Top Qs
Timeline
Chat
Perspective

Talbragar Fossil Fish Bed

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Remove ads

The Talbragar Fossil Fish Bed (or Talbragar Fish Bed) is a paleontological site in New South Wales, Australia, dating to the Kimmeridgian age of the Late Jurassic. Material has been collected from the beds for over a century with the beds first being found in 1889. These beds are most likely the uppermost layer of the Purlawaugh Formation though the beds do overlie the Hawkebury Sandstone. Since being first mentioned in the literature, a number of fossil fish and plants have been described from the locality. Though not as well studied as the other groups due to most work on the beds being done at the northern site, a large number of insects have also been found. The beds themselves represent a shallow, relatively short-lived lake. During this time, the ecosystem would have been on hot and humid. The fossils were preserved due to a two-phase volcanic event with the ash from these events filling up the shallow lake.

Quick Facts Overlies, Thickness ...
Remove ads

History

Summarize
Perspective

The Talbragar Fossil Fish Bed was first found by Arthur Lowe in 1889 with the first mention of the site in the literature being by Woodward in 1895.[1][2] Charles Cullen later collecting a number of fish fossils from the site for the NSW Mines Department. These specimens would later be described by authors such as Woodward and Wade. Along with these fossil fish, a single insect would also be collected in 1968 by I. Holswich, though the preservation was more poor than what was seen in the fish.[1] A year later, the first detailed investigation of the beds would be done by Dulhunty & Eadie who were the first to notice the eroded nature of the fish beds.[2][3] Over the next two decades after this discovery, numerous other insect fossils were collected from the site representing a number of orders. Due to the site being within a paddock used for grazing on private property, not much work has been done though Lynne Bean was able to collect specimens in 2006.[4] Over the next 5 years, a total of twenty weekend collection field trips were made resulting in over 400 insect specimens being collected.[1] In 2021, the first tetrapod material was described from the beds; this material being a single tooth from a temnospondyl.[5]

The name "Talbragar Fossil Fish Bed" was a general name of the site though it was put into publication as an informal name by Dulhuntly and Eadie in 1969 with this name deriving from the nearby Talbragar River.[6][7]

Remove ads

Geology

Summarize
Perspective

The Talbragar Fossil Fish Bed is located around 14 kilometres (8.7 mi) north-northwest of Ulan, New South Wales and is 0.5–1.5 metres (1.6–4.9 ft) in thickness. The unit itself is made up of sandstone and tuffaceous siltstone with the original extent of the unit being larger than what is seen today. This is due to erosion at both the northern and southern ends along with faulting present along the eastern boundary.[1] Unweathered samples from the beds are grey and very fine grained. Within these samples, there are a number of minerals such as igneous quartz.[6] The strata within the bed also lack a sedimentary flow structure.[4] The Talbragar Fossil Fish Bed Reserve itself is on a slope of a hill and measures about 275 metres (902 ft) long with its widest point being about 100 metres (330 ft).[1] Originally, the fossil beds were believed to date to the late early or middle Jurassic based on the flora which correlated it with the nearby Purlawaugh Formation. However, more recent dating of the site using zircon crystals suggests that the age is more likely Kimmeridgian making the site younger than the known dating of the known Purlawaugh Formation.[8] [6] Even with this being the case, it has been suggested that the Talbragar Fossil Fish Bed is the upper unit of the Purlawaugh Formation.[4] The beds themselves overlie the Hawkesbury Sandstone, a formation dating to the middle Triassic.[2] The fish bed as a whole is divided into two sites being the northern and southern sites with the stratigraphy and biota differing between the two.[1]

Northern Site

The northern site of the Talbragar Fossil Fish Bed is where most work has been done with most of this work being done a few meters to the south of the excavations done between 2006 and 2011. Though authors originally thought that fossiliferous layers only had a thickness of 600 millimetres (2.0 ft), more recent work has revealed that these fossiliferous layers have a total thickness of around 1.1 metres (3.6 ft).[1]

More information Layer, Geology ...

