Loading AI tools
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The 2021 Boston mayoral election was held on Tuesday, November 2, 2021, to elect the mayor of Boston, Massachusetts. Incumbent mayor Marty Walsh was eligible to seek a third term. However, he resigned as mayor on March 22, 2021, after being confirmed as secretary of labor in the Cabinet of Joe Biden.[3] This left the Boston City Council president, at the time Kim Janey, to hold the role of acting mayor until the victor of the election would take office.
| ||||||||||||||||
Turnout | 32.66%[1] 4.86 pp[2] | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||
Wu: 50–60% 60–70% 70–80% 80–90% >90% Essaibi George: 50–60% 60–70% 70–80% 80–90% | ||||||||||||||||
|
Since more than two candidates qualified for the ballot, a non-partisan[lower-alpha 1] preliminary election was held on September 14 in order to determine which two candidates would advance to the general election.[4] On the morning of September 15, the counting of ballots reached 100% reporting with Michelle Wu as the first-place winner and Annissa Essaibi George in a second place. As the two top vote-getters, they advanced to face each other in the general election.[5] Wu won the general election on November 2 by 28 points, with her victory making her both the first woman and person of color to be elected as mayor of Boston.[6][lower-alpha 2] The total number of votes cast for Wu in the general election was greater than for any mayoral candidate since 1983.[6]
To advance to the general election, Wu and Essiabi George (both at-large city councilors) outperformed Andrea Campbell (a district city councilor), Kim Janey (acting mayor and district councilor), and John Barros (the city’s former chief of economic development) in the nonpartisan primary.
In early 2021, incumbent mayor Marty Walsh was expected to resign to take the United States Secretary of Labor position. His date of leaving office would normally determine if the city would be required to hold a special election for the remainder of his term, or if the acting mayor would serve the remainder of his term.[8] The Boston City Charter requires that a special election be held for the office of mayor when a vacancy occurs "within sixteen months after a regular municipal election."[9] As Boston held a municipal election on November 5, 2019, a 16-month window from that election extended until March 5, 2021. Thus, if Walsh had left his position as mayor before then, a special election to fill the remainder of his term would have normally been required, per the city charter.
Ricardo Arroyo of the Boston City Council proposed that the city charter requirement for a special election be overridden; such an override requires approval from Boston's city council and mayor, followed by approval by the state legislature and governor.[10][11] The city council approved a home rule petition, which would dispense with the special election, on February 3;[12][13] it was subsequently signed by mayor Walsh.[14] The petition next required approval from the state legislature (where it was filed as HD 1757, "An Act Relative to the Office of the Mayor of the City of Boston")[15] and governor. It passed in the Massachusetts House of Representatives on February 22,[16] the Massachusetts Senate on February 25,[17] and was signed by governor Charlie Baker on February 26, thus eliminating the need for a special election if Walsh vacated his office as mayor before March 5.[18][19] As Walsh was still in office through that date, with his confirmation pending with the U.S. Senate, any consideration of a special election became moot.[20] Walsh ultimately resigned as mayor on March 22, 2021, the same day that he was confirmed to his cabinet role.[21]
In the summer of 2021, state lawmakers temporarily extended a COVID-19 pandemic-related voting reform allowing voters to request no-excuse mail-in ballots and to return them through either the mail or through ballot drop boxes.[22]
