From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archives |
---|
no archives yet (create)
Archive 1. Archive 2. Archive 3. Archive 4. Archive 5. Archive 6. Archive 7 |
A few notes about this article:
Let me know if you have questions about any of this. Thanks. --Auntof6 (talk) 03:21, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Hi, Angela. A couple of things about this article.
Thanks. I'm glad you were able to get back online. --Auntof6 (talk) 02:08, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi, Angela. I saw that two articles you recently created, Chop suey and Hot chicken, do not have references. Please add some references. They also do not have attribution. If you based them on the enwiki articles (which it looks like you did), please add attribution. By the way, I also did some simplifying on them, so please look at what I did so you can see what wasn't simple. Thanks. --Auntof6 (talk) 06:23, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi, Angela. Please add some references to this article. Most articles should have references. I know I have mentioned this before. Thanks. --Auntof6 (talk) 02:44, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
Some notes about this article:
Let me know if you have questions about any of this. --Auntof6 (talk) 08:38, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
An editor has requested deletion of Jingle Bell Rock, an article you created. We appreciate your changes, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").
Please comment on the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2015/Jingle Bell Rock and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also change the article during the discussion to address the nominator's concerns. But you should not remove the requests for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you very much. Lovren 14:26, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
Hello September 1988: Enjoy the holiday season and winter solstice, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, Etamni | ✉ | ✓ 15:26, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
The Invisible Barnstar | ||
I just want you to know that you are appreciated, Angela. You've been invisibly creating and editing articles here on Simple for quite some time, yet most people are oblivious. Thank you. :) Etamni | ✉ | ✓ 05:29, 10 January 2016 (UTC) |
Angela, please don't revert edits on other users' talk pages, as you did on User talk:TDKR Chicago 101. You can revert them on your own talk page (as I see that you did), but please leave it to the page owner or the admins to take care of other users' pages. Thanks. --Auntof6 (talk) 02:53, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
Hi, Angela. Would you please add something to this article to show notability. There's nothing in the text that says why she's notable. Thanks. --Auntof6 (talk) 22:57, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
If you make a page copied from the English Wikipedia, all you have to do is add it as a reference. This is why I am deleting the talk page for the article you made. PokestarFan (talk) 20:34, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
The page you wrote, Talk:Melody Thomas Scott, has been selected for quick deletion. If you think this page should be kept, please add {{wait}} below the line {{QD}} and say why on the talk page. If the page is already gone, but you think this was an error, you can ask for it to be undeleted. You can find more information about the reason here. PokestarFan (talk) 20:35, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
An editor has requested deletion of Talk:Melody Thomas Scott, an article you created. We appreciate your changes, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").
Please comment on the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2016/Talk:Melody Thomas Scott and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also change the article during the discussion to address the nominator's concerns. But you should not remove the requests for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you very much. PokestarFan (talk) 20:42, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
Angela, this article needed a lot of work.
The main thing was the statement that the show had won several awards, and the reference you had for that. The reference was only about Peabody Awards, not "several" awards. References must support the text that they follow, and this one did not support it. Also, mentioning the several awards is very vague; although this was the only thing that implied notability, saying that someone or something has won awards, without specifying which awards, does not show notability. I removed the vague statement and added a section on the awards that the show has won; some of the entries in that section have references.
The main other thing I did was add categories for some of the awards the show has won. Any time you create an article about someone or something that has won major awards, look to see if we have categories for those awards.
I know you've said that you want to be an admin some day. The issue with the references is very important. Anyone wanting admin rights has to understand it and get it right. Please let me know if there's a way I can help you understand this issue better. --Auntof6 (talk) 04:19, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
Angela, neither of the references in this article was valid.
The first reference didn't support the statement it followed, so I removed it. The idea of a reference is to give the source of a statement in the Wikipedia article. You don't just throw in sources that have something to do with the subject and leave it at that: a reference has to support the statement that appears right before it. The first reference you gave is in the enwiki article, but it's with a different piece of information that it ended up with in the article here.
The second reference is a dead link. I flagged it as a dead link.
Please fix these references. When you bring articles here from enwiki, please check the references to be sure that they work and that they support what you think they do. Thanks. --Auntof6 (talk) 04:18, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
Nellie Bly is a significant female figure in American journalism. I am working on the page, but I have been blocked from editing it. When my editing privileges are restored. I will finish article.
Hi, Angela. I saw that you added attribution on Talk:Rachel Griffiths. The attribution notice points to the enwiki article as it existed on 16 February 2016. (As of right now, that is the current version.) However, that can't be the correct attribution, because the article here was created in 2013. The 2016 version wouldn't have existed then. The attribution notice needs to point to the version of the enwiki article that was used as a basis for the article at the time it was created.