Southern Site

The southern region of the Talbragar Fossil Fish Bed is not as well exposed as the northern site due to it being covered in soil and is about 0.5 metres (1.6 ft) thick. Though separated from the northern site, the strata that is exposed is believed to be equivalent to the upper layers of the northern site. The section at the southern site is made up of tuffaceous siltstone that is more course near the base with ranges from 0.3–1.5 metres (0.98–4.92 ft) below the surface. The fossils found in this area are within a disrupted layer of blocks with this disruption being caused by a dense forest that was present in the area in the 1800s. Below these blocks, the stratum is very finely laminated and slightly warped with very little insect and trace fossils. The basal-most layer however is very fossiliferous, containing a large amount of plant, trace, and invertebrate fossils. Unlike the northern site, the fish skeletons at the southern site are much less complete.[1]

Fossil Composition

The chemical composition of the fossils at the Talbragar Fossil Fish Bed differ from the surrounding matrix. Outside of three elements, the composition of the fish fossils are transitional between what is seen in the matrix and plant fossils. Both plant and fish fossils have specimens with what has been referred to as "dark matter" by studies. This "dark matter" is manganese infilling with the element forming dendrites in a plant fossil. Along with this, infilling is also seen in fractures and joints in fish fossils.[9]

More information Type of Fossil, Composition compared to matrix ...
Remove ads

Paleobiota

Summarize
Perspective

Actinopterygii

More information Ray-finned fish recorded from the Talbragar Fossil Fish Bed, Genus ...

Arachnida

More information Arachnids recorded from the Talbragar Fossil Fish Bed, Genus ...

Bivalvia

More information Bivalves recorded from the Talbragar Fossil Fish Bed, Genus ...

Chondrichthyes

More information Chondrichthyans recorded from the Talbragar Fossil Fish Bed, Genus ...

Gastropoda

More information Gstropods recorded from the Talbragar Fossil Fish Bed, Genus ...

Insecta

More information Insects recorded from the Talbragar Fossil Fish Bed, Genus ...

Temnospondyli

More information Temnospondyls recorded from the Talbragar Fossil Fish Bed, Genus ...

Conifers

More information Conifers recorded from the Talbragar Fossil Fish Bed, Genus ...

Corystospermales

More information Corystospermales recorded from the Talbragar Fossil Fish Bed, Genus ...

Cycadophytes

More information Cycads recorded from the Talbragar Fossil Fish Bed, Genus ...

Lycopodiales

More information Lycopodiopsids recorded from the Talbragar Fossil Fish Bed, Genus ...

Pentoxylales

More information Pentoxylales recorded from the Talbragar Fossil Fish Bed, Genus ...

Polypodiopsida

More information Ferns recorded from the Talbragar Fossil Fish Bed, Genus ...

Pteridospermatophyta

More information "Seed ferns" recorded from the Talbragar Fossil Fish Bed, Genus ...
Remove ads

Paleoenvironment

Summarize
Perspective

During the time of deposition, what is now the Talbragar Fossil Fish Bed would have been a shallow lake in a warm and humid environment. Due to the thickness of the unit and small amount of burrows found, it was most likely a short-lived, very shallow body of water that would have shoaled towards the southern section.[1] This lake most likely did not last very long with Percival (1979) estimating an time period of about 250 years.[4] The water in the lake would have been well oxygenated with a large amount of autotroph biomass based on what is found at the site. At least a part of the base of the food web would have been made up by fly larvae found at the bottom of the lake along with smaller fish species. Due to the amount of degraded fish found, mainly at the southern site, the shallowest areas were most likely made up of quiet backwater environments and isolated pools. Unlike modern lake ecosystems, it has been suggested that lake food webs were not regulated by larger aquatic plants. Based on coprolites at the site, fish were eating other fish, bivalves, and softer food such as soft invertebrates and plants.[1] Surrounding the lake, it would have been forested with a number of different plant groups being present including pentoxylalean gymnosperms, araucariacean conifers, seed ferns, and true ferns.[6] This shallow lake would have been covered by volcanic ash showers in the area. This event would have been made up by two phases with the first being made up of lahar with a second fall of ash causing the full infill of the lake.[1]

Remove ads

References

Loading related searches...

Wikiwand - on

Seamless Wikipedia browsing. On steroids.

Remove ads