In late April, the Boston City Council approved moving the date of the preliminary municipal election[lower-alpha 3] from September 21 to September 14.[23] The rationale for doing so was that it would grant officials an additional week to distribute mail-in voting ballots ahead of the November general election, since such ballots could not be printed until after the results of the preliminary election were certified, thereby determining which candidates would advance to the November general election ballot.[24] The date change ordinance was signed two weeks later by Acting Mayor Kim Janey, making the change official.[25]
Because of the vacancy in office, the Boston City Charer stipulated that the winner of the mayoral election will be sworn in as soon as is conveniently possible once the results of the general election are certified.[26] On September 24, 2021, Acting Mayor Kim Janey and general election candidates Annissa Essaibi George and Michelle Wu mutually reached an agreement for November 16 to be the tentative date for the new mayor to be sworn in.[27]
To appear on the ballot, candidates were required to file nomination papers at Boston City Hall by 5:00 p.m. on May 18 with 3,000 certified signatures of registered voters.[28] Eight candidates were certified to appear on the ballot in the preliminary election of September 14.[29]
While the election had a nonpartisan ballot, all of the major candidates had publicly identified themselves as Democrats.[30] All of the major candidates were people of color and four of the major candidates were women (notable, since Boston voters had never before elected a woman or a person of color to the city's mayoralty).[31][32]
Candidate | Announced | ||
---|---|---|---|
Annissa Essaibi George |
Boston city councilor at-large since 2016
Former teacher and businesswoman |
January 28, 2021 (Website) |
[33] |
Michelle Wu |
Boston city councilor at-large since 2014
Former president of the Boston City Council (2016–2018) |
September 15, 2020 (Website) |
[34] |
Candidate | Announced | ||
---|---|---|---|
John Barros |
Former chief of economic development for the City of Boston (2014–2021)
Former Boston School Committee member (2010–2013) |
March 4, 2021 (Website Archived September 27, 2021, at the Wayback Machine) |
[35] |
Andrea Campbell |
Boston city councilor from 4th district since 2016
Former president of the Boston City Council (2018–2020) |
September 24, 2020 (Website) |
[36] |
Kim Janey |
Acting Mayor of Boston since 2021
Boston city councilor from 7th district since 2018 |
April 6, 2021 (Website Archived November 8, 2021, at the Wayback Machine) |
[37] |
The first two major candidates to enter the race were at-large City Councillor Michelle Wu, followed by District 4 City Councillor Andrea Campbell. Both announced their runs in September 2020, while incumbent Mayor Marty Walsh was still considered a likely candidate for re-election.[72]
On January 7, 2021, President-elect Joe Biden designated Walsh to be his nominee for secretary of labor, changing the dynamics of the race, as, if confirmed, Walsh would vacate the mayoralty and make the election an open-race.[73][74] Walsh was ultimately confirmed in March, making Kim Janey acting mayor.[75][76][77] Following the announcement of Walsh's nomination, city official John Barros, At-large Councillor Annissa Essaibi George, and state representative Jon Santiago announced their candidacies. After becoming acting mayor following Walsh's confirmation, Kim Janey announced her candidacy.[78] Santiago withdrew from the race on July 13, with CommonWealth Magazine citing poor poll numbers and difficulty in building a field organization as his probable reasons for doing so.[79]
Writing on the primary election race, Ellen Barry of the New York Times called it "a departure" from the norm that the 2021 election has focused primarily on policy, rather than the candidates focusing on winning over particular racial/ethnic groups, remarking, "Boston's campaigns have long turned on ethnic rivalries, first between Anglo-Protestants and Irish Catholics, then drawing in racial minorities as those populations increased."[77] James Pindell of The Boston Globe wrote that some of the top topics debated in the primary were, "public schools, housing, development, policing, climate resiliency, drug usage, and mental health."[80]
