Top Qs
Timeline
Chat
Perspective

9M730 Burevestnik

Nuclear-powered cruise missile From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

9M730 Burevestnik
Remove ads

The 9M730 Burevestnik (Russian: Буревестник; "Storm petrel", NATO reporting name: SSC-X-9 Skyfall)[2][3][4] is a Russian low-flying, nuclear-powered, nuclear-armed cruise missile under development for the Russian Armed Forces.[2] According to the Russian Ministry of Defense, the missile's range is effectively unlimited.[5][6]

Quick facts Type, Place of origin ...

The Burevestnik is one of the six new Russian strategic weapons unveiled by Russian President Vladimir Putin on 1 March 2018.[4][7] This effort bears similarity to the discontinued US Project Pluto from 1957, which although functional, was perceived as too provocative, less effective than ICBMs, and presented radiological emissions that made scheduling test flights difficult.[8]

Remove ads

History

Summarize
Perspective

Motivation

A cruise missile has the advantage over a ballistic missile of being able to fly under and around missile defense radars and interceptors.[9] However, conventional jet-propelled missiles have a limited flight time and range. Power from nuclear fission offers far more energy from a given mass of fuel which, if it could be used for propulsion, would hypothetically allow a missile to be launched far outside the defensive zone of a target, to take a circuitous route that avoids defenses, and to loiter for an extended period. The United States developed a SLAM nuclear-powered cruise missile during the 1950s, achieving successful full power testing of Tory II-A and -C but abandoned the project, in part due to the radioactive pollution that would result from deployment.

Development

Thumb
9M730 Burevestnik during test flight in March 2018
Thumb
Satellite imagery of Vologda-20

The Russian defense industry began developing an intercontinental-range nuclear-powered cruise missile capable of penetrating any interceptor-based missile defense system. It is said to have unlimited range and can evade missile defenses.[5] A significant stage of trials of the Burevestnik complex's cruise missile, the nuclear power unit tests, was completed in January 2019.[10][better source needed]

The cruise missile received the name Burevestnik (which translates as Storm petrel, a seabird) as a result of an open vote on the Ministry of Defence of Russia's website.[11][12]

On 5 October 2023, Russian president Vladimir Putin claimed that the missile had been successfully flight tested, though Western media sources such as the BBC cast doubt on this claim noting that there was no independent confirmation.[13][14][15] According to the Nuclear Threat Initiative (NTI), an advocacy group focused on reducing nuclear, biological and emergent technology risks, "The Burevestnik has a poor test record of at least 13 known tests, with only two partial successes, since 2016".[16]

According to US researchers Decker Eveleth and Jeffrey Lewis, based on imagery analysis of 2024 launch pad construction and storage facilities, the probable deployment site for the Burevestnik is Vologda-20 located 15 km southwest of Chebsara, around 475 km (295 miles) north of Moscow.[17]

Design speculation

According to Vladimir Putin and the Russian Ministry of Defense, the missile's dimensions are comparable to the Kh-101 cruise missile, but the claimed operational range is orders of magnitude greater than that of the Kh-101. It is equipped with a small-sized nuclear power unit. An official presentation shows that the missile starts from an inclined launcher using a detachable rocket booster.[18]

Pavel Ivanov from VPK-news states that the cruise missile is one and a half to two times the size of the Kh-101, and the wings of the Burevestnik are rooted "on top of the fuselage, rather than below it like on the Kh-101." He also notes that there are "characteristic protrusions where air is most likely heated by the nuclear reactor". According to Ivanov, the mass of the Burevestnik is "several times to order of magnitude" greater than that of the Kh-101, which eliminates Tu-160 and Tu-95 as potential carriers of the missile.[19]

According to Nezavisimaya Gazeta, Burevestnik is a nuclear thermal rocket with a solid-fueled booster engine. The length of the missile is 12 m (39 ft) at launch and 9 m (30 ft) in flight. The nose has the shape of an "ellipse 1 m (3.3 ft) × 1.5 m (4.9 ft) in size".[20]

Military expert Anton Lavrov, in the Izvestia article, suggested that the design of the Burevestnik uses a ramjet engine, which, unlike the more traditional propulsion systems for nuclear weapons, will have radioactive exhaust throughout its entire operation.[21]

Stratfor, an American geopolitical intelligence platform, assumes that Burevestnik utilizes a turbojet engine and a liquid-fueled booster.[22]

According to James Hockenhull, the UK's Chief of Defence Intelligence (CDI), the Burevestnik is a "sub-sonic nuclear-powered cruise missile system which has global reach and would allow attack from unexpected directions." Per Hockenhull, the missile would have "a near indefinite loiter time".[23]

