabilization and peacekeeping future force with 33 nation-contributors, MNF-U was formalized in October 2025 by France and the United Kingdom.[55] Conceived as a rapid deployment force in response to a ceasefire in Russo-Ukrainian war, when comprehensively agreed, it is to operate with English as its working language and under extended multinational agreements.[32] MNF-U's expected mandate to support a comprehensive ceasefire and post-war stabilization in Ukraine includes military logistics, training, force generation, naval mine‑clearing, and air policing.[55]
Its planned command structure is divided between a joint command headquarters in Paris and a coordination headquarters in Kyiv, with a French three‑star commander in Paris and a British two‑star deputy in Kyiv. As of November 2025[update], MNF‑U remains in the planning phase, with deployment to follow the cessation of hostilities.[37]
As a multinational security assistance initiative, it is established to provide post‑conflict advisory, training, and logistical support to the Armed Forces of Ukraine (AFU) and the wider security sector. Coordination headquarters in Kyiv, responsible for operative planning and coordination, is to be led by the United Kingdom, which provides core logistical and administrative staff. Additionally, headquarters is planned in Paris, reflecting both operational presence and strategic oversight.
MNF‑U is to operate under a 'non‑combat mandate' in line with coalition statements made in late 2025.[56] Deployment of the full contingent is conditional upon the verified cessation of major hostilities and the establishment of reliable cease‑fire terms. The United Kingdom is responsible for administrative and logistical costs associated with maintaining the headquarters staff.
The MNF-U's structure, mandate, and legitimacy have quickly become points of discussion not only among governments but also within the media and academic communities across Europe and beyond.[57]
Remove ads
Formation, founding directives, contributors
Summarize
Perspective
Ad hoc multinational crisis response coalition force outside the EU's Crisis Response Operation Core, MNF-U is to be established amidst speculative scenarios concerning Ukraine’s postwar security and the anticipated need for a rapid, 'boots-on-the-ground' peacekeeping or reassurance force, deployed upon a ceasefire or peace agreement.[58] Its formal launch as a coalition of the willing – a Europe-led mechanism for providing concrete security guarantees to Ukraine – was in March 2025 at the London "Securing Our Future" summit, co-hosted by British Prime minister Keir Starmer and French president Emmanuel Macron.[59]
Organization, command and control structure
On 17 July 2025, UK defence secretary unveiled planned military structure of the Multinational Force–Ukraine organized under the MNF-U Commander (COM MNF–U).[2] Political leadership is provided by France and the United Kingdom, co-chairing regular summits of the coalition of the willing. Military command is assigned to a divisional general from France with rotation to a UK general officer in 12 months after force deployment.
Headquarters are distributed across Paris, France, Northwood Headquarters, United Kingdom, and Kyiv, Ukraine. The command structure is modeled on multinational stabilization operations, with France and the UK as lead nations and other contributors also providing troops or specialized capabilities; MNF-U operational dates and legal mandate are contingent a ceasefire agreement.[37]
Contributors and funding
As of 2026[update], MNF-U integrated an array of contributors, ranging from major European allies like the United Kingdom to smaller Baltic states, some of which provided only token or limited contingent pledge up-to-date.[60][61] Troop contribution pledgers included NATO members and some non-NATO partners from Asia Pacific region. While many contributors confined their deployments pledges to support or training tasks, others are to take on more direct security roles. In an interview with Fox News on 19 August 2025, President Trump suggested that US (the non-coalition partner nation) air support was a possibility but ruled out US troops on the ground. [44]: p.21-22
MNF-U’s composition is intentionally European, both symbolically and practically, with defense burden-sharing mechanisms reflecting an emphasis on collective action and sustainable financing.[62][63] Since March 2021, EU has been providing military equipment and training to AFU, among others, through its European Peace Facility (EPF). But this is the first time the bloc has, in its history, approved the supply of lethal weapons to a third country using EU funding, some streams of which are under consideration for potential MNF-U cost allocation.[44]: 22
Reaction
- US may provide security guarantees
Details of what US support and coordination could look like are limited. In a post on Truth Social on 18 August 2025 President Trump said that security guarantees would be provided by various European countries in “coordination with the United States of America”.[64] He has made clear that any security guarantees will not be NATO-based guarantees. Direct US military assistance will also not be provided to MNF-U. Instead, the US is providing arms that are funded entirely by all NATO allies.[65]
- Russian opposition
Russia rejects the deployment of European peacekeepers in Ukraine to monitor and enforce any peace agreement, calling it "demonstrably unviable".[66] Earlier in the 2025, both President Macron and Prime Minister Starmer have said that the deployment of allied forces in Ukrainian territory was "not up to Russia to accept or not".[67][68]
Remove ads
Operational overview
Summarize
Perspective
Coalition's progression from foundational declaration to operational planning was impacted by decisions on force structure, commitment to multinational command, operationalization of ceasefire (prior to peace negotiations), and pledges of troop commitments. MNF-U’s operational doctrine centers on deterrence (demonstrating credible force to prevent violations), assurance of the ceasefire (serving as a "tripwire" against renewed aggression), and support for regeneration of Ukraine’s military institutions.[71] The mission is strictly non-offensive, with weapon posture proportional to self-defense and area security needs.
