FERC v. Electric Power Supply Ass'n
2016 United States Supreme Court case / From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Dear Wikiwand AI, let's keep it short by simply answering these key questions:
Can you list the top facts and stats about FERC v. Electric Power Supply Ass'n?
Summarize this article for a 10 year old
SHOW ALL QUESTIONS
FERC v. Electric Power Supply Ass'n, 577 U.S. 260 (2016), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission had the authority to regulate demand response transactions.[1] Justice Scalia's dissenting opinion in this case was the last opinion he wrote before his death in February 2016.[2]
Quick Facts FERC v. Electric Power Supply Ass'n, Argued October 14, 2015 Decided January 25, 2016 ...
FERC v. Electric Power Supply Ass'n | |
---|---|
Argued October 14, 2015 Decided January 25, 2016 | |
Full case name | Federal Energy Regulatory Commission v. Electric Power Supply Association et al. |
Docket no. | 14-840 |
Citations | 577 U.S. 260 (more) 136 S. Ct. 760; 193 L. Ed. 2d 661 |
Case history | |
Prior | Elec. Power Supply Ass'n v. FERC, 753 F.3d 216, 410 U.S. App. D.C. 103 (D.C. Cir. 2014) |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinions | |
Majority | Kagan, joined by Roberts, Kennedy, Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor |
Dissent | Scalia, joined by Thomas |
Justice Alito took no part in the consideration or decision of the case. | |
Laws applied | |
Federal Arbitration Act |
Close