Director of the Federation of American Scientists's Nuclear Information Project Hans M. Kristensen points out that the Burevestnik will be as vulnerable as any cruise missile and questions the motive behind it since the longer it flies the more time there is to track it.[17]

Former Los Alamos National Laboratory nuclear researcher Cheryl Rofer and former top State Department official with the Arms Control Association Thomas Countryman have both pointed to the risk of nuclear contamination to Russia itself as user of a nuclear powered missile, with Countryman calling the weapon system uniquely stupid, comparing it to a flying Chernobyl in reference to the Chernobyl disaster.[17]

Remove ads

Test locations

Summarize
Perspective
Thumb
24 June 2018 Burevestnik launch site at Pan'kovo

Nuclear nonproliferation expert Jeffrey Lewis has identified some likely test locations for the Burevestnik. These locations share a rail-based environmental shelter visible on satellite imagery.

Pan'kovo

Thumb
15 June 2018 satellite imagery of Pan'kovo launch site with rail-based environmental shelter

The Pan'kovo test range is located 170 km north of Rogachevo air base on Yuzhny Island of the Novaya Zemlya archipelago in the Arctic Ocean.

In November 2017 the site saw an unsuccessful test of a Burevestnik missile that after two minutes of flight that covered some 35 km crashed into the Barents Sea.[24] Three vessels, one of which was equipped to handle radioactive material, were tasked with the recovery of debris from the missile.[25]

Planet Labs satellite imagery from 15 and 24 June 2018 published by Lewis and MIIS show the rail-based environmental shelter at the Pan'kovo test range that is claimed by Lewis to be characteristic of a Burevestnik launch site.[26][24]

Planet Labs satellite imagery from 7 August 2025 published by Lewis and MIIS was claimed by Lewis and by ICBM researcher Decker Eveleth to show test preparations of the Burevestnik at the Pan'kovo test range.[27][28]

Nyonoksa State Central Navy Testing Range

The State Central Navy Testing Range is located near Nyonoksa near Severodvinsk in northern Russia.

Airbus satellite imagery from 14 May 2019 published by Lewis shows the rail-based environmental shelter associated with Burevestnik testing at the State Central Navy Testing Range.[26]

Nyonoksa radiation accident

On 9 August 2019, the Russian nuclear energy agency Rosatom confirmed a release of radioactivity at the State Central Navy Testing Range and stated it was linked to an accident involving the test of an "isotope power source for a liquid-fuelled rocket engine".[29][30] Five weapons scientists were killed in the accident.[31] Nonproliferation expert Jeffrey Lewis and Federation of American Scientists fellow Ankit Panda suspect the incident resulted from a test of the Burevestnik cruise missile.[32] However, other arms control experts disputed the assertions: Ian Williams of the Center for Strategic and International Studies and James Acton of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace expressed skepticism over Moscow's financial and technical capabilities to field the weapon,[33] while Michael Kofman of the Wilson Center concluded that the explosion was probably not related to Burevestnik but instead to the testing of another military platform.[34]

According to CNBC, the explosion occurred during an attempt to recover a missile from the seabed, which was lost during a previously failed test.[35] On 10 October, Thomas DiNanno, member of the United States delegation to the United Nations General Assembly First Committee, stated that the "August 8th 'Skyfall' incident [...] was the result of a nuclear reaction that occurred during the recovery of a Russian nuclear-powered cruise missile", which "remained on the bed of the White Sea since its failed test early last year".[36]

On 26 August 2019, Aleksei Karpov, Russia's envoy to international organizations in Vienna, stated that the accident was linked to the development of weapons which Russia had to begin creating as "one of the tit-for-tat measures in the wake of the United States' withdrawal from the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty".[37]

On 21 November 2019, at the ceremony of presentation of posthumous awards to the dead men's families, Vladimir Putin stated that the scientists killed in the explosion on 8 August had been testing an “unparalleled” weapon: “We are talking about the most advanced and unparalleled technical ideas and solutions about weapons design to ensure Russia’s sovereignty and security for decades to come". He also noted that the "weapon is to be perfected regardless of anything".[38][39][40]

Kapustin Yar

The Kapustin Yar rocket launch complex is claimed by Lewis to also contain the rail-based environmental shelter associated with Burevestnik testing, but believed by him to be for testing without the nuclear-power unit.[26]

Remove ads

Operators

See also

Remove ads

References

Loading related searches...

Wikiwand - on

Seamless Wikipedia browsing. On steroids.

Remove ads