Talk:Iymen Chehade

Iymen Chehade (final version) received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which was archived on 13 March 2022. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article.

Iymen Chehade (final version) received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which was archived on 26 October 2021. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard. If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Politics and Government Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation. This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance). Chicago Low‑importance Chicago portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view. Maren Rosenberg (talk · contribs) This user has contributed to the article.

The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE. TsunamiPrincess (talk · contribs) has been paid by Uprising Theater on their behalf. disclosure

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• IymenChehade.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 19:23, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• IymenChehadeColumbiaCollege.png

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 08:53, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

Note regarding paid contributions

The article was written by an abusive UPE sockfarm (Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Marek.kapicak) and was touched up by a disclosed paid editor (see above). It needs review from volunteers to determine compliance with editorial policies and inclusion guidelines. MER-C 17:06, 25 May 2021 (UTC)

@MER-C:how long do I need to wait for this to be reviewed before I can just take the disclaimer down? TsunamiPrincess (talk) 05:10, 13 July 2021 (UTC)

Wikipedia is a volunteer project. MER-C 12:46, 13 July 2021 (UTC)

RfC on POV Neutrality

Looking for peer review to determine compliance with editorial policies after editing by disclosed paid editor (see above).TsunamiPrincess (talk) 20:13, 2 June 2021 (UTC) TsunamiPrincess,15:09, 2 June 2021

@TsunamiPrincess: This is not an RfC matter, please use the proper peer review process. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 21:30, 3 June 2021 (UTC)

@Redrose64: Thank you for the direction. I am confused though, because the instructions on peer review state: "Content or neutrality disputes should be listed at requests for comment, and not at peer review." Does my request not fall into that? TsunamiPrincess (talk) 19:43, 4 June 2021 (UTC)

You started with Looking for peer review, therefore, you are asking for a peer review. But before starting any RfC, please ensure that you have exhausted the suggestions at WP:RFCBEFORE. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 13:17, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

Ah, I see. My language was misleading. Ok, thank you again for the direction. I will work on this. TsunamiPrincess (talk) 05:23, 6 June 2021 (UTC)