Finite and Infinite Games

1986 book by James P. Carse From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Finite and Infinite Games

Finite and Infinite Games is a book by religious scholar James P. Carse.[1]

Quick Facts Author, Publisher ...
Finite and Infinite Games
Thumb
First edition
AuthorJames P. Carse
PublisherFree Press
Publication date
1986 (1986)
ISBN0-02-905980-1
Close

Summary

Summarize
Perspective

Finite vs. infinite games

A review of the book summarizes Carse's argument: "There are at least two kinds of games: finite and infinite. A finite game is played for the purpose of winning, an infinite game for the purpose of continuing the play. Finite games are those instrumental activities - from sports to politics to wars - in which the participants obey rules, recognize boundaries and announce winners and losers. The infinite game - there is only one - includes any authentic interaction, from touching to culture, that changes rules, plays with boundaries and exists solely for the purpose of continuing the game. A finite player seeks power; the infinite one displays self-sufficient strength. Finite games are theatrical, necessitating an audience; infinite ones are dramatic, involving participants...".[2][3]

Theatrical vs. Dramatic

Carse continues these conceptualizations across all major spheres of human affairs. He extends his themes broadly over several intellectual arenas that are largely otherwise disparate disciplines. He describes human pursuits as either dramatic (enacted in the present) or theatrical (performed according to a script of some kind). This distinction hinges on an agent's decision to engage in one state of affairs or another. If motherhood is a requirement and a duty, there are rules to be obeyed and goals to be achieved. This is motherhood as theatrical role. If motherhood is a choice and a process, it becomes a living drama.

Reception

Finite and Infinite Games received mixed reviews. Howard A. Paul suggested that the book would be valuable in the education of therapists,[4] whereas Francis Kane of The New York Times was critical of the book's premise and logic.[5] Meanwhile technologist Kevin Kelly praised it for "alter[ing] my thinking about life, the universe, and everything."[6] Reviews in Commonweal and Publishers Weekly were more balanced.[7][8] Theology professor John F. Haught, writing in The Washington Times magazine noted the connection between Carse's book and the works of Søren Kierkegaard, Henri Bergson, René Descartes.[9] Finite and Infinite Games received a mixed review in Kirkus Reviews which stated 'For every (not too original) insight worth remembering ... there's a pair of others too familiar ... or awkward ... to hold our attention'.[10] Philosopher David Chalmers has called it a 'neglected classic in the philosophy of living.'[11]

See also

References

Loading related searches...

Wikiwand - on

Seamless Wikipedia browsing. On steroids.