Loading AI tools
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The 2010 United States Senate election in Georgia took place on November 2, 2010. Incumbent Republican U.S. Senator Johnny Isakson won re-election to a second term.[1]
| |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
Isakson: 40–50% 50–60% 60–70% 70–80% 80–90% >90% Thurmond: 40–50% 50–60% 60–70% 70–80% 80–90% >90% Tie: 40–50% 50% No data | |||||||||||||||||
|
Poll source | Dates administered | Michael Thurmond | RJ Hadley | Undecided |
---|---|---|---|---|
Survey USA[2] | June 14–17, 2010 | 68% | 11% | 22% |
Survey USA[3] | July 7–8, 2010 | 64% | 13% | 23% |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Democratic | Michael Thurmond | 297,226 | 84.3% | |
Democratic | RJ Hadley | 55,159 | 15.7% | |
Total votes | 352,385 | 100.0% |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Republican | Johnny Isakson (incumbent) | 558,298 | 100.00% | |
Total votes | 558,298 | 100.00% |
Thurmond was the underdog in trying to become the first African-American to serve Georgia in the U.S. Senate. Thurmond claimed, "Polls are irrelevant. As everyone knows, the only poll that counts is the election on November 2."[7] Isakson defended his record, saying, "Big business is not evil. If you didn't have big business, you wouldn't have jobs in America today."[8] Despite the fact all political prognosticators classified the race as being safe for Isakson by August 20, he stated that Thurmond was a potentially formidable candidate, and that he would take nothing for granted.[9]
Source | Ranking | As of |
---|---|---|
Cook Political Report[11] | Solid R | October 26, 2010 |
Rothenberg[12] | Safe R | October 22, 2010 |
RealClearPolitics[13] | Safe R | October 26, 2010 |
Sabato's Crystal Ball[14] | Safe R | October 21, 2010 |
CQ Politics[15] | Safe R | October 26, 2010 |
Poll source | Dates administered | Johnny Isakson (R) | Michael Thurmond (D) | Chuck Donovan (L) | Other* | Undecided |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rasmussen Reports[16] | April 22, 2010 | 51% | 35% | –– | –– | –– |
Rasmussen Reports[17] | May 20, 2010 | 57% | 30% | –– | 6% | 8% |
Rasmussen Reports[18] | August 11, 2010 | 55% | 41% | –– | 2% | 2% |
Insider Advantage[19] | August 17, 2010 | 47% | 35% | 7% | –– | 11% |
Survey USA[20] | September 10–12, 2010 | 56% | 34% | 6% | –– | 4% |
Mason-Dixon[21] | September 19, 2010 | 52% | 33% | 4% | –– | 11% |
Rasmussen Reports[22] | September 21, 2010 | 52% | 36% | 6% | –– | 6% |
Insider Advantage[23] | September 27, 2010 | 61% | 29% | 3% | –– | 7% |
Rasmussen Reports[24] | October 6, 2010 | 53% | 38% | 5% | 1% | 3% |
SurveyUSA[25] | October 21–24, 2010 | 58% | 34% | 5% | –– | 3% |
Rasmussen Reports[26] | October 24, 2010 | 59% | 29% | 5% | 3% | 4% |
Mason-Dixon[27] | October 26–28, 2010 | 56% | 33% | 4% | 0% | 7% |
Candidate (party) | Receipts | Disbursements | Cash on hand | Debt |
---|---|---|---|---|
Johnny Isakson (R) | $5,943,285 | $5,650,138 | $2,588,284 | $0 |
Michael Thurmond (D) | $288,666 | $202,610 | $86,055 | $5,220 |
Source: Federal Election Commission[28] |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Republican | Johnny Isakson (incumbent) | 1,489,904 | 58.31% | +0.43% | |
Democratic | Michael Thurmond | 996,516 | 39.00% | −0.98% | |
Libertarian | Chuck Donovan | 68,750 | 2.69% | +0.55% | |
Write-in | 88 | 0.00% | N/A | ||
Total votes | 2,555,258 | 100.00% | |||
Republican hold |
Seamless Wikipedia browsing. On steroids.
Every time you click a link to Wikipedia, Wiktionary or Wikiquote in your browser's search results, it will show the modern Wikiwand interface.
Wikiwand extension is a five stars, simple, with minimum permission required to keep your browsing private, safe and transparent.