Pipher v. Parsell
Supreme Court case / From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Dear Wikiwand AI, let's keep it short by simply answering these key questions:
Can you list the top facts and stats about Pipher v. Parsell?
Summarize this article for a 10 year old
SHOW ALL QUESTIONS
Pipher v. Parsell[1] is a case that was decided before the Supreme Court of Delaware. It shows that a minor can be held to an adult standard of care when engaging in inherently dangerous activities such as driving.[2]
This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these template messages)
|
Quick Facts Pipher v. Parsell, Court ...
Pipher v. Parsell | |
---|---|
Court | Supreme Court of Delaware |
Full case name | Kristyn Pipher, Plaintiff Below, Appellant, v. Johnathan Parsell, Defendant Below, Appellee. |
Decided | June 19, 2007 (2007-06-19) |
Citation(s) | 930 A.2d 890 |
Case history | |
Appealed from | Delaware Superior Court |
Court membership | |
Judges sitting | Myron T. Steele, Randy J. Holland, Carolyn Berger, Jack B. Jacobs, John W. Noble[lower-alpha 1] |
Close