Deployment plans and force composition
The coalition is planned as a rapid deployment force of provisionally assigned 25,000-30,000 initial personnel.[72] Subject to a comprehensive ceasefire agreement, MNF–U deployment would be phased according to its terms and conditions.[73]
- Participation levels
will vary: UK and France will anchor command and provide high-readiness forces; European allies may supply ground troops; US support could be focused on logistics, and air/ISR (intelligence, surveillance, reconnaissance) "backstop", with early public exclusion of direct ground deployment.[44]
- Planned strength and capabilities
According to Andriy Yermak, Head of the Office of the President of Ukraine, targeted initial deployment size is 4-5 mechanized brigades, although flexibility built into the force structure allows scaling as conditions evolve.[7][f] Force generation is planned with high-readiness battalions during early phases, and the ability to surge additional units if required. The model allows for national caveats specifics but mandates unity of command in the event of crisis response.[27]
Potential operational area overview
According to the RAND Corporation research report on ceasefire scenarios dated July 2025, there were some underlying assumptions relevant to the MNF-U's operational planning detailed below.[23]
Geographic scope and sectorization
MNF-Ukraine area of operations might encompass:
- The entirety of uncontested Ukrainian territory, with particular focus on newly demilitarized zones (DMZs) or regions adjacent to the frontlines.
- Buffer areas, including potential DMZs, along ceasefire lines and international borders, especially the Russia-Ukraine border in the east and northeast and, potentially, boundary around Crimea (though it likely requires a different arrangement).
- Sectorization, whereby the country is partitioned into zones of responsibility, drawing inspiration from the Multinational Force and Observers model (Zones A, B, C) to facilitate monitoring and management.[g] These zones support both separation of forces and confidence-building measures, and allow for tailored mandates by sector: geographically, main potential monitoring areas can be clustered with 4 sectors.[h]
Demilitarized zones, other buffer areas
According to the RAND Corporation research, buffer areas serve to prevent inadvertent clashes and to maintain spatial separation of hostile forces – classical features of post-ceasefire stability: inner buffer lines,[i] external frontiers contour,[j] and flexible, adaptable arrangements contingent on the ceasefire’s terms. To ensure transparency and incident reporting, neutral observers, as well as sensoring surveillance equipment, are to be placed.[23]: 66, 74, 77–99
The report's first top-line recommendation is the inclusion of DMZs into potential ceasefire agreement along the line of contact: they raise the costs of breaking a ceasefire with physical obstacles. Additionally, DMZs "have to vary in width according to the particular geography; for example, there are some population centers that abut the line of contact as of this writing, and they might require additional protections."[23]: 24
Planning and execution prospects
Joint Anglo-French command arrangement
Though an unprecedented arrangement for Ukraine – above Kyiv two-star operational headquarters – MNF-U's three-star strategic command is to be jointly exercised by the UK and France. This joint structure allows for 'shared sovereign' oversight while maintaining operational unity of command, and is expected to remain even if the command center relocates (from Paris to London, as planned). In line with tested CJF[k] model of rotating HQ under modernized treaty, this dual-level command, in a clear operational–strategic split, is designed to maximize coordination and assure NATO and partner nations of routine oversight.[5][29]
Integration of national and international elements
Additionally, MNF-U command arrangements include liaison structures, coordination cells, and embedded staff from the coalition states, including Ukraine. This composition harmonizes rules of engagement, logistics workflows, reporting discipline, and interoperability.[74] Communicating is a factor: English is established as the working language, thus, staff of the MNF-U are expected to profess in multinational doctrines and protocols, with its potential parent unit in the chain of command remaining under consideration.[32]
Expected support and finance
The MNF-U’s structure emphasizes integrated logistics components, drawing on lessons in multinational sustainment.[75] As of November 2025[update], the challenge of equitable and sustainable MNF–U burden-sharing is likely to be acute, given the size of the projected force and the political complexity of funding defense in a European context.[47]
- Funding mechanism
MNF-U is anticipated to be primarily funded through collective European, NATO, and EU mechanisms, supplemented by national contributions, both financial and in-kind, from coalition partners, and with some limited US in-kind support in the form of ISR and equipment.[33]
- Funds sourcing options
As available data allow, given the EU investment frameworks and US strategic support, and as referenced in contemporary analyses and EU funding legislative summaries, planned financing streams are to include:
- EU’s European Peace Facility (EPF) or the UN-assessed funds;
- contributions of the 'coalition of the willing' states;[76]
- ad hoc mechanisms (e.g., supplemental US or EU grants).
