Top Qs
Timeline
Chat
Perspective

Vennela 1½

2012 Indian film From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Vennela 1½
Remove ads

Vennela 1+12 is a 2012 Telugu-language romantic drama film directed by Vennela Kishore. It is a sequel to the 2005 film Vennela by Deva Katta. It stars Chaitanya Krishna, Monal Gajjar, Bramhanandam and Vennela Kishore in the lead. Sunil Kashyap provided the music. It was released on 21 September 2012.

Quick Facts 1+1⁄2, Directed by ...
Remove ads

Plot

The story is set in Bangkok. Krishna is a happy go lucky man who falls for Vennela in first sight. However, he learns that she was engaged to someone else, but tries his luck. Vennela too loves him, but realizes that he is a fraud. Rest of the story is about how they work out their differences.

Cast

Production

While shooting for Orange (2010) in Australia, Vennela Kishore came up with the idea for this film.[1]

Soundtrack

Quick Facts 1+1⁄2, Soundtrack album to by Sunil Kashyap ...
More information No., Title ...
Remove ads

Reception

Summarize
Perspective

The movie opened to negative reviews. Haricharan Pudupeddi of DNA India gave a review stating "Vennela 1+12 is loathsome with the senseless 'bathroom humour' that runs throughout the film. Vennela 1+12 is one of the worst comedy films of recent times."[2] IBN Live stated "After watching the trailers, most of us did not expect anything more from Vennela 1+12 than low brow comedy. What came as a surprise was that the film did not pack a sensible story that might have made us sit through the haranguing second half."[3] The Times Of India gave a review stating "The performances vary from loony to queer. It would be unfair to call it acting. What the characters just indulge in is absolute tom-foolery of degenerated variety. Chaitanya has a presence, but really has nothing much to do as does Monal. Let's just say, the other departments are in tune with the rest of the film."[4] The Hindu gave a review stating "From the Kya Kool Hai Hum clan of film-making, it tries to be like American Pie, but fails miserably. It's just a mindless excuse for a film, filling up the 70 mm. The film is not for those looking for cinema, but for those with raging hormones, looking for a cheap laugh."[5]

Remove ads

References

Loading related searches...

Wikiwand - on

Seamless Wikipedia browsing. On steroids.

Remove ads