斯帕夫诉美国案（Sparf v. United States, 156 US 51 (1895), or Sparf and Hansen v. United States[1]） 是美国最高法院的案件，考验被控犯有同一罪行的多名被告供述的可采性，以及陪审团的职责。
事实速览 斯帕夫诉美国案 (Sparf v. United States), 法院 ...
斯帕夫诉美国案
(Sparf v. United States) |
|---|
 |
| 法院 | 美国最高法院 |
|---|
| 案件全名 | Sparf and Hansen v. United States |
|---|
| 提交日期 | 1894March 5 |
|---|
| 判决下达日期 | 1895January 21 |
|---|
| 判例引注 | 156 U.S. 51 15 S. Ct. 273; 39 L. Ed. 343; 1895 U.S. LEXIS 2120 |
|---|
|
| 既往案件 | Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of California |
|---|
|
- If one of two people who have committed murder makes a voluntary confession in front of the other, that confession is admissible against both, however not without the other person witnessing it.
- A jury must apply the law based on the facts of a case.
- A court may not direct the jury to return a guilty verdict.
- A jury may convict someone of a lesser crime provided the elements of that crime are included in the original offense.
- A court may instruct the jury to consider guilt only the alleged offenses, in the case of a person accused of murder, rather than any lesser offenses.
- Juries do not have the right to dispute the law, however this does not prevent them from doing so.
|
|
| 多数意见 | Harlan，附议：Fuller, Field, Jackson, White |
|---|
| 协同意见 | Jackson |
|---|
| 不同意见 | Brewer，附议：Brown |
|---|
| 不同意见 | Gray，附议：Shiras |
|---|
本案推翻的以往裁决 |
| United States v. Susan B. Anthony (1873) |
关闭