Janey's campaign suffered a blow in early August when she expressed opposition to COVID-19 vaccine passports, likening them to slavery and birtherism.[81] Janey's remarks drew criticism from elected officials and her fellow candidates, and caused her to drop in the polls.[82][83] Campell was particularly assertive in her criticism of Janey's comments, accusing her of endangering public health.[77]
By early September, news sources largely considered Wu to have established herself in polls as the primary election's front-runner, with Andrea Campbell, Annissa Essaibi George, and Kim Janey being seeing as hotly contesting for a second-place finish.[77][84] Wu's campaign was boosted by a collection of young internet activists who had vigorously supported her, referred to as the "Markeyverse" due to their support for Senator Ed Markey in his re-election campaign the previous year.[85]
2021 Boston mayoral election primary debates | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
No. | Date & Time | Host | Moderator | Link | Participants | ||||||||||
Key: P Participant A Absent N Non-invitee |
|||||||||||||||
John Barros | Andrea Campbell | Annissa Essaibi George | Kim Janey | Michelle Wu | |||||||||||
1[86][87] | September 8, 2021 | NBC Boston NECN Telemundo Boston Dorchester Reporter Bay State Banner |
Shannon Mulaire | Video | P | P | P | P | P |
Graphs are unavailable due to technical issues. There is more info on Phabricator and on MediaWiki.org. |
Poll source | Date(s) administered |
Sample size[lower-alpha 4] |
Margin of error |
John Barros |
Andrea Campbell |
Annissa Essaibi George |
Kim Janey |
Jon Santiago |
Michelle Wu |
Other | Undecided |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Public Policy Polling (D) | September 11–12, 2021 | 522 (LV) | ± 4.3% | 4% | 16% | 19% | 15% | – | 26% | – | 19% |
Beacon Research (D)[upper-alpha 1] | September 6–8, 2021 | 985 (LV) | ± 3.1% | 3% | 19% | 19% | 15% | – | 33% | – | – |
Emerson College | September 6–8, 2021 | 600 (LV) | ± 3.9% | 2% | 17% | 18% | 16% | 1% | 30% | 2%[lower-alpha 5] | 14% |
3% | 20% | 21% | 18% | 1% | 36% | 2%[lower-alpha 6] | –[lower-alpha 7] | ||||
Suffolk University | September 2–4, 2021 | 500 (LV) | ± 4.4% | 3% | 18% | 19% | 20% | 0% | 31% | 1%[lower-alpha 8] | 9% |
MassINC Polling Group | August 25–30, 2021 | 453 (RV) | ± 4.6% | 4% | 11% | 13% | 15% | – | 30% | 4% | 23% |
– (LV) | – | 6% | 11% | 16% | 12% | – | 30% | 4% | 20% | ||
Emerson College | August 23–24, 2021 | 600 (LV) | ± 3.9% | 2% | 14% | 18% | 16% | 1% | 24% | 1%[lower-alpha 9] | 25% |
Change Research (D)[upper-alpha 2] | August 16–21, 2021 | 600 (RV) | ± 3.9% | 5% | 10% | 15% | 15% | – | 27% | – | 28% |
Suffolk University | June 23–26, 2021 | 500 (LV) | ± 4.4% | 2% | 11% | 14% | 22% | 5% | 23% | 1%[lower-alpha 10] | 22% |
GBAO (D)[upper-alpha 3] | Early June 2021 | 600 (LV) | ± 4.0% | 3% | 8% | 12% | 29% | 4% | 29% | 1%[lower-alpha 11] | – |
Poll Progressive LLC (D) | May 25–30, 2021 | 550 (LV) | ± 4.1% | 5% | 6% | 22% | 16% | 5% | 18% | – | 29% |
Global Strategy Group (D) | May 13–16, 2021 | 400 (LV) | ± 4.9% | 5% | 6% | 10% | 22% | 5% | 21% | 1% | 31% |
Emerson College | April 27–28, 2021 | 860 (RV) | ± 3.3% | 3% | 11% | 14% | 15% | 4% | 16% | 1%[lower-alpha 12] | 36% |
MassINC Polling Group | April 7–11, 2021 | 522 (RV) | ± 4.9% | 3% | 4% | 6% | 18% | 3% | 19% | – | 46% |
MassINC Polling Group | September 11–15, 2020 | 400 (RV) | ± 4.9% | – | 4% | – | – | – | 23% | 52%[lower-alpha 13] | 18% |
The following table lists the campaign fundraising and spending totals for each candidates from the dates they each formally launched their campaigns, through the day of the September 14, 2021 primary. Candidates are, by default, sorted in the table in the order of their total funds raised since launching their campaigns, from greatest (at top) to least (at bottom).