All participating nations are expected to contribute to their own contingent’s personnel in-kind, but the costs for command, logistics, and multinational operations may be apportioned according to pre-agreed formulas reflecting NATO/common EU procedures. EU defense expenditure has increased sharply, projected to reach €381 billion in 2025, and defense investments have grown by over 40% compared to earlier levels.[77] Initiatives such as the Ukraine Assistance Fund within the EPF – backed by up to €50 billion (2024-2027) – could provide an explicit structure for funding stabilization, reconstruction, and military support to Ukraine, though direct MNF-U operational costs may fall outside such civilian-focused instruments.[78]
Remove ads
See also
Summarize
Perspective
Inquiry into Australian support for Ukraine by Australian Government
- Armed Forces of Ukraine international deployments – Combined military forces of Ukraine
- Combined Joint Expeditionary Force – Joint UK–French multi-component expeditionary force (rebranded Combined Joint Force [CJF] since July 2025)
- Joint Expeditionary Force – UK-led Northern European multi-national rapid response and expeditionary force
- Joint Centre of Control and Coordination – 2014-17 ceasefire-monitoring and safety-enforcement organization
- Kosovo Force – NATO-led international peacekeeping force
- Lancaster House 2.0 – 2010 treaties between United Kingdom and France, with additional agreement of July 2025
- Multinational Joint Commission – Military training mission to Ukraine
- Operation Atlantic Resolve – US deployments to Europe in response to Russo-Ukrainian War
- Operation Interflex – British training mission in Ukraine
- Operation Unifier – Canadian Armed Forces operation in Ukraine
- Readiness 2030 – European strategic defense initiative
- Weimar+ – Intergovernmental alliance of EU nations and the UK
- Ukraine's Peace Formula – 2022 Ukrainian diplomatic initiative proposed worldwide to simply end the war with Russia[79]
Remove ads
Notes
- The title is a proper name and a common noun phrase.[31] First attested public usage of the acronym is in UK Ministry of Defence answer to a written question.[32] Later in 2025, the attested usage are in the Ukraine's,[33] Serbia's media,[34] in Finnish.[35] For translation influence on shaping conflicts discourse and information transitioning from local to international press and vice versa see the handbook.[36]
- Formally in August, when Prime minister of Japan represented it virtually at three meetings.
- As of November 2025[update], the main discussion points in academia on security studies are:
- Mandate ambiguity for a reassurance force in Ukraine
- Peacekeeping versus peace enforcement
- Current proposals and political signals shaping the mandate
- Rules of engagement, status of forces, and chain of command
- Managing the peace enforcement versus peacekeeping tension
- Practical risks and mitigation steps
- To provide technical precision, the operational framework aligns with the CJTF requirement for force generation for missions not involving the defense of Alliance territory.[50] The concept was launched in late 1993 and endorsed at the Brussels Summit of January 1994, with the overall political-military framework approved in June 1996.
- See infobox Allies for a list
- Composition might include:
- Mechanized infantry, light/medium armor, logistics, medical, and engineering units;
- Specialist detachments for CBRN, EOD, and civil-military coordination;
- Air component for observation, medevac, and rapid reaction;
- Potential naval forces for Black Sea security
- Possibly: "Zone A": Directly adjacent to the Russian border, under international observation but with Russian forces excluded from proximity; "Zone B": A central, demilitarized buffer zone under MNF-U monitoring and patrolling; "Zone C": Ukrainian-controlled, demilitarized areas to the west and near the EU border, monitored to prevent re-escalation.[23]: ?
- (1) the section of Ukraine’s northern border that lies within the geographical region known as Polesia, a large floodplain area that crisscrosses international borders; (2) Ukraine’s flat steppe, which extends through the Donbas; (3) the coastal waters along the Black Sea, possibly including the Sea of Azov; and (4) the areas along the Dnipro River, as well as other rivers, lakes, or narrow straits.[23]: 65
- Potentially to be MNF-U-patrolled.
- a.k.a. Combined Joint Expeditionary Force, rebranded in July 2025
Remove ads
References
External links
Wikiwand - on
Seamless Wikipedia browsing. On steroids.
Remove ads
