Top Qs
Timeline
Chat
Perspective
Talk:Anthony Fantano
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Remove ads
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Anthony Fantano article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 12 months ![]() |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (center, color, defense, realize, traveled) and some terms may be different or absent from (including people)other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
![]() | Reference ideas for Anthony Fantano The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:
|
Remove ads
Adding category for Not Good albums
Summarize
Perspective
Would it be best to add a third list containing albums Fantano rated "Not Good" on release? I personally believe that it would be, considering how unique the rating is. CY223 (talk) 02:36, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- Unless there are third-party sources discussing his Not Good reviews, no, it probably should not be added. Alyo (chat·edits) 05:54, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- I should point out that there aren't any third-party references for his Brat, X or Genre: Sadboy reviews, however I do feel that a Not Good list would need most of its reviews to have a third-party reference. Also, how come they need third-party references when citing from just theneedledrop's website would work just as well? CY223 (talk) 07:38, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- @CY223: & @Alyo: here's a third-party reference to a 'Not Good' review for Drake’s album “Honestly, Nevermind” from Variety - https://variety.com/2022/music/news/drake-anthony-fantano-beef-feud-explained-1235374908/ --Paulisdead (talk) 04:21, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
- That would work incredibly well, hopefully in the future enough third-party references for his 'Not Good' ratings will be found for it to be added as a third category CY223 (talk) 04:30, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
- To me, that is a passing mention with no discussion of that category of reviews as separately worthy of discussion/inclusion. Alyo (chat·edits) 21:42, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
- @CY223: & @Alyo: here's a third-party reference to a 'Not Good' review for Drake’s album “Honestly, Nevermind” from Variety - https://variety.com/2022/music/news/drake-anthony-fantano-beef-feud-explained-1235374908/ --Paulisdead (talk) 04:21, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
Remove ads
Referendum on validity as source
Mononym
Wikiwand - on
Seamless Wikipedia browsing. On steroids.
Remove ads