Campaign finances[134] | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Total raised | Total spent | Date of campaign launch | |
Michelle Wu | $1,872,146.14 | $2,063,046.96 | September 15, 2020 | |
Andrea Campbell | $1,821,643.65 | $1,915,609.83 | September 24, 2020 | |
Kim Janey | $1,344,171.05 | $1,486,589.41 | April 6, 2021 | |
Annissa Essaibi George | $1,261,144.92 | $1,401,799.88 | January 28, 2021 | |
John Barros | $575,631.18 | $644,541.90 | March 4, 2021 |
The following table lists reported independent expenditures made in support or opposition to each candidate from the start of September 2020, through the day of the September 14, 2021 primary. Candidates are listed by default by the total of independent expenditures made in support of them, from greatest (at top) to least (at bottom).
Independent expenditures[134] | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | In support | In opposition | ||
Andrea Campbell | $1,616,712.00 | $34,194.66 | ||
Annissa Essaibi George | $663,481.74 | $0.00 | ||
Michelle Wu | $417,613.69 | $0.00 | ||
Kim Janey | $411,075.82 | $0.00 | ||
John Barros | $0.00 | $0.00 |
There were reportedly twice the number of postal votes cast than election officials had anticipated.[135] In a statement by the Boston Election Department, an hours-long delay on election night in reporting substantial results was blamed on the need to cross-reference the roughly 7,000 postal votes cast by mail or drop-box with the voter rolls. On Twitter, Massachusetts secretary of the commonwealth William F. Galvin's office also laid the blame on drop boxes.[136] With only a small fraction of the vote reported, Janey and Campbell conceded, and Wu and Essaibi George both gave victory speeches.[137] Both Wu and Essaibi George had support from distinct geographical bases, with Essaibi George's margins largely coming from the more conservative areas of South Boston and Dorchester, while Wu's strongest areas were East Boston, Jamaica Plain and Roslindale.[138] Janey won strong support from Boston's African-American community and carried Hyde Park, while Campbell largely ran second in both African-American and more left-wing wards.[138]
Janey's defeat made her the first incumbent of any kind since 1949 to lose a Boston mayoral election.[139]
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nonpartisan | Michelle Wu | 36,060 | 33.4 | |
Nonpartisan | Annissa Essaibi George | 24,268 | 22.5 | |
Nonpartisan | Andrea Campbell | 21,299 | 19.7 | |
Nonpartisan | Kim Janey (acting incumbent) | 21,047 | 19.5 | |
Nonpartisan | John Barros | 3,459 | 3.2 | |
Nonpartisan | Robert Cappucci | 1,185 | 1.1 | |
Nonpartisan | Jon Santiago (withdrawn) | 368 | 0.3 | |
Nonpartisan | Richard Spagnuolo | 286 | 0.3 | |
Total votes | 107,972 | 100 | ||
Turnout | 108,731 | 24.84[141] | ||
Registered electors | 437,647[142] |
2021 marked the first time in Boston's history that both candidates in the general election identified as people of color.[143] It also marked the first time that both were women.[143] Wu was regarded to be a progressive, while Essaibi George was thought of as a moderate.[144]
Wu was endorsed for the general election by eliminated candidate Kim Janey.[145] The neighborhood of Hyde Park was considered a potential battleground in the election, due to it being home to a substantial voter base that had not backed either Wu or Essaibi George in the preliminary.[138]
At the start of the general election campaign, Joe Battenfield of the Boston Herald described Wu as the general election's "presumptive front-runner".[146] William Forry and Gintautas Dumcius of the Dorchester Reporter also opined that Wu was the leading candidate.[147] By early October, there was a wide perception of Wu being the leading candidate in the race.[148] At that time, Meghan E. Irons and Emma Platoff of The Boston Globe opined that the developments of the general election campaign had largely been falling in Wu's favor, particularly pointing to endorsements which Wu had received.[149][150] Writing again in mid-October, Battenfield characterized Wu's campaign as "coasting on a front-runner campaign strategy".[151]
2021 Boston mayoral election general election debates | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
No. | Date & Time | Host | Moderator | Link | Participants | ||||||||||
Key: P Participant A Absent N Non-invitee |
|||||||||||||||
Annissa Essaibi George | Michelle Wu | ||||||||||||||
[152] | October 14, 2021 | NBC Boston NECN Telemundo Boston Dorchester Reporter Bay State Banner |
Jon Keller | Video | P | P | |||||||||
[153][154] | October 19, 2021 | NBC Boston NECN Telemundo Boston Dorchester Reporter Bay State Banner |
Latoyia Edwards | Video | P | P | |||||||||
[155] | October 25, 2021 | WBUR-FM WCVB-TV University of Massachusetts The Boston Globe |
Ed Harding | Video | P | P |
Endorsements in bold were made after the preliminary election.
