Hazen Paper Co. v. Biggins
1993 United States Supreme Court case / From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Dear Wikiwand AI, let's keep it short by simply answering these key questions:
Can you list the top facts and stats about Hazen Paper Co. v. Biggins?
Summarize this article for a 10 year old
SHOW ALL QUESTIONS
Hazen Paper Co. v. Biggins, 507 U.S. 604 (1993),[1] was a United States Supreme Court case in which the court held that a disparate treatment claim cannot succeed unless the employee's protected trait had a determinative influence on the employer's decisionmaking.[2]
Quick Facts Hazen Paper Co. v. Biggins, Argued January 13, 1993, 1993 Decided April 20, 1993, 1993 ...
Hazen Paper Co. v. Biggins[1] | |
---|---|
Argued January 13, 1993, 1993 Decided April 20, 1993, 1993 | |
Full case name | Hazen Paper Company, et al., Petitioners v. Walter F. Biggins |
Citations | 507 U.S. 604 (more) |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinions | |
Majority | O'Connor, joined by unanimous |
Concurrence | Kennedy, joined by Rehnquist, Thomas |
Laws applied | |
Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 |
Close