I have deleted the talk page because it was invalid. Please add the attribution again, but with correct data. Thanks. --Auntof6 (talk) 22:50, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
Hi, Angela. Thanks for including references in the articles you create. I just wanted to mention one thing. When you bring a reference from an enwiki article, please don't shorten the value for the title parameter. The value should be the actual title used at the linked page. For example, you used a title of "Legionella" for the first references in Legionnaires' disease. The enwiki article had the complete title that is shown on the linked page: "Legionella and the prevention of legionellosis". Thanks. --Auntof6 (talk) 04:38, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
I have these comments about some of the articles you created recently.
Let me know if you have any questions about this. --Auntof6 (talk) 06:08, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
Hi, Angela. Sneaker Pimps still needs some simplifying. The complex words and phrases I see are peaked, recruited, vocal duties, provide, suited, and promotional. If you can take care of these pretty quickly, I won't bother to move it to your userspace, otherwise I can move it there for you. Let me know. Thanks. --Auntof6 (talk) 22:21, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
Hi, Angela. When you write in an article that someone has died, please use plain language. In this article, you used the word perished. Just use the word died. Other words and phrases like passed away, lost his life, etc. are euphemisms and are not to be used (except when quoting someone who used them). This is an encyclopedia, and we use plain, straightforward language. I know I've mentioned this before. You can read more about this at en:WP:EUPHEMISM. Let me know if you have any questions. Thanks. --Auntof6 (talk) 04:48, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
I know that I've questioned your commentary you add onto edit summaries when you create new articles in the past. I really think your edit summary today when creating the Orlando shooting article is in poor taste. The idea of the shooting "coming to our town" is terrible. The event is extremely tragic and shouldn't have such a casual remark associated with it like that. Please reexamine the commentary you make when creating articles. Only (talk) 16:07, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
When you leave a warning message, please do not start with level 3. As much as possible, level 1 should be used for first warnings, but sometimes level 2 can be used. Thanks. --Auntof6 (talk) 05:34, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
Hi, Angela. I noticed that you added references to Christmas music. Thanks for doing that -- we certainly need references added to more articles. I just want to mention that when you give the accessdate, the month should be spelled out instead of abbreviated. It's usually best to spell most things out in articles. Let me know if you have any questions about this, and thanks again. --Auntof6 (talk) 02:47, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for helping revert all that vandalism. Per your request on Chenzw's talk page, I have semi-protected your talk page for a week. --Auntof6 (talk) 00:42, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
Hello, September 1988. When you revert a user's changes, like you did earlier, don't forget to leave the user a message on their talk page. You may find Template:User talk page warnings/table useful when doing this, to let them know that the change was considered inappropriate, and to direct them to the sandbox. Thank you. (Nice catch btw) I warned the user for you. Please remember that automatic notices (which do not seem to be working right now) are not the same thing as a user warning. User warnings and user-generated notices (this is a notice) are usually in a category by month of issue (e.g. December 2016) Rus793 (talk) 15:54, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
Angela, I moved the plastic wrap article to User:September 1988/Plastic wrap because it needs more work. Besides needing sources, I listed other issues on the talk page. --Auntof6 (talk) 05:14, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
The page you wrote, Sex Tape (movie), has been selected for quick deletion. This is because the page is not a notable article at all. If you think this page should be kept, please add {{wait}} below the line {{QD}} and say why on the talk page. If the page is already gone, but you think this was an error, you can ask for it to be undeleted. You can find more information about the reason here. Pkbwcgs (talk) 17:56, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
Please do not remove quick deletion tags from articles without a good reason. If you think the article should not be deleted, please explain your reason on the article's talk page. Thank you. Pkbwcgs (talk) 18:00, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
Angela, the "only" warning you gave to the IP user 107.161.102.146 was not appropriate because there had been no previous warnings. There are very few cases when "only" warnings should be issued. When leaving warnings, please start with lower levels. Level one is preferable for a first warning. Level 2 can be used in particularly bad cases. There's usually no need to start with a higher level even in severe cases. Warnings are used to explain to people that we don't allow just any kind of edit here. That's why they graduate through the different levels. Thanks. --Auntof6 (talk) 07:24, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
Seamless Wikipedia browsing. On steroids.
Every time you click a link to Wikipedia, Wiktionary or Wikiquote in your browser's search results, it will show the modern Wikiwand interface.
Wikiwand extension is a five stars, simple, with minimum permission required to keep your browsing private, safe and transparent.