Graphs are unavailable due to technical issues. There is more info on Phabricator and on MediaWiki.org. |
Poll source | Date(s) administered |
Sample size[lower-alpha 4] |
Margin of error |
Annissa Essaibi George |
Michelle Wu |
Undecided |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Emerson College | October 26–27, 2021 | 500 (LV) | ± 4.3% | 31% | 61% | 8% |
Data for Progress (D) | October 14–18, 2021 | 507 (LV) | ± 4.0% | 32% | 57% | 11% |
Suffolk University | October 15–17, 2021 | 500 (LV) | ± 4.4% | 30% | 62% | 8% |
MassINC Polling Group | October 6–12, 2021 | 501 (LV) | ± 4.9% | 25% | 57% | 18% |
Public Policy Polling (D) | September 11–12, 2021 | 522 (LV) | ± 4.3% | 28% | 48% | 23% |
Poll source | Date(s) administered |
Sample size[lower-alpha 4] |
Margin of error |
Andrea Campbell |
Michelle Wu |
Undecided |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Public Policy Polling (D) | September 11–12, 2021 | 522 (LV) | ± 4.3% | 35% | 38% | 27% |
Poll source | Date(s) administered |
Sample size[lower-alpha 4] |
Margin of error |
Kim Janey |
Michelle Wu |
Undecided |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Public Policy Polling (D) | September 11–12, 2021 | 522 (LV) | ± 4.3% | 29% | 45% | 26% |
The following table lists the campaign fundraising and spending totals for each candidates following the end of the primary election through the election, the period of September 15, 2021 through November 2, 2021. The candidates are, by default, sorted in the table in the order of their total funds raised, from greatest (at top) to least (at bottom).
Campaign finances[134] | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Total raised | Total spent | ||
Annissa Essaibi George | $1,294,100.09 | $1,212,502.11 | ||
Michelle Wu | $1,084,193.19 | $995,774.21 |
The following table lists reported independent expenditures made in support or opposition to each candidate between September 15, 2021, and November 2, 2021. Candidates are listed by default by the total of independent expenditures made in support of them, from greatest (at top) to least (at bottom).
Independent expenditures[134] | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | In support | In opposition | ||
Annissa Essaibi George | $1,209,267.89 | $0.00 | ||
Michelle Wu | $879,099.92 | $342,500.00 |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nonpartisan | Michelle Wu | 91,794 | 64.0 | |
Nonpartisan | Annissa Essaibi George | 51,125 | 35.6 | |
Write-in | 595 | 0.4 | ||
Total votes | 143,514 | 100 | ||
Turnout | 144,380 | 32.66%[1] | ||
Registered electors | 442,049[196] |
Seamless Wikipedia browsing. On steroids.
Every time you click a link to Wikipedia, Wiktionary or Wikiquote in your browser's search results, it will show the modern Wikiwand interface.
Wikiwand extension is a five stars, simple, with minimum permission required to keep your browsing private, safe and transparent.