Talk:ProjectLibre

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Computing: Software / Free and open-source software Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Software. This article is supported by Free and open-source software (assessed as Low-importance).

The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE. Tahoeob (talk · contribs) has been paid by Serena Software. Their editing has included contributions to this article. Declaration while asking for help.

Deleted "LibreOffice" affiliation

I just deleted this sentence: "ProjectLibre is supportive of LibreOffice; it complements their replacement of Microsoft Office components.^{[citation needed]}". Not only that the source for this is missing since a long time, but there are sources which show that this is just a wish, but far from being reality. See e.g.:

• http://www.projectlibre.org/discussion/shouldnt-projectlibre-be-fused-libre-office-or-open-office
• http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Introducing-ProjectLibre-compliment-to-LibreOffice-and-replaces-Microsoft-Project-td4069880.html

In general it would be beneficial if the article would be less advertisement and more encyclopedia. --Tomakos (talk) 23:00, 1 March 2014 (UTC)

Manual for ProjectLibre

I was wondering whether the wiki would be a good platform to make a Manual for the ProjectLibre, open source project management software? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ardsong (talk • contribs) 04:23, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

Hello Ardsong! No, Wikipedia is an Encyclopedia and this the wrong place for software manuals. The equivalent of Wikipedia but for books would be https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikibooks, which is run by the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia, just as Wikipedia. For writing a manual for ProjectLibre I would suggest either to use Wikibooks or to self-host a wiki software on the ProjectLibre website. Examples for such wiki software for self-hosting would be e.g. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MediaWiki, which is the same wiki software that wikipedia uses, or any other wiki software listed e.g. here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Free_wiki_software --46.103.231.186 (talk) 16:31, 2 March 2014 (UTC)

Advertisements versus Sources

Advertisements are primary sources TEDickey (talk) 10:01, 12 December 2012 (UTC)