热门问题
时间线
聊天
视角
哈佛法律評論
来自维基百科,自由的百科全书
Remove ads
《哈佛法律評論》(英語:Harvard Law Review)是哈佛大學法學院主辦的一份法學研究學術期刊,創刊於1887年。
Remove ads
簡介
它從11月至6月每月出版一次,一年共計8期。根據期刊引證報告報道,哈佛法律評論2011年的影響因子為3.336,位列134種法學期刊的第二位[1]。
曾任編輯
哈佛法學院的在校研究生負責該期刊的編輯工作,曾經著名編者有:
- 史蒂芬·布雷耶,77期主編[4]
- 費利克斯·弗蘭克福特[5]
- 魯思·巴德·金斯伯格[6]
- 艾蕾娜·卡根[7]
- 安東寧·斯卡利亞[8]
- 愛德華·桑福德
- Michael Boudin[9]
- Henry Friendly[10]
- Pierre Leval[11]
- 黛布拉·安·利文斯頓,聯邦第二巡迴上訴法院首席法官[11]
- James L. Oakes[11]
- 勒恩德·漢德,聯邦第二巡迴上訴法院首席法官、紐約南區聯邦地區法院法官
- Richard Posner[12]
主要文章
- Brandeis, Louis; Warren, Samuel. The Right to Privacy. Harvard Law Review. 1890, 4 (5): 193–220. doi:10.2307/1321160.
- Thayer, James B. The Origin and Scope of the American Doctrine of Constitutional Law. Harvard Law Review. 1893, 7 (3): 129–156. doi:10.2307/1322284.
- Holmes, Oliver Wendell. The Path of the Law (PDF). Harvard Law Review. 1897, 10 (8): 457. doi:10.2307/1322028. (原始內容 (PDF)存檔於2012-01-19).
- Chafee, Zechariah. Freedom of Speech in Wartime. Harvard Law Review. 1919, 32 (8): 932–973. doi:10.2307/1327107.
- Fuller, Lon L. The Case of the Speluncean Explorers. Harvard Law Review. 1949, 62 (4): 616–645. doi:10.2307/1336025.
- Bickel, Alexander M. The Original Understanding and the Segregation Decision. Harvard Law Review. 1955, 69 (1): 1–65. doi:10.2307/1337652.
- Wechsler, Herbert. Toward Neutral Principles of Constitutional Law. Harvard Law Review. 1959, 73 (1): 1–35. doi:10.2307/1337945.
- Breyer, Stephen. The Uneasy Case for Copyright: A Study of Copyright in Books, Photocopies, and Computer Programs. Harvard Law Review. 1970, 84 (2): 281–351. doi:10.2307/1339714.
- Calabresi, Guido; Melamed, A. Douglas. Property Rules, Liability Rules and Inalienability: One View of the Cathedral. Harvard Law Review. 1972, 85 (6): 1089–1128. doi:10.2307/1340059.
- Brennan, William J. State Constitutions and the Protection of Individual Rights. Harvard Law Review. 1977, 90 (3): 489–504. doi:10.2307/1340334.
- Unger, Roberto M. The Critical Legal Studies Movement. Harvard Law Review. 1983, 96 (3): 561–675. doi:10.2307/1341032.
- Cover, Robert. Nomos and Narrative. Harvard Law Review. 1983, 97 (4): 4–68. doi:10.2307/1340787. (原始內容存檔於2017-01-08).
- Powell, H. Jefferson. The Original Understanding of Original Intent. Harvard Law Review. 1985, 98 (5): 885–948. doi:10.2307/1340880.
- Fineman, Martha. Dominant discourse, professional language, and legal change in child custody decisionmaking. Harvard Law Review. 1988, 101 (4): 727–774. doi:10.2307/1341172.
- Kennedy, Randall L. Racial Critiques of Legal Academia. Harvard Law Review. 1989, 102 (8): 1745–1819. doi:10.2307/1341357.
- Obama, Barack H. Tort Law. Prenatal Injuries. Supreme Court of Illinois Refuses to Recognize Cause of Action Brought by Fetus against Its Mother for Unintentional Infliction of Prenatal Injuries. Harvard Law Review. 1990, 103 (3): 823–828. doi:10.2307/1341352.
- Amar, Akhil Reed. Fourth Amendment First Principles. Harvard Law Review. 1994, 107 (4): 757–819. doi:10.2307/1341994.
- Kagan, Elena. Presidential Administration. Harvard Law Review. 2001, 114 (8): 2245–2385. doi:10.2307/1342513.
Remove ads
參考資料
外部連結
Wikiwand - on
Seamless Wikipedia browsing. On steroids.
Remove ads