Top Qs
Timeline
Chat
Perspective

Priyadasi

Ancient Indian ruler From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Priyadasi
Remove ads

Priyadasi, also Piyadasi or Priyadarshi (Brahmi: ๐‘€ง๐‘€บ๐‘€ฌ๐‘€ค๐‘€ฒ๐‘€บ piyadasi, Imperial Aramaic: ๐ก๐ก“๐ก‰๐กƒ๐ก“๐ก”, romanized: Prydrลก), was the name of a ruler in ancient India, namely Ashoka Maurya (3rd century BCE); literally an honorific epithet which means "He who regards others with kindness", "Humane", "He who glances amiably".[1]

Priyadasi
Thumb
"Piyadasi", honorific epithet of Ashoka, in Brahmi script, in the Barabar Caves.
Thumb
Piyadasi in the Lumbini Minor Pillar Edict of Ashoka.
Thumb
Edicts in the name of Piyadasi or Devanampiya Piyadasi ("King Piyadasi"):
: Major Rock Edicts
: Major Pillar Edicts

The title "Priyadasi" appears repeatedly in the ancient inscriptions of Ashoka known as the Major Rock Edicts or the Major Pillar Edicts, where it is generally used in conjunction with the title "Devanampriya" ("Beloved of the Gods") in the formula "Devanampriya Priyadasi".[2][3] Some of the inscriptions rather use the title "Rajan Priyadasi" ("King Priyadarsi").[3] It also appears in Greek in the Kandahar Bilingual Rock Inscription (c. 260 BCE), when naming the author of the proclamation as ฮฒฮฑฯƒฮน[ฮป]ฮตแฝบฯ‚ ฮ ฮนฮฟฮดฮฑฯƒฯƒฮทฯ‚ ("Basileus Piodassฤ“s"), and in Aramaic in the same inscription as "our lord, king Priyadasin" (Imperial Aramaic: ๐ก๐ก“๐ก‰๐กƒ๐ก“๐ก”, Modern Hebrew: ืคืจื™ื“ืืจืฉโ€Ž prydโ€™rลก).[1]

Prinsep, who deciphered the Brahmi script had originally identified Priyadasi with the King of Ceylon Devanampiya Tissa. However, in 1837, George Turnour discovered a Siamese version of the Sri Lankan manuscript Dipavamsa, or "Island Chronicle", associating Piyadasi with the early Maurya dynasty:

"Two hundred and eighteen years after the beatitude of the Buddha, was the inauguration of Piyadassi, .... who, the grandson of Chandragupta, and the son of Bindusara, was at the time Governor of Ujjayani."

It was then supposed that this Priyadasi, being a Mauryan, was probably the Ashoka of Buddhist accounts.[4] Because of the association in the Dipavamsa, the title "Priyadasi" is thought to have been used by the Indian Emperor Ashoka (r.269-233 BCE) in his inscriptions (the Edicts of Ashoka).[2]

Thumb
"Devฤnaแนƒpiyasa Asoka", honorific Devanampiya (Brahmi script: ๐‘€ค๐‘‚๐‘€ฏ๐‘€ธ๐‘€ฆ๐‘€๐‘€ง๐‘€บ๐‘€ฌ๐‘€ฒ๐‘€…๐‘€ฒ๐‘„๐‘€“, "Beloved of the God", in the adjectival form -sa) and name of Ashoka, in Brahmi script, in the Maski Edict of Ashoka
Thumb
The full title Devanampiyasa Piyadasino Asokaraja (๐‘€ค๐‘‚๐‘€ฏ๐‘€ธ๐‘€ฆ๐‘€๐‘€ง๐‘€บ๐‘€ฌ๐‘€ฒ ๐‘€ง๐‘€บ๐‘€ฌ๐‘€ค๐‘€ฒ๐‘€บ๐‘€ฆ๐‘„ ๐‘€…๐‘€ฒ๐‘„๐‘€“๐‘€ญ๐‘€ธ๐‘€š) in the Gujarra inscription.[6]

In inscriptions, the title "Priyadarsin" is often associated with the title "Devanampriya" ("Beloved of the Gods"). Separately, the title also appears in "Devanampriya" in conjunction with the name "Ashoka" as in the Minor Rock Edict inscription discovered in Maski, associating Ashoka with Devanampriya:[2][7]

[A proclamation] of Devanampriya Asoka.
Two and a half years [and somewhat more] (have passed) since I am a Buddha-Sakya.
[A year and] somewhat more (has passed) [since] I have visited the Samgha and have shown zeal.
Those gods who formerly had been unmingled (with men) in Jambudvipa, have how become mingled (with them).
This object can be reached even by a lowly (person) who is devoted to morality.
One must not think thus, โ€” (viz.) that only an exalted (person) may reach this.
Both the lowly and the exalted must be told : "If you act thus, this matter (will be) prosperous and of long duration, and will thus progress to one and a half.

โ€”โ€ŠMaski inscription of Ashoka.[8]

More recently this interpretation has been questioned by Christopher Beckwith โ€” whose theories are not accepted by mainstream scholarship. He argues that "Priyadasi" could simply be the proper name of an early Indian king, not necessarily Ashoka, who was the author of the Major Rock Edicts or the Major Pillar Edicts inscriptions but not the rest, and who can be identified as probably the son of Chandragupta Maurya (otherwise known in Greek source as Amitocrates, i.e. Bindusara)[3][undue weight? โ€“ discuss] However, this interpretation has been questioned on methodological grounds by several other historians, who have criticized many of Beckwith's interpretations concerning early Buddhism, inscriptions, and archaeological sites.[9][10] According to Patrick Olivelle, Beckwith's theory is "an outlier and no mainstream Ashokan scholar would subscribe to that view."[11]

Remove ads

References

Loading related searches...

Wikiwand - on

Seamless Wikipedia browsing. On steroids.

Remove ads